NY correction officers continue to strike as state moves legal action forward: ‘We're looking for help'
State troopers began serving union members out on strike illegally with summons over the weekend as hundreds refuse to comply with last week's court order instructing them to return to work.
'We're not working for threats, we're looking for help,' Rebecca, the wife of an Albany-area correction officer, said alongside state Senate Republicans at a press conference in the Capitol Monday.
Rebecca declined to share her last name out of fear of reprisal by the state corrections department.
Monday marks the eighth day of picketing, which violates New York's Taylor Law banning public sector unions from striking.
The corrections department continued negotiating with a state-appointed mediator and the union for correction officers on Monday.
A spokesperson said the talks remain 'ongoing.'
But the corrections department is also threatening to cancel health care coverage and dock pay for officers on strike.
Meanwhile, thousands of National Guard members have been deployed to the prisons. Sources suggest the situation is deteriorating inside with prisoners in understaffed facilities being confined to cells.
An inmate was found dead in his cell over the weekend at Auburn Correctional Facility in Cayuga County, one of the prisons impacted by the strike. Authorities have yet to release a cause of death.
State police released photos of a bus used by the corrections department that was torchedlast week. Another was graffitied with the message, 'can you hear us now.'
It's unclear whether a deal brokered between the correction officers' union and Gov. Kathy Hochul's administration would even end the strike.
The correction officers union has maintained it doesn't condone the strikes.
Brigett, another wife of a correction officer who joined the Senate Republicans Monday, called the union out of touch with its membership.
'The officers have lost trust in our union with making these negotiations. … The union hasn't been showing they have our backs, honestly,' said Brigett, who did not provide her last name.
But Republicans in both houses of the state Legislature continues to show support for the picketers during joint press conferences Monday but weren't willing to offer any advice.
Asked by The Post whether they think officers should continue to strike in the face of legal action, neither Assembly Leader Will Barclay (R-Oswego) or Senate Minority Leader Rob Ortt (R-Niagara) weighed in.
'I don't have great advice for them. They have to make their own personal decision on that,' Barclay said.
'It's easy for me to say, 'you stay out there and you fight it,' but it's not my health insurance, it's not my kids, it's not my family. And so what I want, the commitment we have to make, is to fight for them so that they can be strong,' Ortt added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration to unveil tougher solar and wind subsidy rules
By Nichola Groom (Reuters) -The Trump administration is expected as soon as Monday to take another step toward curbing the growth of renewable energy in the United States by making it harder for companies to claim federal tax subsidies for wind and solar energy. The Treasury Department next week will reach a 45-day deadline, set by U.S. President Donald Trump in July, to revise rules governing who can qualify for clean energy tax credits that the Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act is phasing out years earlier than planned. The rule under scrutiny centers around what it means for a project to be considered under construction, a definition that is critical to companies building facilities that require years of planning. The OBBBA requires projects to begin construction by July of next year or enter service by the end of 2027 to qualify for a 30% tax credit and bonuses that can push the subsidy even higher. Under previous law, the credits were available through 2032. In an executive order last month, three days after signing the OBBBA into law, Trump directed Treasury to restrict the use of safe harbors, rules that have allowed project owners for years to claim tax credits so long as they incur 5% of their costs or make meaningful physical progress before the credit expires. Washington policy advisory firm Capstone said it could see Treasury requiring developers to incur a higher percentage of costs, such as 10% or 15%. Under the physical work requirement, the agency could exclude off-site construction or require more contact with the government and proof of continuous work. The Treasury Department did not respond to a request for comment. Tightening the requirements would be the latest in a string of steps the administration has taken to stall development of wind and solar energy, which Trump says are unreliable, expensive, and dependent on Chinese supply chains. According to advisory firm Clean Energy Associates, the United States could lose about 60 gigawatts of planned solar capacity through 2030 if stricter "beginning of construction" rules are implemented. That would be enough electricity to power about 10 million homes. Project developers and financiers have leaned on the tax credit rules to guide their investment and construction decisions for the last decade. "The executive order and the uncertainty has actually had a more negative impact than the legislation itself," said Reagan Farr, CEO of solar project developer Silicon Ranch. In the six weeks since the executive order, some companies have stalled progress, while others have ramped up activity to start as many projects as possible, said Javad Asghari, a partner with the law firm Simpson Thacher who focuses on energy and infrastructure projects. Aaron Halimi, founder and president of San Francisco-based solar project developer Renewable Properties, described measures his company has taken to protect its access to subsidies he fears could be at risk. "We've taken many steps to safe harbor a large portion of our pipeline of projects we plan to deliver between now and end of 2029," Halimi said, including buying transformers and American-made panels, and increasing lines of credit for purchasing equipment. Solve the daily Crossword
Chicago Tribune
28 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
DC residents protest as White House says federal agents will be on patrol 24/7
