logo
Stop being honorary, become accountable stewards: Sebi chief to directors

Stop being honorary, become accountable stewards: Sebi chief to directors

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has urged corporate boards to rethink their functioning, warning against treating governance as a box-ticking compliance exercise.
Speaking at the 2025 Annual Directors' Conclave organised by the Institute of Directors, Sebi Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey said independent directors can no longer be 'honorary appointees' or 'friendly critics' — they must evolve into active stewards of accountability.
'Governance should not be a checklist, but should be treated as breathing value,' Pandey said.
He noted that while boards often spend significant time poring over compliance packs, they rarely debate signals about organisational culture.
'Independent directors may have a seat at the table — but are they truly being heard, or merely counted? We have diversity on paper, but do we have diversity of thought?' he asked.
Pandey flagged the growing gap between how companies operate and how boards oversee them — citing examples such as start-ups going public with soaring valuations but no profit history, or AI models making pricing and hiring decisions.
'Markets are no longer driven purely by financials. Stakeholders now ask: What do you stand for? What are you doing for the planet, for your people and for the public trust?' he said, urging boards to have deeper conversations around succession planning and whistle-blower trends.
The Sebi chief pressed for diversification in independent director appointments — across experience, sectors and demographics — backed by ongoing orientation on AI governance, cyber threats and ESG disclosures.
'Independent directors must feel free to dissent. To question, if the information is not robust,' Pandey said.
He also advocated adopting digital tools to strengthen governance.
'Today's boards can and should demand real-time dashboards that provide meaningful insights — not just volumes of PDF reports. Imagine dashboards that track red-flag employee exits, whistle-blower complaints, ESG trends or vendor concentration risks — and bring them to the board's attention before they hit the news,' he said.
The board as a 'team of navigators'
Using a maritime analogy, Pandey likened companies to ships with the CEO as captain and the board as compass:
'…But imagine that ship not steered by one captain, but a team of navigators — each with different instruments, different vantage points, and a shared duty to keep the journey safe, legal and honourable. That team is the board,' he said.
Over the years, Pandey noted, Sebi has 'progressively deepened' its corporate governance framework, detailing requirements for board composition, independence and the operation of key committees — including audit, nomination and remuneration, and risk management.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What's driving the surge in IPOs among jewellery firms?
What's driving the surge in IPOs among jewellery firms?

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

What's driving the surge in IPOs among jewellery firms?

Mumbai: A slew of jewellery retail firms is set to tap the primary markets , with at least 10 companies lining up to raise money through initial public offerings (IPOs) over the next 3-6 months, according to people familiar with the matter. Bankers and industry officials said constraints on raising money through lenders, rich valuations and a thriving IPO market are prompting these companies to explore the public market route. Some firms have already filed their IPO documents with Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi). These include PNGS Reva Diamond Jewellery, backed by PN Gadgil & Sons, Chennai-based Lalithaa Jewellery Mart and Priority Jewels, a Mumbai-based jewellery manufacturer. Agencies Among the companies preparing to file their draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) are RiddiSiddhi Bullions Ltd (RSBL), Nagpur-based Rokde Jewellers and Shankesh Jewellers, Swarnshilp Chains & Jewellers, Royal Chains, and Waman Hari Pethe, according to investment bankers in the know. Emails and calls to these firms remained unanswered. "Jewellery companies are among the few consumer sub-sectors that are doing well in an otherwise sluggish consumer market," said Bhavesh Shah, managing director, head - Investment Banking , Equirus Capital. 'Investors recognise this trend and are willing to play even the regional brands, which have provided good returns to the shareholders. This is encouraging jewellery companies to consider tapping the capital markets given the capital needs of the business.' The Rs 820-crore IPO of Bluestone Jewellery & Lifestyle will open its IPO from August 11. Barring PNGS Reva, which is aiming to raise Rs 450 crore in the IPO, all the other companies plan to raise between Rs 1,000 crore and Rs 5,000 crore, said bankers. Executives at jewellery firms said IPOs have opened an alternative fundraising route to the tradtional avenues. 'The jewellery industry, once largely unorganised, is gradually becoming more structured but access to traditional financing remains a challenge for many players,' said Rajesh Rokde, promoter of Rokde Jewellers and chairman of All India Gems and Jewellery Domestic Council (GJC). 'Going public through an IPO provides an alternative route to raise capital and fund business expansion.' Industry officials said the jewellery sector faces several barriers when it comes to securing traditional bank finance. Many firms operate with high inventory levels in the form of gold and diamonds, which see sharp price swings and are under regulatory scrutiny

Market intermediaries liable for investor losses due to financial default: Consumer court
Market intermediaries liable for investor losses due to financial default: Consumer court

Time of India

time5 hours ago

  • Time of India

Market intermediaries liable for investor losses due to financial default: Consumer court

