Proposed defamation law reforms fall short of addressing free-speech concerns, say campaigners
Thirty organisations including the
National Union of Journalists
,
RTÉ
and the
Irish Council for Civil Liberties
signed a statement calling on members of the Seanad to amend the Bill to include provisions to counter the use of so-called Slapps in areas such as copyright, data protection and privacy in addition to defamation, which is currently addressed.
Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (Slapps) are legal actions taken, often by large corporate entities or wealthy individuals, to intimidate critics, often journalists or activists.
The intention is often to shut down public debate or criticism by bringing an action the other party does not have the resources to fight. These have been widely criticised as a threat to free speech, transparency and the media.
READ MORE
The Ireland Anti-Slapp Network, which includes prominent lawyers and academics, described the present wording of the Bill as 'a missed opportunity to protect the freedom of expression that is the lifeblood of our democracy'.
It said it had engaged with Government throughout a consultation process and suggested a number of targeted amendments it believed would 'significantly strengthen' the legislation, but these were not incorporated.
'While the Bill brings in provisions that give effect to aspects of the EU Anti-Slapp Directive, it falls short of transposing the directive's full set of minimum standards and protections, which Ireland is legally required to implement in full by May 2026″ the group says.
Jessica Ní Mhainín, head of policy and campaigns at Index on Censorship said it was important that the Defamation (Amendment) Bill was changed.
'Its complex and flawed provisions risk becoming tools only accessible to those with significant legal resources – not the individuals most often targeted with SLAPPs,' she said.
'We need the senators to take action now to stop this inadequate Bill from being passed into law.'
During a debate on the Bill in the Seanad on Wednesday,
Fine Gael
Senator Linda Nelson Murray said Ireland had the same number of defamation cases with 5.3 million people as the entire UK, which has a population of 68 million.
The State 'continues to record the highest per capita rate of defamation litigation in the common-law world', she said.
Ms Nelson Murray called for the introduction of a statutory harm test in defamation legislation to mirror the one in the UK 'where a statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant'.
Minister for Justice
Jim O'Callaghan
said the biggest issue with current defamation law 'is the extent to which people are defamed online by anonymous, unknown individuals'.
The proposed legislation includes a provision for someone to go to the Circuit Court and get an order for the service provider to identify the person who has been defaming them.
It provides protection for 'fair and reasonable publication' and safeguards against Slapps in a bid to 'prevent the misuse of defamation laws to stifle public-interest reporting', he said.
The Bill aimed to reduce legal costs and delays, support easier access to justice and provide 'enhanced protection for responsible public-interest journalism'.
Mr O'Callaghan said abolishing juries 'will and should reduce the incidence of excessive or disproportionate awards'.
Independent Senator
Michael McDowell
warned that if defamation cases 'can only be decided by a judge sitting alone' this would not be 'a happy change in our law'. In five or 10 years' time 'people in the media who want to get rid of all juries in all defamation actions' will question a judge who rules a number of times against media organisations and disbelieve 'particular kinds of witnesses', he said.
Sinn Féin
Senator Nicole Ryan said that by removing juries the Government would 'take a sledgehammer to a core principle of our legal system'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
10 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Government expected to hold Budget 2026 on 7 October
Budget Day will take place on Tuesday, 7 October, according to Government sources. Budget 2026 comes against the backdrop of 15% tariffs on goods exported to the US, and threats by US President Donald Trump of even higher tariffs on pharmaceuticals. Last month, Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe and Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform, Jack Chambers, laid out a package worth €9.4bn, but the Summer Economic Statement came before the announcement of the 15% tariff rate. The Summer Economic Statement set out around €1.5bn of tax cuts with a spending package of €7.9bn - a 7.3% increase on 2025. Mr Chambers also confirmed last month that there will be no one-off cost-of-living payments in Budget 2026. Speaking to RTÉ's News at One at the time, he said the Government wanted to take decisions that would be "sustainable with global uncertainty". While business group given the fragile global environment. When launching its pre-budget submission, it urged the Government to take a "measured and strategic approach". The group also called for targeted investment in areas that enhance productivity and competitiveness.
