Project 18: India developing next-gen destroyer that can carry 144 missiles, including BrahMos, and track enemies 500 km away
The Indian Navy's Warship Design Bureau has introduced the P-18 next-generation destroyer concept, a significantly larger and more capable vessel than the Visakhapatnam-class destroyers. Displacing 13,000 tonnes, it features 144 vertical launch systems for diverse missiles, advanced radar systems for multi-domain operations, and a focus on indigenous content, enhancing India's naval power.
AI generated image of the project -18 destroyer. The Indian Navy is reportedly working on the Project 18 (P-18) next-generation destroyer, which is expected to significantly surpass the size and capabilities of the existing Visakhapatnam-class destroyers. With an estimated displacement of approximately 13,000 tonnes, the new vessel would be the largest in the Indian fleet and may be classified as a cruiser under international conventions, which apply to warships exceeding 10,000 tonnes. Speaking in December 2023, Vice Chief of Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Sanjay Jasjit Singh, stated, 'The Indian Navy has started work on building the next generation of more advanced and capable destroyers, and plans for these vessels are already on the drawing board.' The Visakhapatnam-class destroyers, currently the Navy's largest, displace around 7,450 tonnes and are fitted with 48 vertical launch systems (VLS). In comparison, the P-18 under development includes 144 VLS cells that will support a range of missiles for various mission roles.
The warship features four large active electronically scanned array (AESA) radars integrated into the superstructure. These are believed to be long-range multifunction radars developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO). The radar suite includes an S-band active array as the primary radar, a volume search radar, and a multi-sensor mast, providing 360-degree surveillance and tracking of aerial and surface threats. The systems, jointly developed by DRDO and Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL), reportedly have a range exceeding 500 km. — nikhilhatesyou (@nikhilhatesyou)
The destroyer will carry a combination of missile systems across its 144 VLS cells:
32 cells at the stern are dedicated to the under-development PGLRSAM, a long-range surface-to-air missile with a range of 250 km, intended to intercept enemy aircraft and ballistic missile threats.
48 cells will house the BrahMos extended-range supersonic cruise missile and the Indigenous Technology Cruise Missile, both intended for anti-ship and land-attack missions.
64 cells are allocated for very short-range surface-to-air missiles, acting as the final defensive layer against aerial and anti-ship missile threats. At a press conference held ahead of Navy Day on 4 December 2023, Vice Admiral Singh stated, 'The broad timeframe is about five years from now. By then, we should be in a position to target the contract, and within five to 10 years, entire delivery.' The event was also attended by Navy Chief, Admiral R. Hari Kumar. The vessel is expected to feature a 75% of indigenous content under the Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative. It will be capable of operating two multi-role helicopters, launching autonomous underwater drones, and carrying out anti-submarine warfare operations.
As part of its long-term force development strategy, the Indian Navy is targeting a fleet size of 170 to 175 warships by 2035. The induction of the Project 18 destroyers is expected to contribute to this expansion, enhancing the Navy's capability in both defensive and offensive maritime operations.(Disclaimer: This article is based on social media post for informational purposes. ET.com has not independently verified the claims made in the post and does not vouch for their accuracy. The views expressed are those of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views of ET.com. Reader discretion is advised.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
'India not needed...': Finfluencer Akshat Shrivastava shares why the next 10 years will be tough for Indian stock markets
Synopsis Akshat Shrivastava warns that Indian stock markets may face challenges due to India's limited role in the global AI race. He argues that India lacks the advantages of cost-effectiveness or a premium consumer base, hindering its participation in the AI-driven economic transformation. This innovation gap, according to Shrivastava, will negatively impact India's relative economic standing and stock market performance. Agencies Indian markets Finance educator and content creator Akshat Shrivastava has said that Indian stock markets could face a challenging next decade, arguing that India does not have a meaningful role in the global artificial intelligence (AI) race. Shrivastava linked India's future economic and market performance to its relative position in global technological began by stating that economies are shaped by innovation cycles. From Dutch shipbuilding and the UK's Industrial Revolution to US-led factory automation, he said each major economic shift has been led by disruptive technology. 'Wealth does not appear out of thin air. It is systematically build on the back of technological innovation,' he to him, AI is now becoming that next core innovation shaping the global economy—comparable to the internet boom of the late 1990s. AI is driving transformations in energy, manufacturing, learning, and computing, he said, adding that with tools like large language models (LLMs), 'anyone can technically reap the benefits of coding, without being a coder.'Explaining the global innovation structure, Shrivastava referenced the 'hub and spoke' model, where a few countries act as innovation hubs while others operate as peripheral beneficiaries. In the past, India benefited from this structure by becoming a spoke in the US-led IT outsourcing boom. — Akshat_World (@Akshat_World) However, Shrivastava suggested India is missing out in the current wave. 'China and US: are in a AI race. China has already built massive energy reserves (US is catching up). US has already built massive tech reserves (and one could argue China is catching up). This is the new arms race,' he wrote. Shrivastava raised a direct question: 'Why is India needed in this AI race?' He dismissed three possible advantages—data harvesting, cost-effective infrastructure, and a large consumer market—as either already exhausted or ineffective in India's case.'Can we lower the cost for AI infrastructure? (we have very high cost of energy and poor leakages in infra; so we can't). We can't build giga-factories. This is the reason why our manufacturing sucks,' he wrote. On the demand side, he pointed out that 'getting users to pay 20$/month is a challenge for LLMs right now.'According to Shrivastava, India lacks both a cost advantage like China and a premium-paying consumer base like the US. 'So where does India fit in the AI race?' he asked, answering that the country may see isolated economic success stories but will fall behind in global comparison.'Now of course: as the world becomes more productive. India will benefit too. That's obvious. Standard of living will improve. But, 'compared' to other countries, it will fall,' he said. He blamed 'decades of regressive economic policies, unnecessary pride and inability to look at things rationally' for the current concluded that this innovation gap will reflect in the markets. 'All this will reflect into the stock market. There is a reason why since 2020: FIIs have been consistently existing our markets,' he said, referring to foreign institutional investors reducing their positions in India. (Disclaimer: This article is based on a user-generated post on X for informational purposes. has not independently verified the claims made in the post and does not vouch for their accuracy. The views expressed are those of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views of Reader discretion is advised.)
