Trump administration hands over Medicaid recipients' personal data, including addresses, to ICE
The information will give ICE officials the ability to find 'the location of aliens' across the country, says the agreement signed Monday between the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Department of Homeland Security. The agreement has not been announced publicly.
The extraordinary disclosure of millions of such personal health data to deportation officials is the latest escalation in the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, which has repeatedly tested legal boundaries in its effort to arrest 3,000 people daily.
Lawmakers and some CMS officials have challenged the legality of deportation officials' access to some states' Medicaid enrollee data. It's a move, first reported by the AP last month, that Health and Human Services officials said was aimed at rooting out people enrolled in the program improperly.
But the latest data-sharing agreement makes clear what ICE officials intend to do with the health data.
'ICE will use the CMS data to allow ICE to receive identity and location information on aliens identified by ICE,' the agreement says.
Such disclosures, even if not acted upon, could cause widespread alarm among people seeking emergency medical help for themselves or their children. Other efforts to crack down on illegal immigration have made schools, churches, courthouses and other everyday places feel perilous to immigrants and even US citizens who fear getting caught up in a raid.
HHS spokesman Andrew Nixon would not respond to the latest agreement. It is unclear, though, whether Homeland Security has yet accessed the information. The department's spokesperson, Tricia McLaughlin, said in an emailed statement that the two agencies 'are exploring an initiative to ensure that illegal aliens are not receiving Medicaid benefits that are meant for law-abiding Americans.'
The database will reveal to ICE officials the names, addresses, birth dates, ethnic and racial information, as well as Social Security numbers for all people enrolled in Medicaid. The state and federally funded program provides health care coverage program for the poorest of people, including millions of children.
The agreement does not allow ICE officials to download the data. Instead, they will be allowed to access it for a limited period from 9am to 5pm, Monday through Friday, until September 9.
'They are trying to turn us into immigration agents,' said a CMS official did not have permission to speak to the media and insisted on anonymity.
Immigrants who are not living in the US legally, as well as some lawfully present immigrants, are not allowed to enroll in the Medicaid program that provides nearly-free coverage for health services. Medicaid is a jointly funded program between states and the federal government.
But federal law requires all states to offer emergency Medicaid, a temporary coverage that pays only for lifesaving services in emergency rooms to anyone, including non-US citizens. Emergency Medicaid is often used by immigrants, including those who are lawfully present and those who are not.
Many people sign up for emergency Medicaid in their most desperate moments, said Hannah Katch, a previous adviser at CMS during the Biden administration.
'It's unthinkable that CMS would violate the trust of Medicaid enrollees in this way,' Katch said. She said the personally identifiable information of enrollees has not been historically shared outside of the agency unless for law enforcement purposes to investigate waste, fraud or abuse of the program.
Trump officials last month demanded that the federal health agency's staffers release personally identifiable information on millions of Medicaid enrollees from seven states that permit non-US citizens to enroll in their full Medicaid programs.
The states launched these programs during the Biden administration and said they would not bill the federal government to cover the health care costs of those immigrants. All the states — California, New York, Washington, Oregon, Illinois, Minnesota and Colorado — have Democratic governors.
That data sharing with DHS officials prompted widespread backlash from lawmakers and governors. Twenty states have since sued over the move, alleging it violated federal health privacy laws.
CMS officials previously fought and failed to stop the data sharing that is now at the center of the lawsuits. On Monday, CMS officials were once again debating whether they should provide DHS access, citing concerns about the ongoing litigation.
In an email chain obtained by the AP called 'Hold DHS Access — URGENT,' CMS chief legal officer Rujul H. Desai said they should first ask the Department of Justice to appeal to the White House directly for a 'pause' on the information sharing. In a response the next day, HHS lawyer Lena Amanti Yueh said that the Justice Department was 'comfortable with CMS proceeding with providing DHS access.'
Dozens of members of Congress, including Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California, sent letters last month to DHS and HHS officials demanding that the information-sharing stop.
'The massive transfer of the personal data of millions of Medicaid recipients should alarm every American. This massive violation of our privacy laws must be halted immediately,' Schiff said in response to AP's description of the new, expanded agreement. 'It will harm families across the nation and only cause more citizens to forego lifesaving access to health care.'
The new agreement makes clear that DHS will use the data to identify, for deportation purposes, people who in the country illegally. But HHS officials have repeatedly maintained that it would be used primarily as a cost-saving measure, to investigate whether non-US citizens were improperly accessing Medicaid benefits.