WASHINGTON — Residents in one Washington, D.C., neighborhood lined up Wednesday to protest the increased police presence after the White House said the number of National Guard troops in the nation's capital would ramp up and federal officers would be on the streets around the clock. After law enforcement set up a vehicle checkpoint along the busy 14th Street Northwest corridor, hecklers shouted, 'Go home, fascists' and 'Get off our streets.' Some protesters stood at the intersection before the checkpoint and urged drivers to turn away from it. The action intensified a few days after President Donald Trump's unprecedented announcement that his administration would take over the city's police department for at least a month. The city's Democratic mayor walked a political tightrope, referring to the takeover as an 'authoritarian push' at one point and later framing the infusion of officers as boost to public safety, though one with few specific barometers for success. The Republican president has said crime in the city was at emergency levels that only such federal intervention could fix — even as District of Columbia leaders pointed to statistics showing violent crime at a 30-year low after a sharp rise two years ago. For two days, small groups of federal officers had been visible in scattered areas of the city. But more were present in high-profile locations Wednesday and troops were expected to start doing more missions in Washington on Thursday, according to a National Guard spokesman who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the planning process. On Wednesday, agents from Homeland Security Investigations patrolled the popular U Street corridor. Drug Enforcement Administration officers were seen on the National Mall, while National Guard members were parked nearby. DEA agents also joined Metropolitan Police Department officers on patrol in the Navy Yard neighborhood, while FBI agents stood along the heavily trafficked Massachusetts Avenue. Hundreds of federal law enforcement and city police officers who patrolled the streets Tuesday night made 43 arrests, compared with about two dozen the night before. D.C. Councilmember Christina Henderson downplayed the arrest reports as 'a bunch of traffic stops' and said the administration was seeking to disguise how unnecessary this federal intervention is. 'I'm looking at this list of arrests and they sound like a normal Saturday night in any big city,' said Henderson. Unlike in other U.S. states and cities, the law gives Trump the power to take over Washington's police for up to 30 days. Extending his power over the city for longer would require approval from Congress, and that could be tough in the face of Democratic resistance. Trump suggested he could seek a longer period of control or decide to call on Congress to exercise authority over city laws his administration sees as lax on crime. 'We're gonna do this very quickly. But we're gonna want extensions. I don't want to call a national emergency. If I have to, I will,' he said. Later, on his Truth Social site, Trump reiterated his claims about the capital, writing, 'D.C. has been under siege from thugs and killers, but now, D.C. is back under Federal Control where it belongs.' Henderson, who worked for Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York before running for the D.C. Council, said she was already in touch with 'friends on the Hill' to rally opposition for any Trump extension request. She added, 'It's Day Three and he's already saying he's going to need more time?' The arrests made by 1,450 federal and local officers across the city included those for suspicion of driving under the influence and unlawful entry, as well as a warrant for assault with a deadly weapon, according to the White House. Seven illegal firearms were seized. There have now been more than 100 arrests since Trump began beefing up the federal law enforcement presence in Washington last week, White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said. 'President Trump is delivering on his campaign promise to clean up this city and restore American Greatness to our cherished capital,' she said. The president has full command of the National Guard and has activated up to 800 troops to support law enforcement, though exactly what form remains to be determined. Neither Army nor District of Columbia National Guard officials have been able to describe the training backgrounds of the troops who have so far reported for duty. While some members are military police, others likely hold jobs that would have offered them little training in dealing with civilians or law enforcement. The federalization push also includes clearing out encampments for people who are homeless, Trump has said. U.S. Park Police have removed dozens of tents since March, and plan to take out two more this week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has said. People are offered the chance to go to shelters and get addiction treatment, if needed, but those who refuse could be fined or jailed, she said. City officials said they are making more shelter space available and increasing their outreach. The federal effort comes even after a drop in violent crime in the nation's capital, a trend that experts have seen in cities across the U.S. since an increase during the coronavirus pandemic. On average, the level of violence Washington remains mostly higher than averages in three dozen cities analyzed by the nonprofit Council on Criminal Justice, said the group's president and CEO, Adam Gelb. Police Chief Pamela Smith said during an interview with the local Fox affiliate that the city's Metro Police Department has been down nearly 800 officers. She said the increased number of federal agents on the streets would help fill that gap, at least for now. Mayor Muriel Bowser said city officials did not get any specific goals for the surge during a meeting with Trump's attorney general, Pam Bondi, and other top federal law enforcement officials Tuesday. But, she said, 'I think they regard it as a success to have more presence and take more guns off the street, and we do too.' She had previously called Trump's moves 'unsettling and unprecedented' while pointing out he was within a president's legal rights regarding the district, which is the seat of American government but is not a state. For some residents, the increased presence of law enforcement and National Guard troops is nerve-wracking. 'I've seen them right here at the subway … they had my street where I live at blocked off yesterday, actually,' Washington native Sheina Taylor said. 'It's more fearful now because even though you're a law-abiding citizen, here in D.C., you don't know, especially because I'm African American.'
