
How Aston Martin's CEO Plans to Transform the Legendary Brand
Aston Martin
in 2024. The two companies, though similar on the surface, couldn't have been in more different places. One overseen by a German monolith, the other… has been in the news a fair bit.
During the 2025 Le Mans race, Hallmark sat down with a group of journalists to talk about how he plans to make the company profitable, why being independent is a blessing, manual gearboxes, and much more.
"My mission was to do it in half the time it took to fix Bentley. Bentley took three years. We've got to do it in 18 months… which we're on track to do," Hallmark says of reinvigorating Aston Martin's fortunes.
Part of that, he says, involves taking a long, hard look at how the business works.
"We've got great cars, but if you don't have a business that's efficient, if you don't look into every screw, every bolt… every panel on the vehicle, and make sure you're doing it competitively it just wastes money in the rush to try and make it work," he adds.
Adrian Hallmark is a gloriously candid CEO; he's delightfully open about what's going on within the company because, it seems, he wants to show that there's a hugely profitable business in Gaydon waiting to bloom.
Photo by: Aston Martin
On looking into various ways to slim down production costs and up profitability, Hallmark brings up a single piece of metal used in the dashboard of a number of the company's vehicles. It costs £1,250 to make—machining it down from solid aluminium to sheet metal, then laser cutting it is an expensive process, perhaps needlessly so.
He says that starting from sheet metal in the first place, the same piece would cost 'about £80.' The quality would be the same, but the process would be more streamlined and more cost-efficient.
Hallmark notes dozens of other examples of overly complex processes because, in the past, the job was simply to get cars built. Costly processes weren't helped by overheads skyrocketing over the past four years, with revenues, says Hallmark, remaining the same. Going through each car, finding the cost sinks, and streamlining processes can only help. With processes like that, Hallmark reckons Aston Martin can make a net profit this year, "for the first time in, I think, 19 [years]."
You'd expect Aston Martin's independence, far away from the sort of VW Group-shaped safety net Hallmark had at Bentley, would inflate costs—developing your own parts is notoriously costly, and having the likes of
Porsche
, Audi, and Lamborghini at your back to share the load is a good thing, right? Perhaps not…
Photo by: Aston Martin
'My mission was to do it in half the time it took to fix Bentley. Bentley took three years. We've got to do it in 18 months… which we're on track to do.'
"I wish I could give you the numbers," Hallmark smirks, "for us to develop a car is less than a third of the cost of the synergies."
The big group, he said, has lots of cost built in—staffing in Germany costs much more than in the UK and Italy, says Hallmark, and there are German suppliers which are also "about three times more expensive." And finally: "You've got rules of how they allocate cost across different brands, and you pay your share."
The downside of not being part of a big group, said Hallmark, is that you're on your own. The upside, he says, is also… that you're on your own.
"Instead of being locked into the system, you've got freedom to choose, and a lot of people want to do business," which Hallmark says is wonderful. But, with the caveat that it's good so long as suppliers stay in business—something that's become an issue thanks to, well gestures wildly at the wider world.
2026 Aston Martin DBX S
Photo by: Aston Martin
There's another problem to be addressed at Aston: Range. Not the cars themselves, but where customers go once they've bought into the brand.
"If you look at the success of the other luxury brands, what they do, effectively, is every two years, every model's got the reason to change," explained Hallmark.
He asked the table what someone who's bought a DBX707 would do next. Do they get another in a different colour? Would they go elsewhere? There needs to be another Aston to put them in.
The DBX S may have come out of nowhere, but the reason for it is clear: It's where you go when you tire of 707 horsepower in your SUV. Expect more 'S' cars to appear as time goes on. There'll be more dealers offering more cars, too, and hopefully more people will buy them.
Photo by: Aston Martin
'If you look at the success of the other luxury brands, what they do, effectively, is every two years, every model's got the reason to change.'
Hallmark continued: "It's a fairly conventional place, people, and quality of experience upgrade that we're doing together with those incremental products, and then within that three to five year period, we replace every car that we've got today with a completely new model, completely new technology."
