NC House bills will undercut services to homeless vets
People experiencing homelessness in Raleigh pack to leave an encampment off of Highway 70 near Interstate 40. (Photo: Greg Childress)
As a U.S. Navy veteran, I am honored to manage a team that serves other veterans who find themselves without a home in North Carolina. In my role as director of outreach for Veterans Services of The Carolinas (VSC), our team collaborates daily with the faith-based community, mental health and substance use providers, LME/MCOs, law enforcement, housing providers, and others across all 100 counties of North Carolina.
That experience has provided us with deep insight into what works and what doesn't. Two pending bills in the North Carolina General Assembly will have a direct impact on our communities, service providers, law enforcement, and those we serve. Both are promoted—as they were in other targeted states —by an interest group out of Austin, Texas, called Cicero Action. Joe Lonsdale, its founder, is a venture capitalist with ties to those in private prison contracting, including technology for the newer field of e-carceration.
One bill – House Bill 437 – would criminalize nonprofits like ours by threatening felony charges if drug activity occurs within 100 feet of our facilities — an extreme and unworkable standard that punishes service providers for circumstances beyond their control. The other — House Bill 781 — establishes new requirements on cities and counties to set up state-sanctioned homeless encampments for up to a year without additional funding.
Going after nonprofits and supporting unfunded mandates is not on-brand for the state of North Carolina, but neither is disrespecting our faith-based and veteran leaders who the Cicero lobbyists characterize as unserious activists. Representatives for four bishops overseeing 1200 North Carolina Episcopal and United Methodist churches joined VSC and other veterans in sharing concerns about these bills and the impacts they will have at multiple House committee podiums. And yet, the bill passed out of the House and now awaits a round of committee hearings in the Senate.
Under the guise of a self-described think tank, the Cicero Institute—in the absence of data—blames the Housing First model for the increase of homelessness. From Texas, it declares there is no lack of affordable housing in North Carolina and glosses over how two out of three of its residents experiencing homelessness in recent years are experiencing it for the first time.
Prioritizing housing with wrap-around services—the housing first model—has been the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs approach since 2012. More than 133,000 veterans were housed and provided with supportive services to help them retain housing over the last three years. The practice was first introduced by the George W. Bush Administration and has enjoyed subsequent bipartisan support because of data showing its effectiveness.
The average number of returns to homelessness across the state utilizing Housing First is less than 13%. The City of Raleigh estimates it costs $96,000 a year in emergency services, law enforcement and health care for a homeless person living outside.
As Raleigh's News & Observer reported recently, putting someone in a home and making services available costs $20,000 — saving taxpayers' $76,000 per person.
In contrast, another local government projected the cost of installing just one Greenflow unit to provide the bill's requirement of running water and restrooms at up to $200,000 alone. Will local governments have to add this cost and others in their capital improvement or their regular budgets to meet the state's approval? Will property tax increases be required to move the state-sanctioned encampments around each year? Additionally, legal counsels from local governments have raised concerns about increased liability and incarceration along with decreased local control–as reported by their colleagues in states where the Cicero bills have passed into law.
Cicero offers no data to indicate its proposal will do anything to end homelessness—just make it less visible. A month after the Florida encampment law went into effect last year, the first lawsuit was filed, resulting in a hasty sweep of an encampment without a plan for where people would go. Ongoing treatment for substance use and medications for mental illness are interrupted or lost when caseworkers and peer support specialists cannot find those they serve.
State-sanctioned, compulsive homeless encampments will drive unsheltered veterans further from the resources needed and further away from sustainable recovery, while putting the onus on our local law enforcement.
