logo
Teenage boy 'caught in care worker's bed' as she gives brazen excuse

Teenage boy 'caught in care worker's bed' as she gives brazen excuse

Daily Mirror2 days ago
Lindy Leah, 44, from Warrington, is accused of engaging in a sexual relationship with a teenage resident of a care home in St Helens where she was working as a deputy manager
A care worker who allegedly "fell in love with" with a boy at the children's home where she worked claimed it was "completely normal" when he was found in her bed.
Lindy Leah is accused of engaging in a sexual relationship with a teenage resident of the care home in St Helens where she was employed as deputy manager. The 44-year-old was reported to have worn inappropriate and revealing outfits in his presence and allowed him to sleep in her bed, as well as apparently asking him "for a love bite". But she "denies any improper behaviour" and went on trial at Liverpool Crown Court on Monday.
A jury of six men and six women heard this afternoon that Leah, from Orford, Warrington, was employed as deputy manager of the care home where the boy had been placed and was assigned as his key worker, reported the Liverpool Echo.
Graham Pickavance said during the prosecution's opening: "The defendant, by her own admission, admitted that she fell in love with him. But the crown say that it was not simply parental love, but something that went far beyond that and was physical love."
While the teenager "does not support the prosecution", colleagues described "inappropriate" behaviour from Leah, who wore a black dress in the dock with her blonde hair tied back in a bun, as well as "unprofessional interventions which prevented [the boy] from being challenged about his behaviour".
He was also said to have been seen lying in her bed at the home "as if it was completely normal", with the defendant having apparently remarked of this: "He's comfortable. He always does that. No one else has a problem."
A subsequent investigation by Merseyside Police similarly recovered video footage of the teenager asleep in her bed. Leah was meanwhile reported to have "worn skin tight and highly revealing clothing" in his presence, including a bodysuit with no underwear and a "highly visible thong".
On one occasion, she was said to have pulled at her bodysuit at a time when her nipples were apparently "highly visible", which was supposedly accompanied by her saying "I've had a shower but forgot to bring clean knickers".
The youth's mum also "grew more concerned" about the relationship between her son and Leah, who allegedly told the mother that the boy "had her wrapped around his little finger" and called him "gorgeous and handsome".
Mr Pickavance added that a string of messages exchanged between the two also "painted a picture of a relationship far removed from a carer and child". In one, referring to a phone which had been confiscated from him, Leah told him: "I'll give it you on Wednesday for a love bite."
When interviewed by detectives, she "denied any improper behaviour". But, having been released on bail under conditions not to contact the boy, the two were then spotted together weeks later beside a white Audi car at Walton Hall and Gardens in Warrington by a fellow care worker.
Leah, who is represented by Rebecca Filletti, denies one count of being a person in a position of trust causing or inciting a child to engage in sexual activity. The trial, before Judge Brian Cummings KC, continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brit dad with no military background 'killed in first Ukraine mission' as wife speaks out
Brit dad with no military background 'killed in first Ukraine mission' as wife speaks out

Daily Mirror

time11 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Brit dad with no military background 'killed in first Ukraine mission' as wife speaks out