How much of that future product will be electric? Perhaps not too much: "There are very few countries declaring they'll ban engines in 2035. Ninety percent of our volume in 2040 could still be engines at the moment, except for the UK [though a small manufacturer exception will help that along, too - ed]."
While electrification might not be at the top of the business plan, manual gearboxes are. Sort of.
It's not the work of simply choosing a 'box, dropping it in the car, and calling it a day—software gets in the way. Cars run on the stuff, and they legally need to do certain things (market-dependent). Lobbing in an imprecise, human-controlled stick messes with that process.
Aston Martin DB12 Volante
"Making the connections between all of these legally required systems and a missed gear," noted Hallmark, "is very difficult. It can be done. We are planning to do it, but the cost of it is hard compared with linking it to a double clutch."
With Valhalla imminent and a proven front-engined platform, more specials like the Valour and Valiant are on the way. Though not, stressed Hallmark, all with slightly different bodies at silly volumes. They'll be different, collectible, and desirable to the right people.
The plan is simple when it's coming from the boss's mouth in a hospitality suite in the paddock at Le Mans, but Hallmark is confident it can be done. His goal doesn't appear to be making Aston Martin a profitable company in the short term, but sustainably so, and to leave something of a legacy in the process.
Hallmark will be doing so on a time limit: "I don't really want to work for more than five years. I don't want to be doing a full-time CEO job at 67 years of age. I might say something different when I'm 66, but now I don't want to be doing this forever."
The challenge has been laid out, the time limit set. Watching Adrian Hallmark change Aston Martin is going to be fascinating.
More Interviews
The Man Behind Hyundai's Design Revolution: Interview With SangYup Lee
How to Design a Timeless Hypercar: Interview With Horacio Pagani
Share this Story
X
Got a tip for us? Email:
tips@motor1.com
Join the conversation
(
)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
B.C.'s independent wood manufacturers decry retroactive U.S. softwood duties
VANCOUVER — British Columbia's independent wood product makers say hundreds of small- and medium-sized manufacturers may be forced to shut down in light of the latest decision from the United States to raise anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood. The province's Independent Wood Processors Association says in a release that the U.S. Commerce Department's decision this week to raise duties also includes a requirement for Canadian companies to retroactively remit duties for products shipped to the United States since Jan.1, 2023. Association chair Andy Rielly says in a statement that the requirement to pay duties on products shipped in the last 31 months could not only force small B.C. producers to shut down, but may also threaten operators' personal assets as they may have to risk using their homes as collateral to secure bonds to pay. Rielly is urging the Canadian government to create support programs to make sure B.C.'s independent wood processors can keep workers employed and their companies running. The U.S. Commerce Department said earlier in the week it will raise anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood to 20.56 per cent, drawing the ire of several B.C. industry groups such as the B.C. Council of Forest Industries and the B.C. Lumber Trade Council. The Independent Wood Processors Association says the the "all-others" rate affecting its members will be raised from 14.4 per cent to 27.3 per cent, with the possibly of another increase "in the coming weeks" potentially pushing the duties for their products to as high as 35 per cent. 'Until the Canadian government can negotiate a settlement to this long-festering dispute, we need a government support program to keep our workers employed,' Rielly says, adding an overall duty of 35-per-cent would force members to pay retroactive duties of 27 per cent on products already shipped. Association executive director Brian Menzies describes independent wood product producers as "collateral damage" in the trade war, and says the only hope they have of avoiding the hit is either "a favourable appeal from the Canada-US-Mexico Agreement" or "pursuing a bilateral negotiated resolution." 'We should not face export taxes or quotas," Menzies says. "Our raw materials are not subsidized, and we are too small to 'dump' our products in the U.S. market. "We acquire logs and lumber at 'arm's length' from various suppliers on the open market, just like claims made by members of the U.S. Lumber Coalition, and yet our Canadian companies along with U.S. consumers must pay these unfair and costly duties.' Prime Minister Mark Carney had previously said that a future U.S.-Canada trade deal could include softwood lumber quotas. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 26, 2025. Chuck Chiang, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Arsenal move to second deal after completing Goekers deal from Sporting