Especially in the context of yesterday's annual observance of Memorial Day, it makes no sense for our leaders to pass laws that criminalize those who have given up so much for the freedoms we enjoy. Our General Assembly members would serve their communities more effectively by investing in solutions that have been proven to work and are cost effective.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CT Dems move toward free child care. Republicans say it's the end of fiscal stability
After years of work, state legislators voted Saturday evening to approve landmark legislation to fund an endowment account to create more affordable child care in Connecticut by 2032. Lawmakers agreed with Gov. Ned Lamont to set aside as much as $300 million per year from the state's future budget surpluses in order to create a large endowment fund that would be invested by the state treasurer and could grow in future years. This year's allocation is expected to be $200 million, based on the size of the surplus. The debate started at noon in a rare Saturday session, which essentially happens one day each year at the end of the legislative session. The bill passed on strict party lines, by 101 to 45, at 5:30 p.m. after five hours of debate. The measure had been approved the previous day on a bipartisan basis in the state Senate by 32 – 4. Democrats hailed the plan for 'affordable and accessible' child care, but Republicans questioned the use of large amounts of money for an off-budget account instead of allocating more money for the state's unfunded liabilities like pensions for state employees and public school teachers. Under the plan, families earning $100,000 or less would pay nothing for child care starting in 2028, as it would be paid by the endowment, lawmakers said. 'I think it's the most important initiative we have in this budget,' Lamont said Saturday at the state Capitol in Hartford. 'If I can get universal early childhood free of charge for every family under $100,000, it's great for the kids. It helps mom and dad get back to work. It helps with affordability.' State Rep. Jennifer Leeper, a Fairfield Democrat who co-chairs the education committee, said the legislature would be 'achieving something many people thought would never be possible.' The legislation is known as Senate Bill 1 to show that it is the highest priority for Senate Democrats, who control the numbers of the bills. A key feature is that the measure establishes an early childhood endowment fund with a national model in a move to bring down the cost of early childhood for families. But House Republican leader Vincent Candelora of North Branford said creating an off-budget endowment fund was a mistake that lawmakers would see in future years. 'It really is the beginning of the end of good fiscal practices,' Candelora told reporters before the debate. 'They are turning the faucet off on Connecticut paying down its unfunded liabilities. The glory days are over of paying down unfunded liabilities. … This legislation right now is doing away with surpluses as we know it.' Candelora, who said he was surprised that there was not more Republican opposition in the Senate, said many members of the House caucus were opposed to the bill. The debate was delayed Saturday afternoon when Rep. Tina Courpas, a freshman Greenwich Republican who graduated from Columbia University Law School, asserted on the House floor that the bill required a three-fifths vote to pass because uses of the state's surplus funds are heavily restricted unless there is a 60% vote. The Democrats initially told Courpas twice on the floor that she was wrong, but then House Speaker Matt Ritter of Hartford consulted with colleagues before ruling that Courpas was, in fact, correct. 'I have grave concerns about this bill,' Courpas said on the House floor. 'More importantly, the financial aspects of this bill concern me greatly. … The very things that put our state on a better fiscal path are on the table in this bill. … This is a bill which takes a very radical step, hence the three-fifths vote. … I ask the chamber really to consider what is at stake here.' The goal by lawmakers is that the endowment would help pay the costs to create 16,000 spaces for preschool, infants, and toddlers by 2030. While those under $100,000 would be free, those earning more than $100,000 would not pay more than 7% of their household income, lawmakers said. 'Our kids are our most important gifts,' Rep. Lezlye Zupkus, the ranking House Republican on the education committee, said during Saturday's debate. 'They are our leaders of tomorrow.' Zupkus gave examples on the House floor of students who need assistance. During a tour at a public school in New Haven, Zupkus said that she asked about a 5-year-old girl who was a student in the school. 'She saw her father murder her mother,' Zupkus said she was told. 'That's heavy. … I always keep that little girl in the back of my mind.' The multi-faceted bill calls for pay increases for child care workers, who historically make low salaries. This year, an estimated $200 million is expected to be placed into the endowment fund, lawmakers said. The maximum under the bill is $300 million, but that will depend on the size of the state surplus each year. In the first two years, officials could spend a maximum of 12% of the fund. 