Irish Times
13 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on climate policy: Government must avoid backsliding
Methane arising from agriculture and the fossil fuel industry is a notorious greenhouse gas, contributing significantly to global warming. While it breaks down relatively quickly in the atmosphere – unlike carbon dioxide – it is a serious threat to climate stabilisation. The quicker it is reduced, the more global average temperatures can be cut. Much can be done to reduce methane releases in oil and gas production, but it is much more challenging in agriculture. Livestock exporting countries like Ireland and New Zealand are supporting a new approach to classifying methane which is gaining political traction. This is based around achieving national 'temperature neutrality', also known as 'no additional warming'. The Government has yet to take a formal position on the concept. Significantly it got the backing of the Climate Change Advisory Council, its key advisory body. It chose to interpret Ireland's legally-binding climate neutrality obligations in terms of temperature neutrality – rather than the more onerous target of 'net zero emissions'. An international study , published in the Environmental Research Letters journal this week, has questioned this approach. It says that it 'grandfathers high emissions from wealthy, livestock-exporting nations', shifts the burden of cutting emissions to others, and limits space for lower-income countries to grow food systems. The approach fails on food security grounds, with trade data showing most exports serve high-income markets. This risks locking in inequality and misses 'a critical opportunity to reduce peak warming'. READ MORE The most concerning finding was highlighted by lead researcher Dr Colm Duffy of the University of Galway: 'If every country adopted a temperature neutrality target, we'd seriously jeopardise the Paris agreement's goal of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees or even 2 degrees.' The Government is in a bind on this. How methane is regarded in policy terms has big implications for carbon budgets up to 2040, which must be signed off on soon. Climatologist Prof John Sweeney has argued that the shift, which reduces the required emissions reduction target, is not aligned with scientific recommendations and could hinder Ireland's ability to meet its climate goals. The study emphasises that governments must set targets that are internationally credible and farmers need to be supported within a national framework, rather than targeted for blame. The bottom line is that Ireland will not meet the global climate challenge by redefining climate targets. Ireland has yet to deliver an honest appraisal of what a genuinely climate-neutral, sustainable and resilient agricultural sector could look like in coming decades. Avoiding this issue would amount to backsliding on vital climate action.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
New customers to receive cash instead of energy credits in household benefit scheme
A row has broken out between the Government and the representative body for the electricity industry and gas retail sector over the former's decision to replace energy credits with cash, for new customers, in the Household Benefits Package . From September, new applicants to the scheme will no longer be able to avail of a €35 monthly credit towards their electricity or gas bill, but will instead receive the payment into a nominated bank or post office account. Existing customers can continue to receive the credit unless they seek to change supplier. The Government said the move ensures no provider has 'a perceived advantage over competitors' in the market. However, the Electricity Association of Ireland (EAI) said the credit should be made available to customers of more companies, rather than scrapping it. [ Ending of electricity credits will bite hard this winter Opens in new window ] All people over the age of 70 can apply for the benefits package, while younger people may also be eligible but additional rules apply . Under the scheme, people have the option to put a credit towards their electricity or gas bill, but only if they are customers of Electric Ireland, Bord Gáis Energy or Flogas. READ MORE There are 12 electricity and seven gas suppliers in the domestic market. The Department of Social Protection confirmed all new applicants to the Household Benefits Package will receive a monetary payment towards their energy bill, rather than a credit. 'The decision to remove the credit option for new customers has been taken following an examination of customer behaviour and trends over several years,' said a spokeswoman. 'An increasing number of new customers are opting for the cash option even where the credit option is available. Any existing customers using the credit facility at present can maintain that method of payment.' The spokeswoman said the removal of the credit option for new customers also ensures 'no supplier would have a perceived advantage over competitors in the domestic energy market'. EAI chief executive Dara Lynott has accused the Government of 'going for the easier option' instead of implementing targeted measures that would better help people enduring energy poverty. 'If you're intent on targeting customers who need help with energy, and you want to be guaranteed that it gets to the right people, then credits are the way to go,' said Mr Lynott. He said many people who receive the cash will have 'other pressing bills' and may opt not to put the money towards their energy costs. 'They may need petrol for the car and the house still goes cold – so you still have people in energy poverty, even after you've given cash.' Mr Lynott said targeted, long-term measures need to be implemented to help people, rather than universal payments. Figures released to Sinn Féin MEP Lynn Boylan in late July showed that 301,000 households are now in arrears on their electricity bills. [ Households unlikely to receive energy credits and other once-off payments next winter Opens in new window ] From April 2022 until February 2025, households received nine electricity credits worth €1,500 – costing almost €3 billion. However, the Government has ruled out such credits in the forthcoming budget, instead saying it will implement other measures to support households. A Department of Energy spokesperson said the Government is 'keenly aware that energy has been a big driver of costs across the economy, and that price rises over the past number of years impacted almost all householders and businesses'. The Government has established a National Energy Affordability Taskforce to 'identify, assess and implement measures that will enhance energy affordability for households and businesses, while delivering key renewable commitments and protecting security of supply and economic stability'.
