&w=3840&q=100)
US visa interview waiver 2025: Who is still eligible under new rules
This change will affect a wide range of visa categories, including business and tourist visas (B-1/B-2), student visas (F and M), work visas (such as H-1B), and exchange visitor visas (J). Only a few categories will continue to be exempt.
The US Department of State has said certain diplomatic and official visa applicants will still be eligible for waivers. These include:
A-1, A-2, C-3 (excluding personal staff), G-1 to G-4, and NATO categories
TECRO E-1 applicants
Applicants for diplomatic or official-type visas
B-1/B-2 visa holders seeking renewal within 12 months of visa expiry, provided they were at least 18 years old when the previous visa was issued
Eligibility rules for those seeking waivers
Even for those technically eligible for an interview waiver, additional conditions must be met. These include:
The visa application must be submitted in the applicant's country of nationality or residence
The applicant must not have had a previous visa refusal (unless overturned or waived)
There should be no signs of ineligibility on the record
The US Citizenship and Immigration Services noted that discretion still lies with consular officers. 'Consular officers may still require in-person interviews on a case-by-case basis for any reason,' said USCIS. It advised applicants to check embassy or consulate websites for location-specific updates.
This policy replaces the earlier Interview Waiver Update from February 18, 2025.
How the interview waiver programme works
The Interview Waiver Programme (IWP) allows some applicants to send in their visa documents by post rather than visiting the embassy. But the system will now direct more people to schedule interviews.
Once an applicant creates an online profile and pays the visa fees, the appointment system will ask a set of eligibility questions. If the applicant qualifies for the waiver, instructions are provided for submitting documents by post. Otherwise, they must schedule an interview.
What documents to send if you qualify
If you're eligible for the IWP and the system instructs you to mail your documents, the following items must be included in one large envelope. For families, all documents should be submitted together:
Each applicant must include:
Current passport (original, no cover or case)
Previous US visa and passport (if applicable and different from the current passport)
Printed DS-160 confirmation page (barcode page only)
One physical visa-size photo (2x2 inch or 5x5 cm, white background)
Any additional documents based on visa type
Additional documents required for certain applicants
Work visa applicants (H, L, P, R, O): Include the I-797 or I-129S form
Students or exchange visitors (F, M, J): Include the I-20 or DS-2019 form
Missing documents can cause delays. If consular officers later decide an interview is necessary, an email will be sent with scheduling instructions. If the visa can be issued without an interview, the applicant will receive tracking details for the return of their passport, as per the instructions given by the US embassy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
a few seconds ago
- The Hindu
New start: on the Alaska summit and the Ukraine war
The much-anticipated summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, did not yield a breakthrough on the Ukraine war but appeared to narrow the gaps between their positions on how to end the conflict. While Ukraine was the most contentious issue on the agenda, the summit was significant for several reasons. Relations between the world's two largest nuclear powers have been defined by hostility and mutual distrust. A stable, predictable relationship and the prospect of a new arms control pact — hinted at by Mr. Putin — are critical not just for stability in Eastern Europe but also for broader global stability. Yet, rebuilding Russo-American ties is inconceivable without peace in Ukraine. All sides in the Ukraine war publicly claim that they are committed to peace, but they differ sharply on how to achieve it. Ukraine and its European partners have called for an immediate ceasefire, a demand reiterated by Mr. Trump before meeting Mr. Putin. Russia has resisted calls for a ceasefire, insisting instead on a comprehensive peace agreement that addresses what Mr. Putin calls the conflict's 'root causes'. Mr. Trump appeared to endorse the Russian line when he said 'the best way to end the horrific war' is to go directly to a peace agreement. While the downside of the summit was its failure to deliver a breakthrough, the positive side is that it opened a diplomatic path that could lead to conflict resolution. Mr. Trump, who claimed that he and Mr. Putin agreed on 'many points', spoke with European, NATO and Ukrainian leaders after the meeting. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is expected to visit the White House on Monday to discuss Mr. Putin's proposal. Mr. Trump also suggested that it is now 'up to Zelenskyy' to strike a deal with Russia, 'a very big power'. Russia has consistently made three core demands to end the war — recognition for the Ukrainian territories it has annexed and Ukraine's 'neutrality' and 'demilitarisation'. Post-summit reports suggest that Mr. Putin is open to freezing the war along the frontlines in the south (Zaporizhzhia and Kherson) provided Russia retains full control of Donbas (Donetsk and Luhansk). A settlement could also involve Russian withdrawal in the northeast (Kharkiv). Ukraine has so far said that it would not concede land for peace. The challenge before Mr. Trump is to sustain the talks aimed at narrowing the differences further to reach a workable compromise. While it makes perfect sense to end the war on practical terms, Mr. Trump should not impose an agreement on Kyiv. Peace would prevail in Eastern Europe only if Ukraine's security concerns are addressed and it is provided with credible assurances that Russia would not invade it again.


New Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Putin agrees that US, Europe could offer NATO-style security guarantees to Ukraine, Trump envoy says
NEW YORK: Russian leader Vladimir Putin agreed at his summit with US President Donald Trump that the United States and its European allies could offer Ukraine a security guarantee resembling NATO's collective defense mandate as part of an eventual deal to end the war, a US official said on Sunday. Trump envoy Steve Witkoff, who took part in the talks Friday at a military base in Alaska, said it 'was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that' and called it 'game-changing.' 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO," Witkoff told CNN's 'State of the Union'. Witkoff offered few details on how such an arrangement would work. But it appeared to be a major shift for Putin and could serve as a workaround to his deep-seated objection to Ukraine's potential NATO membership, a step that Kyiv has long sought. It was expected to be a key topic on Monday as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and major European leaders meet with Trump at the White House to discuss ending the 3 1/2-year conflict. 'BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA,' Trump said in a social media post. 'STAY TUNED!' Hammering out a plan for security guarantees Article 5, at the heart of the 32-member trans-Atlantic military alliance, says an armed attack against one or more member nations shall be considered an attack against them all. What needed to be hammered out at this week's talks were the contours of any security guarantees, said Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who also participated in the summit. Ukraine and European allies have pushed the US to provide that backstop in any peace agreement to deter future attacks by Moscow. 'How that's constructed, what we call it, how it's built, what guarantees are built into it that are enforceable, that's what we'll be talking about over the next few days with our partners," Rubio said on NBC's 'Meet the Press'. It was unclear, however, whether Trump had fully committed to such a guarantee. Rubio said it would be 'a huge concession." The comments shed new light on what was discussed in Alaska. Before Sunday, US officials had offered few details even as both Trump and Putin said their meeting was a success. Witkoff also said Russia had agreed to enact a law that it would not 'go after any other European countries and violate their sovereignty.' 'The Russians agreed on enshrining legislatively language that would prevent them from — or that they would attest to not attempting to take any more land from Ukraine after a peace deal, where they would attest to not violating any European borders," he said on 'Fox News Sunday'.


New Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Next prosperity round demands human capital
There is also a silver lining that leverages the peninsula's high human development and investment in (relatively) attractive metropolitan cities. A consequence of restricting low-paid, insecure H-1B work in the US would be the reduction of huge earnings from investment in patented innovations in IT, fintech, aerospace, medicine, biotech, and business process engineering. These investments have driven the vast increases in wealth in the US in contemporary times. New York, Houston, Chicago and Silicon Valley are not going to give these up to Trump without a fight. Hence, they will try to offshore these activities to less costly locations. They know from the H-1B migration that the supply of cheap, low-end tech labour is abundant in India. Hence, the rapid rise of Global Capability Centres (GCCs) in all peninsular cities, especially Hyderabad. This will replace export income with domestic income, which will temper the impact of Trump's policies on the peninsula (but not on India's trade balance). The disproportionate impact of Trump's protectionist and nativist policies on the peninsula is a result of its economic and human development success. The peninsula is, and has been, the most modern and forward-looking part of India for at least the past 35 years. Its prosperity is in no small measure linked to its success in maintaining profitable relationships with overseas trading partners and the export of a skilled workforce, especially to the US. The rest of India is more insular, less skilled and less oriented to profitable overseas relationships and, therefore, will suffer much less from the ravages of Trump and his minions. The peninsula is resilient to such adversity. I see great confidence among political and business leaders that they will be able to structurally overcome the challenges through increasing the range of diversification, negotiating with existing customers on cost-sharing these tariffs, and seeking ways to increase productivity rapidly. The governments of all the states have also responded with alacrity to the opportunity that GCCs afford. In fact, Trump may have done the peninsula a favour. I have been arguing that the next round of prosperity will come to the peninsula not through competing on cheap labour but on demonstrating increased productivity and doubling down on investments in human capital, research and development, and process engineering, to produce—for India and the world—products at the higher end of the value chain. This is not something in which the Indian government is interested, or even competent to address. If they can maintain macroeconomic stability (a big if) in the face of this shock, that is enough, thank you. It is for the business, political, and intellectual leaders of the peninsula to rise to meet this epochal challenge. Rathin Roy | THE PENINSULA | Distinguished professor at Kautilya School of Public Policy, Hyderabad; visiting senior fellow, Overseas Development Institute, London (Views are personal) (rathin100@