logo
Syria evacuates Bedouin from Druze-majority Sweida as ceasefire holds

Syria evacuates Bedouin from Druze-majority Sweida as ceasefire holds

News.com.aua day ago
Syrian authorities evacuated Bedouin families from the Druze-majority city of Sweida on Monday, after a ceasefire in the southern province halted a week of sectarian bloodshed that a monitor said killed more than 1,260 people.
The violence, which followed massacres of Alawites in March and clashes involving the Druze in April and May, has shaken the Islamist rule of interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa, who has pledged to protect minorities in a country devastated by 14 years of war.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor said the ceasefire was largely holding despite isolated gunfire in areas north of Sweida city, with no new reports of casualties.
An AFP correspondent saw a convoy of buses and other vehicles enter the provincial capital and exit carrying civilians, including women and children.
State news agency SANA quoted the governor of neighbouring Daraa, Anwar al-Zubi, as saying his province had "received about 200 Bedouin families who had been detained in Sweida", sending them to local shelters.
The ceasefire announced on Saturday put an end to the sectarian violence that killed more than 1,260 people -- about 800 of them Druze fighters and civilians, including nearly 200 noncombatants "summarily executed" by government forces, according to the Observatory. The toll also includes more than 400 government security personnel.
Fatima Abdel-Qader, 52, a Bedouin who was leaving the city on foot, said her family had been surrounded during the fighting, "unable to leave or come back -- anyone who wanted to go out risked gunfire and clashes".
"We were afraid that someone would come to our home and kill us all," she told AFP, adding they had no way of getting food or water.
Damascus has accused Druze groups of attacking and killing Sunni Bedouins during the clashes, which broke out on July 13 after a Druze vegetable seller was kidnapped by local Bedouins, according to the Observatory.
The Observatory's toll includes 35 Bedouins, three of them civilians executed by Druze fighters.
The Druze and Bedouin tribes have had tense relations for decades.
- 'Unthinkable' -
Witnesses, Druze factions and the Observatory have accused government forces of siding with the Bedouin and committing abuses when they entered Sweida last week. Sunni Arab tribes also converged on the area in support of the Bedouin.
The ceasefire effectively began on Sunday after Bedouin and tribal fighters withdrew from Sweida city and Druze groups regained control.
The US special envoy to Syria, Tom Barrack, said on Monday that what had happened in Sweida was "unthinkable".
"You have a Syrian government in effect. They need to be held accountable," he told a press conference on a visit to neighbouring Lebanon.
The weekend ceasefire announcement came hours after Barrack said the United States had negotiated a truce between Syria's Islamist authorities and Israel, which had bombed government forces in both Sweida and Damascus earlier in the week.
Israel, which has its own Druze community, has said it was acting in defence of the group, as well as to enforce its demands for the total demilitarisation of Syria's south.
The deal allowed the deployment of government security forces in Sweida province but not its main city.
An AFP correspondent said security forces had erected sand mounds to block some of Sweida's entrances.
Sunni tribal fighters were sitting on the roadside beyond the checkpoints.
- Aid convoy -
At the main hospital in Sweida city, dozens of bodies were still waiting to be identified, with a forensic medicine official at the facility saying "we still have 97 unidentified corpses".
According to the United Nations, the violence has displaced more than 128,000 people, an issue that has also made collecting and identifying bodies more difficult.
More than 450 of the dead had been brought to the Sweida national hospital by Sunday evening, with more still being recovered from the streets and homes.
"The dead bodies sent a terrible smell through all the floors of the hospital," said nurse Hisham Breik, who had not left the facility since the violence began.
"The situation has been terrible. We couldn't walk around the hospital without wearing a mask," he said, his voice trembling, adding that the wounded included women, children and the elderly.
The United Nations' humanitarian office said hospitals and health centres in Sweida province were out of service, with "reports of unburied bodies raising serious public health concerns".
Humanitarian access to Sweida "remains highly constrained", it said in a statement late Sunday.
On Sunday, a first humanitarian aid convoy entered the city, which has seen power and water cuts and shortages of fuel, food and medical supplies.
A Red Crescent official told AFP the supplies included body bags.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More than 100 NGOs warn 'mass starvation' spreading across Gaza
More than 100 NGOs warn 'mass starvation' spreading across Gaza