A British dad has officially been declared as Missing In Action because his body has yet to be recovered from the battlefield but his wife believes he has been killed in Ukraine The wife of a British father who volunteered to fight in Ukraine despite lacking military experience has been informed that he was killed by a Russian drone on his first mission. ‌ Alan Robert Williams, 35, from Wirral, Merseyside, is officially listed as Missing In Action as his body has not yet been recovered. His wife, Stephanie, 40, has spoken out about her anguish and how she begged Alan, with whom she shares a 12-year-old daughter, not to travel to Ukraine. ‌ Stephanie has also disclosed the tragic reasons behind Alan's decision to enter the conflict zone after he lost his job as a site manager at a school earlier this year. ‌ According to what she has learned from members of Alan's unit, he was fatally struck in the Kharkiv region on July 14 while attempting to rescue some foreign officers. They were caught off guard by four drones, which dropped a mortar just eight metres from their position. Alan, who was facing away from the blast, was unresponsive instantly. His comrades were then forced to retreat under the pressure of the ongoing Russian offensive. ‌ In her first public statement, she told the Liverpool Echo: "He only signed his contract with the unit on the 10th of June. He had only been there a month. He had no frontline military experience at all. "Even though I can't dispute the accounts I've been given from numerous people I have spoken to out there, it still doesn't feel real. "I have been sending him messages on his phone giving him updates as to what has been going on. Even though he has not picked up his phone and all the lads I have spoken to are not going to tell me he is gone if he is not because they are all going through their own pain as well." ‌ Alan and Stephanie first crossed paths 14 years ago at a local Wirral pub before tying the knot in 2017. However, Alan had battled mental health issues for years, and earlier this year attempted to end his own life. Following his hospital discharge, he volunteered to join the fight in Ukraine, despite desperate pleas from his family not to go. Explaining the possible reasoning behind his decision, Stephanie revealed: "We all believed initially he applied because of his mental health, a case of, 'If I can't die at my own hands, I will die at the hands of another man.' That was our initial feeling. ‌ "But since he has gone and I have been able to access his device, he was telling his friends that it was because he couldn't sit by and watch what was happening to the civilians, especially the children. "When it came to children he had a massive heart. It gave him purpose. That is what a few of the lads out there said, he finally felt that he wasn't failing people. That was his biggest issue you see – he always felt like he was failing people." ‌ Alan departed for Ukraine on May 7 where he completed his training, and appeared in much brighter spirits during his initial conversations with Stephanie, who had "feared the worst" from the outset. Stephanie's mental health took a turn for the worse even as Alan's improved, leading her to feel as though they had swapped places. The last conversation she had with Alan was on July 2, when he mentioned embarking on his first mission, and Stephanie sensed a worrying shift in his demeanour. "I could tell by the way he was talking to me it was a dangerous mission," she disclosed. "I noticed the difference in his tone and behaviour and it heightened my senses and I would literally wake up at five in the morning, check my phone, I would check it every hour, checking if he was online. ‌ "I was constantly checking to see if there was any sign of life." The tension stretched out over two excruciating weeks until a Ukrainian sergeant reached out to Stephanie on July 15, delivering news in a brief three-minute call. ‌ "She told me in three minutes they had lost contact with him and all the evidence showed he was killed in action," Stephanie said. Then, on July 30, a man who had been with Alan from his arrival in Ukraine through to the mission rang her up. He confirmed unequivocally that Alan had fallen on the battlefield, and despite their best efforts to save him, the ambush made it too perilous. ‌ Caught in a state of limbo since then, Stephanie said she won't be able to mourn properly until Alan is officially declared Killed In Action. For Stephanie to proceed, her husband's body must be recovered for DNA testing, or after six months, she can petition Ukrainian courts to have him officially declared deceased. The process must take place in Ukraine, with all documents in Ukrainian, complicating matters, particularly financially. ‌ Stephanie, who works as a civil servant by day and call handler by night, shared: "We have lost Alan's wage completely which was half of our bills. I can't claim anything with regards to being a widow until he is officially declared. "I am not entitled to anything. I earn too much to claim any single person benefit and I have two adult children who count towards people in my house so I can't claim anything at all. ‌ "At the moment I have a tiny buffer but once that finishes I will not be able to afford bills or rent or anything like that." Lynne, Stephanie's mother, has set up a GoFundMe to support her daughter, stating on the fundraiser: "We want to help take some of the stress away by raising money towards rent, bills, food and also any possible legal expenses she may have due to him being overseas. Any donation big or small is greatly appreciated at this difficult time." A representative from the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office stated: "We are supporting the family of a British man who is missing in Ukraine and are in contact with the local authorities."

The British state must trust its people
The British state must trust its people

Telegraph

timea day ago

  • Telegraph

The British state must trust its people

It is curious to see how the ability of Britain's executive to govern the country waxes and wanes. When it comes to releasing prisoners early to avoid overcrowding, the Government finds the levers of power at its fingertips. When the discussion is around the disclosure of the nationality and immigration status of suspects, however, the best that Home Secretary Yvette Cooper can apparently offer is to ask 'the Law Commission to accelerate its review'. A cynic might think that this non-committal approach indicates a Government more comfortable with maintaining a tight grip on the flow of information in controversial cases, rather than in trusting the public to behave responsibly when given access to the truth. As the Southport riots among other events demonstrated, however, the maintenance of an official information vacuum creates room for rumours and misinformation to spread, sometimes with tragic consequences. And as we have seen, also, with the attempts to cover up the grooming gangs scandal, and the mass airlift of Afghans into Britain, that the long-term effect of this approach is to utterly destroy trust in the state institutions engaging in these efforts. This is all the more so given the apparent willingness of agencies to release information when it can assist in shaping a narrative. When a car crashed into crowds in Liverpool earlier this year, Merseyside Police decided to disclose that the arrested man was a white British national. Indeed, this same willingness means that non-disclosure of available information is now taken by some as an indication of a non-white British background. It is understandable that Britain's politicians are ill at ease with the country that they have helped to create, and its attendant social strains and tensions. It is true, also, that a lack of trust in the public has marked both Labour and Conservative governments; while the Tories are now demanding an official investigation into the Whitehall 'spy' unit monitoring social media sentiment over migrant hotels, it should be remembered that this same unit was established under a Conservative government, and deployed to monitor critics of its lockdown policies. Ultimately, however, the principles of democratic government demand that citizens are kept informed and that the state acts with their consent, rather than attempting to reshape public opinion to its liking.

