Gujarat HC dismisses plea challenging state UCC panel over no minority representation
A bench of Justice Niral S Mehta dismissed the plea moved by Surat-resident Abdul Vahab Sopariwala.
"Dismissed," the court said while pronouncing the judgement.
A detailed order is awaited.
On February 4 this year, state Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel announced the formation of the committee to assess the necessity of the UCC and also to draft a bill for it.
Challenging its composition of the panel, the petitioner argued that it does not have members from religious minorities, adding that inclusion of such stakeholders was crucial to ensure that diversity of opinions and practices is considered.
The committee set up to examine the need for the UCC in Gujarat does not have a single scholar from minority communities, the petition said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 days ago
- Indian Express
‘Selection within state government's absolute domain': Gujarat HC rejects petition seeking directions to reconstitute UCC committee
Stating that it was 'perfectly justified' for the state government to select members of the committee appointed to oversee the implementation of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in the state, the Gujarat High Court has rejected a petition seeking directions to reconstitute the panel to include minority members. The order of Justice Niral R Mehta of the Gujarat High Court on Tuesday stated that the selection of the five-member committee by the state government was 'within (their) absolute domain' as per the powers conferred by Article 162 of the Constitution. The court order said, 'By constituting a Committee, it cannot be said that prejudice is caused to any class of people when more particularly it is always open for any class of people to make representation espousing their views on the Uniform Civil Code to the Committee so constituted. Under the circumstances, I see no good reason to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in a realm of administrative decisions taken under Article 162 of the Constitution of India by the State of Gujarat.' The UCC committee in Gujarat is chaired by Retired Supreme Court Justice Ranjana Desai and comprises as members retired IAS officer CL Meena, advocate R C Kodekar, former vice-chancellor of Veer Narmad South Gujarat University Dakshesh Thakar, and social activist Geetaben Shroff. The court order further stated, '…If the facts of the present case are considered, admittedly, it appears that the constitution of the Committee is not by way of any provisions of statute. The said Committee is not having any character of statutory in nature. As a matter of fact, the constitution of the said Committee is purely an administrative decision. Thus, in absence of any statutory provisions, the authority cannot be expected and/or directed to act in a particular manner…' The HC said, 'The Court… cannot direct the State authorities to select members in a particular manner. Any direction and/or order, in that regard, would be said to be unjustified and unwarranted interference in a purely administrative affairs of the State authorities, and thereby, this Court would not like to go in the area, which is absolutely within the domain of the State Government on its administrative side.' What the petitioner had stated The petitioner's advocate Zamir Shaikh had submitted before the HC that the members of the committee 'are not experts on the subject law and more so, they are the interested parties… against the principles of fair play'. The petitioner had also contended that UCC covers many personal laws and would touch the many minorities but the said Committee had no representation of any minority communities… the Committee should have been reformed/reconstituted by including representation from the minority communities so that real purpose and object of the constitution of the Committee can be achieved.' Further, the petitioners had argued that the state government must 'have a consultative process involving all minority communities whose personal laws are going to be affected' as selecting members of the committee in 'an unilateral manner is against the basic fundamental' of the Constitution. Advocate General Kamal Trivedi opposed the petition and submitted that when the petitioner has not challenged the power of the state government to constitute the committee under Article 162 of the Constitution, he'cannot challenge the selection of the members qua the Committee.' The Advocate General submitted that the constitution of committee under Article 162 of the Constitution of India is purely an administrative action and has nothing to do with any statutory duty of the state government and therefore, there is 'no legal requirement prescribed by any statute for and how such Committee can be constituted.' The petition was filed by Surat resident Abdul Vahab Sopariwala, challenging the constitution of the committee appointed by Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel on February 4 to examine the need for implementation of the UCC in Gujarat. Sopariwala had made representations to the CM before moving the HC in April this year, seeking reconstitution of the committee on the ground that it does not include members from religious minorities 'who were important stakeholders in the implementation of the UCC'. It was necessary to ensure a diverse opinion on the subject as the lack of such adequate representation would amount to violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution, he said.
