logo
GOP runs into voter buzzsaw of criticism on Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

GOP runs into voter buzzsaw of criticism on Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

The Hilla day ago

Fresh off a huge victory in passing their 'big, beautiful bill' through the House, Republican lawmakers are finding that President Trump's agenda is a much tougher sell at home.
In a series of contentious town halls, rank-and-file Republicans seeking to promote the virtues of the massive domestic policy package have run into a buzzsaw of criticism from constituents leery that the legislation will do more harm than good.
Some of the critics are voicing concerns that the proposal cuts too deeply into federal programs that benefit Americans across party lines. Others are griping that the package piles trillions of dollars onto federal deficits, breaking an early promise from GOP leaders that the bill would help bring budgets closer to balance.
The pushback not only highlights the headaches facing Republican leaders battling to get Trump's domestic agenda to the president's desk this summer, but also forecasts the political challenges facing the GOP as it fights to keep control of the House in next year's midterms in the face of persistent attacks from Democrats, who like their odds of flipping the chamber and are vowing to make the 'big, beautiful bill' a central piece of their pitch to anxious voters.
Those tensions were all on full display in recent days in parts of the Midwest, where a pair of lawmakers staged town halls — a strategy GOP leaders have cautioned against — and got an earful from voters furious over the legislation.
In Nebraska, Rep. Mike Flood (R) faced a tsunami of misgivings about his vote in favor of the 'big, beautiful bill,' with voters asking about Medicaid changes; cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), known as food stamps; and how the package would pile on to the federal deficit.
'How do you justify extending the 2017 temporary tax cuts and offsetting that federal loss by cutting Medicaid and SNAP benefits — tax cuts [that are] expected to add $5 trillion to [the] deficit?' one participant asked.
One of the most viral moments from the event, however, came in response to a question about a small provision in the package that seeks to restrict federal judges' ability to hold government officials in contempt when they violate a court order. The language — a small paragraph in the 1,000-plus-page bill — flew largely under the radar ahead of the vote.
Asked about why he supported a bill with those terms, Flood said it was 'unknown' to him when he cast his vote — a signal that he did not read the full bill before formally weighing in on the matter.
'I am not going to hide the truth: This provision was unknown to me when I voted for that bill,' Flood said, prompting the crowd to break out in shouts. 'And when I found out that provision was in the bill, I immediately reached out to my Senate counterparts and told them of my concern.'
In Iowa, GOP Rep. Ashley Hinson encountered a similarly tough crowd, which erupted into a chorus of boos when the third-term Republican hailed the legislation as 'a generational investment' in American prosperity.
'I can't believe you would boo tax relief for working Americans,' she responded.
And in Colorado, members of the state's Republican delegation held a press conference to tout the bill, only to be shouted over by protesters throughout their remarks, Colorado Public Radio reported.
It's unclear how many attendees of the GOP town halls are Republicans, and how many are Democrats who opposed the legislation from the start. Outside liberal groups like Indivisible have encouraged their members to attend such events, and the Nebraska Democratic Party urged supporters to 'pack' Flood's recent town hall in Seward.
Still, Flood made a point to shake everyone's hand at the outset of the event, and he rejected the accusations from many in his party — including some GOP leaders — that Democrats are paying people to heckle Republicans in public settings.
'I don't think one of you is here because you're getting paid,' Flood said. 'I don't think one of you is here because you were trucked in.'
The heat Republicans are facing is unlikely to subside any time soon. The Senate is expected to make changes to the bill in the coming weeks, then send the package back to the House for a final stamp of approval, forcing GOP lawmakers to vote once again on the contentious provisions that could spark a new round of criticism back home.
Conservative Senate Republicans are pushing for steeper spending cuts — Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), for example has said he wants federal spending to roll back to 2019 levels — while moderates are warning against deep slashes. Medicaid is also poised to be the subject of debate in the upper chamber, with moderate Republicans — along with conservative Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) — saying they will not support a bill that makes cuts to the social safety net program.
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), for his part, has urged Senate Republicans — both privately and publicly — to make minimal changes, citing the 'very delicate equilibrium' he achieved within his conference to get the package over the finish line. Trump, however, has given the upper chamber the green light to make whatever tweaks they wish, which could set up another politically prickly vote for House Republicans.
'I want the Senate and the senators to make the changes they want. It will go back to the House and we'll see if we can get them,' Trump said last weekend. 'In some cases, the changes may be something I'd agree with, to be honest.'
'I think it's going to get there,' he added of the package. 'I think they are going to have changes. Some will be minor, some will be fairly significant.'
The contentious town halls are far from a new scene for House Republicans. Since Trump took office, numerous GOP lawmakers across the country have faced crowds hostile to Trump's boundary-busting mass deportations, blanket pardons for loyalists, and other actions that have defined the early months of his second term. The events grew so extensive — and tense — that House GOP leaders in March urged their members to avoid in-person town halls and instead host call-in and livestream conversations to avoid the chaotic confrontations.
The recent protests have been unique, however, in that the lawmakers have become the target based on their votes in favor of Trump's specific policy agenda.
'I was also proud to vote for President Trump's one big, beautiful bill last week,' Hinson said at the beginning of her town hall, prompting boos from the audience. 'I'm here to clear up a lot of the misinformation that's out here today' — she added, prompting laughs — 'because this bill is about securing our borders, this bill is about providing continued tax relief for working Americans and returning out country to prosperity.'
Democrats, meanwhile, are hoping to capitalize on both the internal GOP divisions surrounding the debate, and the unpopularity of the more controversial provisions of legislation, like the Medicaid and SNAP cuts, which they're hoping will backfire on Republicans in the midterms.
'Now that vulnerable Republicans are on the record voting for it, this betrayal of the American people will cost them their jobs in the midterms and Republicans the House Majority come 2026,' Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), head of the Democrats' campaign arm, said after the House vote.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House plans to pull nomination for NASA administrator
White House plans to pull nomination for NASA administrator

