logo
Social Security wait times were already long under Biden. They're even longer under Trump.

Social Security wait times were already long under Biden. They're even longer under Trump.

USA Today06-05-2025

Social Security wait times were already long under Biden. They're even longer under Trump. Hold times at Social Security's 1-800 number averaged 60 minutes last year, during the Biden administration. Under Trump, they top 90 mins.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Retirement worries grow as seniors face Trump tariffs, stock selloff
Retired educator and part-time yoga instructor Vicki Knight says she feels stretched thin. "I'm semi-retired." The Marietta, Georgia, resident says her Social Security income is not enough to live on and that a recent stock market selloff fueled by tariff uncertainty has complicated her plans.
Anticipating changes might come with a new administration, Sarah Anderson, 68, wanted to get on the Social Security rolls before President Donald Trump was sworn in.
She applied in early January and then waited to be approved. And waited. After 45 days, she tried calling the 1-800 number over and over, holding for hours and never getting a real person on the phone to answer questions about what was slowing down her application.
The Social Security Administration, which provides benefits to about 73 million Americans every year, already had historically low staff levels when Trump took office in January. That meant wait times to reach employees by phone, email or in person were already high when the Trump administration began to slash staff amidst efforts to downsize government.
Then 3,000 of the agency's 57,000 employees took a buyout, new identification rules were added to applications and a policy was floated to limit phone support.
Now, there are "profound" delays for anyone trying to connect with the agency, said Jessica LaPointe, the union council president for AFGE council 220, which represents Social Security workers.
'Our lobbies are flooded," LaPointe told USA TODAY. Walk-ins are no longer welcome and at many field offices people have to join a wait list even to make an appointment.
"People are being turned away and told to come back when they have an appointment," she said, adding that with full calendars, "they don't know when they're going to be served."
LaPointe is worried the delays will make Americans lose trust in an agency that "touches every American life from cradle to grave.'
And agency leaders say they aim to eliminate at least 7,000 more positions.
When asked for an interview to discuss customer service delays and long wait times, a spokesperson provided a statement from Acting Commissioner of Social Security Lee Dudek, blaming former President Joe Biden, the agency's prior work-from-home policy and "advancing radical DEI and gender ideology over improving service for all Americans."
"The result was long wait times for customer service, unconscionable delays for benefit decisions, and insufficient stewardship of Americans' hard-earned benefits," Dudek said in the statement. "With our dedicated employees now leading the way, SSA will deliver on President Trump's promise to protect Social Security by providing the high-quality service and stewardship that the American people expect and deserve."
Hold times on the 1-800 number averaged 1 hour under the Biden administration and are now up to 90 minutes per call, Social Security Administration data shows. The wait times when USA TODAY placed calls to the 1-800 number over the past week ranged from 90 minutes to 150 minutes. Several times the line disconnected without reaching a live person.
Widespread impact of buyouts
The buyouts affected the main office located outside Baltimore as well as in local offices across the country. According to Social Security Administration data, 40 field offices had more than 25% of employees take a buyout.
The most affected of the more than 1,200 field offices are Wisconsin Rapids, Wisc., which lost 58% of staff, Nevada, Mo., which lost 57%, Alexandria, Minn., which lost 50%, and Clinton, S.C., which lost 42%.
A second round of buyouts was offered April 28 to regional office employees who work in operations and in the office of Disability Adjudication, according to an email sent to staff. They were given less than 48 hours to accept the offer.
LaPointe said the buyouts were offered to all staff, not based on what was needed at each office, leaving some places scrambling to provide basic services.
"When the agency and the administration decided that they were going to cut 7,000 people from our workforce in the name of efficiency it caused a lot of inefficiencies within the Social Security Administration," she said.
ID requirements and website
Some of the long lines in person have been caused by confusion over the new identification rules. LaPointe said employees weren't notified about the changes before the public was and weren't prepared for the influx.
'We had lines around the corner, out the door, just taking people's ID to make them feel better that their benefits weren't going to stop,' LaPointe said.
The change, announced in late March, requires both applicants and beneficiaries to provide proof of identity in person if they are unable to access their "My Social Security' account, which requires online identity verification. At the time, Dudek estimated that between 75,000 and 85,000 more Americans would need to visit Social Security offices each week
