logo
Reform clarifies flag policy after red rose row

Reform clarifies flag policy after red rose row

Yahoo05-05-2025

Reform UK has been forced to clarify that it would continue to fly county standards from council buildings after a row over the flying of Lancashire's red rose flag.
Reform chairman Zia Yusuf had earlier announced that "Reform-controlled English councils will move at speed to resolve that the only flags permitted to be flown on or in its buildings will be the Union Jack and St George's flag".
In response, Labour MP for Blackpool South, Chris Webb, said Reform was off to "a great start" by "banning" the Lancashire rose. As of Friday, Reform controls Lancashire County Council.
A Reform spokesman later said: "Reform UK will proudly fly the Union Jack, St George's flag and county flags."
"Unlike the Tories and Labour, we are proud of our country and history," they added.
Lancashire County Council told the BBC the red rose flag would continue to be flown outside its buildings.
Reform took control of 10 local authorities in England at last week's local elections, including Lancashire, Durham and Staffordshire.
Other Labour and Conservative MPs had also criticised the idea that county flags would not be allowed to fly.
Conservative MP for Hinckley and Bosworth, Dr Luke Evans, asked whether it meant "Leicestershire County Council would not be able to fly the Leicestershire county flag".
The Tories lost control of Leicestershire County Council, with Reform now the largest party but falling short of an overall majority.
Meanwhile, Labour MP Mike Tapp accused Reform of banning the Ukrainian flag from being flown, and called on the party to reverse the decision.
Mr Tapp, who has represented Dover and Deal since last July, said: "As VE Day reminds us, Britain has a proud history of working with allies to defeat dictators and tyrants."
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Reform UK take control of Lancashire County Council
Huge swings see Reform gains in local elections while Lib Dems take control of three councils
Bruised Tories and Labour left working out how to tackle Reform
Lancashire County Council

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia's 'Pearl Harbor': What to know about Ukraine's audacious drone strike
Russia's 'Pearl Harbor': What to know about Ukraine's audacious drone strike

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Russia's 'Pearl Harbor': What to know about Ukraine's audacious drone strike

Russia's 'Pearl Harbor': What to know about Ukraine's audacious drone strike Ukraine unleashed more than a hundred drones smuggled deep into Russia in what it called its most damaging attack yet. Show Caption Hide Caption Donald Trump 'disappointed' with Vladimir Putin President Donald Trump told reporters he was 'disappointed' with Russian President Vladimir Putin, referencing latest attacks on Ukraine. Ukraine said the strikes on Russian strategic bombers had caused $7 billion in damage. "It had an absolutely brilliant outcome," Zelenskyy said. 'It is impossible to restore these losses,' Rybar, a pro-Kremlin Telegram channel, said. WASHINGTON − Ukraine destroyed dozens of enemy bombers using a horde of drones smuggled deep into Russia in a stunning attack that Russian war bloggers are calling Moscow's Pearl Harbor. It was the most damaging Ukrainian attack on Russia in the three years since Moscow invaded. Ukrainian intelligence said the coordinated strikes on June 1 took a $7 billion toll on Russia's military and demolished more than a third of Moscow's strategic cruise missile carriers, including planes cabable of carrying nuclear warheads. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called the massive attack, which he said used 117 drones, his country's "longest-range operation." More: War in Ukraine rages on as Putin's 3-day ceasefire nears: updates in maps Russia's Pearl Harbor? "It had an absolutely brilliant outcome," Zelenskyy said on Telegram. "Russia has had very tangible losses, and justifiably so." Oksana Markarova, Kyiv's ambassador to the United States, called the attack a "very successful defensive operation in Russia against Russian aircraft that, on a daily basis, bomb our hospitals and schools and kill our kids." Speaking at an AI event in Washington, Markarova said it was "the best example of how innovation can and should work in defense." With Ukraine set to meet Russia for U.S.-brokered peace talks the next day and amid aggressive Russian advances on the battlefield, the ambitious June 1 attack showed neither side is counting on a breakthrough in negotiations. "We hope that the response will be the same as the US response to the attack on their Pearl Harbor or even tougher," Russian war blogger Roman Alekhin wrote on Telegram, comparing the Ukrainian strike to the 1941 Japanese raid on a U.S. base in Hawaii. 'It is impossible to restore these losses,' reported Rybar, a pro-Kremlin Telegram channel. Ukrainian 'Spider's Web' The operation, code-named "Spider's Web," was characteristic of the style of warfare Ukraine has made its brand as it attempts to undercut Russia's larger military – flooding the zone with cheap, deadly drones. But the scope of this attack set a new precedent. The drones, strapped with explosives, were hidden inside the roofs of wooden sheds, which were dropped off by trucks at the outer edge of Russian military bases, a Ukrainian security official told Reuters. The roofs then opened by remote control, unleashing the drones to swarm the military bases. Ukraine's intelligence service said 41 Russian aircraft were hit at four air bases stretching from the Finnish border to Siberia. One targeted base, in the Irkutsk region, lies more than 2,600 miles from the front lines, making it the farthest target Ukraine has hit during the conflict. Russia's defense ministry acknowledged in Telegram messages June 1 that drones launched "from an area in close proximity to airfields resulted in several aircraft catching fire." The operation came a day after Russia launched a massive overnight attack on Ukraine using 472 drones and seven missiles, according to Ukraine's air force – the most drones launched in one operation throughout the conflict. Separately on June 1, Ukraine struck two highway bridges in Russian regions close to its borders, killing seven people and injuring 69. One bridge collapsed on a train carrying nearly 400 passengers to Moscow, according to Russian investigators. Three of the missiles and 372 drones were downed, the air force said. Peace talks restart as Trump loses patience with Russia Ukraine launched the operation a day before Ukraine and Russia will meet for U.S.-mediated negotiations in Istanbul to end the grinding conflict. President Donald Trump has pressed both sides for a ceasefire. Earlier this year, his focus was trained on Ukraine, sparking tension with Zelenskyy that exploded into public view during a combative Oval Office meeting in late February. But in recent weeks, Trump has grown more frustrated with Russian President Vladimir Putin's dug-in position in negotiations. In his starkest criticism of Putin to date, Trump wrote that Putin had "gone absolutely CRAZY" after Russia launched a barrage of drones and missiles into Ukrainian cities last weekend that killed a dozen people. "I've always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY!" Trump wrote in a May 25 Truth Social. Trump said days later in the Oval Office that he was "very disappointed" that "people were killed in the middle of what you would call a negotiation." (This article was updated to correct the misspelling of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's last name.)

