The treaty that kept India and Pakistan in check is gone. Now what?
Paramilitary soldiers inspect the damaged building of the Government Health and Educational Complex after Indian strikes in Muridke, about 30 kilometers from Lahore, on May 7, 2025. India and Pakistan exchanged heavy artillery along their contested frontier on May 7, after New Delhi launched missile strikes on its arch-rival in a major escalation between the nuclear-armed neighbours.
Air Marshal Anil Chopra
India launched 'Operation Sindoor' on the night of May 7, targeting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan in retaliation for a deadly terrorist attack in Pahalgram, Kashmir last month. New Delhi stated that it hit at least nine targets.
'Our actions have been focused, measured, and non-escalatory in nature. No Pakistani military facilities have been targeted. India has demonstrated considerable restraint in the selection of targets and method of execution,' the Indian government said in a statement.
Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif descried the strikes as a 'cowardly' attack and said Islamabad "has every right to respond forcefully to this act of war imposed by India, and a forceful response is being given."
Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated to military actions following the killing of 26 innocent vacationers in Pahalgam, Kashmir by Pakistan-backed terrorists in a Hamas-style terror attack.
Pakistan Army and Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) links were established by India's National Investigation Agency days after the mass killing. The public was angry, and sought appropriate revenge.
A wide range of diplomatic and economic measures were announced by both nations following the attack. Remarkably, India has put the 1960 Indus Water Treaty (IWT) in abeyance for the first time since the pact was inked by the two neighbors. Rejecting India's move to suspend the IWT, Pakistan warned that any diversion of water will be treated as an 'Act of War.' Islamabad also said that it would hold 'in abeyance' its participation in all bilateral agreements with India, including the landmark 1972 Simla Agreement.
Pakistan pledged a full-spectrum national power response to any threat against its sovereignty, put its armed forces on high alert, and began selective mobilisation. Most measures were quite expected. But by suspending the Shimla Agreement, Pakistan unwittingly handed over big advantage to India.
What is the Shimla Agreement?
The Shimla agreement between India and Pakistan was signed on July 2, 1972 at Barnes Court (Raj Bhavan) in the town of Shimla in the Indian state of Himachal Pradesh, between then-Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and her Pakistani counterpart Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. It was ratified on July 15, 1972 (by Pakistan), and August 3, 1972 (by India), and became effective the next day.
The agreement had come in the wake of Pakistan's comprehensive defeat in the 1971 war that split the country and created independent Bangladesh.
The agreement stated:'The Government of India and the Government of Pakistan are resolved that the two countries put an end to the conflict and confrontation that have hitherto marred their relations and work for the promotion of a friendly arid harmonious relationship and the establishment of durable peace in the sub-continent, so that both countries may henceforth devote their resources and energies to the pressing task of advancing the welfare of their peoples.'
The document was meant to lay the foundation of a peaceful and stable relationship between the two nations. It was decided that the two countries are resolved 'to settle their differences by peaceful means through bilateral negotiations or by any other peaceful means mutually agreed upon between them.'
The treaty mandated that the two countries resolve issues bilaterally, and superseded the United Nation's resolution on Kashmir. Perhaps more importantly, under the agreement, India and Pakistan established the Line of Control (LoC), previously called the Ceasefire Line, making it a quasi-border between the two nations.
New Delhi succeeded in persuading Islamabad to change the name of the ceasefire line to the Line of Control (LoC), thus delinking it from the UN-imposed 1949 ceasefire line and highlighting that Kashmir was now a purely bilateral matter between India and Pakistan.
The treaty clearly stated that Indian and Pakistani forces must be withdrawn to their respective sides of the 'international border.' That in Jammu and Kashmir, the LoC resulting from the cease-fire of December 17, 1971, shall be respected by both sides without prejudice toward the recognised position of either side.
Neither side shall seek to alter it unilaterally, irrespective of mutual differences and legal interpretations. India returned around 13,000 square kilometers of land taken in battle on the western border but retained some strategic areas, including Turtuk, Dhothang, Tyakshi, and Chalunka in Chorbat Valley, covering more than 883 square kilometers, so as to facilitate lasting peace. Both sides further agreed to refrain from the threat or the use of force in violation of the LoC.
The fact that there has only been one limited war since the agreement was signed reflects its effectiveness.
Some Indian bureaucrats later argued that a tacit agreement to convert this LoC into a international border, was reached during a one-on-one meeting between the two heads of government. Pakistani bureaucrats have denied any such thing. Nor was that acceptable to Indian public.