For two weeks in March, internal systems and parts of the "My Social Security' website crashed repeatedly because they could not keep up with the surge of people logging in and employees checking files.
'It caused just such a stressful, chaotic, confusing time that was completely self inflicted and preventable and avoidable," LaPointe said.
Closing offices
DOGE contributed to the panic when it included more than 47 of Social Security's 1,200 field office locations among nearly 800 federal real estate leases that it plans to cancel. Social Security has repeatedly stressed there is no active plan to close field offices, but a draft plan for service delivery the Social Security Administration had to provide the White House that was obtained in April by news outlet Government Executive includes 'field office consolidation' as a goal for next year.
The agency has already closed six of its 10 regional offices, which deal with more complex cases and appeals, and include managers who can sign off on decisions made at the field office level.
"It's gutted our system staff. Our systems are collapsing,' LaPointe said. "And there's a non-responsive regional office because of all the cuts."
Some seemingly mundane issues have become catastrophic, because of the lack of decision-makers, she said.
'We have offices that are having to drive to surrounding offices to see if they have any printer paper," LaPointe said. "They can't print out benefit determinations for the American people because they ran out of paper."
Problems likely to build over time
Greg Bachinski, who retired from the Greenfield, Wisc. office on April 19 after 50 years with the agency, said the impacts of the buyout will become more clear in the coming months. Over the past 10 years, Social Security has dropped from 70,000 to 57,000 employees and losing another 7,000 in a matter of months will be noticeable, he said.
"There's been a general decline in the number of people handling the work, and a gigantic increase in the number of people who need to be taken care of and that's been going on for years," he said. The recent staff cuts will likely speed up the decline, he said, though it may take a while for the full effects to become visible.
The requirement for in-person meetings has led to the appointment wait lists, he said.
"If you came in today, you wouldn't get an appointment because they can't make appointments far enough in the future," he said. "So you would be told, 'okay, you're on the list, so to speak and then we'll contact you when appointments are open, and then notify you of your appointment date.' So it may be quite a quite a bit into the future."
As staff leave, work and phone calls are being passed from office to office, he said. So, a recipient may call their local office but end up speaking with someone on the other side of the state. That's adding to the workload as well because the employee is less likely to be familiar with the case and may have to wait for the local office to transmit documents and information.
"It's kind of cumbersome and I think ultimately, kind of a wasteful system to have all this work being passed around," he said.
Turned away by security
Fed up with not being able to reach some one by phone Anderson went to her local Social Security office in Bellevue, Wash. where she was turned away by security who told her she needed an appointment to even enter. The security officer gave her the same 1-800 number to call.
At the Seattle office, Anderson was allowed to take a number and wait in the crowded lobby to make an appointment. She said the people around her were desperate. Some appeared homeless, others told the security guard at the entrance that they had come multiple times that week to make an appointment, but their number was never called.
"I left because I shouldn't have taken a number ahead of those people," she said. "I don't want to use up the precious resources for people that really are desperate."
Suddenly a check arrived one day in March even though she had never spoken to an actual person.
In Chandler, Arizona, Louisa Pedraza, 64, is still waiting to hear if the disability benefits she applied for last year have been approved. The former 9-11 call center operator is counting on the money to help offset the $300-a-month increase in her health insurance.
Pedraza got a letter in early January saying her benefits should be approved within 30 days.
"I thought, okay, by the end of January, you know, things should be rolling, and maybe by February I can start getting my check And all of a sudden, after the inauguration, everything went silent," she said.
According to Social Security's 1-800 automated system, average wait time for approval of disability benefits is 200 to 230 days, which is on par with the Biden years.
Pedraza dreads the idea of waiting hours on the phone for a real person. Her disability, which impacts her ankles and feet, makes it difficult to wait in a lobby for a long time, she said. She just checks the website over and over hoping to see the status of her application has changed.
"I have no confidence that I know this is coming, or that this is going to resolve," she said.
How are changes from the Trump administration affecting you? Let us know by email at swire@usatoday.com or on Signal at sarahdwire.71.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Graham wants to punish Russia with ‘bone-crushing' sanctions. It could backfire.
Graham wants to punish Russia with ‘bone-crushing' sanctions. It could backfire.

