AVF and ErgoAV Merge to Expand Innovative AV Accessories and Mounting Solutions
SHROPSHIRE, England — Renowned British pioneer of AV mounting solutions AVF and fast-growing AV accessories and ergonomics brand ErgoAV today announced their merger, marking a momentous milestone and paving the way for continued growth and innovation for both companies. Consumers in global markets now benefit from an even broader choice of AV solutions and accessories, as both brands will bring in each other's products to their primary markets.
Article content
AVF is an established industry leader in TV wall mounts, TV stands, and a wide range of AV furniture. Founded in 1977, the company has since become one of the largest AV mount and furniture brands in the UK.
Article content
'AVF is excited to join forces with ErgoAV, which will significantly expand our portfolio for both retail and commercial channels,' said Simon West, Managing Director of AVF.
US-based ErgoAV has been building a name for itself since late 2022 with its innovative and ergonomically designed TV mounts, AV furniture, and smart office solutions—all by a team of known industry veterans with multi-decades of experience. ErgoAV is the US subsidiary of parent company Bestqi, one of the world's largest TV mount manufacturers, selling over five million units annually. The company had acquired AVF in June 2025, with the goal to enhance both brands' AV and office product offerings through combined expertise and leveraging Bestqi's R&D and manufacturing capabilities.
Article content
'The AVF, ErgoAV and Bestqi teams have collectively sold over 100 million TV mounts worldwide,' Henry Lyu, CEO of ErgoAV and Bestqi, shared. 'By merging ergonomics, smart home solutions, and thoughtful design, we aim to enhance every space with comfort, style, and next-generation innovation.'
Article content
AVF and ErgoAV will retain their distinct brand identities while introducing each other's AV solutions, accessories, and furniture to the global market. This strategic synergy expands consumer choices, delivering creative and versatile options for modern homes and smart work spaces.
Article content
About ErgoAV
Article content
Led by a respected team of industry veterans, ErgoAV offers an innovative, ergonomic take on TV mounts, AV solutions, and accompanying accessories and furniture by seamlessly uniting form and function. Designed to enhance viewing and working experiences in any setup, whether home or office, ErgoAV's products optimize any space and provide endless possibilities with layout and viewing flexibility.
Article content
.
Article content
About AVF
Article content
Founded in 1977, AVF has grown to become a leading AV mount brand in the UK and one of the world's leading suppliers of TV wall mounts and stylish TV stands. The company is known for its products' strength, durability, ease of installation, and design—all of which are continuously improved on and upgraded to align with market trends and user needs.
Article content
Article content
Article content
Article content
Article content
Article content
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
11 hours ago
- CTV News
$10K in damages after morning residential fire
The London Fire Department attended a residential fire in the 200 block of Middleton Avenue on Aug. 15, 2025. (Source: London Fire Department) Early Friday morning, the London Fire Department attended a residential fire in the 200 block of Middleton Avenue. Fire crews were able to contain the fire, and officials say early detection due to working smoke alarms prevented serious injury. The damage is estimated at $10,000. LFD is reminding residents that charging devices on soft surfaces can overheat and cause fires.
Globe and Mail
12 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
WKHS Stock Alert: Halper Sadeh LLC Is Investigating Whether the Merger of Workhorse Group Inc. Is Fair to Shareholders
Halper Sadeh LLC, an investor rights law firm, is investigating whether the merger of Workhorse Group Inc. (NASDAQ: WKHS) and Motiv Electric Trucks is fair to Workhorse shareholders. Upon completion of the proposed transaction, Workhorse shareholders will own approximately 26.5% of the combined company. Halper Sadeh encourages Workhorse shareholders to click here to learn more about their legal rights and options or contact Daniel Sadeh or Zachary Halper at (212) 763-0060 or sadeh@ or zhalper@ The investigation concerns whether Workhorse and its board violated the federal securities laws and/or breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders by failing to, among other things: (1) obtain the best possible consideration for Workhorse shareholders; and (2) disclose all material information necessary for Workhorse shareholders to adequately assess and value the merger consideration. On behalf of Workhorse shareholders, Halper Sadeh LLC may seek increased consideration for shareholders, additional disclosures and information concerning the proposed transaction, or other relief and benefits. We would handle the action on a contingent fee basis, whereby you would not be responsible for out-of-pocket payment of our legal fees or expenses. Halper Sadeh LLC represents investors all over the world who have fallen victim to securities fraud and corporate misconduct. Our attorneys have been instrumental in implementing corporate reforms and recovering millions of dollars on behalf of defrauded investors. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Globe and Mail
