Protesters rally outside White House amid nationwide anti-Trump demonstrations
A large number of people gathered near the White House on Saturday to protest President Donald Trump's agenda, building upon a widespread effort by anti-Trump organizers to galvanize voters concerned with the administration's policies and significant use of executive authority.
Attendees of the protest, which took place at Lafayette Square Park in Washington D.C., told NBC News that the treatment of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who the Trump administration says was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, was among the issues that led them to participate in the demonstration.
'Everyone should have due process. No one should be just taken away and locked up. I don't care if he is a murderer, he still should get due process,' protester Susie Stern of Ohio said. 'That's what this country is based on. Laws.'
The White House alleges that Abrego Garcia is a gang member, and the administration has said that if he enters the country again he will be deported again. Court records indicate that Abrego Garcia has never been criminally charged in the U.S. or El Salvador
Other protesters took issue with what they described as the administration's disregard for federal court rulings, including a ruling upheld by the Supreme Court ordering Trump to 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's return to the United States.
'What's happening is very concerning as far as due process of law and how democracy is supposed to work,' first-time protester Samantha Echols of Silver Spring, Maryland, told NBC News. 'You shouldn't just be able to decide what the laws are, to disappear people, to punish people for disagreeing with you. That's things that dictators do, and I don't want to see our country to slide in that direction.'
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the demonstrations.
The nationwide protests are a part of an effort that began earlier this month with a series of 'Hands Off' demonstrations across the country.
The events are coordinated by 50501. Organizers describe the movement as a diverse group of Americans "who stand for democracy, and who stand against the authoritarian actions of the Trump Administration.'
The name 50501 refers to the group's goal of 50 states, 50 protests, 1 movement.
According to a list published online by the group, Saturday's day of action listed nearly 700 events nationwide, from a "Potluck & Protest" event in Kanab, Utah, to a "Tesla Takedown" protest in Woodstock, Virginia, to a "Take America Back" rally in Paw Paw, Michigan.
The nationwide protests come as Democrats work to more aggressively counter Trump's agenda, a top demand for the party's base of voters according to recent polling.
An NBC News poll conducted in March found that nearly two-thirds of Democratic voters said they want congressional Democrats to stick to their positions even if it leads to gridlock, while one-third wanted their leaders to compromise with Trump.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., have held a series of "Fighting Oligarchy Tour" stops across the country, including an event last week in Los Angeles that drew more than 30,000 people, according to the senator's office.
Congressional Democrats in recent months have held dozens of smaller town hall events in a bid to capitalize off of political backlash that Trump has received to his significant cuts to the federal workforce and tariff policy plan.
Regarding Saturday's protests, Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., who serves as Senate minority leader, said "I believe that public sentiment is everything. And public sentiment is growing against Donald Trump as more Americans face rising costs and less freedom under Donald Trump's chaotic failed leadership."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk bows to Trump: Tesla boss admits posts attacking the president 'went too far' in humiliating climb down after their spectacular feud
Elon Musk has said that he regrets some of the posts he made last week about Donald Trump in a humiliating climbdown from his online feud with the president. 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far,' Musk wrote in a message on his social media platform X on Wednesday. He did not say which specific posts he was talking about. Tesla shares in Frankfurt were up 2.44% after Musk's post. Trump and Musk exchanged insults last week after the former DOGE boss described the president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination.' A full spat exploded in public as Trump said his relationship with Musk was over, threatening to take away government funding from Musk's SpaceX company. But Musk doubled down, escalating with a now-deleted post that claimed the president appears in documents related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump rejected the allegations and told ABC News that Musk had 'lost his mind', making clear he has no immediate plans to reconcile. Musk has also since deleted a post signaling support for impeaching the president. Sources close to Musk had said his anger has started to subside, and that they believe he may want to repair his relationship with Trump. The abrupt volte-face comes after Trump threatened 'serious consequences' for Musk if he sought to punish Republicans voting in favour of the controversial spending bill. Some lawmakers who were against the bill had called on Musk to fund primary challenges against Republicans who voted for the legislation. Musk bankrolled a large part of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. Trump named Musk to head an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' Trump, who also branded Musk 'disrespectful,' told NBC News on Saturday, without specifying what those consequences would be. There were reports that said Trump planned to sell off the Tesla he purchased earlier this year. 'I haven't heard that, I mean, I may move the Tesla around a little bit,' Trump told reporters Monday. Musk's father said on Monday that the spat was triggered by months of intense stress on both sides, and that it needed to stop. Asked whether he thought his son had made a mistake by engaging in a public clash with the president, Errol Musk said people were sometimes unable to think as clearly as they should 'in the heat of the moment.' 'They've had five months of intense stress,' Musk told Reuters at a conference in Moscow organised by conservative Russian tycoons. Elon Musk was asked about The New York Times story during his May 30th going away event in the Oval Office alongside the president. He pushed back and mocked the newspaper for its 'Russiagate' coverage, but later denied the Times' report on his social media site, X 'With all the opposition cleared and two people left in the arena, all they have ever done is get rid of everything and now they are trying to get rid of each other - well that has to stop.' Asked how it would end, he said: 'Oh, it will end on a good note - very soon.' Musk's father told reporters he was standing by his son. 'Elon is sticking to his principles but you cannot always stick to your principles in the real world,' Musk's father said. 'Sometimes you have to give and take.' Trump has, in recent days, held back on criticising Musk and publicly wished him the best. On Monday, the president was asked about a New York Times report that said while campaigning for Trump, Musk had been doing so much ketamine it was affecting his bladder, while also taking Ecstasy and psychadelic mushrooms. Trump said: 'I really don't know, I don't think so, I hope not.' He then added, 'I wish him well ... I just wish him well, very well, actually.' He also said he'd keep Musk's Starlink system in place. Trump also said he never saw Musk get physical with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, which had also been alleged. 'No I didn't,' the president answered. 'They did have an argument, but I didn't see a lot of physicality there,' Trump said. Musk had roundly denied the allegations of drug use.
