logo
Santander cuts 2,000 jobs as it closes 95 banks and reduced opening hours in big cost-cutting plan

Santander cuts 2,000 jobs as it closes 95 banks and reduced opening hours in big cost-cutting plan

The Sun2 days ago
SANTANDER has revealed it has made more than 2,000 job cuts after it announced plans to close almost 100 bank branches.
The banking giant today reported a drop in its half-year profits.
1
It said it has been slashing its workforce and getting rid of locations as part of a major cost-cutting plan.
The plan is expected to continue throughout this year.
Santander said in March it would close 95 of its branches and reduce hours at another 50 sites.
Following the changes, Santander will have 290 full-service branches across the country.
It said at the time that roughly 750 jobs were at risk.
It comes as major banks cut down on the number of physical locations as more customers turn to online banking.
Traditional bricks and mortar banks have also faced stiff competition from online-only challenger banks.
These are often able to offer more favourable rates to customers due to their lower costs.
The Santander group announced last October it was axing more than 1,400 jobs across the UK bank in 2024.
It recently announced a £2.65billion deal to buy UK rival TSB, with the takeover expected to complete in the first quarter of 2026.
Mike Regnier, chief executive of Santander, said Banco Santander's the deal to buy TSB from Spanish rival Sabadell would speed up the bank's transformation.
He said: "In the first six months of 2025 we continued to build momentum in our strategy to become the best bank for customers in the UK by investing in technology and service, and improving our processes and efficiency.
"Banco Santander's recent agreement to acquire 100% of TSB from Sabadell accelerates our transformation, allowing us to enhance our customer proposition and invest more in innovative products and our digital offering.
"This is an excellent deal for customers, combining two strong and complementary banks."
Which branches have closed or are set to close?
Here is the list of branches that have shut or are shutting in the coming months:
Aberdare - 24 June
Arbroath - 17 June
Armagh - 1 July
Blackwood - 23 June
Blyth - 5 August
Bognor Regis - 14 July
Borehamwood - 1 July
Brecon - 25 June
Brixton - 11 August
Caernarfon - 7 July
Camborne - 7 July
Canvey Island - 5 August
Clacton - 16 June
Cleveleys - 23 June
Colne - 14 June
Colwyn Bay - 24 July
Crowborough - 23 July
Croydon - 16 June
Cumbernauld - 7 July
Didsbury - 8 July
Downpatrick - 6 August
Dungannon - 23 June
Edgware Road - 12 August
Eltham - 23 June
Exmouth - 15 July
Falmouth - 21 July
Farnham - 29 July
Felixstowe - 16 July
Finchley - 6 August
Fleet - 30 June
Formby - 11 August
Gateshead Metro - 16 June
Glasgow LDHQ - 24 June
Glasgow MX - 23 June
Greenford - 24 June
Hackney - 15 July
Hawick - 24 July
Herne Bay - 8 July
Hertford - 29 July
Holloway - 14 July
Holywell - 13 August
Honiton - 14 July
Kidderminster - 18 June
Kilburn - 17 June
Kirkby - 22 July
Launceston - 16 June
Louth - 17 June
Magherafelt - 24 June
Malvern - 2 July
Market Harborough - 1 July
Musselburgh - 30 June
New Milton - 28 July
Peterhead - 16 June
Plympton - 14 August
Portadown - 30 June
Pudsey - 28 July
Rawtenstall - 15 July
Ross-On-Wye - 30 July
Ruislip - 7 July
Rustington - 5 August
Saltcoats - 21 July
Seaford - 15 July
Shaftesbury - 23 July
Sidcup - 11 August
St Austell - 8 July
St Neots - 30 July
Stokesley - 31 July
Strabane - 23 July
Surrey Quays - 10 November
Swadlincote - 30 June
Tenterden - 7 July
Torquay - 17 June
Tottenham - 8 July
Whitley Bay - 6 August
Willerby - 13 August
Wimborne - 4 August
Wishaw, Date to be announced
Bexhill, Date to be announced
Billericay, Date to be announced
Dover, Date to be announced
Droitwich, Date to be announced
Dunstable, Date to be announced
East Grinstead, Date to be announced
Holyhead, Date to be announced
Ilkley, Date to be announced
Larne, Date to be announced
Lytham St Annes, Date to be announced
Maldon, Date to be announced
Morley, Date to be announced
North Walsham, Date to be announced
Redcar, Date to be announced
Saffron Walden, Date to be announced
Turriff, Date to be announced
Uckfield, Date to be announced
Urmston, Date to be announced.
What Santander shake-up means
Santander announced earlier this year that it would be carrying out major changes.
Some 95 branches will be shutting this year, while a further 36 branches have had their hours reduced, 18 will be counter-free, and five will be Work Cafes.
The new Work Cafe concept includes co-working spaces, superfast WiFi and dedicated event spaces which can be accessed for free.
Branches with reduced hours will be open on either Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays between 9.30am and 3pm, or Tuesdays and Thursdays 9.30am to 3pm and Saturdays 9.30am to 12.30pm.
The exception is the Caerphilly branch, which will be open Tuesdays and Thursdays between 9.30am to 3pm.
The reduced hours began at the end of June.
Counter-free branches won't have the traditional banking teller behind a counter, but there will be Santander staff available.
The majority of services will still be available although customers will need to use the Post Office for transactions involving large cash withdrawals or coin.
Areas affected by branch closures will instead be served by "community bankers" who can provide "face-to-face money management and general support for customers, visiting local communities weekly, as well as attending local Banking Hubs".
Santander had said it would contact all potentially vulnerable customers affected by the closures by phone and try to find ways to help them.
There is also a dedicated phone number to provide customers with help and information on the closures.
To get more information, you can call 0330 678 2469.
Other banks closing branches
Santander isn't the only major bank closing branches this year.
Some 17 bank branches will be shutting their doors this August alone, while 423 branches already closed between January and this month.
A further 127 are expected to close between September and December.
According to consumer champion Which?, banks and building societies have closed 6,443 branches since January 2015, at a rate of around 53 closures each month.
NatWest Group, including NatWest, Royal Bank of Scotland and Ulster Bank, has closed the most, with 1,477 branches shut since 2015.
Lloyds Banking Group, which includes Lloyds Bank, Halifax and Bank of Scotland, shut 1,391 in the same period.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Doomed 105-year-old football club could go out of business in days
Doomed 105-year-old football club could go out of business in days

