The Secret Step Chefs Add For Fluffy, Crispy Potato Wedges
But, like my DIY scrambled and poached eggs and even my air fryer chips, I always feel they're missing a little... something.
They're always a little too rubbery, their skins tough and almost chewy rather than delicate and crisp.
So I was glad to read that Jessica Segal, a chef-turned-blogger, had the crispy, fluffy secrets I've been looking for over on her site, Once Upon A Chef.
And it turns out other experts – like ex-chef and former deputy food editor for Good Food, Esther Clark – agree with her technique.
Cooking legends like Gordon Ramsay and Mary Berry recommend parboiling your potatoes before roasting them.
The logic, Raymond Blanc explains, is that 'by boiling the potatoes prior to roasting, you ensure that you only cook the outside surface, allowing them to be fluffed up'.
This also ensures a crispier skin, as does 'chuffing' the potatoes (shaking them in a colander until the outer layer forms 'hundreds of little ridges that will crisp up when placed in the hot fat').
Segal does both when making her potato wedges. She boils the cut, skin-on potatoes in salted water for about six to seven minutes before shaking them in a colander or sieve as they drain.
This 'helps the wedges crisp up beautifully in the oven,' she wrote – the results should be fluffy, 'golden' perfection.
BBC Good Food recommends waiting for at least five minutes for the potatoes to cool after boiling, draining, and 'chuffing' them.
Per Marc Williams, cookery school director at The Grand in York, failing to wait for the steam to evaporate can result in soggy, soft potato skins.
That's because after you parboil your roast potatoes, the steam puffs out from the exterior of your potatoes for a while after removing them from the water.
This can interfere with the potatoes' interaction with the hot oil, which provides the crispy skin. And if they're seriously steamy, or even wet, you can get some dangerous splash-back.
You should 'strain them and wait until the steam stops,' William said. 'You'll never get a crisp result if they are full of water.'
The more you know...
Scrambled Eggs Come Out Fluffier If You Add 1 Simple Ingredient Chefs Swear By
This Storage Trick Can Keep Potatoes Fresh For 6 Months
So THAT's Why Restaurant Sweet Potato Fries Are So Much Better
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
After Years of Saving, He's Ready to Buy a Home. Why His Mom Wants Him to Hand It to His Sister
When a young man announced his plans to buy his first home, his family's reaction took an unexpected turn A mother's surprising request left her son questioning where his responsibilities truly lie As the debate heated up online, readers were left wondering what they would do in his shoesA man seeks advice from the Reddit community after revealing a tense family conflict involving his plans to buy his first home. The 24-year-old shares that he lives in the U.K. and is now financially ready to take a big step. 'I already understand that this is quite rare,' he writes in his post, explaining how he's reached this milestone through a good job and disciplined saving since he was 16. He adds, 'Anyways, I am in the position to buy a 3-4 bedroom house… plenty of room and kinda future proof for if I get a wife and have kids in the future.' The milestone sparked pride from his father, but his mother didn't share the same enthusiasm. 'She told me that the right thing to do would be to buy the house and rent it to my sister as she needs it more,' he reveals. His sister, who is 30, has two children, one with her ex-husband and another with her current boyfriend. He says, 'She is struggling to make ends meet and she is renting now… it is unsuitable in the current house.' While he expresses sympathy for his sister's situation, he firmly believes it isn't his responsibility to provide her with a home. He explains, 'I even suggested that me moving out into my own house is better as it frees up space in my parents house for my sister and her family if it came to that.' He also points out that some of her financial struggles stem from her own choices. 'My sister has also made very questionable financial decisions over years,' he writes, adding, 'while I understand it's hard, a good part of the hardship she is facing could be avoided.' 'I would like to preface that she is nowhere near being homeless,' he adds. In the Reddit post, he asks, 'What do you think, is my stance wrong or not moral, am I justified?' Many in the Reddit community are backing him up, saying he isn't wrong for wanting to prioritize his own needs. One commenter writes, 'You have no obligation to house your sister and her family. It sounds like your sister doesn't expect this anyway, so you should nip this in the bud with your mother before she passes on this idea to your sister.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Others offer their congratulations while firmly stating that his mother's request is out of line. 'Congratulations on being in position to buy a house!! ... As to your sister, no, NTA, she is not your responsibility to house. My guess is that your mom doesn't want her circus back in her house and would rather you stay than have your sister's circus move back home with her.' Despite the pressure from his mother, he seems determined to stick to his plan. Read the original article on People
CNET
11 hours ago
- CNET
Galaxy Z Flip 7 Unveiled: Thinnest Yet, Enhanced Battery and "Pocket Perfect AI"
We process your personal information to measure and improve our sites and service, to assist our marketing campaigns and to provide personalised content and advertising. By clicking the button on the right, you can exercise your privacy rights. For more information see our privacy notice Cookie Policy