Chandigarh: In a significant ruling reinforcing accountability in capital markets, a consumer panel in Chandigarh awarded damages against market intermediaries for losses suffered by a retail investor stemming from financial default and bankruptcy. The order has wider ramifications as it is perhaps the first case in the country where the consumer court awarded damages for deficiency in service and illegal trade practice against market intermediaries for a financial default. The commission held that the debenture trustee is not merely to hold a nominal position but to act as an active protector of the interests of debenture holders, especially in instances of default. The failure to initiate enforcement measures, secure the charged assets, or communicate timely with stakeholders constitutes a serious breach of trust. "The responsibilities of a debenture trustee, as per SEBI regulations and the trust deed, are not passive or discretionary in nature; they are proactive, fiduciary duties requiring timely intervention, continuous monitoring, and swift redressal in the face of any breach, default, or delay by the issuer," the commission held. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World Undo Justice Raj Shekhar Attri, president, and Rakesh K Arya, member of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh, passed these orders while allowing an appeal filed by Jyoti Khemka, a resident of Sector-19 Chandigarh. In this case, the complainant invested Rs 3,42,000 in 342 secured non-convertible debentures (NCDs) of DHFL issued under a SEBI-approved public prospectus dated July 26, 2016. Among the opposite parties, Catalyst Trusteeship Limited acted as debenture trustee, Credit Analysis and Research Limited, and BrickWorks Rating India acted as credit rating agencies, assigning a top-tier 'AAA' rating. The NCDs matured on Aug 16, 2019, with an expected annual interest of Rs 31,464. In early 2018, market speculation arose about DHFL's financial instability. Despite this, Credit Analysis and Research Limited and BrickWorks Rating India maintained the 'AAA' rating until an abrupt downgrade to 'D' in Feb 2019, just months before maturity. On Aug 16, 2019, DHFL defaulted in redeeming the principal and interest of Rs 3,73,464. Counsel for the complainant, advocate Shreenath A Khemka alleged that Catalyst Trusteeship failed to enforce security or maintain mandatory reserves under the Debenture Trust Deed, the Companies Act, 2013, and SEBI (Debenture Trustees) Regulations, 1993, and that Credit Analysis and Research and BrickWorks Rating India misled investors by unjustifiably maintaining high ratings without due diligence, contrary to the SEBI (Credit Rating Agencies) Regulations, 1999. Responding to the plea, Catalyst Trusteeship contended that it fulfilled its trustee duties, acted promptly upon defaults, and that payment obligations rested solely with the DHFL. It pointed out that the complainant already received Rs 1,68,584 under DHFL's IBC resolution plan. Other parties, including Credit Analysis and BrickWorks Rating, argued that ratings were professional opinions, not investment advice or guarantees, and that market events could be unpredictable. The Piramal Capital (earlier DHFL) and SEBI did not contest the complaint at this stage. After hearing all the parties, the commission held that the inertia displayed by opposite party Catalyst Trusteeship amounts to an abdication of its statutory role, which caused grave and irretrievable harm to the complainant-debenture-holders' interest. Regarding Credit Analysis and Research Limited and BrickWorks Rating India (opposite parties-2 and 3), the commission found the sudden downgrade from 'AAA' to 'D' without intermediate warnings indicative of either negligent or reckless rating practices. Evidence showed DHFL's liquidity crisis from Sept 2018 was not reflected in the ratings, breaching Regulation 13 of the SEBI (Credit Rating Agencies) Regulations, 1999, and Enhanced Disclosure Guidelines of 2018, the commission held. The commission also held that the rating agencies' inaction perpetuated informational asymmetry, misleading retail investors and constituting deficiency in service and unfair trade practice. The commission directed Catalyst Trusteeship to pay Rs 2,04,880 with 9% simple interest from Aug 16, 2019. The CARE Ratings and Brickwork Ratings were to pay Rs 1,00,000 each as compensation for deficient service and unfair trade practice, and all three parties were to pay Rs 33,000 towards litigation costs. MSID:: 123238102 413 | Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.

Upcoming IPO: Mumbai-based Powerica files draft papers with Sebi to raise  ₹1,400 crore via public issue. Details here
Upcoming IPO: Mumbai-based Powerica files draft papers with Sebi to raise  ₹1,400 crore via public issue. Details here

Mint

time8 hours ago

  • Mint

Upcoming IPO: Mumbai-based Powerica files draft papers with Sebi to raise ₹1,400 crore via public issue. Details here

Upcoming IPO: Mumbai-based power solutions provider, Powerica Ltd, filed its preliminary draft papers with the capital markets regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), on Monday, 11 August 2025. The company aims to raise ₹ 1,400 crore from the Indian stock market through the public issue. Powerica is offering a book-built public issue comprising a fresh issue of equity shares up to ₹ 700 crore with a face value of ₹ 5 apiece, along with an offer for sale (OFS) component of shares up to ₹ 490 crore by Naresh Oberoi Family Trust, and ₹ 210 crore by Kabir and Kimaya Family Private Trust, the promoter selling stakeholder of the public issue. According to the company disclosure, the ₹ 525 crore of the proceeds from the public issue will be used to pay off certain loans taken by the firm, while the rest of the funds will be utilised for general corporate purposes. The company also may consider a pre-IPO placement of ₹ 140 crore, if this goes through then the fresh issue component size will be reduced accordingly. The company's draft papers showed that Powerica will allot not more than 50% of the offer to the qualified institutional buyers (QIBs), not more than 15% to the non-institutional investors (NIIs), and 35% will be allocated to the retail investors. Powerica Ltd. is a power solutions provider incorporated in 1994. The company is involved in the generator set business, providing end-to-end power solutions in standby and prime power applications. The company has clients in various sectors including commercial (hospitality, healthcare, banking and financial services industry – banks, education, residential and other real estate), infrastructure (retail infrastructure, logistics, railways and metros), manufacturing (industrial, process industries, dairy), agriculture (including cold storage and aquaculture), information technology/data centres, government and defense, and rentals, according to the official data. The company owns and operates three manufacturing facilities located in Bengaluru, Karnataka; Silvassa, Dadra and Nagar Haveli; and Khopoli, Maharashtra. Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store