
Thousands of Whitehall ‘credit cards' to be suspended in spending crackdown
Thousands of Whitehall officials will have their government 'credit cards' suspended this week in Labour's latest crackdown on what it regards as wasteful spending in the civil service.
Pat McFadden, the Cabinet Office minister, said on Monday he would freeze almost all of the 20,000 government procurement cards (GPCs) within days with a view to permanently cancelling at least half of them.
It is part of a push to reduce spending on the civil service that has already led to the abolition of organisations such as the Payment Systems Regulator and NHS England, at a cost of about 10,000 jobs.
'We must ensure taxpayers' money is spent on improving the lives of working people,' McFadden said. 'It's not right that hundreds of millions of pounds are spent on government credit cards each year, without high levels of scrutiny or challenge. Only officials for whom it is absolutely essential should have a card.'
Officials use GPCs to buy relatively small items such as flights, office furniture or drinks for official functions.
They were introduced by the last Labour government in 1997 as a way to reduce the bureaucracy required to run Whitehall departments. Spending on them has more than quadrupled over the last five years to £676m, with Labour sources pointing to spending on items such as shoes and DJ equipment as potentially wasteful.
While in opposition, Labour conducted an investigation into all spending on GPCs, which found examples of high spending by senior officials and ministers. In 2021, for instance, the then prime minister Boris Johnson used a government card to pay for a £4,445 dinner in New York for himself and 24 of his staff.
Later that year Liz Truss, as foreign secretary, spent nearly £1,500 on lunch and dinner during a visit to Indonesia in two of Jakarta's most exclusive restaurants.
Also in 2021, the Treasury under Rishi Sunak spent more than £3,000 buying 13 photographs from the Tate to hang in its Whitehall building, despite already having access to the government art collection.
The Foreign Office is one of the heaviest users of GPCs, in part because officials have to organise regular functions to entertain foreign dignitaries. But as well as spending on items such as flights and catering, officials also spent nearly £2,500 at a shoe shop called Shoe Crush in Barbados.
Under new guidelines being rolled out by McFadden, the maximum spend for hospitality will be cut from £2,500 to £500, with any spending over £500 requiring approval from a director general.
Civil servants will be banned from using cards to buy things such as travel or office supplies, which could be bought more cheaply in bulk at a departmental or cross-departmental level.
Most of the 20,000 cards that have been issued will now be frozen, with exemptions for a small number of cases such as diplomatic staff in unstable locations. Cardholders will then be forced to reapply for their cards, and if unsuccessful will lose access to them by the end of the month.
McFadden has also asked departments to identify any items of spending that breach government guidelines and discipline the individuals in question.
Keir Starmer is spearheading a wider shake-up of Whitehall. As well as cuts to quasi-non-governmental organisations, the prime minister is urging departments to make greater use of technology such as artificial intelligence tools to reduce spending and streamline decision-making.
Some experts have warned that rather than making government more efficient, the changes to how Whitehall works could make it harder for civil servants to deliver the government's main priorities such as cutting NHS waiting lists.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Chronicle
14 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Assisted dying: Medical students voice opposition as some MPs urge vote delay
It is currently expected the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will have its third reading on Friday, with MPs voting to either send it through to the House of Lords or to stop it progressing any further. It would be the first vote on the overall Bill to take place since November, when the proposed legislation passed second reading stage by a majority of 55 on a historic day which saw MPs support the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales. But, days ahead of third reading, a group of Labour MPs opposed to the Bill have written to Commons leader Lucy Powell asking for more time to scrutinise a Bill they brand as 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'. They added that it 'alters the foundations of our NHS, the relationship between doctor and patient, and it strips power away from Parliament, concentrating it in the hands of future secretaries of state for health'. They also raised concerns that MPs might not have a copy of the final Bill by the time they vote, as some outstanding amendments will still be being considered on Friday morning. The MPs, including Dame Meg Hiller, wrote: 'We implore you as the Leader of the House to allocate more Parliamentary time to the scrutiny of this Bill, the valid concerns that members have about its implementation, and the consequences it could have on vulnerable populations.' Their letter came as medical students sent their own to MPs, citing concerns about the Bill. The student doctors, from universities across the UK, said: 'We do not oppose dignified death – far from it. We oppose a Bill that risks offering death in place of care, that widens health inequalities, that places vulnerable patients in danger, and that reshapes the ethical foundation that our profession is built upon without any clear support. 'As future doctors, we may not yet be the voice of this profession – but we will be. And we are asking to be heard.' But doctor and MP Simon Opher, who backs the Bill, said it is 'no surprise that medical students, like GPs and most other professionals, have a range of opinions on assisted dying'. He referenced one survey he said had been shared with him and showed a majority of medical students supported assisted dying in cases of terminal illness and unbearable suffering. The Bill's sponsor, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, has repeatedly stated that her proposed legislation has been strengthened since it was first introduced last year, insisting it is subject to robust safeguards. As it stands, the Bill would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer voted in favour of the Bill last year, but said the Government remains neutral on the issue. Both Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood voted against. Last week, a majority of MPs approve a new clause, tabled by Dame Meg, to ensure medics cannot raise the topic of assisted dying with under-18s. Her separate amendment to prevent health workers from bringing up the issue with adults patients before they have raised it was voted down. A ban on advertising assisted dying should the Bill pass into law was also supported.