'We do view this as a sustainable source of funds,' said Rep. Kate Farrar, a West Hartford Democrat who outlined the bill on the House floor. The omnibus bill also includes sections on special education, which are combined with additional provisions in House Bill 5001, which is another high-priority bill. 'I struggle with our state because we want to fund everything,' Zupkus said of the costs. 'We have to pick and choose. … I do struggle with all of this funding and ensuring it is put to the best use.' With costs reaching more than $100,000 per year for some students, Lamont called this year for an additional $54 million for special education to help Connecticut communities shoulder the cost. Lamont and the state legislature both earmarked special education this year as a high priority and a renewed area of interest, noting that expenses have been rising for services. Part of the focus is to keep students in their own district, rather than sending them by bus as much as an hour away for specialized programs for which tuition and transportation costs can reach as high as $200,000 per student, officials said. The plan calls for $14 million in competitive grants for in-district programs, plus $40 million in the second year of the two-year budget for 'excess costs' for the most expensive cases. Out of 512,652 students in the public schools statewide, more than 92,000 students, or 18%, are in special education classes. The state and federal governments are spending a combined $324 million annually for the 92,000 students, officials said. Some communities, such as Hartford, have more students in special education and subsequently costs that are higher than the state average. About 80% of all transportation costs in the Hartford schools are for out-of-district trips. While about 20% of Hartford students are in special education classes, the high costs mean that 31.6% of the overall school budget is for special education, according to Mayor Arunan Arulampalam. On Friday night, senators passed the same measure after a long debate. 'Parents have been telling us that child care is unaffordable, and municipalities have been clear they need help with special education. Senate Bill 1 tackles both,' said Senate majority leader Bob Duff, a Norwalk Democrat. 'We're taking sustainable steps toward universal child care so parents can stay in the workforce without breaking the bank. And we're overhauling special education to bring more oversight, more efficiency, and a system that actually works for families and educators.' During the debate, Sen. Ryan Fazio, a Greenwich Republican who voted against the overall bill, offered an amendment that would have created a scholarship fund to help low-income students to attend either public or private schools. Test scores, he said, have dropped 'over the last 10 years or so,' particularly in lower-income areas. 'This is a simple and straightforward amendment,' said Fazio, who also represents parts of Stamford and New Canaan. 'It creates more options and more hope for families and students who need it the most.' The amendment failed along strict party lines at 7:45 p.m. Friday with Republicans in favor and Democrats against. Sen. Doug McCrory of Hartford, a longtime educator, said the overall bill will help students, particularly in lower-income areas. 'Right now, families in underserved communities have fewer child care options and face higher barriers to access. Senate Bill 1 is designed with equity in mind,' said McCrory, who co-chairs the education committee. 'It ensures that funding doesn't just flow to the communities that can afford to pay more, but reaches the families who need it most. Every child deserves the same strong start, no matter where they live.' Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Bond auction shows Trump's economic house of cards may soon collapse
Spectacle often substitutes for substance, and nowhere is this more evident than in the latest tremors shaking Wall Street. On May 21, a lackluster 20-year U.S. Treasury bond auction delivered what can only be described as a resounding vote of no confidence in Washington's economic stewardship. The numbers were as stark as they were symbolic: a bid-to-cover ratio of 2.46 and a yield of 5.047 percent — the highest in five years. The markets responded as they usually do to bad news in the Capitol Hill core: stocks tumbled, bond yields soared and the dollar retreated. Now, with Moody's recent downgrade of the U.S. credit rating, concerns about fiscal instability have deepened, reinforcing investor skepticism about the sustainability of Washington's approach. One could almost hear the groan of a global economy growing weary of underwriting President Trump's illusions. At the center of this financial unrest lies a paradox that has defined recent U.S. economic policy: the fantastical belief that one can cut taxes, ramp up spending, and somehow avoid the mathematical consequences. The latest offering from the House Republicans — an expansive tax-and-spend package aligned with Donald Trump's post-presidential ambitions — illustrates the delusion in full color. Advertised as a tonic for economic rejuvenation, the bill is projected to add $3.8 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Not surprisingly, investors are beginning to ask whether Washington has any intention — let alone a plan — for reversing the fiscal tide. This concern has been magnified as the 30-year bond yield surged to 5.15 percent intraday on May 22 before settling at 5.05 percent, highlighting waning confidence in America's debt