China denies military base ambitions in Pacific Islands
"The claims about China setting up a military base in the Pacific are false narratives," an embassy spokesperson said in a statement on Thursday.
"China's presence in the Pacific is focused on building roads and bridges to improve people's livelihoods, not on stationing troops or setting up military bases."
Rabuka said on Wednesday his country had development co-operation with China, but was opposed to Beijing establishing a military base in the region.
In any case, China did not need a base to project power in the region, he said.
China tested an intercontinental ballistic missile in September that flew over Fiji to land 11,000km from China in the international waters of the Pacific Ocean.
"If they can very well target an empty space they can very well target occupied space," Rabuka told the National Press Club in Canberra.
Washington became concerned about China's ambition to gain a military foothold in the Pacific Islands in 2018 when Beijing sought to redevelop a naval base in Papua New Guinea and a military base in Fiji.
China was outbid by Australia for both projects.
The concern resurfaced in 2022 when China signed a security pact with Solomon Islands, prompting Washington to warn it would respond if Beijing established a permanent military presence.
In November, the outgoing US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell urged the Trump administration to keep its focus on the region because China wanted to build bases in the Pacific Islands.
The Chinese embassy spokesperson said Fiji and China respect each other's sovereignty.
"China has no interest in geopolitical competition, or seeking the so-called 'sphere of influence'," the statement said.
China has established a police presence in Solomon Islands, Kiribati and Vanuatu.
China's embassy in Fiji denies that Beijing wants a military base or sphere of influence in the Pacific Islands after Fijian Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka said islands were trying to cope with a powerful China seeking to spread its influence.
"The claims about China setting up a military base in the Pacific are false narratives," an embassy spokesperson said in a statement on Thursday.
"China's presence in the Pacific is focused on building roads and bridges to improve people's livelihoods, not on stationing troops or setting up military bases."
Rabuka said on Wednesday his country had development co-operation with China, but was opposed to Beijing establishing a military base in the region.
In any case, China did not need a base to project power in the region, he said.
China tested an intercontinental ballistic missile in September that flew over Fiji to land 11,000km from China in the international waters of the Pacific Ocean.
"If they can very well target an empty space they can very well target occupied space," Rabuka told the National Press Club in Canberra.
Washington became concerned about China's ambition to gain a military foothold in the Pacific Islands in 2018 when Beijing sought to redevelop a naval base in Papua New Guinea and a military base in Fiji.
China was outbid by Australia for both projects.
The concern resurfaced in 2022 when China signed a security pact with Solomon Islands, prompting Washington to warn it would respond if Beijing established a permanent military presence.
In November, the outgoing US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell urged the Trump administration to keep its focus on the region because China wanted to build bases in the Pacific Islands.
The Chinese embassy spokesperson said Fiji and China respect each other's sovereignty.
"China has no interest in geopolitical competition, or seeking the so-called 'sphere of influence'," the statement said.
China has established a police presence in Solomon Islands, Kiribati and Vanuatu.
China's embassy in Fiji denies that Beijing wants a military base or sphere of influence in the Pacific Islands after Fijian Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka said islands were trying to cope with a powerful China seeking to spread its influence.
"The claims about China setting up a military base in the Pacific are false narratives," an embassy spokesperson said in a statement on Thursday.
"China's presence in the Pacific is focused on building roads and bridges to improve people's livelihoods, not on stationing troops or setting up military bases."
Rabuka said on Wednesday his country had development co-operation with China, but was opposed to Beijing establishing a military base in the region.
In any case, China did not need a base to project power in the region, he said.
China tested an intercontinental ballistic missile in September that flew over Fiji to land 11,000km from China in the international waters of the Pacific Ocean.
"If they can very well target an empty space they can very well target occupied space," Rabuka told the National Press Club in Canberra.
Washington became concerned about China's ambition to gain a military foothold in the Pacific Islands in 2018 when Beijing sought to redevelop a naval base in Papua New Guinea and a military base in Fiji.
China was outbid by Australia for both projects.
The concern resurfaced in 2022 when China signed a security pact with Solomon Islands, prompting Washington to warn it would respond if Beijing established a permanent military presence.
In November, the outgoing US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell urged the Trump administration to keep its focus on the region because China wanted to build bases in the Pacific Islands.
The Chinese embassy spokesperson said Fiji and China respect each other's sovereignty.
"China has no interest in geopolitical competition, or seeking the so-called 'sphere of influence'," the statement said.
