
Migrants at Ice jail in Miami made to kneel to eat ‘like dogs', report alleges
The incident at the downtown federal detention center is one of a succession of alleged abuses at lails operated by Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (Ice) n the state since January, chronicled by the advocacy groups Human Rights Watch, Americans for Immigrant Justice, and Sanctuary of the South from interviews with detainees.
Dozens of men had been packed into a holding cell for hours, the report said, and denied lunch until about 7pm. They remained shackled with the food on chairs in front of them.
'We had to eat like animals,' one detainee named Pedro said.
Degrading treatment by guards is commonplace in all three jails, the groups say. At the Krome North service processing center in west Miami, female detainees were made to use toilets in full view of men being held there, and were denied access to gender-appropriate care, showers or adequate food.
The jail was so far beyond capacity, some transferring detainees reported, that they were held for more than 24 hours in a bus in the parking lot. Men and women were confined together, and unshackled only when they needed to use the single toilet, which quickly became clogged.
'The bus became disgusting. It was the type of toilet in which normally people only urinate but because we were on the bus for so long, and we were not permitted to leave it, others defecated in the toilet,' one man said.
'Because of this, the whole bus smelled strongly of feces.'
When the group was finally admitted into the facility, they said, many spent up to 12 days crammed into a frigid intake room they christened la hielera – the ice box – with no bedding or warm clothing, sleeping instead on the cold concrete floor.
There was so little space at Krome, and so many detainees, the report says, that every available room was used to hold new arrivals.
'By the time I left, almost all the visitation rooms were full. A few were so full men couldn't even sit, all had to stand,' Andrea, a female detainee, said.
At the third facility, the Broward transitional center in Pompano Beach, where a 44-year-old Haitian woman, Marie Ange Blaise, died in April, detainees said they were routinely denied adequate medical or psychological care.
Some suffered delayed treatment for injuries and chronic conditions, and dismissive or hostile responses from staff, the report said.
In one alleged incident in April at the downtown Miami jail, staff turned off a surveillance camera and a 'disturbance control team' brutalized detainees who were protesting about a lack of medical attention to one of their number who was coughing up blood. One detainee suffered a broken finger.
All three facilities were severely overcrowded, the former detainees said, a contributory factor in Florida's decision to quickly build the controversial 'Alligator Alcatraz' jail in the Everglades intended to eventually hold up to 5,000 undocumented migrants awaiting deportation.
Immigration detention numbers nationally were at an average of 56,400 a day in mid-June, with almost 72% having no criminal history, according to the report.
The daily average during the whole of 2024 was 37,500, HRW said.
The groups say that the documented abuses reflect inhumane conditions inside federal immigration facilities that have worsened significantly since Trump's January inauguration and subsequent push to ramp up detentions and deportations.
'The anti-immigrant escalation and enforcement tactics under the Trump administration are terrorizing communities and ripping families apart, which is especially cruel in the state of Florida, which thrives because of its immigrant communities,' said Katie Blankenship, immigration attorney and co-founder of Sanctuary of the South.
'The rapid, chaotic, and cruel approach to arresting and locking people up is literally deadly and causing a human rights crisis that will plague this state and the entire country for years to come.'