It seems that Arsenal wants some additional reinforcements for next season. Getty Images Press reports have revealed that Arsenal are indeed keen to secure some additional reinforcements in the attacking positions for next season, noting that Arsenal have shown widespread interest in signing Crystal Palace player Eberechi Eze, who is performing well for the Falcons on the other side of London. After the team completed the signing of Swede Viktor Gyokeres from Lisbon for £55 million plus eight million euros in add-ons, it is worth noting that the Swede will travel to Asia soon to participate in the pre-season with his new team before the start of the new official season. Good scoring numbers for Eze with Crystal Palace Following his impressive performances last season under Austrian coach Oliver Glasner, which culminated in the club winning the FA Cup, the distinguished English striker contributed to 14 goals in 43 appearances, scoring 14 and assisting 11. Many people close to the player believe the deal will be completed in the next few weeks due to Arsenal's enthusiasm for completing the deal. The Gunners are attempting to structure a deal worth approximately £60 million for their primary transfer target, hoping to avoid triggering the player's £68 million release clause. Club officials believe the lower figure represents fair value for the sought-after talent as they work to strengthen Mikel Arteta's squad ahead of the new season. These negotiations demonstrate Arsenal's strategic approach to the summer transfer market as they balance ambitious recruitment with financial prudence.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How much should a 40-year-old invest in an ISA to earn a monthly passive income of £1,000
One of my favourite ways to target future passive income is by investing in shares. More specifically, investors can make use of tax wrappers like a Stocks and Shares ISA, or SIPP, to achieve future income. Within these, it's possible to own a range of managed funds, exchanged-traded funds (ETFs), or individual shares. Please note that tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances of each client and may be subject to change in future. The content in this article is provided for information purposes only. It is not intended to be, neither does it constitute, any form of tax advice. Readers are responsible for carrying out their own due diligence and for obtaining professional advice before making any investment decisions. Targeting £1,000 of monthly passive income If an investor wanted to target a £1,000 monthly income, that equates to £12,000 a year. A commonly used withdrawal rate of 4% means that this investor would need a pot worth £300,000. That might sound like a chunky sum to save, but when broken down over many years, it's far more manageable. For instance, I calculate that a 40-year-old would just need to invest £500 a month over 20 years to build such a pot. Some eagle-eyed readers might note that this just adds up to a total investment of £120,000. That's because I'd expect the remaining £180,000 to appear from investment gains over time. The assumption here is that it grows by 8% a year. And given long-term investment returns have been around 8%-10%, I think that's a reasonable assumption to make. Of course, by targeting greater returns (and accepting greater risk), an investor could reach their goal far quicker. One way that I aim to do that is by selecting individual shares and holding them for many years. Rewards from long-term investing One such FTSE 100 share that I've owned for several years is Games Workshop (LSE:GAW). Its share price has soared by over 1,200% since I first bought it back in 2017. If an investor had spent £500 a month on just this share since then, they'd be sitting on a pot worth over £210,000 already. That's a phenomenal achievement in just eight years. It would also likely result in a much earlier passive income than planned. But there are a few things to bear in mind. First, I would never suggest that anyone invest everything in one stock! Second, Games Workshop wasn't large enough to be in the FTSE 100 back in 2017. It was a much smaller business. Smaller companies can often grow much faster than giant, mature businesses. As UK small-cap investor Jim Slater famously quipped, 'elephants can't gallop'. It also traded at a much lower price to earnings ratio. Today, it hovers around 30, but back in 2017 it traded as low as 10 times earnings. It's not as cheap as it used to be. Still a great business Looking ahead, I still consider Games Workshop to be a high-quality business with ample potential. It operates in a niche market that is difficult to replicate. That gives it a competitive advantage. In turn, it earns a chunky double-digit profit margin and an incredible 70% return on capital employed. In recent years it has partnered with Amazon to bring some of its vast character universe to movies and TV shows. And this licencing revenue has much more room to grow in my opinion. A long-term investor could consider this and similar prospects. And although much can go wrong with individual shares, by selecting a diversified group of 10-20 names, it would spread the risk. The post How much should a 40-year-old invest in an ISA to earn a monthly passive income of £1,000 appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool The Motley Fool UK has recommended Games Workshop Group Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Harshil Patel owns shares in Games Workshop. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data