Common sense but true: Don't let people who hate America move here
Common sense but true: Don't let people who hate America move here

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Common sense but true: Don't let people who hate America move here

I pledge allegiance, to the flag . . . I heard those strange words for the first time at Riverside Elementary School in 1976, as a First Grader who had just moved to the United States with my family. I learned quickly how to say the words, but it took me much longer to learn what they mean. Like Jefferson, Franklin, and Washington, I was born English but chose to become an American. I took US history in middle and high school, got a degree in history, and later taught American history to 8th and 11th graders. But though I knew the names and dates, nothing taught me to love my country like spending half my life outside of it, including 23 years as a US diplomat in Africa, Asia, and Europe. The singularity of American freedom and opportunity is best proven through comparison. Like many other Americans who came here legally and became citizens, nothing rankles me more than seeing disrespect, ingratitude, and even homicidal violence from some who have been granted the opportunity to come here — or allowed to remain despite coming illegally. You'd figure the least they could do would be to obey our rules and respect our culture and values. Watching Columbia University and other supposed elite institutions become hot-beds of radical protest and support for antisemitism and terrorist violence has been painful. It's bad enough when the ill-informed youth are home-grown, but when foreign students here on visas are leading the charge, it's too much to take. So, we shouldn't – and we don't have to. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's recent announcement that he will interpret our visa laws to keep out those who would steal our secrets, undermine our democracy, or obstruct our foreign policy abroad, is cheering news. Law enforcement officials at the scene of the terror attack in Boulder. AP Photo/David Zalubowski He's suggesting nothing new – our immigration law already contains many ineligibilities both statutory and discretionary, which he can wield. All across the developed West, the same crisis is playing out: who gets to decide who comes in, and who stays? Does our citizenship have any value? Do we ask nothing in exchange? The global Left does not believe in borders. They think anyone, anywhere should be allowed to live where they want. When they get there, the Left believes they should get all the rights of citizens – health care, education, welfare, and even the vote. For them, under no circumstances should a foreigner – invited or not, criminal or not – ever be evicted. This is a recipe for national suicide, and it's a choice we should reject. On Sunday, an Egyptian illegal immigrant attempted to kill several American Jews in Boulder, Colorado by burning them alive. It appears the man entered the US with a tourist visa in 2022, which would have allowed him to come for six months tops. He overstayed, like maybe half a million other foreigners do every year and then claimed asylum so he wouldn't be kicked out. He was given a work permit while he waited years for his immigration case to work through the system. This kind of 'defensive' asylum claim is the easiest ploy for someone, even with no credible case, to remain here. Millions of aliens are waiting in processing backlogs, most of them with cases that don't qualify. Millions more entered illegally over land and were released by DHS when Joe Biden was president, with the administration encouraging them to all claim asylum. Soliman is in the country illegally. AP As Lora Ries and I argued in a recent Heritage report, it's time we reformed our asylum and refugee process so that it prioritizes American interests, brings in a finite number of people that we can accommodate and assimilate, and ends the farce of mass economic migration based on fraud. At the same time, the State Department is right to use the wide discretion they already have under immigration law to more carefully screen those coming in on visas, for whatever purpose. Anyone likely to be coming to foment political unrest should be denied — particularly students, who will stay for years. If visitors or students become undesirable after they get here, they should be sent home. Actively working against American basic values or foreign policy should be a negative factor in applications for legal permanent residence. The process should be real, not a rubber stamp. The bar for citizenship should be the highest of all — requiring not just a basic knowledge of civics, English, and history, but a proven love of this country, or at the very least no evinced hatred for it. We have enough domestic strife without importing the squabbles of the Middle East and the rest of the world. And though terrorism is the worst case of allowing in, or letting remain, people who harbor ill will towards our country or its people, every week brings examples of Americans robbed, raped, killed by drunk drivers, and even murdered by people who would not have been here if we had properly guarded our borders and enforced our laws. Just over a year ago, our Heritage Foundation Center for Border Security and Immigration started this visual map showing just a few examples of these preventable crimes. What started as a few spots has turned into a solid mass in some areas – like Massachusetts, whose governor seems to care more about the rights of illegal aliens than her own voters. No foreign national has a right to a US visa. Once they arrive, each visitor must do what he said he was coming here to do, and obey our laws. Some will learn to value this country enough to want to become Americans. Many of these will find a way, and they are welcome. But to preserve this unique society so many still want to join, we need to start according our country the singular value it deserves. Simon Hankinson is a senior research fellow in The Heritage Foundation's Border Security and Immigration Center.