The Guardian has contacted Ice for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Los Angeles schools are prepping ‘safe zones' to keep ICE agents away as students return to classroom
Los Angeles city schools are ready with unprecedented protections to keep federal immigration authorities away as students return to the classroom. School police, other officers and volunteer 'scouts' will patrol some 100 schools that are part of the nation's second-largest school system in hopes of keeping the district's 400,000 students – and their families – out of reach from ICE. "Our young people are going through this unnecessary trauma, which should not interfere with their education,' Mayor Karen Bass said. Officers, both employed by the schools and surrounding municipalities, will establish 'safe zones' in neighborhoods with a large Latino population, focusing specifically on watching out for older students who walk to class, according to the Los Angeles Times. Bus routes have also been altered to help immigrant families avoid ICE agents during their commute, officials said. Additionally, community volunteers will take on the role of scouts, alerting schools to nearby ICE agents so they can take necessary precautions, including potentially locking down the campus. The initiatives, a collaboration between city and school officials, come at what Bass described as a 'profound' moment in American history. Other programs the district is taking include coordinating food aid for families in hiding, providing information about online schooling options and distributing a 'family preparedness' guide detailing their rights. L.A. schools superintendent Alberto Carvalho, once an undocumented immigrant himself, said the district will oppose 'any entity, at any level, that seeks to interfere with the educational process of our children. "We want no one to stay home as a result of fears," Carvalho said. 'We are standing on the right side of the Constitution, and years from now, I guarantee you, we will have stood on the right side of history. We know that,' he said. Officials' worries are not unfounded. On Monday, a 15-year-old boy with disabilities was handcuffed outside Arleta High School. Federal agents drew their guns on the teen, who was later released after his relatives convinced federal agents he was not who they were looking for. A spokesperson for U.S. Customs and Border Protection told the Times that the school was not being targeted; rather, agents believed they were going after a 'criminal illegal alien' and suspected MS-13 gang member. The 2024-2025 school year ended in L.A. as immigration raids targeting workplaces broke out across the city. The raids left parents scrambling to check apps dedicated to tracking ICE activity during important moments, such as their children's graduation ceremony, the Los Angeles Times reported at the time. Agents have also targeted homes with children who attend L.A. County schools. Mary, a mother of three without legal status, said she knew what to do when ICE agents came to her door twice in May because of what she learned from her local public school. ICE agents — often dressed in plainclothes and driving unmarked vehicles — raided L.A. County businesses and homes this past June, and were often spotted near schools, too, sparking widespread panic and disruption of daily life. The raids led to massive protests and prompted President Donald Trump to deploy 700 U.S. Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to try and bring order to the city. It was the first time the National Guard had been ordered by the president, not the state, since 1965. That escalation led to over 2,000 'No Kings' protests against the Trump administration's policies in all 50 states, from California to Maine. The demonstrations coincided with a D.C. parade for the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, which critics blasted as just an extravagant birthday party for Trump. While litigation, including a temporary restraining order, appears to have slowed down immigration raids in L.A., local leaders believe they haven't stopped completely.


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
An Uber ride that should've taken 23 minutes became a nightmare — and she's not alone: ‘Attacks every 8 minutes'
In May 2021, an intoxicated Oklahoma woman called an Uber to take her home from her niece's engagement party. Although the ride should have only taken 23 minutes, when she woke up hours later, she wasn't home, but seated behind the steering wheel of a strange car, with her underwear in her purse and her jeans on inside out. Her mind blurred with confusion and her body covered in bruises, she went to the hospital and was given a sexual assault examination, according to a civil lawsuit against Uber and the driver, seen by The Independent. Authorities charged the driver, Timothy Alexander Greene, in June 2021. A jury convicted him of sexual battery two years later, court records show, and he is serving a 10-year prison sentence. The woman's horrifying assault in a ride-share vehicle is far from an isolated incident. 'Especially with solo female passengers, this is a huge problem in the industry,' Jim Mitchell, one of the attorneys representing the Oklahoma woman, told The Independent. 