China has established a police presence in Solomon Islands, Kiribati and Vanuatu.
China's embassy in Fiji denies that Beijing wants a military base or sphere of influence in the Pacific Islands after Fijian Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka said islands were trying to cope with a powerful China seeking to spread its influence.
"The claims about China setting up a military base in the Pacific are false narratives," an embassy spokesperson said in a statement on Thursday.
"China's presence in the Pacific is focused on building roads and bridges to improve people's livelihoods, not on stationing troops or setting up military bases."
Rabuka said on Wednesday his country had development co-operation with China, but was opposed to Beijing establishing a military base in the region.
In any case, China did not need a base to project power in the region, he said.
China tested an intercontinental ballistic missile in September that flew over Fiji to land 11,000km from China in the international waters of the Pacific Ocean.
"If they can very well target an empty space they can very well target occupied space," Rabuka told the National Press Club in Canberra.
Washington became concerned about China's ambition to gain a military foothold in the Pacific Islands in 2018 when Beijing sought to redevelop a naval base in Papua New Guinea and a military base in Fiji.
China was outbid by Australia for both projects.
The concern resurfaced in 2022 when China signed a security pact with Solomon Islands, prompting Washington to warn it would respond if Beijing established a permanent military presence.
In November, the outgoing US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell urged the Trump administration to keep its focus on the region because China wanted to build bases in the Pacific Islands.
The Chinese embassy spokesperson said Fiji and China respect each other's sovereignty.
"China has no interest in geopolitical competition, or seeking the so-called 'sphere of influence'," the statement said.
China has established a police presence in Solomon Islands, Kiribati and Vanuatu.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
As China prepares to invade Taiwan, a reality check: sitting on the sidelines won't help us
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's second visit to China – pencilled in for this month – will come weeks before the People's Liberation Army's 98th anniversary on August 1, 2025, a date laden with symbolism as Beijing approaches the military modernisation milestone of its centenary in 2027. Since 2021, US military and intelligence officials have warned that 2027 marks another key milestone: the date that Xi Jinping has instructed his military to have the capability to invade Taiwan. It was a point reinforced by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth at the Shangri-La defence conference in Singapore in June. And it is a warning the Australian prime minister will have in the back of his mind: China is both a critical economic partner and an escalating security threat. If the People's Republic of China chooses to take Taiwan by force, it will not be a straightforward island invasion but one that is likely to lead to a wide-raging Indo-Pacific conflict with significant implications for Australia. Xi's PRC views Taiwan as a 'a sacred and inseparable part of China's territory'. China's PLA has become one of the planet's most capable forces – with a growing nuclear arsenal, the world's largest standing army and navy, and a sophisticated rocket force. This rapid growth in military strength, which some could equate with China's growing economic and security weight globally as a superpower, has been coupled with a sharp deterioration in relations between Taiwan and the PRC. China has suspended official communications and restricted tourism. China has also ramped up its military operations in and around Taiwan. Following then US speaker Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan in August 2022, China launched its largest ever military exercises in the area, including ballistic missiles flying over Taiwan. These coercive demonstrations, paired with increasingly hostile rhetoric, have now become the norm. Last year, China's military published a simulated graphic of missiles hitting Taiwan. At the Shangri-La dialogue that same year, China's current Defence Minister, Admiral Dong Jun, said Taiwan's ruling Democratic Progressive Party will be 'nailed to the pillar of shame in history' and that 'anyone who dares separate Taiwan from China will only end up in self-destruction'. Loading It is within this context that Hegseth, at the Shangri-La dialogue, referred to the threat from China as 'imminent'. My recent trips to Taiwan indicate there is mixed sentiment in the security community as to the likelihood of a Chinese military invasion. In late 2023, then Democratic Progressive Party president Tsai Ing-wen said China's current economic and political challenges would probably hold it back from attempting an invasion in the near term. In May this year, however, Taiwan's current president – while generally reticent to talk on the prospects of an invasion – compared Taiwan's present plight with 1930s Europe. A September 2024 poll of 1200 Taiwanese people conducted by the country's Institute for National Security and Defence Research showed that, while most saw China's 'territorial ambitions as a serious threat', they did not think this was likely to manifest in an attack on Taiwan. This view is perhaps understandable. Taiwan's geography, shallow coastal waters, mountainous terrain and limited invasion windows due to weather make any military assault a monumental task. Such a challenge that the US abandoned plans to invade Taiwan during World War II under Operation Causeway.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
