Here's How Expensive the American Dream Is in 9 California Cities
The American Dream — that ideal that the United States is the Land of Opportunity and anyone can take advantage and become upwardly mobile — never gets cheaper. Inflation makes sure of that.
View More:
Discover Next:
A recent GOBankingRates study revealed the cost of the American Dream in the 50 largest U.S. cities, and it is probably no surprise that California is host to six of the top 10 cities — and $200,000 is the cost of living the Dream in those places.
Check out all nine California cities that made the top 50 and how much the American Dream will cost you in these places.
Household income for the American dream: $150K
Total annual cost of living: $75K
Grocery costs per year: $9,496
Average monthly mortgage cost: $2,864
Read Next:
Learn More:
Household income for the American dream: $297K
Total annual cost of living: $149K
Grocery costs per year: $10,565
Average monthly mortgage cost: $8,110
Find Out:
Household income for the American dream: $319K
Total annual cost of living: $160K
Grocery costs per year: $10,302
Average monthly mortgage cost: $9,228
Household income for the American dream: $130K
Total annual cost of living: $65K
Grocery costs per year: $8,970
Average monthly mortgage cost: $2,323
Household income for the American dream: $130K
Total annual cost of living: $65K
Grocery costs per year: $8,989
Average monthly mortgage cost: $2,308
Explore Next:
Household income for the American dream: $242K
Total annual cost of living: $121K
Grocery costs per year: $9,940
Average monthly mortgage cost: $6,660
Household income for the American dream: $205K
Total annual cost of living: $102K
Grocery costs per year: $10,085
Average monthly mortgage cost: $4,761
Household income for the American dream: $234K
Total annual cost of living: $117K
Grocery costs per year: $9,433
Average monthly mortgage cost: $6,007
Household income for the American dream: $215K
Total annual cost of living: $108K
Grocery costs per year: $9,233
Average monthly mortgage cost: $5,321
Methodology: GOBankingRates used data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey, Sperling's BestPlaces, the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey, Zillow Home Value Index for January 2025 and Federal Reserve Economic Data. Using the 50/30/20 rule that states 50% of household income goes to needs, 30% goes to discretionary spending and 20% is used for savings, the cost of living was doubled to find the income needed to live the American Dream. All data was collected on and is up to date as of March 4, 2025.
More From GOBankingRates
Mark Cuban: Trump's Tariffs Will Affect This Class of People the Most
How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region
How To Get the Most Value From Your Costco Membership in 2025
12 SUVs With the Most Reliable Engines
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Here's How Expensive the American Dream Is in 9 California Cities
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
4 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
US imposes sanctions on a Palestinian NGO and other charities, accusing them ties to militant groups
The federal government claims that Addameer 'has long supported and is affiliated' with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a secular, left-wing movement with a political party and an armed wing that has carried out deadly attacks against Israelis. Israel and the United States have labeled the PFLP a terrorist organization. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Addameer did not immediately have a comment on the sanctions. Advertisement Israel has alleged that Addameer funds terrorism, a claim that the United Nations previously said it could not support with compelling evidence. In a 2022 The organization also works with Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and is a member of the World Organization Against Torture. Israel's 2022 storming of Addameer's offices, prompted a rebuke from the UN, who said in a statement that Israel had not provided convincing evidence to support the claim. The UN said Addameer was conducting 'critical human rights, humanitarian and development work in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.' Advertisement In February, Zachor Legal Institute, an Israeli-American advocacy group that says it focuses on combatting antisemitism and terrorism, requested Addameer be added to Treasury's sanctions list. Marc Greendorfer, president of Zachor Legal Institute said in an email to the Associated Press that his group is 'very pleased to see Treasury following up on our request.' He said the federal government should act 'to prevent hostile foreign actors from spreading hate and violence in the United States. We applaud Treasury's action and encourage Treasury to expand its focus to the other groups that we identified.' Other entities hit with sanctions Tuesday include: The Gaza-based charity Al Weam Charitable Society and its leader The Turkish charity Filistin Vakfi and its leader El Baraka Association for Charitable and Humanitarian Work and its leader The Netherlands-based Israa Charitable Foundation Netherlands and two employees The Italy-based Associazione Benefica La Cupola d'Oro A Because the majority of crowdfunding activity is legitimate, 'this status can make it more difficult for law enforcement attempting to investigate potential (terrorist financing) cases with a crowdfunding and online fundraising nexus,' the report said. Frankel reported from Jerusalem.
CNBC
8 minutes ago
- CNBC
The copper market shows how tariffs are putting traders and businesses in a bind
Lingering uncertainty over the 90-day suspension of President Trump's high tariffs could scramble some traditional market signals as traders and businesses try to get ahead of government policy. Copper is one asset caught up in such a push-pull scenario, according to Morgan Stanley. The metal, sometimes referred to as " Dr. Copper ," has a history of serving as a leading economic indicator due to its wide use in industry. Viewed from that lens, it should be bolstering confidence on Wall Street right now. The front-month contract for copper futures has gained more than 5% since early May — though it is still well below its high of the year reached in late March, right before tariff fears shook markets. @HG.1 YTD mountain Copper futures are trending higher over the past month, though still below the highs of the year. Equities tied to copper are also doing well, with Freeport-McMoRan up more than 11% over the past month, and Southern Copper higher by 8%. However, reality may not be that simple. Amy Gower, commodities strategist at Morgan Stanley, said in a note to clients Tuesday that several factors are muddying the picture for copper, including "front-loading" from U.S. companies who are buying up the metal now, before potential new tariffs take effect. "Copper faces diverging market forces. [London Metal Exchange] inventories are depleting rapidly as copper is pulled to the U.S., boosting timespreads and prices, but China market signals are weakening, suggesting downside risks to come," Gower said. In February, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing the Commerce Department to look into the possible need for tariffs on copper. That levy would be separate from, and possibly in addition to, the tariffs on shipments from individual countries. If companies keep buying up copper for fear of future tariffs, that could create an "upward squeeze," Gower said. But the supply-demand picture could also change quickly and pull prices down instead. "Already in April, China exported 77kt of copper, and this will likely have continued in May/June, which may provide some relief to LME inventories. On top [of that], the strong solar installations (+70% YTD in Jan-April) are expected to slow from June as new power tariffs come in ... while U.S. demand will slow if copper tariffs are announced," Gower said. — CNBC's Michael Bloom contributed reporting.
Wall Street Journal
12 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Fortress Reacts to the Tillis-Hern Tort Reform
We take issue with your editorial 'Ending a Tax Break for Lawsuits' (June 5). You assert that 'foreign investors in U.S. litigation don't have to pay tax on lawsuit proceeds because the tax code exempts foreigners from paying U.S. capital-gains tax, and their legal payouts are treated as capital gains.' But this isn't true for Fortress, an American company, whose investment decisions are made by our U.S. leadership. We have never allowed any non-U.S. investor to treat recoveries from legal assets as exempt from tax by characterizing income as capital gains. Investments in U.S. legal assets by our funds are subject to the usual corporate or ordinary income-tax rates and rules. American corporations use legal financing, like that offered by some Fortress-managed funds, because using the court system isn't free. This financing isn't about 'harming U.S. businesses' or targeting corporations. It helps American businesses spend less of their money on pursuing justified claims and more on job creation and economic growth.