The Shimla agreement called on both sides to resolve all issues bilaterally. But Pakistan never respected this part of the treaty, and has taken matters to an international level, especially by doing chest-beating over Kashmir at the UN. The latest example of this attitude is Pakistan's outcry over the Abolition of Article 370 by the Narendra Modi-led government in 2019. One critical clause was that 'both shall prevent the organisation, assistance or encouragement of any acts detrimental to the maintenance of peaceful and harmonious relations.'
Pakistan has been engaging in cross-border terrorism as a foreign policy tool to bleed India and to foster separatism in Kashmir, as well as to keep the Indian Armed Forces pinned down. Some of the major Pakistan-sponsored Islamist attacks against India have included a terrorist attack on the Parliament of India in New Delhi on December 13, 2001, the attack on the Akshardham temple in Gandhinagar in 2002; the Mumbai train blasts in 2003; twin blasts at Gateway of India and Zaveri Bazaar in Mumbai in 2005, Delhi bombings and 2006 Mumbai train bombings, train blasts in Jaipur in 2008, and the tragic Mumbai attacks in November 2008.
The latest large-scale attacks occurred in Kashmir: a deadly terrorist attack on the Army camp in Uri killed 17 Indian soldiers and an attack on the military convoy in Pulwama resulted in the death of 40 personnel.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Ramaphosa defends transformation, we must dispense false notion
Ramaphosa said economic growth without transformation entrenches exclusion and transformation without growth is unsustainable. President Cyril Ramaphosa has defended transformation, saying black empowerment is 'vital to inclusive economic growth.' Writing in his weekly newsletter, Ramaphosa emphasised that 2025 marks the 70th anniversary of the Freedom Charter, the country is reminded of its 'aspiration that the people shall share in the country's wealth.' 'Our Constitution reflects the promise we made to one another and to future generations to redress the injustices of our past and realise the full potential of our country. 'For this reason, we reaffirm that broad-based black economic empowerment is not just a policy choice but a constitutional imperative,' Ramaphosa said. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa urges employers to give BEEI youths their 'next opportunity' Inequality The president said that according to Statistics SA, between 2006 and 2023, black African households experienced real income growth of 46%, coloured households of 29% and Indian households of 19%. 'Despite this progress, the average income of white households is still nearly five times higher than that of black African households. This is the gulf we must close through deliberate and sustained efforts to expand opportunity. 'Transformation is not a favour. It is a necessity. The inequality of our past continues to shape the lives of millions of black South Africans. And yet many who continue to benefit from the legacy of exclusion continue to decry black economic empowerment and are even challenging it in our courts,' Ramaphosa said. 'False notion' Ramaphosa said economic growth without transformation entrenches exclusion, and transformation without growth is unsustainable. 'We must dispense with the false notion that we must make a choice between growth and transformation. 'We also need to challenge the notion that broad-based black economic empowerment is a cost to the economy. It is actually an investment in the economy,' Ramaphosa said. Last week, Ramaphosa came out swinging against critics of Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), questioning whether their opposition is rooted in 'greed' or 'jealousy'. ALSO READ: US visit came amid 'increasing strain' between two countries, Ramaphosa says

IOL News
19 hours ago
- IOL News
Reflecting on Gandhi's legacy: 132 years since a defining moment
Director of the National Gandhi Libray from New Delhi,India Professor Annamalai Alagan addresses guests at the 132nd anniversary of Mohandas Gandhi forcibly ejected at the Pietermaritburg railway station. A solemn commemoration was held at Pietermaritzburg railway station this week to mark the 132nd anniversary of a pivotal moment in the life of Mahatma Gandhi. In 1893, Gandhi, then a 23-year-old lawyer, was forcibly removed from a first-class train compartment despite holding a valid ticket, after a white passenger objected to his presence. The incident occurred during a journey from Durban to Pretoria and is widely regarded as the catalyst for Gandhi's lifelong commitment to non-violent resistance. The commemorative event was co-hosted by the Indian Consulate in Durban and the Pietermaritzburg Gandhi Foundation. Among those in attendance was Gandhi's granddaughter, Dr Ela Gandhi.