As China prepares to invade Taiwan, a reality check: sitting on the sidelines won't help us
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's second visit to China – pencilled in for this month – will come weeks before the People's Liberation Army's 98th anniversary on August 1, 2025, a date laden with symbolism as Beijing approaches the military modernisation milestone of its centenary in 2027. Since 2021, US military and intelligence officials have warned that 2027 marks another key milestone: the date that Xi Jinping has instructed his military to have the capability to invade Taiwan. It was a point reinforced by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth at the Shangri-La defence conference in Singapore in June. And it is a warning the Australian prime minister will have in the back of his mind: China is both a critical economic partner and an escalating security threat. If the People's Republic of China chooses to take Taiwan by force, it will not be a straightforward island invasion but one that is likely to lead to a wide-raging Indo-Pacific conflict with significant implications for Australia. Xi's PRC views Taiwan as a 'a sacred and inseparable part of China's territory'. China's PLA has become one of the planet's most capable forces – with a growing nuclear arsenal, the world's largest standing army and navy, and a sophisticated rocket force. This rapid growth in military strength, which some could equate with China's growing economic and security weight globally as a superpower, has been coupled with a sharp deterioration in relations between Taiwan and the PRC. China has suspended official communications and restricted tourism. China has also ramped up its military operations in and around Taiwan. Following then US speaker Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan in August 2022, China launched its largest ever military exercises in the area, including ballistic missiles flying over Taiwan. These coercive demonstrations, paired with increasingly hostile rhetoric, have now become the norm. Last year, China's military published a simulated graphic of missiles hitting Taiwan. At the Shangri-La dialogue that same year, China's current Defence Minister, Admiral Dong Jun, said Taiwan's ruling Democratic Progressive Party will be 'nailed to the pillar of shame in history' and that 'anyone who dares separate Taiwan from China will only end up in self-destruction'. Loading It is within this context that Hegseth, at the Shangri-La dialogue, referred to the threat from China as 'imminent'. My recent trips to Taiwan indicate there is mixed sentiment in the security community as to the likelihood of a Chinese military invasion. In late 2023, then Democratic Progressive Party president Tsai Ing-wen said China's current economic and political challenges would probably hold it back from attempting an invasion in the near term. In May this year, however, Taiwan's current president – while generally reticent to talk on the prospects of an invasion – compared Taiwan's present plight with 1930s Europe. A September 2024 poll of 1200 Taiwanese people conducted by the country's Institute for National Security and Defence Research showed that, while most saw China's 'territorial ambitions as a serious threat', they did not think this was likely to manifest in an attack on Taiwan. This view is perhaps understandable. Taiwan's geography, shallow coastal waters, mountainous terrain and limited invasion windows due to weather make any military assault a monumental task. Such a challenge that the US abandoned plans to invade Taiwan during World War II under Operation Causeway.
7NEWS
2 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Military experts say Australian Defence bases ‘extraordinarily vulnerable'
Military experts have raised major concerns with the vulnerability of Australia's defence bases. Civilian spectators gathered at RAAF Williamtown in NSW on Thursday to watch Australia's $100 million F-35 Stealth Fighters take off. But the sight of our most lethal fighter jets being put through their paces in front of an audience has some, like leading strategic analyst Michael Shoebridge, worried. 'Australia's military bases all around the country are extraordinarily vulnerable,' Shoebridge told 7NEWS. Ukraine showed why in June when it blew up dozens of Russian aircraft using a barrage of drones launched from trucks parked close by air bases. 'We need a heightened sense of security and vigilance,' Shoebridge said. He said Canberra is not listening. 'The shift of spending needs to be to protect these bases and the multibillion-dollar assets on them,' Shoebridge said. Williamtown recently underwent a major upgrade — better ground lighting, drainage and reinforced services — to accommodate larger aircraft. 'Security of bases, ports and barracks is, and will remain, a focus for Defence resources,' a Defence spokesperson told 7NEWS. It comes after concerns were raised earlier this year when a Chinese naval taskforce circumnavigated Australia. Canberra is also under growing pressure from Washington to lift Defence spending. 'I've said very clearly we will invest in the capability that Australia needs,' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said. Australian companies including DroneShield sell their products to Europe and Ukraine, but Australia is not a customer. Shoebridge said this 'is very strange' because 'they're much cheaper than air and missile defence systems' used by other countries, including the US.