News.com.au

time8 hours ago

  • News.com.au

More than 100 NGOs warn 'mass starvation' spreading across Gaza

More than 100 aid organisations warned on Wednesday that "mass starvation" was spreading in Gaza ahead of the US top envoy's visit to Europe for talks on a possible ceasefire and an aid corridor. Israel is facing mounting international pressure over the catastrophic humanitarian situation in the Palestinian territory, where more than two million people face severe shortages of food and other essentials after 21 months of conflict, triggered by Hamas's attack on Israel. The UN said on Tuesday that Israeli forces had killed more than 1,000 Palestinians trying to get food aid since the US- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation started operations in late May -- effectively sidelining the existing UN-led system. A statement with 111 signatories, including Doctors Without Borders (MSF), Save the Children and Oxfam, warned that "our colleagues and those we serve are wasting away". The groups called for an immediate negotiated ceasefire, the opening of all land crossings and the free flow of aid through UN-led mechanisms. It came a day after the United States said its envoy Steve Witkoff will head to Europe this week for talks on Gaza and may then visit the Middle East. Witkoff comes with "a strong hope that we will come forward with another ceasefire as well as a humanitarian corridor for aid to flow, that both sides have in fact agreed to," State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told reporters. Even after Israel began easing a more than two-month aid blockade in late May, Gaza's population is still suffering extreme scarcities. Israel says humanitarian aid is being allowed into Gaza and accuses Hamas of exploiting civilian suffering, including by stealing food handouts to sell at inflated prices or shooting at those awaiting aid. - 'Hope and heartbreak' - In their statement, the humanitarian organisations said that warehouses with tonnes of supplies were sitting untouched just outside the territory, and even inside, as they were blocked from accessing or delivering the goods. "Palestinians are trapped in a cycle of hope and heartbreak, waiting for assistance and ceasefires, only to wake up to worsening conditions," the signatories said. "It is not just physical torment, but psychological. Survival is dangled like a mirage," they added. "The humanitarian system cannot run on false promises. Humanitarians cannot operate on shifting timelines or wait for political commitments that fail to deliver access." UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said Tuesday that the "horror" facing Palestinians in Gaza under Israeli military attack was unprecedented in recent years. The head of Gaza's largest hospital said Tuesday 21 children had died due to malnutrition and starvation in the Palestinian territory in the past three days. - Standstill - Israel and Hamas have been engaging in drawn-out negotiations in Doha since July 6 as mediators scramble to end nearly two years of war. But after more than two weeks of back and forth, efforts by mediators Qatar, Egypt and the United States are at a standstill. More than two dozen Western countries recently urged an immediate end to the war, saying suffering in Gaza had "reached new depths". Israel's military campaign in Gaza has killed 59,106 Palestinians, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory. Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, which sparked the war, resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.

What to expect from Russia and Ukraine's third round of peace talks
What to expect from Russia and Ukraine's third round of peace talks

