logo
Reform clarifies flag policy after red rose row

Reform clarifies flag policy after red rose row

Yahoo05-05-2025
Reform UK has been forced to clarify that it would continue to fly county standards from council buildings after a row over the flying of Lancashire's red rose flag.
Reform chairman Zia Yusuf had earlier announced that "Reform-controlled English councils will move at speed to resolve that the only flags permitted to be flown on or in its buildings will be the Union Jack and St George's flag".
In response, Labour MP for Blackpool South, Chris Webb, said Reform was off to "a great start" by "banning" the Lancashire rose. As of Friday, Reform controls Lancashire County Council.
A Reform spokesman later said: "Reform UK will proudly fly the Union Jack, St George's flag and county flags."
"Unlike the Tories and Labour, we are proud of our country and history," they added.
Lancashire County Council told the BBC the red rose flag would continue to be flown outside its buildings.
Reform took control of 10 local authorities in England at last week's local elections, including Lancashire, Durham and Staffordshire.
Other Labour and Conservative MPs had also criticised the idea that county flags would not be allowed to fly.
Conservative MP for Hinckley and Bosworth, Dr Luke Evans, asked whether it meant "Leicestershire County Council would not be able to fly the Leicestershire county flag".
The Tories lost control of Leicestershire County Council, with Reform now the largest party but falling short of an overall majority.
Meanwhile, Labour MP Mike Tapp accused Reform of banning the Ukrainian flag from being flown, and called on the party to reverse the decision.
Mr Tapp, who has represented Dover and Deal since last July, said: "As VE Day reminds us, Britain has a proud history of working with allies to defeat dictators and tyrants."
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Reform UK take control of Lancashire County Council
Huge swings see Reform gains in local elections while Lib Dems take control of three councils
Bruised Tories and Labour left working out how to tackle Reform
Lancashire County Council
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

President Putin Must Return Ukraine's Children
President Putin Must Return Ukraine's Children

Newsweek

time7 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

President Putin Must Return Ukraine's Children

Last week's much-hyped Trump–Putin summit ended in a cloud of deliberate vagueness: no communiqué, no substantive briefing, no clear commitments. Monday's meeting in the White House with President Volodymyr Zelensky along with some of our most powerful European leaders was far more promising, but time will tell if peace between Russia and Ukraine is possible in the near future. That makes this precisely the moment for Vladimir Putin to demonstrate that he is serious about ending the war in Ukraine. The overgrown playground of the Kherson children's house (orphanage) where Russian forces allegedly took 46 children from, is seen on November 27, 2022, in Kherson, Ukraine. The overgrown playground of the Kherson children's house (orphanage) where Russian forces allegedly took 46 children from, is seen on November 27, 2022, in Kherson, imagine if the Russian leader were to announce not only a commitment to peace but also an unconditional pledge to return the 20,000 Ukrainian children his forces have illegally abducted since the full-scale invasion of February 2022. And while reporting on the meeting in Alaska made little mention of the illegally abducted children, demands that they be located and returned to Ukraine have been unwavering and essentially universal, crossing the political spectrum in the U.S. from Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) to Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa); from Representatives Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.) to Michael McCaul (R-Texas). Just this month, a coalition of 38 countries plus the Council of Europe issued a powerful statement calling on the Russian Federation to "facilitate the return of all unlawfully deported and forcibly transferred Ukrainian children." The fate of these children, dispersed and unable to communicate with their families in Ukraine, is deeply disturbing to me, as a pediatrician—and especially as a parent and grandparent. Most of the older children have been sent to so-called re-education camps scattered throughout Russia, where they are subjected to relentless propaganda aimed at erasing their Ukrainian identity. Younger children have been placed with Russian families, renamed, stripped of their language, and put on a path toward permanent adoption. These acts are not only morally reprehensible but also flagrant violations of international law. That is why, in March 2023, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Putin, charging him with war crimes, including the deportation of children. Having traveled to Ukraine multiple times, representing our organization, the Ukraine Children's Action Project, my wife, Karen Redlener, and I have witnessed firsthand the heartbreak of these abductions. The knowledge that tens of thousands of children have been stolen deepens despair for parents across Ukraine. A credible promise to bring them home could help make the idea of other sacrifices during peace negotiations less intolerable for Ukrainians. Meanwhile, the slow grind of lethal combat and unrelenting attacks on civilian targets have left the most vulnerable—the elderly, people with disabilities, and especially children—bearing the heaviest burdens. Children in particular have endured devastating losses. At least 2,500 have been killed or injured. At least 1.5 million children are now at risk of developing mental health problems. Some 2 million school-age children have had their education upended. And beyond the numbers lies the loss of normalcy: classrooms, friendships, sports, the arts—the everyday fabric of childhood is disrupted by war. During war, children dash to bomb shelters at school, study by candlelight when power fails, use tablets and cell phones when schools have been destroyed, stay indoors for safety, watch their parents grieve the loss of loved ones, and, in the frontline communities, they prepare to flee advancing enemy troops at any hour of the day or night. No child should live like this. And there must be no ambiguity: A credible peace agreement requires the unconditional return of every abducted child. Anything less would legitimize kidnapping as an instrument of war and set a grotesque precedent. To allow these children to remain in Russia under the guise of "integration" or being assimilated into "new families" would make world leaders complicit in cultural erasure on a staggering scale. Some may argue that this demand could complicate peace talks. That is precisely the point. If the futures of stolen children are negotiable, then the peace being crafted is already corrupt. The United States, Europe, and every nation that claims to stand for law and justice must continue to insist on the return of abducted children as a nonnegotiable precondition for any settlement. Ukraine can rebuild its cities, its infrastructure, and its economy. What it cannot do is reclaim the lives lost or undo the profound scars left on its youngest generation. Putin must return Ukraine's children. This may be his best shot at convincing the world that he is serious about ending a war that has already cost too many young lives—Russia and Ukraine's alike. Dr. Irwin Redlener is the co-founder of the Ukraine Children's Action Project, The Children's Health Fund, and is on the faculties of Columbia University and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Zelenskyy says he wants 'strong' US reaction if Putin not ready to meet
Zelenskyy says he wants 'strong' US reaction if Putin not ready to meet