trajectory. Yet this story is neither new nor uniquely American. Japan, that other industrial behemoth weighed down by demographic decay and decades of tepid growth, held its own 20-year bond auction just a day earlier. It recorded its weakest demand since 2012. The yield spiked to levels not seen since the turn of the millennium. In both Washington and Tokyo, the bond markets are holding up an unflattering mirror: fiscal indiscipline, once tolerable and even fashionable, is losing its market cachet. To be clear, the stakes are global. For decades, U.S. Treasurys have represented the financial equivalent of terra firma — a bedrock in turbulent times. The dollar's status as the world's reserve currency has been undergirded not just by the size of the U.S. economy but by an assumption of stability, predictability and institutional maturity. All three are now in question. The sputtering auction of long-term debt, a financial instrument once deemed near-sacred by global investors, signals something deeper: an erosion of faith not just in fiscal management, but in the very political coherence of the United States. The temptation in elite financial circles, and increasingly among central bankers, is to reach once more for the palliative of quantitative easing — anesthetic for the markets, if not a cure for the underlying disease. The Federal Reserve may indeed expand its balance sheet in the coming months, but such measures are the fiscal equivalent of painkillers prescribed for organ failure. They may mask the symptoms, but they leave the rot untouched. Worse, they risk reinforcing a cycle in which fiscal irresponsibility is not only tolerated but incentivized, on the assumption that the central bank will always ride to the rescue. This moral hazard is not abstract. It undermines the very foundations of democratic accountability. What incentive remains for lawmakers to make unpopular decisions — on entitlement reform, tax equity or defense spending — if the consequences of inaction are indefinitely deferred? In this sense, the current drama on Wall Street is a symptom of a broader malaise: the decoupling of economic decision-making from political courage. Yet the White House remains allergic to introspection. The instinct is to externalize, to locate the cause of internal disarray in foreign villains — China, Russia, Iran — while studiously ignoring the unsustainable structure at home. If the bond market signals anything, it is that the margin for error is narrowing. Investors are not ideologues. They do not traffic in patriotic bromides. They want to know whether the empire can pay its bills. And they are not reassured. This should worry more than just Wall Street. For better or worse, the global economy is still chained to the health of the American financial system. A destabilized dollar or an imploding Treasury market would not merely dent U.S. prestige; it could spark global contagion, the effects of which would be felt from Lagos to Lahore, from São Paulo to Seoul. The dominoes may fall more slowly than in 2008, but fall they will. Japan's bond market woes further underscore this global fragility. Weak demand for its 20-year bond auction mirrors Washington's struggles, suggesting that investors are recalibrating their appetite for long-term debt in major economies. The simultaneous erosion of confidence in both U.S. and Japanese fiscal policies could foreshadow broader financial instability ahead. What's needed is not another round of fiscal theatrics, but a sober reckoning. The United States must confront its own contradictions — between rhetoric and reality, between consumption and production, between global ambition and domestic decay. This means real decisions: revisiting the tax code to ensure the wealthy pay their share, reducing wasteful defense expenditures and investing in productive capacity rather than speculative finance. Above all, it means recognizing that empire is expensive — and often unaffordable. As economist Herbert Stein once quipped with characteristic clarity, 'If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.' The current U.S. fiscal trajectory is not merely unsustainable; it is absurd. The only real question is whether the correction will be orderly — or catastrophic. The alarm bells have sounded, not just in economic data but in the global perception of American reliability. It is late in the day, but not too late — yet. If the world's most powerful economy cannot demonstrate basic fiscal sanity, it may not be long before the privileges of empire begin to vanish, one auction at a time. Imran Khalid is a physician and has a master's degree in international relations.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Gentleman Warrior' John Thrasher dead at 81
