Dresden locals, First Nations take landfill fight to Queen's Park
The chair of a local advocacy group says the community feels betrayed by the decision to cancel an environmental assessment for the landfill just north of Dresden, a small rural farming community in southwestern Ontario.
Stefan Premdas, the head of the group, questioned how the project got singled out in a controversial omnibus bill introduced by Premier Doug Ford's government.
The Liberals have asked the integrity commissioner to look into whether the government gave the project preferential treatment because it's backed by lucrative Progressive Conservative donors.
Ford says he doesn't know the developer and didn't look at who owned the project.
Story continues below advertisement
He says Ontario sends about 40 per cent of its waste to the United States and President Donald Trump could turn it away if trade disputes were to escalate.
'It takes one phone call from President Trump to say cut us off, and then what do we do? We have to be prepared. It's an existing site, we need to expand it,' Ford told reporters on Tuesday.
York1, the company behind the project, is seeking to revive a small dormant landfill and expand it to service waste from across the province.
Municipal officials have suggested the company is relying on outdated approvals, granted decades ago, to try to bypass a full environmental assessment of a project that would turn an area less than a kilometre north of Dresden into one of Ontario's busiest waste sites.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The company did not respond to a request for comment.
Details of the developers' donations and lobbying efforts were first reported by The Trillium, a Queen's Park-based news outlet, and were cited by the Liberals in their letter to the integrity commissioner.
The Trillium reported that executives at the companies and their family members had donated about $200,000 to the PCs since 2018.
The Canadian Press has corroborated some of those political contributions recorded in a public Elections Ontario database.
Story continues below advertisement
Under the developer's proposal, a small landfill dating back to the 1960s that holds 40,000 cubic metres could expand to a total of 1.6 million cubic metres, enough to fill almost 650 Olympic-sized swimming pools.
Officials have said the company also wants to establish waste processing stations to receive up to 6,000 tonnes of waste per day, even though existing permits for the property dating back to 1998 only allow for a tiny fraction of that amount.
Locals fear any leaching from the landfill could be disastrous for the area waterways and endangered species, and balk at the site's proximity to homes and schools.
The property is also surrounded by prime agricultural land and the water around the site streams into the Sydenham River, home to some endangered species, including the spiny softshell turtle.
An environmental assessment would have had to consider alternative designs or locations for the project.
Chief Leela Thomas of Walpole Island First Nation, whose reserve is just downstream of the project, says the government's backtracking not only threatens local biodiversity, but violates 'the spirit and intent' of Ontario's commitment to environmental protections.
'What message is the government sending when it is willing to trade away clean water, community safety, and climate resilience for the convenience of avoiding proper review and consent?' she said.
Story continues below advertisement
The province initially announced in March 2024 it would pursue an environmental assessment for the project, citing community concerns. Shortly after that, the premier called a byelection in the local riding of Lambton-Kent-Middlesex, where the successful PC candidate Steve Pinsonneault campaigned against the expansion.
Then, in a surprise move, the government proposed to cancel that assessment as part of the omnibus Bill 5 introduced last month.
Pinsonneault's office has not responded to a request for comment.
NDP Leader Marit Stiles claimed the government never intended to keep its promise to Dresden residents.