Politico

time30 minutes ago

  • Politico

Graham wants to punish Russia with ‘bone-crushing' sanctions. It could backfire.

Sen. Lindsey Graham has pledged that his expansive sanctions bill would be 'bone crushing' for the Russian economy. But if enacted, the South Carolina Republican's proposal to impose 500 percent tariffs on any country that buys Russian energy would effectively cut the U.S. off from some of the world's largest economies — including allies in Europe. 'A 500 percent tariff is essentially a hard decoupling,' said Kevin Book, managing director of Clear View Energy Partners, an energy research firm. Graham appeared to acknowledge as much on Wednesday, when he proposed a broad carve-out for countries that provide aid to Ukraine. This exemption would spare the European Union, which continues to import almost 20 percent of its gas from Russia. But experts remain skeptical that the sky-high tariffs proposed in the Sanctioning Russia Act are in any way feasible. India and China buy roughly 70 percent of Russian energy exports, but several other countries that buy any oil, gas or uranium from Moscow — and aren't included in the carve-out — could also be exposed to tariffs under the bill. The United States, which is still reliant on imports of enriched uranium from Russia to fuel its nuclear reactors, could also run afoul of the bill. Edward Fishman, a senior researcher with the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University, said countries in the crosshairs of the bill would struggle to halt their imports of Russian energy overnight. Tariffs of 500 percent on imports of goods made in China would send prices soaring, disrupt supply chains and could drive up U.S. unemployment to recessionary levels. Most likely, it would lead to a screeching halt in U.S. trade with China. 'It would hurt Americans quite a bit,' Fishman said. The legislation's goal, co-sponsored by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), is to starve Russia's war economy, which continues to earn hundreds of billions of dollars from energy exports. There is widespread support for the overall objective, with 82 senators signing on to Graham's bill so far, and growing support for a companion bill in the House. The bill is likely to change significantly as it moves through Congress and in consultations with the Trump administration, said Matt Zweig, senior policy director of FDD Action, a nonprofit advocacy organization affiliated with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. It may also take a long time. 'With sanctions legislation, you're also normally dealing with iterative processes where you would want to go through every nook and cranny,' Zweig said. Still, the widespread bipartisan support for the legislation suggests there is a high degree of support among lawmakers for tougher action on Russia. 'What Congress may be doing is pressuring the executive branch to act,' said Adam Smith, a partner at the law firm Gibson Dunn. 'There is a sense in the Senate that more sanctions on Russia need to be imposed, or ought to be imposed,' added Smith, who was a senior adviser to the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control during the Obama administration. Graham, the bill's most vocal Republican advocate, said as much in a meeting with reporters in Paris over the weekend, where he described the bill as 'one of the most draconian sanctions bills ever written.' 'The Senate is pissed that Russia is playing a game at our expense and the world's expense. And we are willing to do something we haven't been willing to do before — and that is go after people that have been helping Putin,' Graham said. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, dismissed concerns that the bill is too harsh. 'We need to make Putin understand he has to stop screwing around and come to the table. But we also need to follow it up and make clear we will be tough,' she said. Not everyone agrees. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who has long been skeptical about the effectiveness of sanctions to change the behavior of U.S. adversaries, bashed the bill on Monday as 'literally the most ill-conceived bill I've ever seen in Washington,' he said. 'It would be a worldwide embargo on 36 countries.' Meanwhile, Russia and Ukraine have made little progress on peace talks. Officials from both countries met in Istanbul on Monday and agreed to a further prisoner swap, but failed to achieve any major breakthroughs. Graham and Blumenthal visited Ukraine, France and Germany during last week's congressional recess, where they discussed the sanctions bill, as well as efforts to push Russia to the negotiating table. The proposal has been welcomed by European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen, who met with Graham in Berlin on Monday. 'Pressure works, as the Kremlin understands nothing else,' Von der Leyen said in a statement. 'These steps, taken together with U.S. measures, would sharply increase the joint impact of our sanctions.' Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated Monday that the chamber could take up the legislation later this month. Republican senators have said they would like to secure the approval of the White House before moving forward. The proposed use of blanket tariffs to target countries that continue to do business with Russia's energy sector is novel and appears to be pitched to Trump's interests. On Tuesday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump viewed sanctions as 'a tool in his toolbox,' but declined to comment about his position on the bill. Trump appeared to be inching closer toward supporting the bill in a post on Truth Social on Wednesday, which linked to an op-ed in The Washington Post supporting the legislation. Speaking in the Oval Office on Thursday, Trump indicated he wanted lawmakers to secure his approval before moving forward with the bill. 'They're waiting for me to decide on what to do,' he said, describing the legislation as a 'harsh bill.' The president has liberally wielded tariffs to advance his foreign policy agenda, but his implementation has been spotty. Wall Street has even adopted a trading strategy referencing Trump's capriciousness called TACO, which stands for 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' Tariffs of 145 percent on China, imposed in April, lasted a month before being dramatically scaled back to make way for trade talks, which have so far failed to secure a breakthrough. As it stands, the bill includes some levers that Trump could pull to forestall the tariffs, requiring the president to make a formal determination that Russia is refusing to negotiate or has violated any future peace agreement. Nahal Toosi, Joshua Berlinger, Phelim Kine and Katherine Tully-McManus contributed to this report.

