Fire contained in Dubai's Al Habtoor City area
Emergency services were called into action in Dubai on Tuesday afternoon after a fire broke out in the Al Habtoor City area, near Business Bay. Dubai Civil Defence (DCD) said it swiftly contained the fire, which broke out at a construction storage area. A DCD representative described the fire as being medium in severity. No injuries were reported in the blaze, which was brought under control by a DCD team from Al Quoz fire station less than an hour after they arrived, just before 2pm.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Large blaze contained at Sharjah's Al Hamriyah fuel depot after 24-hour battle
Helicopters and firefighting equipment were used to bring a blaze at a fuel depot in Sharjah's Al Hamriyah Port under control on Saturday. No casualties were reported by Sharjah Civil Defence, who battled black smoke and raging flames from about 6.10am after the fire was sparked by the ignition of petrochemical substances. With specialists in fire and chemical safety brought in from across the country, the incident is believed to have started in a warehouse and was brought under control at 6.25am on Sunday, officials said. After the alarm was raised, a unified response system was activated in a joint operation overseen by civil defence units from across the Emirates, the Ministry of Defence, National Guard and Joint Aviation Command, the military air division. Chinook helicopters could be seen unloading gallons of water from buckets onto the flames. Municipalities of Sharjah and Al Hamriyah were also involved in the co-ordinated response to control the incident. The emergency action limited damage to surrounding property, emergency services said. Maj Gen Abdullah Mubarak bin Amer, commander-in-chief of Sharjah Police and chairman of the Local Emergency, Crisis, and Disaster Management Team in Sharjah, said there had no been no loss of human life, and urged the public to follow official sources of information on the incident. Maj Gen bin Amer hailed the efforts of emergency units from across the country who worked in tandem to prevent the large fire from spreading. He said forensic teams will conduct investigations on site to determine the cause of the blaze and assess the damage caused, the results of which will be announced once concluded. Fire crews will remain on site on Sunday as dampening down of the affected area continues, to prevent further outbreaks, with temperatures expected to reach 40°C through the day.
Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
Shahid Afridi breaks silence over Dubai event row, calls outrage 'uncalled for'
Former Pakistan captain Shahid Afridi has spoken out for the first time since a recent event in Dubai triggered backlash in India. He said he was surprised by the outrage and reiterated his long-held belief that sports should rise above politics. In an exclusive interview with Khaleej Times, the flamboyant all-rounder, nicknamed Boom Boom for his explosive batting, dismissed the criticism as 'uncalled for' 'Let's not politicise things,' Afridi said. 'It wasn't even a planned appearance.' The controversy erupted after Afridi and his former teammate Umar Gul were seen receiving a warm welcome by Keralites at an inter-collegiate dance event held at the Pakistan Association Dubai (PAD) building on May 25. The event, reportedly hosted by the alumni association of India's Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUBAA), coincided with Afridi's visit to PAD to celebrate a Guinness World Record for the most contributions to a handprint painting. Afridi, who also runs a fitness centre at the PAD facility, said some Indians spotted him and Umar Gul at the venue and invited them in. 'They were just excited to see us. We were happy to meet them and share a few light moments. That's all it was,' he said. Footage from the event showing Afridi being cheered by a largely Indian crowd quickly spread on social media, fueling criticism from certain groups in India amid ongoing tensions between the two nations. Afridi, however, urged calm. 'This kind of reaction is uncalled for. I've always supported sports diplomacy,' he said. 'Cricket has the power to bring people and countries closer. That's something I've believed in throughout my career.' He recalled with fondness his cricket tours to India, calling them some of the most memorable experiences of his life. 'To be honest, the respect I received in India as a cricketer and as a captain of Pakistan was overwhelming. I've said it before and I'll say it again: the love I got there, I didn't get anywhere else, not even in Pakistan,' Afridi said. Afridi stressed the importance of dialogue and people-to-people connections in resolving issues between India and Pakistan. 'If our politicians won't talk and we don't play each other, how will we ever solve anything?' he asked. Afridi said he often interacts with members of the Asian community and enjoys those conversations. 'I meet so many Indians wherever I go. We chat, we joke, we share cricket memories. There's mutual respect. It's always a pleasure.'
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
‘Is a non-compete clause valid if I quit during the probation period?'
Question: I started a new job in April and am still in my probation period of up to six months. I am not happy, so plan to resign as soon as I find another job. Do I need to give notice in my probation period? For how long? When I started, they made me sign a non-compete clause even though I am only an accounts clerk and am not involved in the sales side at all. Will this cause a problem, and can this company stop me from taking a new job? What if the new job is for a similar business? NR, Dubai Answer: NR is required to give his employer written notice of his resignation. This always applies, even if someone is on probation. This is covered in UAE labour law, Article (9), which states: 'If the worker wishes to move during the probationary period, to work for another employer in the State, he shall notify the original employer of the same in writing within not less than one month from the date of his wish to terminate the contract.' The same clause adds: 'And unless agreed otherwise, the new employer shall compensate the first employer for recruitment or contract costs. ' Note that costs are borne by the employers, not the employee. In this situation, the non-compete clause will not be enforceable. This was covered in the follow-up legalisation to the main labour law, Cabinet Resolution No. (1) of 2022 Concerning the Executive Regulations of Federal Decree-Law No. (33) of 2021 Regulating Labour Relations. Article (12) of this states: 'The worker shall be exempted from the non-compete clause … in accordance with the following conditions: b. If the contract is terminated during the probation period. ' The non-compete clause protects the interest of a business and should not be used as a way of preventing any departing employee from taking another job. It does not apply to all employees in any business and for such a clause to be upheld in a court, the company would need to demonstrate that there would be genuine harm to their business in some way. The burden of proof is on the employer. This is made clear in the executive regulations, which state that such a clause is only relevant if it can be demonstrated that 'the work's nature … causes gross damage to the employer's legitimate interests'. To clarify, NR must give one month's written notice, will not be bound by a non-compete clause, and all costs must be borne by his employers. Q: I work for an international company with an ADGM visa and transferred to them at the start of 2024. It was a very busy year, so I did not take my entire annual leave. I have asked for all eight days to be added to this year's leave, but the HR department is not letting me do that. I was able to carry days forward when working for the company in Hong Kong, so it seems unfair that the rules are different. What does the law say so I have all details before I make my complaint? HC, Abu Dhabi A: HC is a permanent employee with a contract of employment under ADGM, so the provisions of this employment law are the only ones that apply. He should have signed a contract that states this. The provisions that apply are those set out in the latest rules, Employment regulations 2024, which came into effect on April 1, 2025. Section 21 covers annual leave and clause 2 states: 'An employee is entitled to carry forward accrued but untaken vacation leave into the next vacation leave year for a maximum period of 12 months, after which any unused vacation leave carried forward from the previous vacation leave year shall expire. The amount of accrued but untaken vacation leave to be carried forward may be agreed between the employer and the employee, provided that nothing shall prevent an employee from carrying forward at least five days of vacation leave in each vacation leave year.' All employers must apply the provisions in the relevant law as a minimum, although they can choose to offer benefits above the minimum required. Five days is the amount stated in law but the employer can choose to permit more. If the reason is due to pressures of work, HC should speak to his manager to request special dispensation to carry forward additional days of annual leave, although there is no legal obligation to do so. Should the company refuse to permit his request, there are no grounds for a complaint under the ADGM employment regulations.
