logo
New Texas law pushes Coastal Bend schools to ban cell phones in schools

New Texas law pushes Coastal Bend schools to ban cell phones in schools

Yahoo4 days ago
After Texas lawmakers took action to keep students off their cell phones during the school day, Coastal Bend schools are grappling with how to enforce the law.
From locked device pouches to school day bans, here's how some area schools are approaching personal student devices in the 2025-26 academic year.
The Corpus Christi Independent School District Board of Trustees voted to adopt a policy prohibiting students from using devices during the school day on July 28, though the district has yet to announce specifics, including what the consequences will be if students disobey.
If a student violates the policy, the district will confiscate the device.
State law lays out two ways for school districts to comply: Either school districts can prohibit students from bringing devices onto school property, or districts can designate a method for storing a student's personal device during the school day.
Corpus Christi ISD opted for the second method, with the district's new policy stating that while on school property students shall store any personal communication device 'in accordance with administrative regulations.'
What exactly this means is not yet clear. The school board is expected to approve updates to the Student Code of Conduct outlining implementation of the policy during a future meeting ahead of the start of school on Aug. 11.
However, district staff indicated during the meeting that the designated storage method might be as simple as requiring that any personal device be powered down and put away in the student's backpack.
This is a slightly stricter approach to student cell phones than has previously been implemented in Corpus Christi ISD, though the district has made moves to limit student devices before.
Last year, the district mandated that elementary and middle school students keep any devices turned off and put up during the entire school day, while high school students were required to keep their devices off and away during class. High school students were allowed to use their devices during lunch and between classes last year.
Now, school staff should not see or hear a student's cell phone during the school day — not during class time or any other part of the school day, including lunch and passing periods.
Gregory-Portland ISD
The Gregory-Portland Independent School District is taking a different approach. Last week, the district announced that it is introducing pouches to securely store devices during the school day.
At the middle and high school campuses, students will be issued a CellockED pouch. At the elementary level, pouches will be used as needed.
Students will put their devices in their sealed pouch each morning. At the end of the day, they will be able to unlock their pouches. Students who check out of school early will be able to unlock their pouch at the front office.
The pouches can be unlocked at designated unlock stations on campus. The pouches are unsealed using magnets, similar to security tags used at retail stores, according to the district.
According to a district informational webpage, magnets will also be mounted in strategic locations across campus so that students can access their devices in case of an emergency. There is also a phone capable of dialing 911 in each classroom.
Parents can communicate with their child during the school day by contacting the front office.
Gregory-Portland ISD has created a video explaining the new policy. The video and more information about the policy are available online at g-pisd.org/district-info/house-bill-1481.
Flour Bluff ISD
Other districts, like the Flour Bluff Independent School District, are still considering their policies, with plans to share updated guidelines before the start of the school year.
'As we review the new legislation in full, we want to reassure our community that many of the bill's guidelines are already reflected in current district practices,' Flour Bluff ISD Superintendent Chris Steinbruck said in a letter to families. 'However, we are taking this opportunity to assess and refine campus-level procedures to ensure consistency and full compliance across all grade levels.'
Tuloso-Midway ISD
The Tuloso-Midway Independent School District has already started the 2025-26 school year, but hasn't yet taken action in response to the new legislation.
Tuloso-Midway ISD Superintendent Steve VanMatre said in an email that the district began the school year under the 2024-25 policy and is currently receiving guidance on the policy. Staff will make a recommendation to the school board on Aug. 18.
The new legislation has not arrived without some opposition.
A Flour Bluff ISD student started a petition, which has since closed, with several signers expressing enjoyment of digital socialization and concerns about communicating during emergencies.
But Texas public schools are bound by state law.
What the Texas law says
House Bill 1481, governing student use of personal communication devices in public and open-enrollment charter schools, was approved by both the Texas House of Representatives and the Texas Senate this spring. Gov. Greg Abbott signed the bill into law in late June.
The law defines personal communication devices as phones, including smartphones and flip phones, tablets, smartwatches, radio devices, paging devices or any electronic device capable of telecommunication or digital communication.
Excluded from the law are any school-issued electronic devices. Schools across the state provide students with electronic devices for educational purposes. Corpus Christi ISD students use Chromebooks.
But public and charter school students are prohibited from using personal communication devices on school property during the school day.
However, there is an exception for students with disabilities if a device is needed to implement their individualized education program plan and for students with a documented need as determined by a qualified physician or if it is necessary to comply with a health or safety requirement.
The law doesn't apply to adult education programs.
Over the past two years, some parents and educators in the Coastal Bend community have raised the alarm about the impact smartphones can have on children's mental health, as well as on maintaining a productive educational environment.
Back to school: What to know about calendars, resources and new rules in Corpus Christi
From the brink of extinction, wintering whooping crane counts rise
Nueces County examines fraud risk, irregularities from former county auditor's office
Can AI predict flooding? A&M-Corpus Christi project focuses on Oso Creek
This article originally appeared on Corpus Christi Caller Times: Texas law pushes Coastal Bend schools to ban cell phones in schools
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla ordered to pay $200 million in punitive damages over fatal crash
Tesla ordered to pay $200 million in punitive damages over fatal crash

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla ordered to pay $200 million in punitive damages over fatal crash