'This government will always promise anything and everything during an election, and then they turn around and break their promise,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
an hour ago
- National Observer
How Mark Carney and the baby boomers can save Canada
Mark Carney owes his unlikely election victory in April to a variety of factors, from Donald Trump's repeated threats against Canada's sovereignty to Pierre Poilievre's repeated failure to take them seriously. But more than anything, perhaps, he owes it to the baby boomers, who voted for his Liberals in such overwhelming numbers that it prevented what many — myself included — felt was an inevitable victory for the Conservatives. Carney might be tempted to reward them a new tax credit, more generation-specific spending or some other predictable political bauble. But if he wants to be a genuinely transformational leader, one who fundamentally alters the economic and political trajectory of Canada rather than merely maintaining it, he has to do more than just cater to their needs. Instead, he ought to challenge the most self-interested generation in history to step up for their country — elbows and all — and make a sacrifice. As Gen Squeeze has noted, rising Old Age Security costs are roughly equivalent to the entire federal deficit — and many of those recipients live in households with more than $100,000 in annual income. By reducing payments to those affluent retirees and closing a couple of tax loopholes that disproportionately benefit wealthy seniors, the federal government could free up $14 billion every year. That's enough to lift every senior in Canada out of poverty, shrink the federal deficit, and create a new funding stream for young people that supports childcare, lowers their income taxes, or brings down tuition fees, among other ideas. Yes, this is politically treacherous terrain. Just look at the vitriol and venom in the comments on a recent Global story on the Gen Squeeze proposal, accusing the group of everything from waging intergenerational warfare to inviting outright communism. But if only Richard Nixon could go to China, maybe only Mark Carney can risk offending the boomers and still survive the fallout. In the last federal election they gave him an enormous deposit of political capital. Now it's time to spend it. After all, as bad as Canada's finances might be right now, they're only going to get worse as the boomers keep aging. According to the Office of the Chief Actuary, Old Age Security payments are going to rise from an estimated $77.8 billion in 2023 to $136.6 billion in 2035. And as Canada's population continues to skew older, with smaller families and fewer children being born, the ratio of workers to retirees will only continue to grow. That means an ever-growing proportion of the average citizen's taxes will go towards Old Age Security, healthcare, and other senior-oriented programs. Maybe AI can bail us out here, although the odds of large technology companies paying significantly higher taxes on anything seem about as good as you or I winning the lottery. And in the absence of that sort of shared windfall, the demographic math we're staring at here has a lot of the characteristics of a ponzi scheme — one where existing participants are paid out with funds collected from newer ones. That's how Don Wright, who served as BC's deputy minister to the Premier, cabinet secretary and head of the public service under John Horgan from 2017 through late 2020, described the situation in a recent Substack piece. 'The senior promise was established in the 1960s and 1970s, when the younger generations were significantly larger than the retired population. That proportion no longer exists. Furthermore, in the 1960s a person reaching the age of 65 could expect to live another 15 years; by 2023 that had been extended to 21 years.' The growing bill on Canada's so-called "senior promise" — the combination of Old Age Security, healthcare spending, and other senior-oriented benefits — threatens to bankrupt the country. Why Mark Carney can, and should, do something about it. That 'senior promise' was underwritten by math that should, in hindsight, have been almost immediately suspect. 'It would not be sufficient for the baby boom numbers to be reproduced over time,' Wright writes, 'but rather that each succeeding generation would need to be as much larger relative to the preceding generation as the baby boom generation was to the generation that preceded it.' That didn't happen. In retrospect, it couldn't possibly have happened. And now, we're left to clean up the mess — one that grows with each passing year. Mark Carney, more than any politician I can remember, has both the political capital and personal courage needed to do that. By forging an intergenerational compromise that sees older Canadians make certain sacrifices in order to help younger people, he could help Canada avert the sort of rightward shift among younger voters that's happening in almost every other Western democracy. In democracies around the world, from the United States and France to Poland, Portugal and Germany, voters under 40 have shifted noticeably to the right, driven by deteriorating material circumstances, a growing sense that they won't have the same opportunities as previous generations and politicians who are more than willing to echo — and amplify — those fears. As American pollster and political strategist Tom Rodriguez wrote for The Hill, ' if this unprecedented rightward trend continues, the identity of the West will be transformed for decades.' Averting this sort of rightward lurch among young voters isn't just about protecting the incumbent Liberal government. If anything, the safer political path for Carney would be to double down on his support among seniors, given their higher propensity for actually casting a ballot. But by deliberately and conspicuously fighting for the material interests of younger Canadians, and asking older ones to help pay the bill, Carney could help inoculate Canada against the toxic right-wing populism that's infecting much of the western world right now. If Carney needs help selling it to the Baby boomers, he might want to call on the words of John F. Kennedy. As Kennedy said in a famous 1962 speech delivered at Rice University, 'We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard….because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one we intend to win.' In other words, it's time for baby boomers in Canada to think less about what their country can do for them and more about what they can do for it.