Associated Press
12 hours ago
- Associated Press
What to know about the Bayeux Tapestry, an 11th century masterpiece of historical record
LONDON (AP) — The Bayeux Tapestry, a 70-meter- (229 foot)-long medieval artwork that depicts the Norman conquest of England, will be displayed in Britain next year for the first time in 900 years. It will be exhibited at the British Museum in London from September 2026 to July 2027 as part of a bilateral celebration of the 1,000th anniversary of the birth of William the Conqueror, the French nobleman who led the invasion. The loan was announced during French President Emmanuel Macron's state visit to the UK this week. Millions of Britons and people from around the world are expected to view this slice of English history — which is normally housed in France at a dedicated museum in Bayeux, in Normandy — while it is on loan to the British Museum. The Bayeux Tapestry Museum will close later this year until 2027 for the construction of new facilities. Here is a brief history of the Bayeux Tapestry, which shines a light on the long and sometimes bloody links between Britain and France. Art, propaganda and history Stitched in wool thread on linen cloth, the tapestry tells the story of the events surrounding the Norman invasion of England. The story begins in 1064 when Edward the Confessor, the king of England, sends his brother-in-law Harold Godwinson to offer his cousin William, the Duke of Normandy, the succession to the English throne. When Edward died, however, Harold has himself crowned king and William set sail for England to reclaim the throne. The tapestry ends with the epic Battle of Hastings on Oct. 14, 1066, where William's Normans rout the Anglo-Saxon forces. Historians suggest the events leading to the invasion were a bit messier. But the artwork in thread tells the story of the victor. There are banquets, fleets of Viking-style ships, and battles between armored knights wielding swords and spears. The bodies of the dead and wounded are strewn about the battlefield, and one scene depicts Harold pulling an arrow from his eye. The story is told in 58 scenes that include 626 characters and 202 horses. While the tapestry is a work of art, it is also considered an accurate account of 11th century life, offering clues about architecture, armor and ships. Kept in a box for 700 years Historian's believe the tapestry was commissioned by Bishop Odo of Bayeux, William's half-brother, shortly after the events it depicts. Exactly who crafted it is unknown, though evidence suggests the artisans were Anglo-Saxons, according to the Bayeux Tapestry Museum. For the first 700 years of its existence, the tapestry was a little known church artifact that was hung in Bayeux Cathedral once a year and stored in a wooden chest at other times. According to local lore, it was almost cut up in 1792 during the French Revolution, but was saved by a local lawyer. The first public displays of the tapestry took place at Bayeux city hall in 1812. Studied by the Nazis At the start of World War II the tapestry was placed in an underground shelter in Bayeux for safekeeping. But by 1941 it had attracted the attention of the Nazi's pseudoscientific ancestral heritage unit, which removed it for study. By the end of the war, the tapestry was at the Louvre in Paris. After the Allied invasion of Normandy in June of 1944, The New Yorker magazine played off the parallel between those events and the Norman invasion of England nine centuries earlier. The cover of the magazine's July 15, 1944, edition showed Britain's King George VI, President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill in a cartoon version of the tapestry alongside Gen. Dwight Eisenhower, the supreme Allied commander, and British Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery. British authorities highlighted the connection when they built a memorial in Bayeux to honor U.K. and Commonwealth soldiers who died in Normandy. 'We, once conquered by William, have now set free the Conqueror's native land,' reads the inscription on the memorial. 'It reeks of male hormones!' For those who can't wait until next year, the Reading Museum, 40 miles (65 kilometers) west of London, has a full-size replica of the Bayeux Tapestry. The 'faithful replica' was created in 1885 by 35 skilled female embroiders, according to the museum's website, though one thing you won't see in the Reading Museum's tapestry is genitalia. The Victorian artisans who created the replica worked off glass photographic plates that obscured the spicy details that were included in the original. 'Although a faithful copy, it's not quite exactly the same,″ said Brendan Carr, the community engagement curator at the Reading Museum. 'There are differences that you can spot. So if any visitors to the museum might be shocked by, you know, body parts, then they're protected if they come to Reading.' Such niceties didn't stop an Oxford University historian from counting 93 penises, 88 belonging to horses and five to men, in the original. But earlier this year Dr. Chris Monk, a consultant on medieval history, argued that that an appendage previously thought to be a scabbard was actually another example of male genitalia, pushing the number to 94. Male genitals are a 'mode of emphasis' that articulate machismo, Monk wrote in a blog post. 'A more testosterone-soaked scene is hard to find,' he wrote. 'Well, truthfully, there are plenty of scenes of political aggression and posturing in the Bayeux Tapestry: it reeks of male hormones!'
