Eric Vernsten Recognized as the Best DUI Lawyer Rockford 2025
Eric Vernsten is proud to announce his recognition as the #1 DUI Lawyer in Rockford by leading legal experts. Known for his proven track record and unique background as a former prosecutor, Eric has become the go-to defense attorney for individuals facing DUI charges (both alcohol and drug related) who want an experienced and strategic advocate in their corner.
Eric stands out in the crowded legal landscape by delivering aggressive defense strategies in a clear, no-nonsense style that makes complex legal processes accessible and less overwhelming. Clients gain practical, results-driven representation focused on protecting their rights, minimizing penalties, and navigating every stage of the legal process with confidence. Whether it's a first-time DUI, a drug-related DUI, or a repeat offense, Eric equips clients with the tools and defense needed to move forward.
Over the past year, Eric has represented clients across Rockford and surrounding areas, praised for his straightforward approach that cuts through the stress of DUI cases. His experience as a prosecutor gives him a rare advantage: understanding exactly how the other side builds its case, so he can dismantle it effectively in court. This insider knowledge has helped countless clients achieve reduced charges, dismissals, and favorable outcomes in both alcohol and drug related DUI cases.
As the Best DUI Lawyer in Rockford for 2025, Eric Vernsten serves as an essential advocate for anyone navigating the challenges of a DUI charge. His practice is built on real results, protecting clients' futures and fighting for the best possible resolution. With deep expertise in both alcohol-related and drug-related DUI law, he provides the edge clients need in one of the most competitive and high-stakes areas of criminal defense.
About Eric Vernsten:
Eric Vernsten is a DUI defense attorney in Rockford, Illinois. A former prosecutor, Eric now uses his insider knowledge to fight for clients' rights, delivering aggressive and strategic representation in DUI, drug DUI, and criminal defense cases. To learn more visit vernstenlaw.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
U.S. sanctions Canadian judge on International Criminal Court
Kimberly Prost, a Canadian judge on the International Criminal Court, has been slapped with sanctions by the Trump administration for ruling to authorize the ICC's investigation into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity by U.S. personnel in Afghanistan. The sanctions come as the U.S. State Department unleashes a new wave of restrictions against judges it said were instrumental in efforts to prosecute Americans and Israelis.
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
Trump slaps sanctions on Canadian International Criminal Court judge
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration slapped a Canadian judge on the International Criminal Court with sanctions as the U.S. State Department continues to push back on the tribunal. Article content The State Department said Wednesday that Kimberly Prost was sanctioned for 'ruling to authorize the ICC's investigation into U.S. personnel in Afghanistan.' Article content Prost has been a judge in the trial division since 2018, following a two-year stint as Chef de Cabinet for the ICC president, according to the tribunal's website. Before joining the court, she was the first Ombudsperson for the United Nations Security Council Al Qaida Sanctions Committee. Article content She also worked for the Canadian Department of Justice for nearly two decades. Article content Article content The State Department also took action against other ICC officials from France, Fiji and Senegal linked it to the tribunal's investigation into Israel's actions in Gaza and the West Bank. Article content The department said French judge Nicolas Guillou was sanctioned for ruling to authorize the ICC's issuance of arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant. Deputy prosecutors Nazhat Shameem Khan and Mame Mandiaye Niang were sanctioned for upholding the arrest warrants. Article content The State Department has sanctioned a growing list of ICC officials with similar actions since U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order targeting the international tribunal in February. The sanctions freeze any assets the officials have in U.S. jurisdictions. Article content The ICC previously condemned the actions of the Trump administration, calling it an attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution. Article content Neither the U.S. nor Israel is a member of the international court. The State Department alleged it is a 'a national security threat that has been an instrument for lawfare against the United States and our close ally Israel.' Article content 'The United States has been clear and steadfast in our opposition to the ICC's politicization, abuse of power, disregard for our national sovereignty, and illegitimate judicial overreach,' the State Department said. Article content Trump also targeted the ICC during his first administration over its probes into Israel and complaints over the war in Afghanistan. The first Trump administration took significant efforts to block preliminary investigations into the Afghanistan situation, which eventually paused the court's probe. Article content Trump and other Republicans have criticized the court saying it could lead to warrants for American politicians, diplomats and military personnel. They say the ICC has no jurisdiction over Israel or the United States. Article content Trump's initial sanctions on officials were rescinded by President Joe Biden in 2021 and the ICC resumed its investigation into Afghanistan the following year. The court in July issued warrants for two senior Taliban leaders as part of the investigation. Article content
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Judge denies U.S. Justice Department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts
A board outlining the case against Ghislaine Maxwell is seen during a news conference to announce charges against Maxwell for her alleged role in the sexual exploitation and abuse of multiple minor girls by Jeffrey Epstein, July 2, 2020, in New York. (AP Photo/John Minchillo, File) NEW YORK — A U.S. federal judge in New York who presided over the sex trafficking case against the late financier Jeffrey Epstein has rejected the government's request to unseal grand jury transcripts. The ruling Wednesday by federal Judge Richard Berman in Manhattan came after the judge presiding over the case against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend, also turned down the government's request. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her conviction on sex trafficking charges for helping Epstein sexually abuse girls and young women. Epstein died in jail awaiting trial. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment. Berman said the information contained in the Epstein grand jury transcripts 'pales in comparison to the Epstein investigative information and materials in the hands of the Department of Justice.' According to Berman's ruling, no victims testified before the Epstein grand jury. The only witness, the judge wrote, was an FBI agent 'who had no direct knowledge of the facts of the case and whose testimony was mostly hearsay.' The agent testified over two days, on June 18 and July 2, 2019. The rest of the grand jury presentation consisted of a PowerPoint slideshow shown during the June 18 session and a call log shown during the July 2 session, which ended with grand jurors voting to indict Epstein. Both of those will also remain sealed, Berman ruled. Maxwell's case has been the subject of heightened public focus since an outcry over the Justice Department's statement last month saying that it would not be releasing any additional documents from the Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The decision infuriated online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and elements of President Donald Trump's base who had hoped to see proof of a government cover-up. Since then, Trump administration officials have tried to cast themselves as promoting transparency in the case, including by requesting from courts the unsealing of grand jury transcripts. 'The government is the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein file,' Berman wrote in an apparent reference to the Justice Department's refusal to release additional records on its own while simultaneously moving to unseal grand jury transcripts. 'By comparison,' he added, 'the instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession. The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct.' Meanwhile, Maxwell was interviewed at a Florida courthouse weeks ago by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, and the House Oversight Committee had also said that it wanted to speak with Maxwell. Her lawyers said they would be open to an interview but only if the panel were to ensure immunity from prosecution. In a letter Maxwell's lawyers, Rep. James Comer, the committee chair, wrote that the committee was willing to delay the deposition until after the resolution of Maxwell's appeal to the Supreme Court. That appeal is expected to be resolved in late September. Comer wrote that while Maxwell's testimony was 'vital' to the Republican-led investigation into Epstein, the committee would not provide immunity or any questions in advance of her testimony, as was requested by her team. Larry Neumeister, The Associated Press