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Carney welcomes European leaders joining Ukraine's Zelenskyy for Trump meeting
European and NATO leaders announced Sunday they will join President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Washington for talks with President Donald Trump on ending Russia's war in Ukraine, with the possibility of U.S. security guarantees now on the negotiating table. In a statement from Ottawa, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney immediately welcomed the move and revealed he had his own virtual meeting with Zelenskyy on Sunday. 'This approach is consistent with the principles of no decisions about Ukraine being taken without Ukraine and no decisions about Europe being taken without Europe, and the promotion of the long-term security of Ukraine, Europe, and the Euro-Atlantic community,' the Prime Minister's Office stated. 'Experience has shown that Russian President Putin cannot be trusted,' Carney's office added, saying that current diplomatic engagement must be reinforced 'by continued military and economic pressure on Russia to end its aggression.' Story continues below advertisement Carney's statements came as the leaders from Canada, France, Britain and Germany are rallying around the Ukrainian leader after his exclusion from Trump's summit on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Their pledge to be at Zelenskyy's side at the White House on Monday is an apparent effort to ensure the meeting goes better than the last one in February, when Trump berated Zelenskyy in a heated Oval Office encounter. 'The Europeans are very afraid of the Oval Office scene being repeated and so they want to support Mr. Zelenskyy to the hilt,' said retired French Gen. Dominique Trinquand, a former head of France's military mission at the United Nations. 'It's a power struggle and a position of strength that might work with Trump,' he said. Prime Minister Carney also pledged to intensify Canadian support for Ukraine, which was already boosted with $2 billion in new military support, a $2.3 billion loan through the G7 Extraordinary Revenue Acceleration Loans mechanism, and recent sanctions against Russia and 'its enablers.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Carney's statement also included a renewed joint call for Russia 'to immediately and unconditionally return Ukrainian children who have been unlawfully deported or forcibly transferred from Ukraine.' Special U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff said Sunday that Putin agreed at the meeting in Alaska with Trump to allow the U.S. and European allies to offer Ukraine a security guarantee resembling NATO's collective defense mandate as part of an eventual deal to end the 3 1/2-year war. Story continues below advertisement European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, speaking at a news conference in Brussels with Zelenskyy, said 'we welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine. And the 'Coalition of the willing' — including the European Union — is ready to do its share.' Von der Leyen was joined Sunday by French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in saying they will take part in Monday's talks at the White House, as will secretary-general of the NATO military alliance, Mark Rutte. The European leaders' demonstration of support could help ease concerns in Kyiv and in other European capitals that Ukraine risks being railroaded into a peace deal that Trump says he wants to broker with Russia. Neil Melvin, director of international security at the London-based Royal United Services Institute, said European leaders are trying to 'shape this fast-evolving agenda.' After the Alaska summit, the idea of a ceasefire appears all-but-abandoned, with the narrative shifting toward Putin's agenda of ensuring Ukraine does not join NATO or even the EU. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday that a possible ceasefire is 'not off the table' but that the best way to end the war would be through a 'full peace deal.' Putin has implied that he sees Europe as a hindrance to negotiations. He has also resisted meeting Zelenskyy in person, saying that such a meeting can only take place once the groundwork for a peace deal has been laid. Story continues below advertisement Speaking to the press after his meeting with Trump, the Russian leader raised the idea that Kyiv and other European capitals could 'create obstacles' to derail potential progress with 'behind-the-scenes intrigue.' For now, Zelenskyy offers the Europeans the 'only way' to get into the discussions about the future of Ukraine and European security, says RUSI's Melvin. However, the sheer number of European leaders potentially in attendance means the group will have to be 'mindful' not to give 'contradictory' messages, Melvin said. 'The risk is they look heavy-handed and are ganging up on Trump,' he added. 'Trump won't want to be put in a corner.' Although details remain hazy on what Article 5-like security guarantees from the U.S. and Europe would entail for Ukraine, it could mirror NATO membership terms, in which an attack on one member of the alliance is seen as an attack on all. In remarks made on CNN's 'State of the Union,' Witkoff said Friday's meeting with Trump was the first time Putin has been had heard to agree to such an arrangement. Zelenskyy continues to stress the importance of both U.S. and European involvement in any negotiations. 'A security guarantee is a strong army. Only Ukraine can provide that. Only Europe can finance this army, and weapons for this army can be provided by our domestic production and European production. But there are certain things that are in short supply and are only available in the United States,' he said at the press conference Sunday alongside Von der Leyen. Story continues below advertisement – with a file from Andrew McIntosh, Global News