Politico

time20 minutes ago

  • Politico

White House plans to pull nomination for NASA administrator

The White House is planning to withdraw the nomination of Jared Isaacman to be the administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, a White House official confirmed to POLITICO. The sudden move comes days before the Senate was slated to vote on his nomination to lead NASA. Isaacman, a commercial astronaut and billionaire CEO of the payment processing company Shift4, has a long-standing relationship with Elon Musk, who this week left his post as a senior adviser to President Donald Trump and chief of the Department of Government Efficiency. It's not yet clear what the White House's reasoning is for the personnel change. Semafor was first to report on the plan. The White House official was granted anonymity to discuss not-yet-announced personnel moves. Senate Democrats for months have been critical of Isaacman's relationship with Musk, in light of his close ties to the White House and his role as CEO of SpaceX, one of NASA's largest contractors. In March, The Wall Street Journal reported that Musk personally asked Isaacman to lead the agency, which Democrats honed in on during his confirmation hearing last month.

‘60 Minutes' has history of cozy interviews and self-promotion
‘60 Minutes' has history of cozy interviews and self-promotion

New York Post

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Post

‘60 Minutes' has history of cozy interviews and self-promotion

Beware of those who publicly declare that their stuff doesn't stink. Recently, CBS newsman and '60 Minutes' regular Scott Pelley made news and noise when he seized the close of the venerable program to deliver an appeal, threat or whatever, depending on how one heard it, to CBS News parent Paramount, as it was reportedly preparing to settle a lawsuit brought last year by President Trump over the show's very cozy interview with VP Kamala Harris during last year's presidential campaign. Pelley cited the week's resignation of '60 Minutes' executive producer, Bill Owens, adding, 'Paramount began to supervise our content in new ways. None of our stories has been blocked, but Bill felt he lost the independence that honest journalism requires. … Bill made sure they were accurate and fair. Advertisement 'He was tough that way, but our parent company Paramount is trying to complete a merger. The Trump administration must approve it.'

Ernst doubles down on Medicaid comment with sarcastic video ‘apology'
Ernst doubles down on Medicaid comment with sarcastic video ‘apology'

The Hill

time23 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Ernst doubles down on Medicaid comment with sarcastic video ‘apology'

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) doubled down on a recent quip about Medicaid in a Saturday post on her Instagram story. 'Hello, everyone. I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely apologize for a statement that I made yesterday at my town hall,' Ernst said in the clip, with a sarcastic tone. On Friday, the Iowa Republican was jeered after brushing aside life or death concerns about cuts to Medicaid, a public health insurance program for low income families and individuals with disabilities. 'See I was in the process of answering a question that had been asked by an audience member, when a woman who was extremely distraught, screamed out from the back corner of the auditorium, people are going to die,' Ernst said Saturday. 'And I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that, yes, we are all going to perish from this earth. So I apologize, and I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well,' she continued. The Iowa lawmaker then encouraged viewers who want to see 'eternal and everlasting life' to 'embrace' Jesus Christ. During her Friday event in Butler, Iowa, Ernst promised that Republicans would 'protect' social services for the most vulnerable. She suggested that those who work and have opportunity for benefits elsewhere 'receive those benefits elsewhere' and leave taxpayer dollars for those eligible for Medicaid. Under the current GOP-House passed spending bill, millions would lose access to healthcare if passed by the Senate. 'Children will get hurt. Women will get hurt. Older Americans who rely on Medicaid for nursing home care and for home care will get hurt. People with disabilities who rely on Medicaid to survive will get hurt,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said during the debate on the bill, according to Politico. 'Hospitals in your districts will close. Nursing homes will shut down. And people will die. That's not hype. That's not hyperbole. That's not a hypothetical,' he added. Every Democrat who voted in the House, voted against the bill. Some Senate Republicans have pledged to make some edits to the legislation, objecting to changes to Medicaid, the proposed phaseout of clean energy incentives and an increase in the federal debt.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store