'HHS acted entirely within its legal authority – and in full compliance with all applicable laws – to ensure that Medicaid benefits are reserved for individuals who are lawfully entitled to receive them,' Nixon said in a statement responding to the lawsuits last month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
16 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
People Who Switched Political Parties Explain Why They Left
Political affiliation in America is supposed to be a choice, but for most people, it functions more like inheritance — passed down through family, geography, and social networks without much active deliberation. Yet that assumed loyalty can fracture, sometimes gradually, sometimes in a single moment that forces a fundamental recalculation of where you actually stand. When u/Deimos7779 asked people who've switched political parties to explain what drove that shift, the responses revealed something deeper than personal conversion stories. They exposed the fault lines where personal experience collides with institutional politics — where the gaps between stated values and actual policy become impossible to ignore. From economic realities to military service to local governance, these accounts map the pressure points where political identity breaks down and rebuilds itself. Here's what pushed 29 people to abandon their political home — and what that says about the state of American democracy: "I was raised conservative, spent 27 years in the military. Got retirement jobs with other conservatives. I considered myself a moderate conservative. After I was laid off from a very well-paying job, I chose not to work. After a couple of months, I got bored and took a job stocking shelves in a local grocery store. Getting to know my coworkers REALLY opened my eyes. These folks were barely getting by. I mentioned I needed a root canal; their response was that it would be cheaper to get it pulled. Everyone was a paycheck away from homelessness, took multiple bus rides to and from work, and on Medicaid providers. I realized that a large portion of people were barely surviving, and things needed to change." "My stepmother had come from privilege and spent her life around privileged conservative Catholics. Then she decided to use her degree in psychology to help treat inmates and drug addicts. It took less than a month for her to realize the system really is rigged against the poor. All the criminals were born poor and never had a chance. Things she knew white people did and got a slap on the wrist for, she met multiple people of color serving long prison terms for. And this wasn't just based on their side either — she had all of their files and knew everything the state could know about them. Later, when she went to her church and started asking people to she had a crisis of faith for a bit, after no one wanted to live up to Jesus's ideals and help the poor." "My come-to-Jesus moment was when I found out some district in Pennsylvania (I think) was trying to end their free lunch program because too many kids were racking up debt. Some rich millionaire, a rags-to-riches kind of guy, offered to cover all the debt, but the superintendent refused, saying, 'The kids need to learn a lesson.' I flipped my shit so hard over that, I basically became radicalized instantly. I wasn't a hardcore Republican, but one of those edgy centrist types. Children being fed is my 101 principle. And if we, the richest nation, can't even give our kids a damn sandwich, then what the fuck are we doing?" "As a kid, my dad had a union job, so we were a few notches above poverty. I grew up hearing about lazy people, single moms, etc., but I was always told you'd make it if you just worked hard. While working low-end jobs, I met the hardest working people you can imagine, but things were never going to get better for them." "For me, it was because I was brought up as a fiscal and rule-of-law, constitutional-integrity conservative. As I got into my late 20s, I began to see that the Republican party was just as bad at blowing money and was worse at dealing with party member corruption (even before Trump). It was completely over when Trump got elected. I couldn't wrap my head around why anyone who was a conservative like me could EVER support Trump. It turns out that the number of people who actually care about the principles of an ideology is quite low. The vast majority is just, 'My tribe red, ug ug ug.'" "I grew up in a family that voted one way and one way only because 'that's what we do.' My mom even admitted that she picked her political party because that was what her great-grandmother — who died when she was a teen — picked. My mom still votes that way, but I don't think she realizes that her party is not what it originally was when she started voting. And if you listen to her long enough, you realize that her ideals don't align with them. But she will never admit that. Ironically, most of the family in my generation is the opposite of what our parents are." "I was a staunch Republican supporter in my youth because my dad was, because his dad was. But my first real experience with politics was watching the George H. Bush team tell me the sky was green ten times a day, and I realized these were not good people. My dad made the same decision at about the same time." "I moved from Republican to Independent because my party was ignoring and demonizing scientists and doctors in favor of religion and ideology, costing the lives and ruining the education of my fellow Americans." "As one of my coworkers said, 'I was a Reagan Republican my whole life. Now, I'm a fucking centrist, and my