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Skipping the U.S. and taking a vacation to East Coast this year? It will cost you
In September 2024, Natasha Beitman Brener and her husband decided to take a three-week vacation to Canada's East Coast. Beitman Brener, a lawyer in Kingston, Ont., spent about six months planning the trip, looking at various options to stay in Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. 'We are young, we don't have all the money in the world, we have a mortgage. So we went on this trip and we thought, 'oh, this will be affordable compared to something like Japan' . … We were going to cook our own food,' she said in a recent interview. They rented a recreational vehicle in Montreal for about $6,000, and between campground parking fees, gasoline, groceries, park passes, a round of golf, and a couple of dinners out, Beitman Brener said the total added up to $15,000. 'It was the most incredible trip. We loved it. It was worth it. It was incredible. The East Coast is so extraordinary,' she said. 'But it was $15,000 and we talked to our friend — they went to Japan for three weeks for the same price, with flights. And I said to my husband, 'well, we could have gone to Japan for the same price.'' Story continues below advertisement This year, as a trade war grinds on with the United States, Canadians who decide to vacation within their country are realizing their patriotism comes with a hefty price tag — and some are choosing to scale back their plans. For Alick Tsui, a St. John's, N.L., resident, a recent five-day, two-person trip to Port Rexton, N.L., cost him about $3,000. He is avoiding spending his dollars in the United States because of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war and comments of annexing Canada. But high prices are forcing him to cut costs for future trips in Canada. 'Before I would stay for four nights, now I may cut it down to three nights. But that won't change my plan to travel.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Tsui said he and his wife try to save money with 'economical' lunches from gas stations. 'But nighttime, we try to find whatever we can to have a good meal. Not expensive, but a good meal,' he said. The couple went to Vietnam and Thailand earlier this year for about 10 days; that trip cost about one-third the price that he usually pays for a week's vacation in Canada. Beitman Brener, meanwhile, says she wanted to take a mother-daughter vacation this month after the lawyer had some unexpected time off. The duo sought to travel within Canada on a budget of $3,000 for four nights and five days. They too are avoiding travelling to the United States. Story continues below advertisement She looked into several locations, including Quebec City and Manitoulin Island in Ontario, but — even with sharing a hotel or Airbnb room — their accommodation costs would have been about $3,000. Along with food and gas, the total would have been about $6,000, she said. They couldn't justify the cost so they chose to spend two nights at a boutique hotel in their hometown. The fact each vacation has to be planned down to every meal because of high costs has removed some of the joy of taking a spontaneous holiday in Canada, she said. A scan of individual round trip flights from Toronto to cities on the East Coast for the week of Aug. 18 -23 showed prices to Halifax ranging from around $700 for Flair Airlines to nearly $1,700 for WestJet; about $1,200 via Air Canada to $2,500 via Air Transat to St. John's; and between $1,500 and $3,000 on Air Canada to Charlottetown. A vehicle rental for five days the week of Aug. 18 -23 in Halifax, St. John's, and Charlottetown ranged from an average of $1,500 for an SUV to $1,000 for a sedan. For the week, hotel rooms in Halifax, St. John's and Prince Edward Island ranged from around $200 a night to $500. Richard Powers, associate professor at University of Toronto's Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, said two main reasons can help explain why travel within Canada is so expensive — lack of competition among airline services and fallout from COVID-19. Story continues below advertisement Airlines haven't reinstated some of routes they cut down at the height of the pandemic, he said. How long the fallout from COVID-19 will last is anybody's guess, Powers said. 'That's the million-dollar question.' When it comes to accommodation, he said the high prices can be blamed on minimal supply. 'I'm just booking Vancouver for the fall, and I'm having trouble finding a place for under $500 a night,' he said. 'That's a lot.' Restaurant bills in Canada add up — when compared with those in Europe — because of the tipping culture that adds 15 to 20 per cent for each meal, he said. With the push to support Canadian tourism, Powers said, people are willing to pay 'a bit of a premium.' 'How much premium is the question? And it's almost getting out of control.'