SBS Australia

time10 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

What to expect from Russia and Ukraine's third round of peace talks

Ukraine wants the return of prisoners of war and "children abducted by Russia", while the Kremlin said it will "pursue our interests" as peace talks between the two nations are set to begin on Wednesday. Two previous ceasefire negotiations have led to the exchange of thousands of prisoners of war and the remains of dead soldiers. There is now renewed pressure to end the war. What do we know about the ceasefire talks? Russia and Ukraine will meet in Istanbul for the latest ceasefire talks, which will take place at the same venue where previous negotiations in May and June failed to yield a ceasefire, the Agence France-Presse news agency reported. The Istanbul talks could focus on further prisoner exchanges and a possible meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin, a senior Ukrainian official told AFP. Russia, however, has signalled that a meaningful breakthrough isn't expected anytime soon. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters earlier this week the two sides have "diametrically opposed" positions on how to end the war in Ukraine. One of the main sticking points at previous meetings has been over territory, as Russia has seized swathes of Ukrainian land since its invasion began three years ago. Ukraine continues to seek the return of the occupied territories, but Russia has shown no intent to retreat. "There is no reason to expect any breakthroughs in the category of miracles — it is hardly possible in the current situation," Peskov said. "We intend to pursue our interests, we intend to ensure our interests and fulfil the tasks that we set for ourselves from the very beginning." Asked if he could provide a sense of how the Kremlin viewed the potential timeframe for a possible peace agreement, Peskov said he could offer no guidance on timing. "There is a lot of work to be done before we can talk about the possibility of some top-level meetings," he said. Zelenskyy outlined what he is seeking in the negotiations. "The agenda from our side is clear: the return of prisoners of war, the return of children abducted by Russia, and the preparation of a leaders' meeting," he said. What happened last time? At the time, Russia told Ukraine it would only agree to end the war if Ukraine gave up big new chunks of territory and accepted limits on the size of its army, according to a memorandum reported by Russian media. The Russian memorandum, which was published by the Interfax news agency, said a settlement of the war would require international recognition of Crimea — a peninsula annexed by Russia in 2014 — and four other regions of Ukraine that Russia has claimed as its own territory. Ukraine would have to withdraw its forces from all of them. Peskov suggested Russia still holds this view. "There is our draft memorandum; there is a draft memorandum that has been handed over by the Ukrainian side. There is to be an exchange of views and talks on these two drafts, which are diametrically opposed so far," he said. Ukraine has repeatedly rejected the Russian conditions as tantamount to surrender. — Additional reporting by the Reuters news agency

Have the Greens lost their way as co-founder expelled
Have the Greens lost their way as co-founder expelled