IOL News
21 hours ago
- IOL News
BRICS+ Series: Indonesia Joins the World's Top 10 Manufacturing Nations
This handout picture taken and released on July 3, 2024 by the Indonesian Presidential Palace shows Indonesian President Joko Widodo (R) speaking with Hyundai Motor Group Executive Chairman Chung Eui-sun (C) during an inspection of the battery and electric vehicle manufacturing plant by PT Hyundai LG Indonesia-Green Power in Karawang, West Java. Indonesia's Manufacturing Global Ambitions The manufacturing sector constitutes a significant portion of Indonesia's economy, contributing 20% to the GDP and thereby playing a pivotal role in the nation's economic advancement. The majority of manufacturing operations are concentrated on the island of Java, which is home to 60% of the national population and generates 58% of the country's revenue. Indonesia's Manufacturing Growth & Key Sectors Overall, Indonesia's manufacturing sector has demonstrated consistent positive growth of 4% since 2016, despite the COVID-19 setbacks from the lockdown regulations, today the industry is ranked as the 12th largest manufacturer globally; and by 2030 the government has plans to elevate the country into the top 10 biggest economies and aiming to become a global manufacturing hub according to the Making Indonesia 4.0 strategy. One of the main areas of production include textiles, chemicals, electric vehicles (EVs), and food processing. Currently, manufacturing makes a major contribution as a source of employment, with the expansion of production, Indonesia stands to play an increasingly critical role in the various small and medium-sized enterprises which represent the majority of the sector. Government Initiatives: Making Indonesia 4.0 & Investment Attraction In order to achieve government-mandated goals such as manufacturing contributing 28% to GDP by 2045, there have been efforts to attract foreign investment for companies to operate in Indonesia's manufacturing hubs, thus supporting the increased market presence in the global supply chain. The country's geographic location is greatly beneficial in this capacity because of the Strait of Malacca- a vital channel for trading routes connecting the Pacific Ocean to the Indian and the South China Sea. BRICS+ Membership: Opportunities & Trade Expansion Following Indonesia's recent membership to BRICS+, the proximity the country has to the popular sea route makes for increased commercial activity which boosts the country's shipping, port and other coastal services. It is significantly important for its strategic geopolitical and economic characteristics, but also for security measures. By virtue of the BRICS+ bloc representing a large market, Indonesian membership could significantly increase the volume of trade flowing through or into the country. Secondly, aligned with the bloc's founding values, they seek to reshape the global economy and world order by ensuring that emerging markets and countries have a greater more equitable voice in international affairs, Indonesia has a great opportunity to influence sea trade interests, commodity pricing and global trade policies, especially considering that they recently had a trading surplus in February 2025 increasing to $3.12 billion (USD), a substantial raise from $0.83 billion the year before. Key Trade Partners & South-South Cooperation Some of the top exporting destinations that Indonesia trades with are China, the USA, India, Japan and Singapore. The top importing countries are China, USA, Japan, South Korea and Singapore. This is to potentially change because of the BRICS+ agenda promoting greater South-South cooperation to foster economic exchange and growth. China and India pose the greatest strengths in this capacity regarding the BRICS nations. China is recognised as the world's leading manufacturing nation, possessing substantial expertise in restructuring the global supply chain to be heavily centered around its operations. Furthermore, both China and India, the latter being the most populous country globally, possess vast consumer markets attributable to their large populations. India is home to a rapidly growing middle class and thus, increasing purchasing power- pivotal to the BRICS+ bloc financial cycle. Complementing this is New Delhi's robust service, telecommunications and information technology (IT) industries whose expertise can be great collaboration avenues to Indonesia for skill transfers. Challenges & The Road Ahead Indonesia aims to be a leader in manufacturing automation technologies. However, its current lack of skilled workers and infrastructure will need to be addressed to reach this goal. Recent data indicates that Indonesia's manufacturing growth is moderating. In March 2025, Indonesia's Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) declined to 52.4 from 53.6 in February, signaling that while the sector is still expanding, the pace has slowed. However, foreign demand remains strong amidst rising input costs and the current volatility of international trade with the ongoing tariff wars initiating from the USA could host broader economic implications on future growth. Indonesia's strategic decision to diversify its international presence through BRICS+ membership significantly enhances the nation's prospects for realising its global manufacturing ambitions. This alliance presents opportunities to foster collaborative partnerships, bolster economic sovereignty by mitigating import dependency on raw materials, and solidify Indonesia's standing as a prominent industrial force on the world stage. Written by: *Dr Iqbal Survé Past chairman of the BRICS Business Council and co-chairman of the BRICS Media Forum and the BRNN *Banthati Sekwala Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group Egyptian & South African Specialist **The Views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Independent Media or IOL. ** MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE ** Follow @brics_daily on X/Twitter & @brics_daily on Instagram for daily BRICS+ updates