STV News
25 minutes ago
- STV News
Dumfries and Galloway leader quits ahead of 'no confidence' vote
The leader of Dumfries and Galloway Council quit less than an hour ahead of a 'no confidence' vote on Monday. In a note to council officials, Tory council leader Gail Macgregor said she had decided to resign as leader with 'the heaviest of hearts'. 'It has been an absolute privilege to serve the people of Dumfries and Galloway as leader of the council for the past 26 months,' she said. 'During this time I have always tried to lead with a collaborative approach, and I will always do so for the good of the people we serve and the services we provide.' A special meeting will take place on Monday afternoon in which members are expected to choose a new administration. The Tory group, with Macgregor at the helm, has led the administration in Dumfries and Galloway over the past two years since the collapse of a Labour/SNP coalition in 2023. However, that is now likely to come to an end on Monday. More than half of the members of the local authority signed a call for a special meeting to 'call for the removal of [Macgregor and deputy leader Malcolm Johnstone] with a motion of no confidence'. It has signatures from 22 local councillors, and it comes two weeks after seven Tory councillors left the Conservative group to form two separate groups of their own. It has left the Conservatives with just nine remaining councillors – down from a previous group of 16 – and it prompted other parties to request the meeting. However, before councillors got the chance to consider the motion to remove Councillor MacGregor from her post, she resigned from the role voluntarily. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Assisted dying: Medical students voice opposition as some MPs urge vote delay
It is currently expected the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will have its third reading on Friday, with MPs voting to either send it through to the House of Lords or to stop it progressing any further. It would be the first vote on the overall Bill to take place since November, when the proposed legislation passed second reading stage by a majority of 55 on a historic day which saw MPs support the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales. But, days ahead of third reading, a group of Labour MPs opposed to the Bill have written to Commons leader Lucy Powell asking for more time to scrutinise a Bill they brand as 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'. They added that it 'alters the foundations of our NHS, the relationship between doctor and patient, and it strips power away from Parliament, concentrating it in the hands of future secretaries of state for health'. They also raised concerns that MPs might not have a copy of the final Bill by the time they vote, as some outstanding amendments will still be being considered on Friday morning. The MPs, including Dame Meg Hiller, wrote: 'We implore you as the Leader of the House to allocate more Parliamentary time to the scrutiny of this Bill, the valid concerns that members have about its implementation, and the consequences it could have on vulnerable populations.' Their letter came as medical students sent their own to MPs, citing concerns about the Bill. The student doctors, from universities across the UK, said: 'We do not oppose dignified death – far from it. We oppose a Bill that risks offering death in place of care, that widens health inequalities, that places vulnerable patients in danger, and that reshapes the ethical foundation that our profession is built upon without any clear support. 'As future doctors, we may not yet be the voice of this profession – but we will be. And we are asking to be heard.' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater is the sponsor of the Bill (Jordan Pettitt/PA) But doctor and MP Simon Opher, who backs the Bill, said it is 'no surprise that medical students, like GPs and most other professionals, have a range of opinions on assisted dying'. He referenced one survey he said had been shared with him and showed a majority of medical students supported assisted dying in cases of terminal illness and unbearable suffering. The Bill's sponsor, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, has repeatedly stated that her proposed legislation has been strengthened since it was first introduced last year, insisting it is subject to robust safeguards. As it stands, the Bill would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer voted in favour of the Bill last year, but said the Government remains neutral on the issue. Both Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood voted against. Last week, a majority of MPs approve a new clause, tabled by Dame Meg, to ensure medics cannot raise the topic of assisted dying with under-18s. Her separate amendment to prevent health workers from bringing up the issue with adults patients before they have raised it was voted down. A ban on advertising assisted dying should the Bill pass into law was also supported.