'Safety is a core value at Uber, and we have invested billions of dollars and countless hours to reduce safety incidents during trips, particularly when it comes to sexual misconduct and assault,' the company said in a statement on its website. Across the country, passengers have shared claims of misconduct that took place in Uber rides. In Utah, a woman on her way home was subjected to unwanted touching. In California, a driver touched himself as a female passenger vomited. In Texas, a 20-minute ride turned into a five-hour ordeal and an alleged rape at a motel. While Uber touts its safety record — and the company has implemented a string of features to protect passengers and drivers since its inception — allegations detailed in thousands of legal cases, internal company documents, and stories on social media underscore that staying safe in ride-shares is still an issue. Uber received reports of sexual misconduct every eight minutes from U.S. riders from 2017 through 2022, documents first reported by The New York Times revealed this week. Over six years, that totaled more than 400,000 Uber trips in the U.S. resulting in reports of sexual assault and sexual misconduct, according to the report. Uber's 2022 safety report disclosed 12,522 sexual assault and misconduct reports over the same time period. The tech company addressed the large discrepancy in a statement posted on the company website Wednesday after the Times published its report. The 'vast majority' of the hundreds of thousands of misconduct reports were 'less serious and non-physical in nature,' like flirting or staring, Hannah Nilles, Uber's Head of Safety for the Americas, wrote. Most of these 400,000-plus reports have not been subjected to a 'rigorous' process that vets allegations and weeds out false reports made 'with the goal of getting a refund,' Nilles continued. Uber claims that 99.99 percent of trips end without any issue. Roughly 0.006 percent of the 6.3 billion trips in the U.S. in the six-year span ended with a sexual misconduct or assault report, according to Nilles. The most serious reports accounted for 0.00002 percent — or 1 in 5 million trips — she said. The vast majority of sexual misconduct reports between 2017-2022 were made by female drivers or riders. Women represented 89 percent of survivors, according to the company's 2022 safety has not released a safety report since. The Independent has asked the company why this is the case. Uber identified other patterns in the sexual assault report data, according to internal documents seen by the Times. Incidents tended to occur late at night and on weekends with pick-ups near bars. The company has implemented a series of safety measures over the past several years. 'RideCheck' uses GPS tracking to detect whether the ride stays on course, pinging drivers and riders to ensure they're safe. There's also a 'Follow My Ride' feature that allows riders to share their trips so loved ones can track. But Uber acknowledges the features' limitations. 'No single safety feature or policy is going to prevent unpredictable incidents from happening on Uber, or in our world,' Nilles told the Times. In one case, what should have been a 20-minute trip became a harrowing five-hour ordeal that culminated in an alleged rape, The Times reported. A woman in Houston requested an Uber in December 2023. The driver picked her up at 8.53 p.m. at an apartment complex to take her to a house 22 minutes away. But the driver took a detour to a gas station around 9.10 p.m., the records show. That's when Uber sent a ping to check in on the woman, who didn't respond. By 9.29 p.m., the car continued to veer off the requested course and instead stopped at a motel. The company notified the woman again, and again, it went unanswered. Minutes later, Uber tried to get in touch with her with a robocall, to which she also didn't respond. The driver didn't mark the trip as complete until 2.01 a.m. Three hours later, the woman called Uber, claiming that she had been intoxicated and woke up in a motel with the driver, who had raped her, the Times reported. Uber banned the driver immediately after the alleged attack. An investigation into him the following month revealed a 'a concerning fact pattern' that included two previous accusations of sexual misconduct for inappropriate comments. The three missed contact attempts served as a potential signal that something could have gone wrong in the trip, the documents said. The report asked: 'Are our actions (or lack of actions) defensible?' In Oklahoma, when charges were brought against Uber driver Greene in 2021, the State Bureau of Investigation warned that there may be other survivors. Authorities had 'reason to believe other women could also have been assaulted by the ride-share driver.' It appears that investigators found another survivor. Last June, Oklahoma County District Attorney's Office brought another charge against Greene, accusing him of raping a woman in July 2019 while he was driving for Lyft, court records show. He has pleaded not guilty and is next due in court on August 20. An attorney for Greene declined to comment on the ongoing cases. The woman filed a police report and contacted Lyft to report the alleged incident. Greene was booted from the platform, the 2021 civil suit says. Greene then allegedly engaged in 'platform hopping,' jumping over to Uber after being deactivated from Lyft, said Mitchell, who also represents the woman. In March 2021, Lyft and Uber launched the Industry Sharing Safety Program which allows both companies to share information about drivers who were banned from the other's platform for sexual or physical assaults. "Any act of violence or assault has no place in the Lyft community or our society. When an incident is reported to us, our trained team takes immediate action to investigate, provides our support to the victim, and works with law enforcement on any investigation. With regard to the Oklahoma case, we were made aware of the allegations against the driver in June of 2019, and we immediately and permanently banned him from ever driving on the Lyft platform again. At that time we also provided support to the rider, and assisted law enforcement with their investigation,' a Lyft spokesperson told The Independent. Since Uber issued its first safety report for 2017 and 2018, the rate of reported sexual assaults has declined 44 percent, according to the company's latest report. Meanwhile, hundreds of plaintiffs across 29 states have joined a class action lawsuit against the ride-share giant. More than 2,435 cases are pending in the multidistrict litigation against Uber for activity described in the Times article, lead attorneys Rachel Abrams, Sarah London, and Roopal Luhana told The Independent in a statement. There are an additional 621 cases brought in California under a related proceeding. 