ABC News

timea day ago

  • ABC News

Have the Greens lost their way as co-founder expelled

SARAH FERGUSON, PRESENTER: Drew Hutton, welcome to 7.30. DREW HUTTON, GREENS CO-FOUNDER: Hello, Sarah. SARAH FERGUSON: What do you mean that the Greens have been taken over by a cult? DREW HUTTON: Well, there are plenty of really good people in the Greens, and I still identify as having green politics, always have had, always will have. But over the last decade or so, it would seem that some people have come into the Greens with the determination to take it over, to convert it into the sort of party, one of whose main preoccupations is with transgender rights. Now I've got no problem with transgender rights, but what they've done is they have a closed set of beliefs. They have a closed language, which they understand, but nobody else does. And they've got an absolutely rigorous determination to stop any dissent from occurring to the things that they think are important. And the main things they think are important are that we get rid of the notion of biological sex and replace it with gender identity. SARAH FERGUSON: You say that this change in the greens has made the party, in your words, 'weird' and 'unlikable'. Does it also make Greens members unelectable? DREW HUTTON: Well, we'll have to see Sarah. I don't know whether it makes them unelectable or not, but I do know… SARAH FERGUSON: Well, you say this has been going on for 10 years, so presumably you have got some evidence. So is it actually having an impact on Green's electoral support? DREW HUTTON: I think it is. Look, there is a clear need for a party like the Greens or for a political force in there that is saying the sorts of things that the Greens should be saying. But there is also this fairly authoritarian and aggressive and unlikeable element to the Greens that I think people in the community are responding to. They do acknowledge that there's a role for the Greens, and I acknowledge that too but the fact that there is an element of authoritarianism creeping into the party, a disdain for freedom of speech, which is exemplified by the treatment of me and I might add by dozens of other members of the Greens, mostly women, mostly good conservationists, have been forced out of the party. SARAH FERGUSON: How many people do you say have been forced out of the party on this issue of Greens support for transgender rights? DREW HUTTON: I've been contacted by 40 former members of the Greens. Now about half of them have been expelled and the other half have been forced out by being subjected to massive complaints. They've weaponized the complaint system. This faction, this cult that I call them, has taken over all the key committees in the party, including the disciplinary committees. So, members are hauled before these committees as I was, and in a bit of a star chamber, they're expelled. Now, a lot of people don't even want to go through that process because it is just so distressing and traumatic, so they just leave the party. We've lost some of the best talent, the best conservationists, best environmental campaigners in the party have left because they've been subject to this really bad treatment by this faction of the Greens. SARAH FERGUSON: Let me ask you this, the party, the Greens party has a policy on transgender issues, a policy determined by the members of the Greens, that people have a right to their self-identified gender. Doesn't the party have a right to uphold its policy positions? DREW HUTTON: Absolutely and actually I agree with that position. The people do have a right, should have a right to identify, if they want to identify as another sex, that's fine as another gender. But what I disagree with vehemently is the way that anybody who actually voices any dissent with that policy and do so from a credible position, that is that there is such a thing as biological sex and there are two sexes, is forced out of the party. I mean, that's extremely authoritarian and what I worry about is that there is a very doctrinaire mentality developing in the Greens, especially with regard to this issue. Not only this issue, but especially this one and if there is this attitude of there must be no debate on this issue, then that's a bit of a slippery slope. Then you start moving into other areas where there's no debate. You can't have a debate about this because it might offend somebody or it might… SARAH FERGUSON: Let me put this question to you in a different way. And of course, we have Larissa Waters on so she can defend whether or not the party was indeed doctrinaire, or they were engaged in trying to protect people from harm but she can answer that question. My question to you is, has the Greens Party just changed, and you are unwilling to see the party evolve? DREW HUTTON: Oh, look, I accept that every new generation is going to give any political party, and the Greens included, its own stamp. That's okay. I was no longer active in the Greens. I'm a life member. I was a life member after 2009. I went on to form the Lock the Gate movement after that. So I really haven't taken any role in the Greens, and I didn't want to. All I wanted to do was keep my membership and go hand out how to vote cards every three years or so, and this came at me. All I did was argue that there should be free speech on this issue, and the next minute I've got the party coming at me. So, I was simply defending myself and defending the issue of free speech. SARAH FERGUSON: Drew Hutton, thank you very much indeed for joining us. DREW HUTTON: Thank you, Sarah. SARAH FERGUSON: Leader of the Greens, Larissa Waters, joins me now. Larissa Waters, welcome to 7.30. SENATOR LARISSA WATERS, GREENS LEADER: Hi, Sarah, thanks for having me. SARAH FERGUSON: Can I get your response to Drew Hutton's description of your party as authoritarian, aggressive and doctrinaire. LARISSA WATERS: Well, that's not the experience that I and so many of our other wonderful members have and what's happened in this situation is actually just really sad because a man who spent his life doing really wonderful environmental advocacy has taken this focus on to other matters and it hasn't ended well. The party went through a process that our members run, our members drive, our volunteers participate in, and that process has concluded, but I want to make sure people know that the Greens are a safe party for trans people. It's a safe place and it will always be. SARAH FERGUSON: He's describing a party where debate on contentious issues is prevented, not just on this issue. He's saying