Police can't barge into houses of history-sheeters under guise of surveillance: Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court has held that the police have no right to knock on the doors of suspected persons or history-sheeters or 'barge' into their houses at night under the guise of surveillance.
The ruling by Justice V.G. Arun came on a plea by a man accused of threatening police officers from discharging their duties when they asked him to come out of his house late at night as part of night check on rowdy history sheeters.
Allowing the plea, the court quashed the FIR against the man and all further proceedings in connection with it, saying that 'under the guise of surveillance, the police cannot knock on the doors or barge into the houses of history sheeters'.
The court said that police officers should understand that the concept of home 'transcends its physical manifestation as a dwelling and encompasses a rich tapestry of existential, emotional and social dimensions'.
'In other words, every man's house is his castle or temple, the sanctity of which cannot be vilified by knocking on the door at odd hours. A person's right to life encompasses the right to live with dignity and dignity is non-negotiable,' it said.
The court further said that under the Kerala Police Manual only 'informal watching' of history sheeters and 'close watch' over those leading criminal existence were permitted.
'Undoubtedly, neither of those expressions permit domicile visits at night,' it added.
It also pointed out that under section 39 of the Kerala Police Act all persons are bound to comply with the 'lawful directions' of a police officer for discharge of his functions.
'Knocking on the doors of a history sheeter at midnight and demanding him to come out of the house cannot by any stretch of imagination be termed as a lawful direction,' the court said.
Consequently, the petitioner cannot be prosecuted for the offence of threatening a police officer to obstruct him from discharging his duties under the Kerala Police Act for refusing to abide by the direction to come out of the house at night, the court added.
'If, as alleged, the petitioner had used derogatory language or threatened the police during the course of such refusal, his action may invite some other offence, but definitely not the offence he is presently charged with,' it said.
The petitioner had claimed that he was implicated in the case to divert the enquiry ordered by the High Court into his complaint alleging police harassment.
The police had claimed that as part of their night check duty on rowdy history sheeters, officers had gone to ascertain if the petitioner was at home.
However, when he was asked to open the door of his home, he refused to do so and also abused and intimidated the officer, it had alleged.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Court Blocks Release Of Ship Until Rs 6 Crore Security Deposit Paid
A Kerala High Court ruling has prevented port authorities from allowing the departure of a cargo vessel linked to the shipping company whose container ship MSC Elsa 3 sank off Kerala's waters in late May. The court has mandated that a Rs 6 crore security deposit must be provided before the sister vessel can leave port. The judicial decision follows a legal challenge brought by six cashew trading companies who lost their imported goods when MSC Elsa 3 went down on May 25. These businesses approached the court seeking compensation for their cargo that was aboard the sunken vessel. The court ruled that the related ship cannot depart until adequate financial security is demonstrated. Legal counsel Joy Thattil, representing the affected importers, informed the court that further proceedings would take place at 1:45 PM, when the shipping company was expected to present proof of the required deposit payment. Criminal charges have been filed against the vessel's ownership team, captain, and crew members for dangerous navigation practices. The Liberian-registered container ship went down in waters near Alappuzha while transporting dangerous and flammable materials. Law enforcement lodged a First Information Report at Fort Kochi Coastal police station on June 11, citing violations under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita related to reckless seamanship, improper handling of dangerous cargo, and blocking public shipping lanes. The police complaint, initiated by local resident C Shamji from Alappuzha, accuses the ship operators of negligent vessel management that resulted in the maritime disaster and extensive environmental damage. Officials allege that dangerous substances were improperly secured, and floating containers have severely harmed ocean ecosystems while devastating local fishing operations, causing economic losses worth hundreds of thousands of rupees. Defense Ministry data reveals MSC Elsa 3 was transporting 640 shipping containers when it sank, including 13 units containing dangerous materials and 12 filled with calcium carbide. The vessel also held 84.44 metric tons of diesel fuel and 367.1 metric tons of heavy fuel oil. Acknowledging the disaster's severity, Kerala's state administration officially designated the MSC Elsa 3 wreckage as a state-level emergency on May 29, recognizing its far-reaching environmental, social, and economic consequences. The vessel capsized approximately 14.6 nautical miles from Kerala's coastline in the Arabian Sea. Following the sinking, cargo containers have continuously washed up along shorelines across Alappuzha, Kollam, and Ernakulam districts. State officials have highlighted serious environmental threats, particularly concerns about petroleum contamination and the dispersal of toxic cargo remnants throughout coastal waters. The court's decision to detain the sister vessel ensures that financial resources remain available to compensate victims while ongoing investigations determine the full extent of liability for this maritime can make mistakes. Please double-check responses.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Photojournalist dies after brutal Melbourne assault by released immigration detainee