'We look forward to litigating these claims in Court on behalf of the brave survivors who have come forward to seek justice from a company that has put profits over safety,' the attorneys said. The cases are scheduled to go to trial in December. Lyft, Uber's ride-share rival, also disclosed thousands of sexual misconduct reports from 2017 through 2022. In that period, there were 6,809 reports, accounting for 0.0002 percent of rides, according to Lyft's 2022 safety report. On social media, women have also been sharing their disturbing stories. One TikToker, xknowlsallpodcast, alleged she was sexually assaulted in 2016 in San Francisco. Intoxicated, she got in an Uber and immediately started feeling sick. She threw up a little on the car's central console. The driver then stopped the car and asked what she was doing, she recalled. The rider then opened the door and continued to vomit. The driver walked around to her side of the car. He then took off his pants and started touching himself, she said. She then ran out of the car, hid behind a nearby house, and called another Uber. Later, she looked at her Uber receipts to find that her second ride picked her up far from where she wanted to go. She had ordered a car to take her from a holiday party in downtown San Francisco to her home in the northern part of the city. Instead, she said, her receipts showed that she was south, near the airport. 'When I look at my Uber receipts, the first car that was supposed to take me downtown to my house was cancelled,' the woman said in the video. 'My theory is this driver saw me, he saw how intoxicated I was, he saw an opportunity to hurt me, and he cancelled the ride when I got into his car.' When she reported the incident to Uber, the company told her that she got into the wrong car that night, the TikToker recalled. She also said that this was a possibility. Since then, she said she shares her rides with her friends and 'never, ever, ever get into a car by myself intoxicated like that.' The Independent has asked Uber about the alleged incident but received no response. In Utah, a Facebook user said she called an Uber to take her home in August 2021. The driver reached into the backseat where she was sitting and started 'repeatedly touching and rubbing' her leg, despite her pleas for him to stop, she wrote in a social media post. When she tried to exit, he locked the door, she claimed. She eventually got to her destination after telling him that family members were expecting her. The woman contacted Uber about the incident, she said, and urged other riders to share their locations when using a ride-share. The driver was banned from the platform, Uber told The Independent. Safety issues extend to female drivers as well. And due to the media attention around ride-share assaults, attracting female drivers has become a challenge. 'Safety has ranked as one of the top reasons for prospective female drivers to not join Uber, and for current female drivers to not drive during certain hours of the day,' an internal document, seen by the Times, stated. Uber rolled out an experimental program that matched female riders with female drivers in Saudi Arabia in 2019 and found an 'overwhelmingly positive response,' the company said. It has since replicated the feature in 40 countries. The company had planned to launch the same program in the U.S. in November, but Donald Trump's election victory prompted executives to rethink the timing of the rollout. 'This is not the right environment to launch, and we want to take a beat to assess our timing,' an internal document, reported by The Times, stated. The Independent has asked Uber about the decision. Last month, Uber announced that the 'Women Preferences' option for riders and drivers will become available in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Detroit starting 'in the next few weeks.' Lyft rolled out a similar program — 'Women + Connect' — last September, giving women and nonbinary riders and drivers the option to be paired. The company has since expanded the program nationwide.


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
A $200 million endowment focused on Black Americans is taking shape
Started in 2020 as a five-year initiative inspired by the racial justice outcry following the police murder of George Floyd, the California Black Freedom Fund plans to expand to a $200 million endowment. The move is both rare in the world of philanthropy and politically bold, given the Trump administration's efforts to eliminate race-based grant making. Originally a designated fund of the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, the fund spun off on July 1, renaming itself the Black Freedom Fund, to indicate its new national scope. Over the past five years, it has drawn more than $97 million in donations. Of that, it has directed $45 million to 206 nonprofits in California, largely working to increase the sway of nonprofits that serve Black people, with a portion of the remainder being reserved to start the endowment. Marc Philpart, the fund's executive director, said the endowment will let the fund make grants of $10 million a year without cutting into its asset base, assuming historical rates of return on investments. By establishing a durable institution with a sizable reservoir of cash, the fund can serve as a lasting beacon to smaller organizations serving Black communities in California, Philpart said. 'When a crisis occurs in the Black community, philanthropy parachutes in, there's a wave of support, and then as soon as the news cameras turn away, the support recedes,' he said. 