Former Florida State University President and House Speaker John Thrasher, whose career in politics and public service spanned more than three decades, died Friday after a battle with cancer, his family announced. Thrasher, 81, served in the House and the Senate before being tapped in 2014 as president of FSU, where he had earned his bachelor's and law degrees. During his tenure in the Legislature, Thrasher, a Republican, was a close ally of former Gov. Jeb Bush and helped carry out Bush's overhaul of the state's education system that included a controversial school-grading system and rigorous testing of student performance. 'I am heartbroken. John was one of my best friends in life. I loved the guy. I am praying hard for the wonderful Jean and his children and grandchildren,' Bush said in an email Friday morning to The News Service of Florida, referring to Thrasher's wife of 60 years, Jean. Thrasher, with Bush's backing, was elected to lead the Republican Party of Florida in 2010 after its former chairman, Jim Greer, was forced out amid a probe into the party's finances. Thrasher became speaker in 1998, the same year Bush was first elected — and as Republicans cemented what remains a dominance of state government. Thrasher died Friday morning in Orlando surrounded by his family, according to a statement released by spokeswoman Sarah Bascom. 'The family would like to thank everyone for their well wishes, visits and prayers during the last month and express their deep gratitude for the doctors and nurses who cared for him at Tallahassee Memorial Hospital, Moffitt Cancer Center, Orlando Health and Cornerstone Hospice,' the statement said. In addition to his wife, Thrasher is survived by daughter Jennifer Jordan and her husband, Don; son Jon Thrasher and his wife Millie; and daughter Julie Weinberg and her husband Mark. He also was a 'proud and devoted grandfather' to eight grandchildren, Bascom said in an email. Accolades for Thrasher, who represented parts of Northeast Florida in the Legislature and was fiercely devoted to FSU, poured in after the announcement of his death. Thrasher's bid to become FSU president initially drew some opposition, in part, because of his lack of an academic background. But Thrasher, who as a lawmaker took numerous steps to support the university, such as helping start its medical school, became a widely respected president. Thrasher's presidency, which lasted until 2021, 'marked a period of historic momentum for the university,' according to FSU President Richard McCullough. 'As an alumnus, legislator, trustee and president, he devoted his life to elevating FSU's national reputation and helping the university reach new heights in student success, academic excellence and research,' McCullough said in a statement. 'Jai (McCullough's wife) and I feel incredibly fortunate and blessed to have known him and will always cherish the time we spent together at university events, out on the golf course or sharing a meal. John had a remarkable ability to bring people together with his warmth, humor and unmistakable charm.' Thrasher was 'one of the greatest men I've ever known,' Gus Corbella, a lobbyist who served as director of the House Majority Office during Thrasher's two-year term as speaker, told the News Service in a text. 'He was a mentor to me more than just in public service, but also as a shining example of what a man of integrity, courage and conviction can be in this often challenging world. He was a gentleman of the highest order worthy of every respect accorded to him,' Corbella said. Kathy Mears, who has held a series of high-level staff positions in the Legislature and state government and served as Thrasher's government-relations director at FSU, offered similar praise. 'No words can adequately capture the deserved honor Florida owes to John Thrasher,' Mears said. 'He was a gentleman warrior. He led with quiet strength and firm resolve. He did so much good for so many — as a lawmaker, as a leader, as a mentor, but most of all as a friend.' Gov. Ron DeSantis and First Lady Casey DeSantis also praised Thrasher, who served in Vietnam and was elected to the state House in 1992 from Clay County. After a time out of the Legislature following his term as speaker, Thrasher joined the Senate by winning a special election to succeed the late Jim King, R-Jacksonville, in 2009. 'John was a decorated combat veteran, served the state well as both Speaker of the House and as a Florida senator, and provided great leadership as the president of his alma mater, Florida State University. John lived a remarkable life — and he made a big difference in the lives of so many in our state. We send our condolences to Jean and the entire Thrasher family,' the governor said in a post on X. Thrasher 'made a huge impact' on the state GOP 'from his time in public office to his willingness to step in and chair the party during a difficult time,' Republican Party of Florida Chairman Evan Power said in an X post. 'Florida is better for his service,' added Power, calling Thrasher 'a legend.' Senate President Ben Albritton also lauded Thrasher, who after leaving the House helped found The Southern Group, one of the capital city's most influential lobbying firms. 'Integrity, perseverance, and strength propelled John to success at every level of public service and private industry. His life was rooted in devotion to public service, patriotism, a love of the law, and a passion for education. From the battlefields of Vietnam where he returned as a highly decorated officer, to years of honorable service as speaker of the House, Rules (Committee) chair of the Senate and president of Florida State University, John was regarded by all as a strong, fair leader with unquestionable judgment, timeless principles of honor, and a gentleman all the way through,' Albritton said. The family will hold a private burial for Thrasher in Orange Park. A celebration of life is scheduled on Aug. 19 at Florida State University's Ruby Diamond Concert Hall in Tallahassee. Click here to download our free news, weather and smart TV apps. And click here to stream Channel 9 Eyewitness News live.