Dominic O'Brien, a veteran photojournalist, has died after an alleged assault in Footscray. Lominja Friday Yokoju, the suspect, was arrested. Yokoju was initially charged with intentionally causing serious injury. Following O'Brien's death, police are reviewing the charges. The incident has sparked public and political criticism regarding immigration detainee releases. Maribyrnong Council plans to improve safety in Footscray. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The suspect The veteran photojournalist Dominic O' Brien Police investigation Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Veteran photojournalist Dominic O'Brien, 62, has died in hospital, six days after being allegedly assaulted in Footscray on Sunday, June 15. The incident occurred just before 10 am at the intersection of Nicholson and Paisley Streets in an outdoor shopping mall, where O'Brien was reportedly approached by 43‑year‑old Lominja Friday Yokoju Yokoju, a former immigration detainee on a bridging visa and part of the 'NZYQ cohort' released after a High Court ruling in late 2023, was arrested at the scene. He was initially charged with intentionally causing serious injury. Witnesses allege Yokoju struck and stomped on O'Brien's head during the O'Brien, a renowned photographer for major outlets including The Age , The Australian, Getty Images, AAP, and Reuters, was a well‑respected figure in photojournalism and known for his work with Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory. Colleagues described him as a 'talented storyteller' who embraced both analogue and digital photography O'Brien's death on Saturday morning, June 21, police confirmed they are reviewing the existing charges and may upgrade them pending the outcome of the post‑ remains in custody and is scheduled to face the Melbourne Magistrates' Court on October 20, 2025, for a committal incident has led to widespread public and political backlash. Figures such as Andrew Hastie and Brad Battin have criticized the government's handling of immigration detainee releases, while the Maribyrnong Council has pledged to bolster safety in Footscray.
The Hindu
14 hours ago
- The Hindu
Police can't barge into houses of history-sheeters under guise of surveillance: Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court has held that the police have no right to knock on the doors of suspected persons or history-sheeters or 'barge' into their houses at night under the guise of surveillance. The ruling by Justice V.G. Arun came on a plea by a man accused of threatening police officers from discharging their duties when they asked him to come out of his house late at night as part of night check on rowdy history sheeters. Allowing the plea, the court quashed the FIR against the man and all further proceedings in connection with it, saying that 'under the guise of surveillance, the police cannot knock on the doors or barge into the houses of history sheeters'. The court said that police officers should understand that the concept of home 'transcends its physical manifestation as a dwelling and encompasses a rich tapestry of existential, emotional and social dimensions'. 'In other words, every man's house is his castle or temple, the sanctity of which cannot be vilified by knocking on the door at odd hours. A person's right to life encompasses the right to live with dignity and dignity is non-negotiable,' it said. The court further said that under the Kerala Police Manual only 'informal watching' of history sheeters and 'close watch' over those leading criminal existence were permitted. 'Undoubtedly, neither of those expressions permit domicile visits at night,' it added. It also pointed out that under section 39 of the Kerala Police Act all persons are bound to comply with the 'lawful directions' of a police officer for discharge of his functions. 'Knocking on the doors of a history sheeter at midnight and demanding him to come out of the house cannot by any stretch of imagination be termed as a lawful direction,' the court said. Consequently, the petitioner cannot be prosecuted for the offence of threatening a police officer to obstruct him from discharging his duties under the Kerala Police Act for refusing to abide by the direction to come out of the house at night, the court added. 'If, as alleged, the petitioner had used derogatory language or threatened the police during the course of such refusal, his action may invite some other offence, but definitely not the offence he is presently charged with,' it said. The petitioner had claimed that he was implicated in the case to divert the enquiry ordered by the High Court into his complaint alleging police harassment. The police had claimed that as part of their night check duty on rowdy history sheeters, officers had gone to ascertain if the petitioner was at home. However, when he was asked to open the door of his home, he refused to do so and also abused and intimidated the officer, it had alleged.