'We need enduring institutions that are led by and committed to the Black community in ways that have a lasting impact.' DEI targeted Philpart's fundraising for the endowment comes as the Trump administration has characterized diversity, equity, and inclusion programs as illegal and has called for investigations of large foundations that support diversity programs. Under Philpart's leadership, the California Black Freedom Fund started the Legal Education, Advocacy, and Defense for Racial Justice Initiative, which provides pro bono legal consulting and training for nonprofits. The program operates on the premise that there isn't anything illegal about racial justice funding. But the 2023 Supreme Court ruling against considering race in college admissions, in a pair of cases brought by Students for Fair Admissions against Harvard University and the University of North Carolina, was viewed by some as an indication that private philanthropies could not legally engage in race-based grant making — and the issue is far from settled. While Philpart's fundraising pitch might resonate with some donors, others are sure to be nervous, given the scrutiny placed on race-based grant making by the White House, said Dan Morenoff, executive director of the American Civil Rights Project, a litigation and advocacy nonprofit that has challenged affirmative action programs. The White House has directed the Department of Justice to root out instances of race-based grantmaking, which it considers discriminatory. 'You don't want to be on their radar because they are fervently looking for people to make examples of at this point,' Morenoff said. While some corporations and philanthropies, including the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, an early supporter of the California Black Freedom Fund, have retreated from supporting racial justice, Philpart is counting on securing support from donors who want to stay with the cause even as the issue is argued in various court cases stemming from Trump's anti-DEI executive orders. The attacks from the administration, Philpart said, have been a 'clarifying moment' for many donors and have generated interest in the fund. ' People have rallied to us and really doubled down on their commitments to support Black freedom and Black power,' he said. 'That is the most telling thing coming out of this moment — that there is a critical mass of leaders throughout the country who care very deeply about the community.' 70 financial supporters One grantmaker that has doubled down is the California Wellness Foundation. The foundation made an initial grant of $500,000 when the fund was first launched, then made a $200,000 commitment to a separate fund created by the California Black Freedom Fund in response to the January Los Angeles fires, and recently added $500,000 to support the spin-off. Richard Tate, president of the California Wellness Fund, said the new fund is 'needed now more than ever' because of attempts by the administration to roll back equity efforts. 'The fact that we are talking about a Black Freedom Fund is an acknowledgment that not everyone has equal standing in the culture,' he said. 'Whatever headwinds that may exist because of this political moment, now is the time for us to continue to be explicit about our intentions of supporting a community.' Philanthropy needs to act quickly by unleashing more money in grants to support areas like litigation, public advocacy, and the replacement of lost federal funds, said Glenn Harris, president of Race Forward, a nonprofit racial justice advocacy group. But, he said, lasting institutions that can respond to future challenges are also needed. 'There's a balancing act,' Harris said. 'It's really clear that struggles for liberation and justice are going to be with us for a minute.' Among the two dozen grant makers that chipped in to start the fund are the Akonadi, Conrad Hilton and San Francisco foundations as well as the Emerson Collective, Crankstart, the Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr. Fund and the Silicon Valley Community Foundation. The total of institutional funders to the effort since 2020 now exceeds 70. Why endowments Among the groups the fund has supported are the East Bay Permanent Real Estate Cooperative, a community-owned cooperative that 'removes land and housing from the speculative market and places it into permanent community stewardship,' according to the fund. A late 2023 survey of nearly 300 foundations conducted by the Center for Effective Philanthropy found that more than two thirds of grantmakers did not offer endowment grants. Half of those that did so made them to arts organizations and museums. Nonprofits led by Black people receive endowment grants even more rarely, according to a 2022 analysis of social change organizations by the Bridgespan Group, a philanthropy consultancy, which found that nonprofits led by Black people had endowments that were only a fourth as big as those led by white people. Since then, some grant makers have stepped forward to support endowments at organizations serving members of Black communities, said Darren Isom, a partner at Bridgespan. For instance, in 2022 the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation made grants of $5 million each to three racial justice organizations led by people of color: UnidosUS, the NAACP, and Faith in Action. 'Endowments are transfer of power from philanthropic organizations to the organizations that are closest to the work,' he said. 'From an impact perspective, the work is more high impact, more beneficial, and more durable if it's owned by and led by those that are the closest to issues and closest to the communities.' Philpart is confident that despite the blow-back against diversity and racial justice, the fund can raise enough money to meet its goal. 'We're drawing people out who want to prove we are greater than divisiveness, we are greater than bigotry, and we are a greater than racism,' he said. 'We are better than all the things that pull us apart and don't fundamentally improve anyone's well-being.' ______ Alex Daniels is a senior reporter at the Chronicle of Philanthropy, where you can read the full article. This article was provided to The Associated Press by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as part of a partnership to cover philanthropy and nonprofits supported by the Lilly Endowment. The Chronicle is solely responsible for the content. For all of AP's philanthropy coverage, visit