Kava Coalition Statement on the Safety and Legal Protection of Kava in the United States
Recent court actions, including the decision in Kavasutra v. Adams, relied on outdated and discredited allegations of liver toxicity from a 2002 German case. That case, and others like it, have long been dismissed by the scientific community as flawed and unsupported by credible evidence. In the more than two decades since, peer-reviewed research and decades of safe consumption have shown no causal link between kava beverages and liver harm.
Kava has been consumed safely in the United States for over 100 years, both as part of the cultural heritage of the people of Hawaii and American Samoa, and among the broader Pacific Island diaspora. Its traditional preparation, which is cold-water extraction of the peeled root, has been practiced in the South Pacific for over 3,000 years, with no evidence of harm when consumed in its customary form. Additionally, extractions of kava using CO₂ have shown no evidence of harm.
The recent judicial determination that kava prepared at kava bars is unsafe and considered an adulterated product stands in stark contradiction to the accepted treatment of other botanicals that are routinely steeped in water and sold as teas, such as moringa, hibiscus, chamomile, and countless other herbal infusions, none of which are classified as unsafe or adulterated when prepared in this way. Singling out kava for this treatment ignores both scientific evidence and longstanding cultural practices.
The American Herbal Products Association (AHPA) Botanical Safety Handbook, available at kavacoalition.org/ahpa-botanical-safety-handbook, affirms kava's long history of safe use. The updated edition distinguishes between traditional kava, which is water-based extracts, and contemporary kava products, which use organic-based extraction methods. It notes that the association between liver injury and organic-based methods is tenuous at best, and that poor quality control - such as use of inappropriate plant parts, improper extraction methods, combinations with chemical additives, and improper drying - may be the real culprits in past safety concerns.
The handbook's safety review includes all human clinical trial results and finds that liver injury is extremely rare and only tenuously correlated to kava. It also documents kava's use as a food in the United States prior to 1958, including documented sales in the 1915 Sears catalog, demonstrating that its presence in American commerce predates modern food additive laws. While the FDA does not currently recognize kava as GRAS, the Hawaii State Department of Health has formally rejected that position and declared kava GRAS in Hawaii, a status also recognized and granted one year earlier in Michigan State.
Importantly, in March 2025, the United States Food and Drug Administration confirmed in written correspondence that 'a tea produced from kava and water alone is considered a single-ingredient conventional food' and 'would generally not be regulated as a food additive if the tea is consumed as food.' This position, consistent with prior FDA communications and the agency's 2023 adoption of the Codex Alimentarius Regional Standard for Kava Products, makes clear that traditional kava beverages are not prohibited under federal law when prepared with water alone.
Federal law clearly recognizes kava, when steeped in water, as a food under 21 U.S.C. § 321(f). Attempts by state or municipal authorities to redefine kava as an adulterant directly conflict with federal jurisdiction over food and are subject to preemption under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.
The Kava Coalition will continue to support kava bars and other businesses serving traditionally prepared kava as a single-ingredient beverage. We will challenge regulatory overreach, defend against misinformation, and protect the rights of Pacific Islanders and all Americans to enjoy this important part of our shared cultural heritage.
Kava is more than a beverage. It is a tradition, a livelihood, and a bridge between cultures. We intend to see it treated in law as it has been in history: as a safe, respected, and protected food.
About Kava Coalition
Kava Coalition is an alliance of kava consumers, experts, and industry leaders committed to advancing kava education, advocacy, and choice. The Kava Coalition aims to empower informed decisions about kava, promoting responsible consumption while understanding the importance of preserving kava's history and cultural heritage. For more information, visit kavacoalition.org.