you have a disdain for free speech. How is the state of free speech inside the Greens? Are people free to express their opinions? LARISSA WATERS: Yes, and they frequently do, Sarah. You can have a robust debate and there's lots of differences of opinion when party members are actually debating and formulating our policies, but you can do that in a respectful manner and that's what our Code of Conduct... SARAH FERGUSON: But is that your issue with him, the manner in which he did it or the views he was expressing? Why has he been expelled? LARISSA WATERS: Look, I wasn't part of that process, Sarah. That was a process that the party ran. SARAH FERGUSON: You must know the reasons that were underpinned it? LARISSA WATERS: I haven't read the documentation because here I am in parliament hoping to talk tomorrow about introducing a climate trigger into our environmental laws and fixing the gender inequalities in our tax system amongst other things. SARAH FERGUSON: Nonetheless, this is a significant figure in the Green movement in this country, the co-founder along with Bob Brown, both Bob Brown and Christine Milne want Drew Hutton to be restored to the party, but you haven't taken the time to read the complaint against him and why he's been expelled? LARISSA WATERS: Well, like me, they respect his environmental achievements and, you know, I think hard-pressed to find anyone who doesn't feel that way about his contribution over the decades but this was a decision that was reviewed by the party, taken by volunteer party members, many of whom uphold the Code of Conduct on a regular basis. It's not hard to uphold the Code of Conduct. SARAH FERGUSON: He's got a description there of the way the disciplinary system works in the party. He's calling it committees that come in with a very fixed view, with closed language, closed beliefs. Do you recognise those descriptions? LARISSA WATERS: Oh, that's not the experience that many others have. It's certainly not the experience that I have had of my party and like I said as the parliamentary leader, my focus here is how we can use the parliament to try to help people and help the planet, and those party matters have been dealt with by our party on the weekend. SARAH FERGUSON: Is a member of the Greens party free to question the Greens' policy on transgender rights? LARISSA WATERS: Well, look, parties are involved in, and our members are involved in formulating those very policies and those debates happen on a regular basis. SARAH FERGUSON: You have a position, are people now free to question the policy that the Greens arrived at? LARISSA WATERS: Look, it's not obligatory to be a Greens member, people can question what they like and they'll form their own view ... SARAH FERGUSON: Within the Greens. LARISSA WATERS: ...on whether those values match their own. And we love involvement in the democratic process. SARAH FERGUSON: Is that debate allowed within the Greens because that's what he's saying. LARISSA WATERS: That's the process of policy review that occurs. That process occurs as a matter of course. People have those debates, but you do need to have those debates respectfully and that can be done, and it generally is done. SARAH FERGUSON: Now, are you saying that Drew Hutton didn't conduct that debate respectfully, is that the issue here? LARISSA WATERS: I believe that's the basis for which the party upheld the decision. SARAH FERGUSON: So, you do know something about the decision? LARISSA WATERS: I believe that's the basis on which the party made the decision. SARAH FERGUSON: So, the way in which he conducted the debate rather than its, the argument that he was making? LARISSA WATERS: Look, I think so, Sarah. Like I said, tomorrow I'm introducing a bill to try to fix the climate crisis and wanting the government to look at the gender inequalities in our tax system. Yeah, these are the things that I'm focused on, trying to actually help people in their daily lives. SARAH FERGUSON: Will you speak to Drew Hutton about what's happened? LARISSA WATERS: Um, look, I think I'll send a message to him perhaps through this program that we really respect the contribution that he's made to environmental advocacy in the past, and like many others, I'm sad that his focus isn't on those issues. SARAH FERGUSON: Is he welcome to come back to the party if he changes the ways he conducts his debate on this issue? LARISSA WATERS: It's not up to me and he may not wish to do that, but I wish him no harm. SARAH FERGUSON: Let's talk about this new parliament, just underway today. The government's round-table next month, I think your critical goal is women's economic empowerment. Now the Greens are not invited in the summit. How are you going to drive your desire for that to be central in the debate around tax reform if you're not there. LARISSA WATERS: Well, thankfully Sarah, we have got the sole balance of power in the Senate and so if the government wants a progressive pathway to do good things to help people, then here we are in the Senate saying we're ready to work with you. And one thing we do want them to focus on, either at the round-table or through legislation, both, is the fact that as a working parent, when you seek to go back to work, many women are finding, and finding a woman who hasn't experienced this, that when you go back to work, if you're working day two, three, four, the more days you work, the less you earn because of a weird combination of income tax, family tax benefits, child care subsidies, student debt repayment - this combination of tax settings that when put together for a secondary income earner, generally a mum who wants to go back to the workforce when she's ready to do that, it punishes women and it further sets women up for poverty in later life, and I think that is a gender inequity in our tax system and it is a productivity measure as well. The government could fix that and we're going to engage with them to try to do that. SARAH FERGUSON: And just briefly we know one of the early priorities of the government is going to be the government's proposed change to taxation of large superannuation balances over $3 million. Will you support them in the Senate to pass that legislation? LARISSA WATERS: Well, we'll be having some good discussions with the government on that matter and I'm optimistic of a good outcome there, but I'll have those discussions in private. SARAH FERGUSON: Larissa Waters, thank you very much indeed for joining us. LARISSA WATERS: Thanks for having me.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store