17 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Court ruling on Indigenous claim creates uncertainty around land ownership
On a stretch of the south arm of the Fraser River, in the Vancouver area, the Cowichan Tribes in centuries past had an annual summer fishing village, a place they defended with a warrior ethos against other Indigenous groups. But in the mid-1800s, the Cowichan – whose home territory is on Vancouver Island – were displaced from that village as the British took control and, after British Columbia joined Canada, the land was sold over the years. Today, the land is occupied by an array of owners. Part of the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority and other industrial operations are there. There's a golf course and private homes with small farms, along with a span of infrastructure such as roads and dikes. In a Globe and Mail analysis of property assessments, land and buildings in the area are worth more than $1.3-billion. On Aug. 8, the seeming solidity of land ownership was blown open by a major ruling from the B.C. Supreme Court that declared the Cowichan have Aboriginal title to the area in question. The lower court ruling vaulted unanswered questions in B.C. into the fore: what happens when Aboriginal title directly overlaps modern ownership of land under rights called fee simple? Andrew Coyne: To recognize aboriginal title is not to abolish property rights, but to uphold them Opinion: A land-claims ruling shakes the foundation of property rights in B.C. Justice Barbara Young noted that Aboriginal title is 'a prior and senior right to land' and said the question is not what happens to Aboriginal title after fee simple title is in place. 'The proper question is: what remains of fee simple title after Aboriginal title is recognized in the same lands?' the judge wrote. The potential provincewide implications of the judgment led to an immediate and aggressive response from the B.C. provincial government. After the court decision landed, Premier David Eby spoke of the crucial economic importance of clear title in property ownership, and last Monday the province announced it would appeal and seek a stay of the ruling. Companies such as Canadian Tire, Euro Asia Transload and Westport Intermodal, which have operations on the land, did not respond to requests for comment. Kash Heed, a Richmond city councillor and former provincial solicitor-general, said uncertainty has stoked anxiety among some owners in the area. 'They're in a world of, 'We're not sure what's going to happen to our property,'' said Mr. Heed. 'Which they feel they rightfully own.' The ruling, after an epic trial that spanned five years, made several other declarations beyond Aboriginal title. One was on fishing rights. Another said land titles held by the federal government and the city of Richmond were 'invalid' – a finding the judge suspended for 18 months so the various sides could negotiate. Private land titles were excluded from the declaration of invalidity but, regardless, now exist in a legal limbo. The Cowichan this week said they do not aim to displace private land owners and have previously said they'd expect compensation from governments for private land on their territory. The court decision effectively said the situation for private landowners is unchanged until it changes. Private ownership is 'valid until such a time as a court may determine otherwise or until the conflicting interests are otherwise resolved through negotiation,' Justice Young wrote. How that is figured out is 'not a matter for this court to address.' For now, some are in wait-and-see mode. Harry Hogler, a local resident and co-owner of the Country Meadows Golf Course, told The Canadian Press he wasn't worried about the court ruling but declined an interview. Geoff Plant, a former provincial attorney-general who worked on treaty negotiations and is a lawyer for one of the defendants against the Cowichan, said for a long time, private landowners in B.C. were told there was nothing to worry about, even as claims of Aboriginal title advanced in talks with government, in the courts and in court decisions. 'The average person should now start paying attention to this question more closely,' said Mr. Plant. Negotiations are likely the best way forward, he said. One example is last year's deal between B.C. and the Haida Nation. It granted the nation Aboriginal title to all of Haida Gwaii, islands in the province's northwest, while the Haida agreed to leave privately owned lands unchanged and under B.C. authority. Indigenous rights expert and law professor Dwight Newman, at the University of Saskatchewan, said governments are in a challenging spot as they try to negotiate deals and defend cases in court. What happens next in the Cowichan case is 'a giant legal question.' In the appeal courts process, Prof. Newman said judges will consider a wider spectrum of legal thinking than at the trial level. 'Courts are going to have to come up with something that makes sense and that's also practical and somehow tries to respect everyone's interests,' he said. The federal government has offered only minimal comment on the case. In a statement, the government said it is looking at the implications of the decision to 'determine how best to move forward.' Mr. Heed said the appeal courts will take a sharp eye at the initial ruling, which he argued was somewhat convoluted and disjointed. 'We know this is going to end up at the Supreme Court,' he said. 'We are several years away from any finality on this.'