The Independent

time8 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Doomed 105-year-old football club could go out of business in days

Morecambe Football Club faces imminent closure, with prospective buyers stating it will go out of business on Monday without immediate action. Panjab Warriors, the prospective buyers, have urged current owner Jason Whittingham to sign the deal to allow the takeover to proceed and save the club. The club's academy is set to cease operations by the end of the week, and the first team has already halted activities due to lapsed insurance. Morecambe's membership with the National League has been suspended, and the club remains under embargo ahead of the upcoming season. Panjab Warriors, supported by a minority shareholders action group, are ready to complete the acquisition to preserve the club's 105-year legacy.

Is this tough US-EU trade deal a triumph for Brexit Britain? Only in leavers' most delusional fantasies
Is this tough US-EU trade deal a triumph for Brexit Britain? Only in leavers' most delusional fantasies

The Guardian

time17 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Is this tough US-EU trade deal a triumph for Brexit Britain? Only in leavers' most delusional fantasies

Those who misled the country over Brexit are usually quieter these days. They do not hang their heads in shame, but change the subject whenever they can. They deflect with their new war-cry that Britain must also leave the European convention on human rights. As the effects of their wicked Brexit folly worsen by the month, they rarely get a chance to whoop: 'We were right!' So their glee was unrestrained when the great US global bully gave Britain a less hard beating with a 10% tariff on its goods, compared with the EU, which was walloped with 15%. Their joy overflowed when the business and trade secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, conceded: 'I'm absolutely clear, this is a benefit of being out of the European Union, having our independent trade policy, absolutely no doubt about that.' But what else can a trade secretary, speaking through gritted teeth, actually say? In his attempts to attract foreign investment, he can hardly tell the truth about the damage done by leaving the EU. These advocates of Brexit should gloat while they can. When the French prime minister called the EU's deal with Donald Trump a 'soumission' (submission), Kwasi Kwarteng seized on the word in a piece for the Telegraph, writing: 'For the French, with their memories of capitulation to the Nazis in 1940, the word is even more associated with abject humiliation than it is in English.' Yes, that's the same Kwarteng who hurled the British economy over a cliff only three years ago. 'This trade deal is the EU's greatest humiliation since Britain voted to leave', read the headline on his column. But he would never confess that the difference between a 10% and 15% tariff with the US is minimal, since we trade twice as much with the EU as the US. It barely equates to the regular variation in exchange rates: in other words, it's 'a rounding error', the Centre for European Reform's trade expert, John Springford, told me, when compared with the hammer blow Britain gave itself with Brexit. The UK-India trade deal signed with the Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi, last week was greeted with another Brexiter whoop from the Conservative peer Daniel Hannan. Also writing in the Telegraph, he said: 'My party, and Brexiteers more widely, should be taking credit for having done what all the clever Europhiles have spent six years telling us was impossible. Instead of moaning, we should welcome Starmer's belated understanding that world's biggest and fastest-growing markets are outside the EU.' But the Tory leader took another view: 'Keir Starmer called this 'historic.' It's not historic, we've just been shafted!' Kemi Badenoch said, dismissing the India agreement as a bad deal that would increase immigration. I don't know whether clever men like Kwarteng and Hannan are blinded by Brexit monomania or paralysed by the awful knowledge of the damage they have inflicted on their country, unable to confess an act of treachery and delusion hardly matched in British history. But as ever, facts are too inconvenient for them to deal with. Yes, the India deal is the biggest and most substantial trade deal since