Tesla was found partly liable in a wrongful death case involving the electric vehicle company's Autopilot system, with a jury awarding the plaintiffs $200 million in punitive damages plus additional money in compensatory damages. The case, which took place in a Miami courtroom over the last couple of weeks, centered on whether defects in Tesla's self-driving technology ultimately contributed to the death of 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon in 2019. Along with the $200 million in punitive damages, Tesla was also ordered to pay around $43 million in compensatory damages directly to the plaintiffs. Leon was killed when a man driving a Model S Tesla equipped with Tesla's Autopilot technology plowed through a T-shaped intersection and struck her and her boyfriend Dillon Angulo. Angulo survived but was gravely injured. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility in the incident and that George McGee, the Florida driver who lost sight of the road when he dropped his phone, was not entirely to blame. "Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries, holding Tesla and Musk accountable for propping up the company's trillion-dollar valuation with self-driving hype at the expense of human lives," said the plaintiffs' attorney Brett Schreiber in a statement shared with CBS News. The plaintiffs in the case originally asked for $345 million in damages during closing arguments on Thursday. During the trial, lawyers for the plaintiffs alleged that Tesla either hid or lost key evidence after a forensic data expert was able to recover data from the accident that Tesla said had been deleted. Tesla disputes ruling and will appeal "Today's verdict is wrong, and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," Tesla said in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch. "This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver — from day one — admitted and accepted responsibility." Tesla also said it plans to appeal the decision. The case was a big test for the electric vehicle maker, which has been under scrutiny over the safety of its cars. Similar cases have been brought against Tesla, although many have been dismissed. "This will open the floodgates," said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. "It will embolden a lot of people to come to court." Arkansas officials reveal new details about Devil's Den murders of husband and wife Trump says nuclear subs to be positioned after former Russian president's remark Trump says he's ordered the firing of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner

Manhunt launched after 4 killed in a shooting at a Montana bar
Manhunt launched after 4 killed in a shooting at a Montana bar

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Manhunt launched after 4 killed in a shooting at a Montana bar

Montana Shooting ANACONDA, Mont. (AP) — Four people were killed in a shooting at a Montana bar Friday, authorities said as they launched a manhunt for the suspect. The suspect was last seen in the Stump Town area, which is just west of Anaconda, according to a Facebook post by the Anaconda-Deer Lodge County Law Enforcement Center. He was believed to still be armed, the Montana Highway Patrol said in a statement. The shooting happened around 10:30 a.m. on Friday at The Owl Bar, according to the Montana Division of Criminal Investigation, which is leading the investigation. The agency confirmed four people were pronounced dead at the scene and that it was an active investigation. Authorities have yet to release details about what led to the shooting. More than a dozen officers from local and state police converged on Stump Town where they appeared to be searching for the suspect in the woods. His home in Anaconda had already been cleared by a SWAT team, according to the Granite County Sheriff's office. Anaconda is about 75 miles (120 kilometers) southeast of Missoula. The owner of the Firefly Café in Anaconda said she locked up her business at about 11 a.m. Friday after getting alerted to the shooting by a friend. Two hours later, she was still waiting for an all clear before reopening. 'We are Montana, so guns are not new to us. For our town to be locked down, everybody's pretty rattled,' café owner Barbie Nelson said. 'It's a small town, so we all probably know someone who was there' at the shooting. she added.

Tesla Ordered to Pay More Than $200 Million Over Fatal Autopilot Crash
Tesla Ordered to Pay More Than $200 Million Over Fatal Autopilot Crash

Gizmodo

time4 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

Tesla Ordered to Pay More Than $200 Million Over Fatal Autopilot Crash

A jury in Florida found Tesla partially liable for a fatal 2019 crash involving one of the company's vehicles operating in Autopilot mode. The jury awarded a combined $243 million in punitive and compensatory damages to Tesla, according to The New York Times. The incident in question occurred in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019. George McGee was behind the wheel of a Tesla Model S and had the company's Autopilot software activated while traveling down a two-lane road at night. As the car drove through the intersection while McGee was searching for his phone, it crashed into the back of a legally parked black SUV at a speed of more than 50 miles per hour. Naibel Benavides, a 22-year-old college student, and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, were standing outside the vehicle at the time of impact. Angulo sustained serious injuries from the crash, and Benavides lost her life as a result of the collision. The Florida jury found that McGee bore 2/3rds of the responsibility for the crash, but Tesla was responsible for 1/3rd of it, as the company's Autopilot software failed to brake while approaching the intersection that it ultimately sped through before initiating the deadly crash. 'Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans,' Brett Schreiber, counsel for the plaintiffs, told CNBC. Tesla denounced the ruling and said that it plans to appeal the decision. 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology. We plan to appeal given the substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial,' Tesla said in a statement, per The Times. Of the many lawsuits brought against Tesla for failures stemming from its autonomous systems, this was the first to go to a jury trial. Tesla has previously settled out of court to avoid trial—a route the company took earlier this year to avoid proceedings related to another 2019 incident in which a Model 3 allegedly failed to avoid a collision with a tractor-trailer. The ruling, which the judge in the case accepted, comes as Tesla is attempting to ramp up its fully autonomous 'Robotaxi' service, which allows people to request rides from driverless Tesla vehicles. The company's limited launch in Austin, Texas, was plagued by dangerous driving from the Robotaxis. The company started offering the service in San Francisco last month, though the vehicles have a human in the driver's seat.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store