Carer, 44, 'urged boy at kids' home to go missing so they could have night away'
Carer, 44, 'urged boy at kids' home to go missing so they could have night away'

Daily Mirror

timea day ago

  • Daily Mirror

Carer, 44, 'urged boy at kids' home to go missing so they could have night away'

Lindy Leah, 44, allegedly 'fell in love with' a teenage boy at the kids' home where she worked, and was said to have encouraged him to go 'missing from care' so they could spend time together A care worker encouraged a boy at the children's home she worked at to go "missing" so they could later meet up for a night away, a court heard. Lindy Leah, 44, from Warrington, allegedly "fell in love" with the teen, who she had been assigned to as his key worker. Lindy worked as a deputy manager at the home. The 44-year-old was said to have worn inappropriate and revealing outfits in his presence and allowed him to sleep in her bed, as well as apparently asking him "for a love bite", the court heard. She however "denies any improper behaviour" and is currently on trial at Liverpool Crown Court. Jurors were read a series of WhatsApp messages which were exchanged between Leah and the boy yesterday afternoon, Liverpool Echo reports. One one occasion, she told him "proper paranoid" that she had "lost him to a slag" before stating: "If you never met me then your life would be better. I miss you so much. All I want is for me and you to have a night away from everyone, just us. So if I wake up from these tablets and wine, then we will." Leah then went on to add: "Do you wanna go MSC [missing from care]? I love you so much. Can I book somewhere for me and you on Friday? Red and silky with some balloons and flake. Make sure you get your arse home tonight so you can go missing from care with me without there being meetings." Graham Pickavance, prosecuting, told the court that "balloons" was a "colloquial term" for the class C drug nitrous oxide. In a further message, Leah told the teen: "Just listened to a song and it made me cry. Stupid love songs. It made me think of you, then it made me cry. I won't be listening to that again. Add me back on Instagram now. "Why you took me off it? I get paranoid. I find it hard to trust you. I'm just scared you're still talking to her and going to see her. I just can't bear catching you out again. What's the point, because you know I'll find out? I hate her." In another message, Leah said: "I wanted to give you the chance to apologise to me before I left. I can't do this any more. I'm done. You really are not sorry for what you did today. Vile, what you did to me today. "Texting 'I'm sorry' after you called me all of the names and hit me isn't enough. Bye. Enjoy your ket session. One day you will realise what you did to me today. Enjoy the last 25 quid you ever took from me. Last chance to see me before I go." Leah was meanwhile said to have promised to buy the boy a tracksuit if he "stop sniffing ket" for two weeks. But, in a further message, she told him: "What you've done to me is vile. The worst thing is you, you don't even give a f***. You got what you wanted. "You actually don't give a f***. This will be the hardest decision of my life. I deserve to be treated better. The fact you stole and lied and you can't be arsed begging me to take you back shows you don't even give a f*** about me. Bye then. You hurt me then won't even speak to me. Instead of making an effort to say sorry, you blocked me. "You really want me to go away forever. You lied and stole from me and you blocked me. If I lied and stole from you would you speak to me? You're horrible to me. You don't care if you ever speak to me again or see me again. You're with your mates and they're clearly more important than how I feel. "Instead of being vile to me, how about fixing what you broke? You had no right to block me on Instagram and Snapchat. Add me back now. It's not even funny, 'cos I'm the one crying again. I've done f*** all wrong and I'm the one that gets hurt again. You genuinely don't give a f*** about me at all. A jury of six men and six women previously heard that Leah, of Capesthorne Road in Orford, Warrington, was employed as deputy manager of the care home in St Helens where the boy had been placed and was assigned as his key worker. But Mr Pickavance said during the prosecution's opening: "The defendant, by her own admission, admitted that she fell in love with him. But the crown say that it was not simply parental love, but something that went far beyond that and was physical love." While the teenager "does not support the prosecution", colleagues described "inappropriate" behaviour from Leah, who wore a black dress in the dock with her blonde hair tied back in a bun, as well as "unprofessional interventions which prevented [the boy] from being challenged about his behaviour". He was also said to have been seen lying in her bed at the home "as if it was completely normal", with the defendant having apparently remarked of this: "He's comfortable. He always does that. No one else has a problem." A subsequent investigation by Merseyside Police similarly recovered video footage of the teenager asleep in her bed. Leah was meanwhile reported to have "worn skin tight and highly revealing clothing" in his presence, including a bodysuit with no underwear and a "highly visible thong". The youth's mum also "grew more concerned" about the relationship between her son and Leah, who allegedly told the mother that the boy "had her wrapped around his little finger" and called him "gorgeous and handsome". Mr Pickavance added that messages exchanged between the two "painted a picture of a relationship far removed from a carer and child". When interviewed by detectives, she "denied any improper behaviour" but, having been released on bail under conditions not to contact the boy, the two were then spotted together weeks later beside a white Audi car at Walton Hall and Gardens in Warrington by a fellow care worker. Leah, who is represented by Rebecca Filletti, denies one count of being a person in a position of trust causing or inciting a child to engage in sexual activity. The trial, before Judge Brian Cummings KC, continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store