Economic Times
3 days ago
- Economic Times
Gujarat HC upholds state's power to form Uniform Civil Code panel, dismisses plea over minority representation
The Gujarat High Court has said the setting up of a five-member committee on Uniform Civil Code (UCC) by the state government cannot be said to have caused prejudice to any class of people, and does not warrant its interference. A single bench of Justice Niral R Mehta on Tuesday rejected a plea challenging the constitution of the committee and seeking the court's direction for its reconstitution as there was no representation of minority communities. The selection of the committee members would be "within the absolute domain of the state government," the court said. On February 4 this year, Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel announced the formation of the committee to assess the necessity of the UCC and also to draft a bill for it. The panel is chaired by retired Supreme Court judge Ranjana Desai. Its members include retired IAS officer C L Meena, advocate R C Kodekar, former Vice Chancellor Dakshesh Thakar and social activist Geetaben Shroff. In the detailed judgment made available on the HC's website, the bench noted the constitution of the committee was purely an administrative court said it was of the firm opinion that once the UCC committee has been constituted purely by an executive order under Article 162 of the Constitution of India, selection of its particular members would be "within the absolute domain of the state government." It is "perfectly justified for the state authorities to select the members of the committee and for which, writ of mandamus cannot be issued," it said. "By constituting a committee, it cannot be said that prejudice is caused to any class of people when more particularly it is always open for any class of people to make representation espousing their views on the Uniform Civil Code to the committee so constituted," the court said in the absence of any statutory provisions, the authority cannot be expected or directed to act in a particular manner as it would be "unjustified and unwarranted interference in the purely administrative affairs of the state authorities," it said."Under the circumstances, I see no good reason to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in a realm of administrative decisions taken under Article 162 of the Constitution of India by the State of Gujarat," the bench court, therefore, cannot direct the state to act in a particular manner as any direction and/ or order in that regard would be "unjustified and unwarranted interference in the purely administrative affairs of the state authorities," it said. The petitioner, Surat resident Abdul Vahab Sopariwala, had approached the HC seeking a direction to the state government to reconstitute the committee with fresh members with the knowledge and experience over the subject law, and adopt a consultative process involving all religious and cultural communities before any move to implement the UCC. His lawyer had argued that members of the present committee are not experts on the subject law and are interested parties, and therefore the selection of members is against the principles of fair when the committee was formed with the objective of implementation of the UCC, covering many personal laws and touching minorities, there was no representation of any minority communities in the panel, he committee should thus be reconstituted by including representation from the minority communities so that real purpose and object of the constitution of the committee can be achieved, he had said in his General Kamal Trivedi said in his submission that the constitution of the committee is purely an administrative action and has nothing to do with any statutory duty of the state is, therefore, no legal requirement prescribed by any statute for and how such committee can be constituted, he said. Accordingly, it cannot be said that the committee is in breach of any statutory or legal duties, for which the court would issue its prerogative writ of mandamus by exercising its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, he said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 days ago
- Business Standard
Selection of UCC panel members within state govt's domain: Gujarat HC
The Gujarat High Court has said the setting up of a five-member committee on Uniform Civil Code (UCC) by the state government cannot be said to have caused prejudice to any class of people, and does not warrant its interference. A single bench of Justice Niral R Mehta on Tuesday rejected a plea challenging the constitution of the committee and seeking the court's direction for its reconstitution as there was no representation of minority communities. The selection of the committee members would be "within the absolute domain of the state government," the court said. On February 4 this year, Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel announced the formation of the committee to assess the necessity of the UCC and also to draft a bill for it. The panel is chaired by retired Supreme Court judge Ranjana Desai. Its members include retired IAS officer C L Meena, advocate R C Kodekar, former Vice Chancellor Dakshesh Thakar and social activist Geetaben Shroff. In the detailed judgment made available on the HC's website, the bench noted the constitution of the committee was purely an administrative decision. The court said it was of the firm opinion that once the UCC committee has been constituted purely by an executive order under Article 162 of the Constitution of India, selection of its particular members would be "within the absolute domain of the state government." It is "perfectly justified for the state authorities to select the members of the committee and for which, writ of mandamus cannot be issued," it said. "By constituting a committee, it cannot be said that prejudice is caused to any class of people when more particularly it is always open for any class of people to make representation espousing their views on the Uniform Civil Code to the committee so constituted," the court said. It said in the absence of any statutory provisions, the authority cannot be expected or directed to act in a particular manner as it would be "unjustified and unwarranted interference in the purely administrative affairs of the state authorities," it said. "Under the circumstances, I see no good reason to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in a realm of administrative decisions taken under Article 162 of the Constitution of India by the State of Gujarat," the bench added. The court, therefore, cannot direct the state to act in a particular manner as any direction and/ or order in that regard would be "unjustified and unwarranted interference in the purely administrative affairs of the state authorities," it said. The petitioner, Surat resident Abdul Vahab Sopariwala, had approached the HC seeking a direction to the state government to reconstitute the committee with fresh members with the knowledge and experience over the subject law, and adopt a consultative process involving all religious and cultural communities before any move to implement the UCC. His lawyer had argued that members of the present committee are not experts on the subject law and are interested parties, and therefore the selection of members is against the principles of fair play. Even when the committee was formed with the objective of implementation of the UCC, covering many personal laws and touching minorities, there was no representation of any minority communities in the panel, he said. The committee should thus be reconstituted by including representation from the minority communities so that real purpose and object of the constitution of the committee can be achieved, he had said in his submission. Advocate General Kamal Trivedi said in his submission that the constitution of the committee is purely an administrative action and has nothing to do with any statutory duty of the state government. There is, therefore, no legal requirement prescribed by any statute for and how such committee can be constituted, he said. Accordingly, it cannot be said that the committee is in breach of any statutory or legal duties, for which the court would issue its prerogative writ of mandamus by exercising its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, he said.