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Why not just let AI do the redistricting?
In Texas, Democratic state legislators have flown the coup as Republicans try to manipulate the redistricting process to maximize Republican strength. Democrats elsewhere, including California, are threatening retaliation. It's the same old story where both sides of the aisle play games on redistricting to benefit themselves. It's why reformers have been pushing for decades to get the process out of the hands of self interested elected officials whose only goal is to protect their incumbency. In 2007, as county executive in Suffolk County, N.Y., I signed a landmark bill to take the task of redrawing our county legislature's lines away from elected officials, placing it instead with an independent panel. It passed with great fanfare, with the governor even coming to to lend support as I signed it. But, lo and behold, several years later, when it was about to kick in, a Democratic legislature abolished the reform and went back to the old system of having the legislature control the process. This was done, of course, because at the time the Democrats were in control. Something similar would later play out later at the state level. In 2014, New York voters added an independent commission redistricting system to their state constitution. But during the 2022 election cycle, the Democrat-controlled legislature didn't like the map it produced. So Democrats tried to override the independent commission and draw their own partisan map, only to be blocked by the state's high court, the Court of Appeals. The real issue here is that it's just plain wrong for either party to manipulate this process. The Republicans in Texas are throwing a new fly into the ointment by opting to implement the 10 year redistrict process — which usually coincides with the disclosure of the new census — five years earlier than normal. They're doing this to get as many as five new seats for their party prior to the 2026 midterms. Now governors from California to New York and elsewhere are warning that they will do the same to maximize seats for Democrats prior to the next census. But the Democrats don't have clean hands here either. We need independence in redistricting. But some complain that, even when you appoint good government groups and retired judges to do it, politics will always come into play. Unfortunately, even well-intentioned attempts at reform often fail to produce the desired results. Take California, which in 2008 passed a referendum supported by then governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to create an independent commission to draw the lines. If its goal was to create fair districts that would create a better bipartisan balance, it was a failure. At the time of the referendum's passage, there were 34 Democrats and 19 Republicans from the state's congressional caucus. By 2012 the number grew to 39 Democrats and only 14 Republicans. By 2025, there were only nine Republican seats left throughout the state. While much of this can be attributed to changing demographics and political issues of the day, some of it might be attributable to the biases of even those supposedly non-partisan appointees. So why not have the lines redrawn by using artificial intelligence instead? Just key in that we want the fairest redistricting possible to create as balanced a map as possible from the perspective of demographics and political party registration. That would take the politics out of the system and make our races more competitive. Best of all, it would ultimately make our elected officials more reactive to the center rather than the extremes on both sides of the political spectrum. Of course the outcome of AI is only as good as the input. Care must be given to ensure that a balanced group of nonpartisan technocrats prepare the algorithms as opposed to party hacks. To maximize the potential for delivering the fairest lines possible, take a grouping of five potential maps from the computer, throw them into a lottery barrel and pick a winning plan at random, as was once tried in North Carolina before partisan lawsuits marred the process. There is no fool-proof solution, but AI may present the best of all the options available. Steve Levy is president of Common Sense Strategies, a political consulting firm. He served as Suffolk County executive, as a state assemblyman, and as host of 'The Steve Levy Radio Show.' He is the author of ' Solutions to America's Problems ' and ' Bias in the Media.'