Could Musk-Trump feud stoke GOP divisions ahead of midterms? ANALYSIS
Could Musk-Trump feud stoke GOP divisions ahead of midterms? ANALYSIS

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Could Musk-Trump feud stoke GOP divisions ahead of midterms? ANALYSIS

Even by the standards of President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk's relationship -- an unprecedented alliance punctuated by a meme-inspired reshaping of the government, numerous rocket launches, assassination attempts, a quarter-billion-dollar political gamble and electric car photo-ops -- it's been an unusual week. For months, Musk had been the closest of Trump's advisers -- even living at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida and spending time with the president's family. More recently, Trump gave Musk a congratulatory Oval Office sendoff from his work leading cost-cutting efforts in his administration, giving him a golden key with a White House insignia. But the billionaire's muted criticisms of Trump's "big, beautiful bill" grew louder and more pointed, culminating in posts Thursday on his social media platform taking credit for Trump's November win and Republicans' takeover of the Senate. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk posted. "Such ingratitude." Some lawmakers and Republicans worry Musk's apparent acrimonious departure from Trump's orbit could create new uncertainties for the party -- and stoke GOP divisions that would not serve Republicans well heading into a critical legislative stretch before the midterm elections. The back-and-forth attacks, which continued into the weekend and took a sharply personal turn, reverberated across a capital they have both reshaped. Trump on Friday told several reporters over the phone that he was not thinking about Musk and told ABC News Chief Washington Correspondent Jonathan Karl that Musk had "lost his mind." In the near term, Trump and the GOP are trying to muscle their signature tax and domestic policy megabill through the House and Senate, with the slimmest of margins and no shortage of disagreements. MORE: Speaker Johnson tries to protect fate of megabill from Trump-Musk crossfire Any shift on the key issues could topple the high-wire act needed to please House and Senate Republicans. A nonstop torrent of criticism from Musk's social media megaphone could collapse negotiations, harden the position of the bill's critics and even undermine other pieces of Trump's first-term agenda. "You hate seeing division and chaos," Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., who represents a swing district, told ABC News about the Trump-Musk fracas. "It's not helpful." Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, the chairman of the House Budget Committee, called Musk a "credible voice" on "debt and spending" issues. "It's never helpful when he says those things. He's a believable person and he has a broad reach, but I think he's frustrated and people understand the context," Arrington said, predicting that both men will eventually resolve their dispute. Republican operatives watching the spat unfold this week told ABC News it is too early to say how the feud between Trump and Musk could affect the next election. The billionaire spent more than anyone else on the last election, pouring $270 million into groups boosting Trump and other Republicans up and down the ballot, according to Federal Election Commission filings. MORE: Trump-Musk feud leaves some DOGE staffers worried about their futures: Sources He already suggested he would cut back on his political donations next cycle, more than a year out from the midterm elections. In the final stretch of the 2024 race, he relocated to Pennsylvania, hosting town halls and bankrolling his own get-out-the-vote effort in the critical swing state. Since his foray into Washington, Musk has become a deeply polarizing and unpopular figure, while the president's approval rating has ticked up in some recent surveys. Groups affiliated with Musk spent $20 million this spring on the Wisconsin Supreme Court race, only for the liberal candidate to win -- signaling to some Republicans the limits of Musk's political pull. While his support may be missed by Republicans next cycle, Trump has continued to raise millions of dollars to support his future political plans, a remarkable sum for a term-limited president that underscores his central role in the party and undisputed kingmaker status. MORE: Trump tells ABC Musk 'lost his mind,' as CEO's dad says 'make sure this fizzles out' Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., who is mulling a gubernatorial bid in 2026, downplayed the tensions or political implications, suggesting that reporters "spend way more time worrying about these things than most average people." "I'm sure they will make peace," Lawler told ABC News on Friday. There were some signs of a détente. While Musk continued to hurl insults at Trump ally and critic Steve Bannon, his social media activity appeared to cool off on Friday, and the billionaire said one supporter was "not wrong" for saying Trump and Musk are "much stronger together than apart." Through nearly a decade in politics and three campaigns for the White House, Trump has demonstrated a remarkable ability to move past disputes or disagreements with many intraparty rivals and onetime critics, including some who now serve in his Cabinet. Now, some Republicans left Washington this week asking themselves if Musk is willing to do the same. Could Musk-Trump feud stoke GOP divisions ahead of midterms? ANALYSIS originally appeared on