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
WATCH: Google boss Sundar Pichai joins Harsha Bhogle in commentary box in Oval Test, video goes viral
Harsha Bhogle (L), Sundar Pichai (R) On Day 3 of India's final Test match against England at The Oval for the fifth Test, Google CEO Sundar Pichai made a surprise visit to the commentary box. With the match entering an entertaining stage, Pichai joined Harsha Bhogle, seasoned commentator, for a brief yet memorable few minutes on-air. Pichai is a huge cricket lover and he was in the commentary box during a crucial moment of India's second innings. Coincidentally, Indian all-rounder Washington Sundar was in the middle of a phenomenal innings at the exact time. This moment did not go unnoticed by the fans as Sundar mentioned how Sundar was batting. Harsha Bhogle took to social media to praise Pichai for his humility Harsha Bhogle later took to social media platform X (formerly twitter) to shower praise and wrote, 'I don't think I have been in a commentary box with a corporate leader of this stature. Loves cricket, is extraordinarily down-to-earth. #SundarPichai. I don't think I have been in a commentary box with a corporate leader of this stature. Loves cricket, is extraordinarily down-to-earth. #SundarPichai — Harsha Bhogle (@bhogleharsha) August 2, 2025 Though not a professional commentator, Pichai impressed the cricket fans with his calm and composed presence. He timed his pauses well during live action and contributed valuable input. In response to Bhogle's praise, Pichai playfully said, 'I'm sitting next to the best,' appreciating Bhogle Pichai lauded both the team while reflecting on the series Pichai also praised both the teams, looking back at the series. 'What a series it's been. Loved the fight between both teams. At this point, I'd put money on a 2-2.' Pichai said Talking about the match, Washington Sundar's sensational fifty from just 39 balls, which included four sixes and a couple of fours, had the Oval crowd on their feet. His aggressive batting helped India to a commanding score of 396 to give England a difficult target of 374 runs. Players had a great day with the bat. Yashasvi Jaiswal did the most damage with a brilliant 118. Akash Deep played a crucial knock of 66. Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar both had 53. After trailing by 23 runs in the first innings, Indian team were able to put up a total of 396 in the second innings, which set England an ambitious target of 374 runs with over two days left in the match.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'India not needed...': Finfluencer Akshat Shrivastava shares why the next 10 years will be tough for Indian stock markets
India's missed opportunity in the 'hub and spoke' model Live Events No major role for India in AI value chain, says Shrivastava 'We are nowhere close to becoming a hub of innovation' Implications for stock markets (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Finance educator and content creator Akshat Shrivastava has said that Indian stock markets could face a challenging next decade, arguing that India does not have a meaningful role in the global artificial intelligence (AI) race. Shrivastava linked India's future economic and market performance to its relative position in global technological began by stating that economies are shaped by innovation cycles. From Dutch shipbuilding and the UK's Industrial Revolution to US-led factory automation, he said each major economic shift has been led by disruptive technology. 'Wealth does not appear out of thin air. It is systematically build on the back of technological innovation,' he to him, AI is now becoming that next core innovation shaping the global economy—comparable to the internet boom of the late 1990s. AI is driving transformations in energy, manufacturing, learning, and computing, he said, adding that with tools like large language models (LLMs), 'anyone can technically reap the benefits of coding, without being a coder.'Explaining the global innovation structure, Shrivastava referenced the 'hub and spoke' model, where a few countries act as innovation hubs while others operate as peripheral beneficiaries. In the past, India benefited from this structure by becoming a spoke in the US-led IT outsourcing Shrivastava suggested India is missing out in the current wave. 'China and US: are in a AI race . China has already built massive energy reserves (US is catching up). US has already built massive tech reserves (and one could argue China is catching up). This is the new arms race,' he raised a direct question: 'Why is India needed in this AI race?' He dismissed three possible advantages—data harvesting, cost-effective infrastructure, and a large consumer market—as either already exhausted or ineffective in India's case.'Can we lower the cost for AI infrastructure? (we have very high cost of energy and poor leakages in infra; so we can't). We can't build giga-factories. This is the reason why our manufacturing sucks,' he wrote. On the demand side, he pointed out that 'getting users to pay 20$/month is a challenge for LLMs right now.'According to Shrivastava, India lacks both a cost advantage like China and a premium-paying consumer base like the US. 'So where does India fit in the AI race?' he asked, answering that the country may see isolated economic success stories but will fall behind in global comparison.'Now of course: as the world becomes more productive. India will benefit too. That's obvious. Standard of living will improve. But, 'compared' to other countries, it will fall,' he said. He blamed 'decades of regressive economic policies, unnecessary pride and inability to look at things rationally' for the current concluded that this innovation gap will reflect in the markets. 'All this will reflect into the stock market. There is a reason why since 2020: FIIs have been consistently existing our markets,' he said, referring to foreign institutional investors reducing their positions in India.(Disclaimer: This article is based on a user-generated post on X for informational purposes. has not independently verified the claims made in the post and does not vouch for their accuracy. The views expressed are those of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views of Reader discretion is advised.)
