logo
Speaker Mike Johnson, Jeff Landry tell Gavin Newsom to mind his own business after Shreveport insult

Speaker Mike Johnson, Jeff Landry tell Gavin Newsom to mind his own business after Shreveport insult

Yahoo3 hours ago
U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry said Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom should focus on what they describe as his own broken state rather than insulting Shreveport about its crime rate in what they say is a false narrative.
During an interview this week with Brian Tyler Cohen, Newsom criticized President Trump's police takeover in Washington, D.C., and previous National Guard activations in Los Angeles while invoking Johnson's hometown of Shreveport as an example of crime chaos.
'I think (Trump) should start with Shreveport, La., and Speaker Johnson's district that has six times plus the per capita murder rate of Nancy Pelosi's San Francisco," Newsom said in the interview. What about the carnage, Mr. President, in Shreveport? Why aren't you protecting the folks there?"
In a text to USA Today Network Saturday, Johnson said Newsom "should spend less time commenting on national affairs and trying to subvert state laws for a blatant power grab, and much more time working to change the disastrous, far-left policies that are destroying his state."
"Republicans will not be lectured about what makes the American people safe by a man who has repeatedly protected violent criminals and illegal aliens," Johnson said. "While Democrats have created crime crises through radical policies like defunding the police, President Trump and Republicans are serious about solving this scourge in America's capital city and across the nation."
Most of Shreveport is actually represented in Congress now by Democratic U.S. Rep. Cleo Fields, though Johnson still represents a small portion of his hometown. USA Today is seeking comment from Fields.
Though Shreveport was considered one of America's most dangerous cities as recently as 2023, Landry, Louisiana's Republican governor, and Shreveport Mayor Tom Arceneaux said violent crime fell significantly in 2024 and so far in 2025.
"Gov. Newsom may hold his own opinions but he is not entitled to distort the facts; homicides in Shreveport are down 40% this year, and we are continuing to see a significant decline in crime," Landry said Saturday in a text to USA Today Network.
"Gavin has done a great job of wrecking California, we don't need him doing the same to the rest of the country," Landry said.
Arceneaux said he doesn't want Newsom's comments to present a distorted picture of Shreveport to those who live there or would consider moving to the city or investing in Shreveport.
"I would disagree with (Newsom's) assessment," Arceneaux said Saturday as he was conducting "block by block" engagements with Shreveport residents. "For a number of years were on the Top 10 (most dangerous cities), but we're no longer on those lists.
"We've invested in police and technology and our officers are doing a good job."
More: Louisiana attorney general says gaming site Roblox fosters environment for child predators
Greg Hilburn covers state politics for the USA TODAY Network of Louisiana. Follow him on Twitter @GregHilburn1.
This article originally appeared on Shreveport Times: Speaker Mike Johnson, Jeff Landry blast Gavin Newsom's Shreveport insult
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Orleans Mayor Joins Long Line of Louisiana Politicians Accused of Corruption
New Orleans Mayor Joins Long Line of Louisiana Politicians Accused of Corruption

New York Times

time9 minutes ago

  • New York Times

New Orleans Mayor Joins Long Line of Louisiana Politicians Accused of Corruption

Hundred-dollar bills stashed in a freezer. Riverboat casino licenses sold to the highest bidder. Truckloads of granite traded in a quid pro quo. Louisiana has a long and colorful history of political corruption allegations, which for decades have ensnared lawmakers at many levels of government. The most recent was Mayor LaToya Cantrell of New Orleans, who was indicted on Friday after a lengthy federal investigation. According to the charges laid out in the indictment, Ms. Cantrell abused public funds to facilitate a romantic relationship with her bodyguard, a city police officer, and then sought to cover up the personal time they spent together in New Orleans and on out-of-state trips while he claimed to be on duty. Ms. Cantrell's lawyer said on Friday that he needed to review the indictment before commenting; he declined to comment again on Saturday. Here's a look back at some of the most significant corruption scandals in Louisiana history: Richard Leche After the assassination of Huey Long, a popular Louisiana governor turned United States senator, in 1935, Richard Leche emerged as his successor. But Mr. Leche's single term as governor came to an early end when he resigned in 1939 amid corruption allegations. His resignation failed to stave off charges, and in 1940, he was convicted of mail fraud in a plot that prosecutors said involved a dealer selling trucks to the state's Highway Department at excessively high prices, and then giving Mr. Leche a kickback. He served five years in prison before President Harry S. Truman pardoned him in 1953. Huey and Earl Long Earl Long, the lieutenant governor under Leche in 1939, was swept into the state's highest office when his predecessor resigned. Mr. Leche's scandals loomed over Mr. Long's first term, and in 1940, Long was himself charged with embezzlement. The charges didn't stick, however, and Mr. Long would go on to win the governorship in two elections, holding office from 1948 to 1952 and from 1956 to 1960, in a career defined by personal excess and eccentric behavior. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Urban Deployments Raise Questions: What Is Our Military For?
Urban Deployments Raise Questions: What Is Our Military For?

Forbes

time9 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Urban Deployments Raise Questions: What Is Our Military For?

As noted in a recent report by the Center for American Progress, in 2022 Donald Trump stated that 'the next President should use every power at his disposal to restore order — and, if necessary, that includes sending in the National Guard or the troops' to conduct law enforcement activities on U.S. soil. In 2023, said that if restored to office, that he he would send troops to U.S. cities to combat crime: 'The next time, I'm not waiting. … We don't have to wait any longer.' Ominously, the president has talked of using troops to combat 'the enemy within." That time has come. Earlier this year the Trump administration deployed 700 Marines to Los Angeles to deal with immigration protests. At the time, California Attorney General Rob Bonta said 'We don't take lightly to the president abusing his authority and unlawfully mobilizing California National Guard troops.' The new target of troops deploying to a U.S. city is in Washington, DC. On Saturday August 16th West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrissey annnounced a plan to deploy hundreds of National Guard member of his state's National Guard to Washington, DC, stating that 'West Virginia is proud to stand with President [Donald]The question is why? Violent crime in Washington, DC is projected to be down 26% this year from 2024. The demonstrations in Los Angeles were overwhelmingly peacaful until the show of force – police, National Guard and Marines – prompted clashes between protesters and military and law enforcement officials. Local law enforcement officers have gone so far as to fire munitions that have left both protesters and journalists injured. Many veterans have taken exception to the deployments, and some have filed an amicus brief in support of California Governor Gavin Newsom's opposition to the troop presence. One of them, Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton, said 'This is the politicisation of the armed forces. It casts the military in a terrible light." President Trump's rationale for sending troops into U.S. cities is the Insurrection Act of 1807, which does indeed allow the president to deploy troops for domestic law enforcement in the event of an insurrection. But neither the immigration protests in Los Angeles nor the crime rate in DC qualify as an insurrection, by any stretch of the imagination. The deployments are deeply disturbing, and should be questioned by our elected leaders across the spectrum, along with veterans and average citizens concerned about federal overreach. Questions about the troop deployments need to be louder and more persistent. This is not a partisan issue. It is a basic issue about the role of the. military in a democracy. We can't afford to ignore it and go about business as usual.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store