DOGE caucus leader says Elon Musk made a 'massive exaggeration' about spending cuts
DOGE caucus leader says Elon Musk made a 'massive exaggeration' about spending cuts

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

DOGE caucus leader says Elon Musk made a 'massive exaggeration' about spending cuts

A key DOGE-minded lawmaker in Congress calling out Elon Musk amid his feud with Trump. "Most everybody knew Elon was exaggerating to what he could do," said Rep. Blake Moore of Utah. He also said Musk was "parroting false claims" about the "Big Beautiful Bill." Shortly after the feud between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk hit its apex on Thursday, a key DOGE-minded lawmaker in Congress had some pointed words about the world's richest man. "Most everybody knew Elon was exaggerating to what he could do," Republican Rep. Blake Moore of Utah told reporters outside the Capitol. "He was claiming finding $4 billion a day in cuts he was going to get. One time, he said $2 trillion, he was going to find." "It's a massive exaggeration, and I think people are recognizing that now," Moore said. The Utah Republican is one of the three co-leaders of the House DOGE caucus, a bipartisan group of lawmakers who had hoped to support Musk's cost-cutting efforts. The caucus met a handful of times at the beginning of the year, and leaders previously told BI that they intended to compile a report of potential cost-saving measures for DOGE at the end of the first quarter of this year. That didn't end up happening, in part because the White House DOGE Office ultimately had little interaction with the caucus. One Democratic member declared the group to be "dead" last month. "We've always been a little frustrated that there was such limited interaction," Moore said on Thursday. "We couldn't really identify where we were to lean in, and we had a ton of folks ready to support it, but there just wasn't that interaction." Musk did not respond to a request for comment. Moore said that he wanted to pursue cuts to federal spending through the bipartisan government funding process, saying that there are "plenty of Democrats that recognize there's waste in our government." GOP leaders have said they'll pursue DOGE cuts both through that process and through "rescission" packages, the first of which is set to be voted on in the House next week. The first package, which includes cuts to public broadcasting and foreign aid, is $9.4 billion, just a fraction of the cost savings that Musk once predicted. "It's definitely kind of over-promising, under-delivering," Moore said. Musk's public feud with Trump began last week, when the tech titan began criticizing the "Big Beautiful Bill" that Republicans are trying to muscle through Congress. The bill is projected to increase the deficit by trillions of dollars, though Republicans have argued that those forecasts do not account for the economic growth that might be spurred by the bill. That feud boiled over on Tuesday, with the two men engaging in a war of words on their respective social media platforms. "When I saw Musk start posting, just parroting false claims about the tax reconciliation bill, it was clear something's amiss," Moore said. "And so it escalated, yeah. It escalated very quickly." Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store