Ukraine Deliberately Blindsided Trump Before Massive Drone Attack on Russia
Ukraine Deliberately Blindsided Trump Before Massive Drone Attack on Russia

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Ukraine Deliberately Blindsided Trump Before Massive Drone Attack on Russia

President Donald Trump was deliberately left in the dark about Ukraine's unprecedented drone strike in Russia on Sunday, which destroyed nearly a third of the Kremlin's strategic bomber fleet in a surprise attack. The large-scale drone attack saw a fleet of drones scattered all across Russia carry out simultaneous attacks on five airbases, wiping out 40 irreplaceable military bombers worth an estimated $7 billion, which have been used to reign terror upon Ukrainian civilians. 'Operation Spider-Web' took over 18 months to plan and was personally overseen by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, a source told CBS News. Drones were smuggled deep into Russia in wooden crates on the back of trucks, which were later opened remotely, allowing the drones to take off. Among the targets hit was the Belaya air base in Russia's far-east Irkutsk region, located more than 2,500 miles away from Ukraine. During his evening address on Sunday, Zelensky said 117 drones had been deployed in the attack, and that Ukraine's base of operations in Russia had even been located next to a branch of the FSB, Russia's intelligence agency. The White House however has declined to comment on the attack—with an administration source confirming to NewsNation on Sunday that Trump was not informed about the operation before it had taken place. While no official reason has been given for the snub, it comes just months after the U.S. announced it would stop sharing military intelligence with Ukraine unless progress was made on peace talks. Trump's longtime fondness for Vladimir Putin and public dislike of Zelensky is also likely a key factor in Kyiv's reluctance to share information with the President. Following the strike, Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to reiterate Trump's call for peace between the two nations, Axios reported on Sunday. Both Russian and Ukrainian officials will meet in Istanbul on Monday to engage in peace talks. 'We are doing everything to protect our independence, our state, and our people,' Zelensky wrote in a post on X. 'I outlined the tasks for the near term and also defined our positions ahead of the meeting in Istanbul on Monday.' The Ukrainian president said his priorities included 'a complete and unconditional ceasefire' and the return of abducted prisoners and children. Operation Spider-Web follows a similarly huge drone strike from Russia on Sunday night, in which the Kremlin launched 472 drones and seven missiles at Ukrainian military bases and infrastructure—the biggest drone attack in the war to date. 12 military personnel were killed in the attack and 60 more injured.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store