Media Contact
Patrick George
+1 916-202-1982
[email protected]
###
SOURCE: Kava Coalition
Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire
https://app.eznewswire.com/news/kava-coalition-statement-safety-legal-protection-united-states
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Could your voice reveal cancer before you know it? Scientists say AI might soon make it possible
A simple voice recording could one day help doctors spot early signs of throat cancer, according to new research. In a study published in Frontiers in Digital Health, scientists found that artificial intelligence (AI) could potentially detect abnormal growths on the vocal cords, from benign nodules to early-stage laryngeal cancer, by analysing short voice recordings. The findings could support efforts to find an easier, faster way to diagnose cancerous lesions on the vocal cords, also known as folds. 'With this dataset we could use vocal biomarkers to distinguish voices from patients with vocal fold lesions from those without such lesions,' said Phillip Jenkins, the study's lead author and a postdoctoral researcher in clinical informatics at Oregon Health and Science University in the United States. Related Experimental vaccine to fight cancer prompts immune response for some patients in small trial Why early detection of throat cancer matters Cancer of the voice box, or larynx, affects more than a million people worldwide and kills roughly 100,000 every year. It is the 20th most common cancer in the world. Smoking, alcohol use, and certain strains of HPV (human papillomavirus) are key risk factors, and survival rates vary from around 35 per cent to 90 per cent depending on how early the disease is diagnosed, according to Cancer Research UK. One of the most common warning signs for laryngeal cancer is hoarseness or changes in the voice that last more than three weeks. Other symptoms include a persistent sore throat or cough, difficulty or pain when swallowing, a lump in the neck or throat, and ear pain. Early detection of laryngeal cancer is crucial because it significantly improves survival rates and treatment outcomes. Related AI battled doctors in a live showdown to diagnose patients. Who came out on top? Yet current diagnostic methods, including nasal endoscopies and biopsies, are invasive, uncomfortable, and often slow, requiring specialist equipment and expertise that many patients struggle to access quickly. Developing a simple tool to flag early signs of vocal fold abnormalities through a quick voice recording could transform how throat cancer is detected – making it faster, more affordable and accessible to a wider population. The next steps for AI-driven diagnosis The research team examined about 12,500 voice recordings from 306 people across North America. They looked for subtle acoustic patterns, such as changes in pitch, loudness, and harmonic clarity. The team identified clear differences for men in the harmonic-to-noise ratio and pitch between those with healthy voices, benign lesions, and cancer. No significant patterns were found in women, but the researchers say this may be due to the smaller dataset. Related New AI tool is better than doctors at diagnosing complicated medical issues, Microsoft says Jenkins said that the results indicate large datasets "could soon help make our voice a practical biomarker for cancer risk in clinical care'. The next step is to train AI models on larger, professionally labelled datasets and test them in clinical settings. The team would also need to test the system to make sure it works well for both men and women, he said. 'Voice-based health tools are already being piloted," Jenkins said. "Building on our findings, I estimate that with larger datasets and clinical validation, similar tools to detect vocal fold lesions might enter pilot testing in the next couple of years".


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
An Unexpected Clue To How Metformin, The World's Top Diabetes Drug, Works
Metformin is an unassuming hero of modern medicine. For more than sixty years, this humble pill has been a mainstay of diabetes care, helping millions of people manage their blood sugar. It lowers blood sugar, improves cholesterol, modestly reduces weight, and is so safe it's prescribed to millions worldwide. And yet, for decades, scientists haven't fully understood how it works. The standard explanation has long been that metformin works in the liver, reducing how much sugar it sends into the bloodstream. It also helps muscles and fat cells respond more effectively to insulin. More recent research added other suspects: the gut, which can tweak hormones and the microbiome, and a cellular pathway called mTOR, a major regulator of metabolism and longevity. But a new study published in Science Advances suggests that part of metformin's magic might be happening somewhere unexpected: in the brain. The Blood Sugar Command Center Researchers turned their attention to a protein called Rap1, found in a small pocket of the brain known as the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH). This area is a metabolic mission control, coordinating hunger, energy use, and glucose balance. When scientists switched off Rap1 in this brain region in mice, blood sugar levels fell, even without metformin. But when they kept Rap1 switched on, metformin lost its blood-sugar-lowering