USA Today

time8 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Zelenskyy says he wants 'strong' US reaction if Putin not ready to meet

KYIV, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Kyiv would like a "strong reaction" from Washington if Russian President Vladimir Putin was not willing to sit down for a bilateral meeting with him. President Donald Trump is seeking to broker peace between the two warring countries but has conceded that Putin, with whom Zelenskyy has sought a one-on-one sitdown, may not be willing to make a deal. "I responded immediately to the proposal for a bilateral meeting: we are ready. But what if the Russians are not ready?" Zelenskyy said in comments released on Thursday from a briefing with reporters in Kyiv a day earlier. "If the Russians are not ready, we would like to see a strong reaction from the United States." More: Ukraine's Zelenskyy avoids Trump mauling at White House. Will he get Putin meeting? Despite a flurry of diplomacy in recent days between Trump and his Russian and Ukrainian counterparts, the path to peace remained uncertain as Washington and allies worked out what security guarantees for Kyiv might look like. Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and now holds just under 20% of its neighbour, making gradual advances in the east of late though the conflict has become largely attritional. Zelenskyy said it was unclear what concessions regarding territory Moscow was willing to make to end the war. Trump has previously said Kyiv and Moscow will both need to cede land. "To discuss what Ukraine is willing to do, let's first hear what Russia is willing to do," Zelenskyy said. "We do not know that." More: Amid Putin, Zelenskyy talks, several Trump approval polls dropped. Here's what they say. Responding to a question about the Hungarian capital Budapest serving as a potential location for future Ukrainian-Russian talks, Zelenskyy said it would be "challenging". Hungary, Russia's closest ally in the European Union, has twice offered to host peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said on Thursday. (Reporting by Anastasiia Malenko and Yuliia Dysa; writing by Dan Peleschuk; editing by William Maclean and Mark Heinrich)

NATO scrambles jets after Russian strikes near Romania
NATO scrambles jets after Russian strikes near Romania

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NATO scrambles jets after Russian strikes near Romania

Two German fighter jets were dispatched to Romania's border with Ukraine on Tuesday in response to Russian attacks in the region. Moscow targeted Ukrainian ports on the Danube River, according to Romania's Ministry of National Defense. However, no intrusions from Russian forces were detected during the German mission. 'The close cooperation with Allies throughout the enhanced Air Policing Missions strengthens Romania's defense capability and contributes to NATO's deterrence and defense posture on the eastern flank,' Romania's Ministry of National Defense said in a Wednesday statement. Despite these escalations, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova on Monday warned NATO leaders against deploying troops in Ukraine. Earlier this month, Russia hit civilian infrastructure in Ukraine's Ismail region near Romania. Defense officials deployed two Romanian F-16 fighter jets in response to the assault's close proximity. In recent weeks, NATO leaders have increased pressure on the Kremlin as its war with Ukraine continues past its three-year mark. European leaders met with President Trump at the White House this week alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in an attempt to solidify peace in the region. Last week, Trump also met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska to discuss an end to the conflict. But Moscow has continued its attacks on its neighbor. On Monday, Putin ordered a major overnight attack on Ukraine's energy infrastructure followed by a Wednesday drone strike on Okhtyrka, which injured 14 people including a family with young children. Both offensives also caused widespread fires. 'In total, more than 60 drones and a ballistic missile were used,' Zelensky wrote in a Wednesday post on social media, with accompanying footage of the damage. 'All of these are demonstrative strikes that only confirm the need to put pressure on Moscow, the need to impose new sanctions and tariffs until diplomacy is fully effective,' he added. Trump has refrained from sanctioning Russian trading partners but has remained adamant about ending the war. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store