leaving the EU. Yes, it's a deal that would have been impossible to do from inside the union. But how big is it? It will add 0.13% to our economy. That's better than the Australia agreement, worth just 0.08%, the New Zealand deal, worth 0.03%, or the proposed US agreement, worth 0.16%, according to Department for Business and Trade analysis. But our fragile economy needs all the help it can get, so hurrah for Brexit and our new trade deals! But the gloaters ignore the context: our great Brexit losses. Here's the Office for Budget Responsibility's assessment: 'Our forecasts have assumed that the volume of UK imports and exports will both be 15% lower than if we had remained in the EU.' That 15% loss in trade 'will lead to a 4% reduction in the potential productivity of the UK economy'. In other words, as Jonty Bloom of the New World calculates, we need 50 India trade deals to make up for Brexit, because Britain does more than 40% of its trade with the EU – more if you include the European Economic Area and Switzerland. India has just 2% of our trade. Brexiters bleat that Labour is sneaking us into the EU by the back door, with deals on Horizon, the EU's research and innovation funding programme; soon, hopefully, Erasmus; and maybe a youth experience scheme. We hope for agricultural products and energy deals. But even these, say the trade experts, are still small potatoes. Major attempts to rescue Britain's 4% loss in productivity since 2020 hit the concrete walls of Boris Johnson's monumentally bad trade and cooperation agreement. Brexit zealots protest against agreements to keep a dynamic alignment with EU standards that would make trade easier. But it doesn't apply to our internal environmental standards: outside EU rules, we have let our water quality fall behind the EU. More than 85% of bathing waters in the EU are rated excellent compared with just 64% in the UK, with the gap rising every year, reports the European Movement. Public opinion has shifted rapidly: we are now a 'Bregretful' country, where only 31% still think it was right to leave and 61% say Brexit has been more of a failure than a success. Who do they blame? The Conservatives and Boris Johnson are top of the list, with 88% and 84% respectively holding them responsible. More than two-thirds (67%) blame Nigel Farage. A majority of Britons (56%) want to rejoin the EU as the grim reaper carries off old Brexiters, replacing them with young, pro-European voters. Don't expect bolder moves from the Labour government in its current frame of mind. Though defence and security draw us towards ever closer union, public opinion is not to be trusted. If people were confronted now with actual re-entry terms – paying in, free movement, joining the euro, no special deals – their answers might change. The mood might also be different if the far right continues its gains in EU countries, dividing the union's values. What might it take to throw off the economic, political and psychological darkness of Brexit? A clever – or Cleverly? – new Tory leader daring to break with the past, confessing the error of Brexit and taking us back into the EU, once and for all. It may take another generation to recover. Polly Toynbee is a Guardian columnist

Whatever Keir Starmer says, Heathrow's third runway is a folly
Whatever Keir Starmer says, Heathrow's third runway is a folly

Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Times

Whatever Keir Starmer says, Heathrow's third runway is a folly

F or a flight to nowhere, at least it's a popular one. Heathrow's third runway is back on the radar again: a reheated version of its pre-Covid plan, only this time with a jumbo £49 billion price tag. It's got a political tailwind, too, with the PM saying he'll do 'whatever it takes' to get 'spades in the ground' by 2030 and Rachel Reeves bizarrely making it her No 1 growth project. Yet there are good reasons Britain has been failing to build this landing strip since 1968. And none of them have gone away, whatever the breezy assurances of the Heathrow boss Thomas Woldbye: the fellow who was famously sparko when the North Hyde substation fire shut the airport. In fact, some have got trickier. Back then, no one was contending with 'net zero' or the joys of the M25 — least of all putting all 12 lanes in a tunnel and having the planes land on top.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store