power. The results hint that, at the doses typically prescribed, metformin may partly work by silencing Rap1's activity in the brain, not just by acting on the liver or gut. Most of us think of blood sugar control as the domain of the pancreas, liver, and muscles. Yet the brain is deeply involved. The VMH works like an air traffic controller, taking in information from across the body and sending out signals to adjust glucose production and use. Metformin, it seems, may be tapping into this high-level control system. By dialing down Rap1 activity, the drug might trigger a cascade of neural instructions that ripple out to the rest of the body, improving how tissues handle sugar. Beyond Diabetes Metformin has drawn attention far beyond the diabetes world. It's being studied for its potential to slow certain aspects of aging, with researchers probing whether its effects on pathways like mTOR could help extend not just lifespan but healthspan. The discovery of the brain-Rap1 link opens new possibilities. Could this same circuit be part of metformin's longevity effects? If so, drugs that target Rap1 or its related pathways might someday offer more precise ways to improve metabolism or promote healthy aging, perhaps without some of metformin's side effects. When Old Drugs Tell New Tales This does not mean discarding what is already known about metformin's effects on the liver, muscles, and gut. Those mechanisms are still in play. But at everyday doses, the brain may have a starring role in how the drug works. At much higher doses, peripheral mechanisms can take over, but in real-world clinical use, the brain's contribution could be key. The finding is also a reminder that the brain and body are not separate actors in the story of metabolism. They are in constant conversation, adjusting and responding to keep systems in balance. And as this research shows, an old drug can reveal something entirely new about that conversation. Even after six decades, metformin still has secrets to share: secrets that may change how both the medicine itself and the intricate links between the brain, the body, and health are understood.


Fox News
3 hours ago
- Fox News
Man 'wanted a cheeseburger' but French girlfriend made him eat healthy meals, he said
A French woman's homemade dinner sparked fury from her American boyfriend who wanted a burger instead, according to a viral post. The woman said she moved from France to the U.S. two years ago and has dealt with digestive issues since, according to her Reddit posting. "For some reason, the food here makes me sick," she wrote. "My body seems to struggle to digest it." "Whether it's takeout or fancy restaurant food … I can't go to the bathroom for days, or I'm violently vomiting," the woman added. The expat consulted medical professionals and, after multiple tests, was told that her body was probably "not used to the amount of salt and preservatives" in American food. After incorporating more whole foods into her diet, her health improved, she said. She wrote that she began meal-prepping and cooking meals from scratch. "My dad is actually a chef back home, so he was more than happy to send me some recipes to keep my diet interesting," she said. But one of her recipes – a "delicious" vegetarian lasagna made from scratch – caught the ire of her American partner. When he asked what was for dinner, the boyfriend "rolled his eyes" when he found out it was lasagna, the woman wrote. "[H]e was sick of 'that organic crap' and wanted a cheeseburger," she recounted. "The comment hurt." She said he told her that "it was unfair to 'make' him eat my diet." The woman also clarified that she intended no ill will toward Americans and said she enjoys living here – and those who shared comments mostly sided with her. "You are not responsible for feeding a grown man because he doesn't want to put in the effort," one of the top comments read. While most commenters supported her, some questioned whether the post was even real. "Because this totally happened, what in the world have you been eating since you've been in the U.S.?" one person questioned. "In today's America, it is not compulsory for the woman to cook her boyfriend or husband a meal every night." Carole Lieberman, M.D., a psychiatrist based in Beverly Hills, California, told Fox News Digital the Reddit poster appears to have "excellent taste in food, but bad taste in boyfriends." She added, "In today's America, it is not compulsory for the woman to cook her boyfriend or husband a meal every night – and certainly not a meal that the woman can't eat herself. Many couples share meal preparation duties and even enjoy it." Lieberman, who lived in France for years, also attested that the food is generally better than what most Americans eat. "The problem is that your boyfriend has come to expect home-cooked meals every night because you have spoiled him," she observed, speaking to the woman who shared her story. "He feels entitled to dictate the menu as well." "Perhaps you should remind him that there are many American men who would be delighted to have a French girlfriend cook for them." Lieberman encouraged the Redditor to reevaluate her relationship. "Perhaps you should remind him that there are many American men who would be delighted to have a French girlfriend cook for them, regardless of whether she's making vegetarian lasagna or veal escalope."