Nearly three in five students want more education on budgeting at school
Nearly three in five university students want more education on financial choices and budgeting at school, a survey has suggested.
More than two in five (44%) undergraduates wanted more teaching on career pathways in Personal, Social, Health and Economic education (PSHE) classes, according to the poll for the Higher Education Policy Institute (Hepi) think tank.
The survey, of 1,105 full-time undergraduate students domiciled in England, found that the majority (83%) said their time in school or college prepared them well for their studies in higher education.
But only 38% said the curriculum in school or college left them 'ready for life and ready for work'.
The volume of assessments is overwhelming teachers, never mind pupils, so the number of these must be cut down
Josh Freeman, author of the report
In July, the Government launched its curriculum and assessment review, which is being led by education expert Professor Becky Francis.
The consultation on the review in England closed in November and an interim report is due to be published early this year.
Students were asked in the poll about which aspects of the PSHE curriculum they found helpful, and which topics they wanted to know more about.
Overall, 59% said they wanted to know more about financial choices and budgeting in these classes.
The Hepi report said: 'This may be more pressing because of the financial challenges students increasingly face while studying in higher education.
'Some 56% of students now work part-time during term. Of those who do not work, a third say it is because they cannot find a job.
'They may therefore benefit from more careers experience and education in school.'
The poll, which was carried out by Savanta in November and December, suggested that 63% of students want more vocational skills – and around half want more digital and IT skills (52%) and more oracy skills (49%).
Nearly two in five (39%) students said they think there are too many assessments in school and college, the survey found.
Meanwhile, around a third (34%) think studying four or five A levels or Btecs would give pupils 'greater fulfilment and satisfaction'.
The report has called for students to be given more education on financial planning at school, and that every young person is given a 'pathway mentor guarantee' – a one-to-one conversation with an expert in careers pathways to advise them on the best post-16 choices.
It has also called for students to be able to take four or five subjects at A-level rather than just three, and for the number of assessments to be reduced.
Josh Freeman, policy manager at Hepi and author of the report, said: 'It is a great success that our schools and colleges prepare many young people so well for higher education.
'Policymakers should think very carefully before making any changes that put this preparation at risk.
'But other parts of the system punch below their weight and should be reformed.'
The curriculum review is a chance to reform the system and deliver learning that is relevant, reflects society's diversity and gives all students access to meaningful qualifications across a broader range of academic, arts and vocational subjects, using a variety of assessment methods
Sarah Hannafin, head of policy at the NAHT union
He added: 'It is time to rebalance the GCSE curriculum back towards creative subjects which are sadly neglected in the current system.
'The volume of assessments is overwhelming teachers, never mind pupils, so the number of these must be cut down.
'And more space might be given to the things students feel are lacking, like financial education and budgeting.'
Tom Middlehurst, deputy director of policy at the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'It's great to see that most students feel the curriculum prepares them well – but it's also apparent that there are problems that need to be fixed.
'Much of this is to do with the previous government's emphasis on a highly academic diet of subjects and lots of examinations.'
Sarah Hannafin, head of policy at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'Schools want to offer a varied, balanced curriculum but are constrained by tight budgets, lack of specialist facilities and limited curriculum time.'
She added: 'The curriculum review is a chance to reform the system and deliver learning that is relevant, reflects society's diversity and gives all students access to meaningful qualifications across a broader range of academic, arts and vocational subjects, using a variety of assessment methods.'
A Department for Education (DfE) spokesperson said: 'We know there are parts of the current curriculum and assessment system that work well and other parts that need improvement to support all young people to achieve and thrive.
'Our independent, expert-led curriculum and assessment review will ensure students benefit from a cutting-edge system that is fit for purpose and will ensure they leave school ready for work and ready for life.
'The review is ongoing with a final report and recommendations due to be published in the autumn, as we continue to deliver on our plan for change.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
As Australia campaigns for Cop31 hosting rights, it's time to stop talking and start doing
Australian officials are gearing up for next week's mid-year climate talks in Bonn where they'll be going full tilt lobbying other governments to support the bid to host next year's COP31 negotiations. But can the government claim enough climate leadership? Our latest Climate Action Tracker shows the government's efforts to cut emissions are still rated 'insufficient'. Australia is not on track to meet its renewable energy target, its flagship industrial emissions policy is deficient, and its support for the fossil fuel industry – especially exports – remains unwavering. The climate change and energy minister, Chris Bowen, has said getting the COP31 host honour would restore Australia's leadership on climate – after what have been many years of denial and delay – but it could equally serve to show the world how inadequate his policies are. While the Albanese government has made some progress on climate policy since it came to power in 2022, restoring leadership won't come from hosting climate talks; it means turning words into action on both domestic and international fronts. The latest emissions inventory shows only a 1.5% reduction over the last two financial years, throwing this challenge into sharp relief – this rate needs to nearly double to 3% every year to reach the government target. We have based our update for Australia on government projections from 2024. The federal government has released emission figures for 2024, which were broadly similar. The Albanese government claims it is on track for emission reduction of 42.6% by 2030 from 2005 levels – close to the national 43% target. While this is partly the result of the renewables rollout, it's mostly due to the increase in the projected carbon stored in the land by 2030, such as in soils and vegetation. Without the increase in projected 2030 land sequestration in the past three years, Australia would only record a 34.9% emission reduction. Excluding the land and electricity sectors, emissions from all other economic sectors are projected to be 4.5% above 2005 levels in 2030. Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as a free newsletter Australia's 43% target is not aligned with the Paris agreement, which aims to keep global warming to no more than 1.5C. It should be at least 59%. The government also has yet to announce its 2035 emissions reduction target, well behind the February deadline. This needs to be at least 72% below 2005 levels. The government's 82% renewable energy target for the power sector by 2030 doesn't cover off-grid generation, which mostly occurs in mining regions of Western Australia where connecting to the main grid is not feasible. These account for about 10% of Australia's electricity generation. So the government's target translates to only a 77% renewable power grid nationwide by 2030. And that's assuming the target is met; the Climate Change Authority has warned that the renewables rollout must be accelerated to make that happen. Barriers to renewable energy development include slow planning and environmental approval processes, grid bottlenecks, tighter markets for equipment and labour, a lack of community acceptance and state rollbacks of renewable energy targets or projects. Overcoming these problems is crucial and provide a strong case for the federal government legislating Australia's renewable energy targets for 2030 and beyond. This would ensure it becomes a national standard and provides certainty for investors. But the 2030 target is just one milestone on the way to 100% renewable electricity system by the late 2030s, and this will require national coordination. Labor has tightened its flagship policy to curb emissions from industry's biggest polluters: the safeguard mechanism. Emissions from companies captured by the policy account for about 31% of Australia's total emissions The policy sets declining limits for how much facilities can emit with 'net' emissions to decline to 100 MtCO2e by 2030, or 28.1% below 2023 levels, allowing companies to buy carbon offsets rather than make real emission reductions. Offsets are not equivalent to fossil fuel CO2 reductions and often do not represent real and permanent emissions reduction, as Energy Australia was forced to admit. Allowing a company to buy carbon offsets means it does not change its on-site operations to be less polluting, delaying the structural change needed across high-emitting sectors to decarbonise which is critical if climate goals are to be met. Sign up to Clear Air Australia Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis after newsletter promotion Our new analysis shows that, due to the use of carbon offsets, the companies could collectively reduce their actual emissions by only 2% by the end of this decade, from 2023 levels. Fossil fuel projects in the approval and development pipeline threaten to swamp emissions reductions projected by the government out to 2030. This includes Woodside's North West Shelf gas extension, which Labor has approved to operate until 2070 – decades beyond the point when Australia is meant to have reached net zero emissions. Australia's transport sector is set to become the country's greatest source of emissions by 2030. The national fuel efficiency standard introduced by Labor last term applies to new light vehicles. The standard should be extended to heavy vehicles to encourage a transition to electrification. Heavy vehicles accounted for 22% of Australia's transport emissions last year and are expected to increase. Australia's electric vehicle uptake remains slow compared with other countries. The growth of Australia's fast-charging network is not keeping pace with electric vehicle sales, which could limit uptake further. It's clear Australia must lift its domestic game to align with anything close to the Paris agreement goal of limiting global warming to 1.5C. That would still leave the problem of emissions flowing from our fossil fuel exports, which, together with our domestic emissions, are responsible for about 4.5% of the global total. After the first assessment of global action, governments agreed at COP28 in Dubai that the world needs to 'transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems to achieve net zero', a call strongly supported by Bowen. But our analysis shows Australia's fossil fuel exports are projected to remain close to recent levels through the next decade in official projections. In the lead-up to the decision on hosting rights for the COP31 talks, Australia has much work to do to lift its climate game and ensure its policies withstand global scrutiny. Bill Hare, a physicist and climate scientist, is the chief executive of Climate Analytics
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Corruption watchdog makes massive call about Brittany Higgins' $2.4MILLION taxpayer-funded compensation payout - as she gets job after 'medically unfit to work' claims
There was 'no corruption issue' found with the $2.4m taxpayer-funded compensation payout handed to Brittany Higgins after just one day of deliberation, the corruption watchdog has reported.
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Land value tax in Wales could replace council tax and rates
The former first minister said the Welsh Government continues to explore the feasibility of LVT as used in countries such as Denmark and Singapore. Professor Drakeford has long supported a LVT, arguing those who have the privilege of ownership should pay something back for that privilege. LVT is levied on the value of the land rather than the property itself. Proponents argue LVT is easier to collect, more efficient and difficult to avoid, while discouraging speculation and encouraging people to bring idle land back into use. Professor Drakeford told the Senedd: "I am anxious to see this discussion move beyond the theoretical and into the realms of the practically possible. He explained that the Welsh Government has invited tenders to test approaches to valuing land, with submissions for every aspect of the work. The finance secretary said: "I want to use the coming months to test the boundaries of what might be possible in the next Senedd term. "Let's open the door to more radical, fundamental and progressive reform in the future." He added: "The current system is unfairly weighted against those who experience difficulty in paying. "I want to shift the focus from harmful escalation towards supportive prevention." He stated ministers will introduce a new council tax appeals process by April 2026 that will be "easier to navigate and provide a better, modern system for taxpayers". Peter Fox agreed that council tax is regressive by nature "and that it will never really become a fair local tax". Mr Fox accused the Welsh Government of increasing tax on families "by stealth" through underfunding councils which, in turn, pass on the shortfall to people. He called for reform of the "outdated and flawed" funding formula. Professor Drakeford replied: "Almost every local authority in Wales will agree that the formula needs revision – nobody can agree on how that should be done. "The 22 local authorities each believe that the formula uniquely disadvantages them."