views haven't changed.'" "Voted Green to save the environment. Green Party won. Green Party did absolutely none of the things they promised and instead damaged the economy. Never voting for them again." "I was raised in a very conservative area, to the point that I remember being told the one girl in my grade who had Democratic parents was being abused because they were exposing her to those ideals. I naturally am an adventurer, so I went far away to college. Just meeting other people and cultures completely dismantled that entire structure within a year." "I went to college. Met new people and developed a profound sense of empathy. Going into the military later only strengthened my views." "I grew up in a conservative household in a red state. I then went to college and joined the Army, and that completely changed my view on social issues. What you do with your life isn't my concern. We all just want to be happy and loved. I vote left now (I also owe Obama a huge apology; he was a great president). I'm not happy with the Democratic Party either, but the right has lost their damn minds and I want no part of that." "After this last presidential election, I changed my party affiliation from Democratic to undeclared, not because I can see myself voting for a Republican, but because the Democratic Party needs to know that our confidence in them is badly damaged." "I realized I was voting for a label, not values. I started paying attention to policy over party." "When I was 18, I decided I was a Libertarian — thanks in large part to a high school teacher who fed us a bunch of shitty ideas via Ayn Rand books. Then, I turned 22 and realized the 'social freedom' aspect of the Libertarian Party was complete bullshit. Now, I typically vote for the Democratic Party, while lamenting a lack of more progressive candidates." "I tried to actually do research and talk to people of specific groups instead of consuming only what pundits and YouTubers told me." "I was pretty apolitical but Republican for 10 years. I switched to Independent after their COVID response and the first impeachment. I switched to Democratic after January 6." "My mom was in the Navy her whole life and mostly apolitical, but bought into 'Republicans = military support' propaganda from the Reagan years. She wasn't a big Trump fan — albeit she doesn't really watch the news — but voted for him in 2016 because it's just what she does. During COVID, she decided she wasn't going to vote. Then, after January 6, she decidedly turned against Trump. When he formally got the nomination, she actively worked against him." "I was and still am a Democrat. However, I went from extremely left to moderate because there is a certain level of leftist orthodoxy where it's literally impossible to have an open conversation without being shouted down. My issue isn't really the ideas so much as the absolutism — there's no room for dissension. I feel like people who are extreme on either end of the spectrum have more in common with each other than people who are a little more moderate. I feel like there's this attitude where there's no room for compromise, so we have to burn it all down — both far right and far left say that kind of thing." "Trump the first time. I served my country in combat, came home broken, but found my way in law enforcement. I had a sense of brotherhood again and was helping people while also protecting them. All that shattered when Trump was elected and empowered the far-right radicals by not speaking against them. Suddenly, I was standing the line at protests and riots, being told to protect the cowards waving Nazi flags, hiding behind the police. It kept getting worse and worse as the far right felt more empowered, culminating on January 6. And then he got elected again and pardoned those traitors! I can ignore all the other illegal stuff this administration is getting away with and calling it politics, but any party that continues to back a traitor who doesn't even try to hide it, is not a party I want to be affiliated with. This is not the America I fought and continue to fight for." "I was a single-issue voter in my first election, coming from a religious background. After having learned more about the world — namely capitalism, healthcare, and LGBTQ+ issues — I became a voter of the left and have never looked back." "I have a very religious friend. His wife was also very religious. When they got pregnant, they were informed it was a high-risk pregnancy and presented with their options. They discussed it and decided to proceed with the pregnancy. Sadly, his wife died in childbirth. The baby did make it, however. Years later, we were talking, and the subject of abortion came up. He shocked me by saying he was now pro-choice. I inquired what brought that on, and he explained that while he is still very much against abortion, he realized that was his opinion. He said the thing that allowed him to ultimately accept and be at peace about his wife's death is the fact that they were able to discuss it and make the choice that was right for them. He said that he simply cannot condone depriving others of the ability to have those discussions and make those choices, even if that meant their choices may be different from his own." "I went from Republican to Independent because I was for fiscal responsibility and liberal on social issues. I do not even recognize the Republican Party I once belonged to." "I moved from a Democrat to an Independent because the Democratic Party has villainized straight white males, and I am a straight white male." "Well, I have always been an Independent — or rather had been — until Bernie, so I registered Democratic to vote for him in the primary. The DNC completely obliterated that in the following months and years. I am now an Independent again and no longer believe either of these parties are the way forward." "I was raised liberal and was super liberal until COVID. That changed everything, including seeing how my fellow liberals act when you have a differing opinion. Now, I am a Libertarian and more right-leaning. I will never go back. That being said, both sides are full of it, definitely do not have the public's best interest in mind, and are corrupt." "Winston Churchill was attributed with saying: 'If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.' That was pretty much me, and that is why I changed my political affiliation to conservative." "Grew up a Republican in Oklahoma. Joined the Navy. Met LOTS of folks from all over the world. Fought alongside most of them. Fought against a few others. The common trait those I fought against had was a hypocritical eye toward authority — it was bad unless they were in charge. This was a mindset I grew up around with my rural parents, but not my World War II veteran (overseas deployed) grandparents. I never understood it. Unfortunately, it took root in American society, pushed by people like Newt Gingrich, the NRA, the 'Moral Majority,' and Faux News. Karl Rove drove me to switch parties while running the Bush campaign. During the 2000 South Carolina primary, he talked about how McCain (Vietnam War POW and scion of a multi-generational Navy family) fathered a 'Black child' in an extramarital fling — it was an outright appeal to racists for their votes! Never mind the fact that said daughter was a child from Bangladesh the McCains had adopted. I was done." Taken together, these accounts reveal that political identity is far more fragile — and more responsive to lived experience — than our polarized discourse suggests. The moments that break political loyalty aren't always abstract ideological shifts but visceral encounters with institutional failure that force a reckoning between stated principles and actual practice. And more and more Americans are actively renegotiating their political identities as traditional party boundaries prove inadequate to the challenges they actually face. So, have you ever found yourself questioning your political affiliation? What moment or experience made you reconsider where you stand? Share your story in the comments below!
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Fareed's take: Trump's immigration woes give Democrats an opportunity
Despite fear-inducing spectacle, the Trump administration has deported far fewer people per month than the Obama administration did. Immigration has become a political weakness for President Trump as optics take precedence over effective deportation policy. Fareed says the best solution remains comprehensive immigration reform. If Trump won't embrace that, Democrats should — and thereby reclaim the sensible center on the issue, Fareed argues.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
The city and state's fiscal pain just got real —and it was all so avoidable
Albany and City Hall are now staring at some wicked fiscal headwinds, a key watchdog reports — but it's not like they weren't warned. The Citizens Budget Commission is flagging both the city and state's massive budgets, slamming them as 'unaffordable and unprepared' in light of federal funding cuts and a possible economic slowdown down the road. With passage of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which aims to (slightly) curb the growth of federal outlays, including aid to New York, Gov. Kathy Hochul is directing state agencies to cut $750 million from their budgets. When folks gripe, she'll just point her finger at Trump. Convenient, no? But about reckless and dishonest as can be. And she'll still have to find another $3 billion — and that's assuming no further cuts from Washington in the short term and an economy that remains robust. Plus, the long-term structural gap, CBC says, is now a monstrous $22 billion. It was all sadly predictable, but Hochul and state lawmakers nonetheless decided to blithely run up the tab — to a whopping quarter of a trillion dollars–plus — figuring they can blame the GOP when they have to make cuts or raise taxes. Take health care: Lawmakers boosted spending on it by 17%, even as the Empire Center's Bill Hammond predicted federal Medicaid cuts would shift over $3.3 billion in costs to the state. In April, budget expert E.J. McMahon slapped Hochul and the Legislature for 'whistling in the dark' instead of anticipating likely changes to the state's 'nearly out-of-control Medicaid program.' Now the gov's budget director won't rule out raising taxes, even though Hochul vowed she wouldn't. The CBC instead urges to keep her promise and instead shred her $2 billion 'inflation reduction checks' (i.e., reelection bribes), for starters. The group also called out the city's $116 billion spendapalooza and hit both Albany and City Hall for not squirreling away enough reserves. Whoever become mayor in November, it noted, will have to fill a $6 billon to $8 billion budget gap in just 16 days of taking office. It also ripped mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani's planned tax hikes to cover his ludicrous plans for $10 billion in new outlays. He'd be setting a record for irresponsibility. New Yorkers are now sure to be hit with some pain, whether it's spending cuts or tax hikes. The pols will try to shift blame, of course, but the public wouldn't be in this mess if their leaders had acted like adults from the start.