NBC News
25 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump says China tariffs will stay high after two days of talks
The U.S. will keep high tariffs on Chinese goods, President Donald Trump said Wednesday morning, touting a preliminary trade agreement that he and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, will need to approve. China will supply rare earth minerals and magnets "up front," Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform, although he didn't clarify the exact terms. Trump also said "we are getting a total of 55% of tariffs, China is getting 10%" without explaining further. A White House official told NBC News that the 55% figure isn't new, as it reflects the 30% tariffs Trump has implemented this year in addition to pre-existing duties totaling 25%. The president's announcement came the morning after top-level U.S. and Chinese officials wrapped up two days of negotiations in London that were meant to get a trade truce, originally brokered in Geneva last month, back on track. Trump's post also went further than what Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, one of the top U.S. negotiators in London, said about the outcome of the negotiations. 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents,' Lutnick told reporters Tuesday night. "I think we have the two largest economies in the world have reached a handshake for a framework." Trump added in a later Truth Social post that "President XI and I are going to work closely together to open up China to American Trade." The American negotiators on Tuesday night did not announce any major modifications to Chinese market access for U.S. companies after the conclusion of talks. Additionally, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said there were no further meetings planned with Chinese officials. Lutnick and Greer did not commit to releasing the "framework" agreed upon in London either. Chinese officials, likewise, said the two sides agreed in principle on a consensus regarding the Geneva agreement but did not provide any specific details. The talks in London occurred after the U.S. and China accused each other of breaching a pact reached in early May, which led to both countries lowering tariffs by 115%. Part of that agreement was easing export restrictions on rare earth minerals and metals that are critical for everyday products such as batteries and automobile production.
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘We've got to become an aggressively populist party': Chris Murphy on the task facing Democrats
Pete Buttigieg. Ruben Gallego. JD Vance. All are young politicians who sport facial hair, perhaps in the belief that it confers gravitas. One headline writer even suggested: '2028 Might Be The Year Of The Beard For Presidential Hopefuls.' Cue Chris Murphy, a Democratic senator who recently joined the ranks of the bearded. The 51-year-old's is flecked with white, perhaps implying a warrior weathered by battle. Murphy is one of the most outspoken voices in the Democratic opposition to Donald Trump. In an interview with the Guardian, the senator has thoughts to share not only about the president but the future direction of his own party. He calls on Democrats to embrace populism, urges his colleagues to 'take risks' and makes clear that he is not yet even thinking about 2028. 'We've got to look ourselves in the mirror and ask, how can we claim that we're the party of poor people if poor people aren't voting for us?' says Murphy, sitting in an office at a Washington thinktank about half a mile from the White House. 'There's a lot of conservative poor people out there who think that our party is way too judgmental. We've got to become a bigger tent party when it comes to a lot of social and cultural and hot button issues and then we've got to become an aggressively populist party.' Democrats have been soul searching since November, when they saw a further erosion of support among the working class. Trump won 56% of voters without a college degree, compared with 42% who chose Kamala Harris, a decline from 2020 when Trump and Joe Biden were about even. Biden delivered an economic agenda that was bigger in scope and scale than many expected, with input from the progressive senator Bernie Sanders and impetus from the crisis of the Covid-19 pandemic. But Murphy, senator for Connecticut, argues that it failed to give people a sense of empowerment. 'We did some good things for poor people in the last Congress but they were largely seen as handouts: the child tax credit, student loan repayment, enhanced Obamacare subsidies – good policy, but it ended up feeling very unfulfilling to people to have the government write them a cheque to paper over the fact that work doesn't pay. 'Our focus needs to be on making work pay, giving power to people. That's what they want to feel: people want to feel powerful. They don't want to feel like you have to subsidise them. 'That's a higher minimum wage, stronger labour unions, fairer work rules, the deconcentration of economic power, the blowing up of the monopolies. Those are the kind of policies that are rooted in addressing the almost spiritual crisis of the country, the country that's feeling like they don't have agency over their entire lives.' Earlier, during an event at the Center for American Progress thinktank, the last question from the audience concerned young men's shift to the right and how Democrats can win them back. Murphy replied that young people fundamentally believe the Democratic party is just as corrupt as the Republican party, meaning that government reform should be a priority. Democrats should also talk in 'an unfiltered way', the senator said. He also acknowledged a social revolution over the past half-century. 'Men in this country – but in the world generally – were able to easily find identity as breadwinners and protectors, and as women entered the workforce – an undeniably good, great thing – it has robbed from many men their easy access to meaning and purpose. Over the last 10 years, the right has been in a very deliberate conversation with men about that. 'Now, their answer is dangerous and irresponsible and misogynist. It's just roll back – we'll just go back to a world in which you were in charge. But the left's message to men and young men has largely been 'get over it' – and that's not satisfactory either. We have got to be more deliberate about talking to men about what their post-feminism identity can be, and the fact that there is a difference between male identity and female identity.' Facing the Trump 2.0 onslaught, Democrats are still trying to find their feet and are hungry for leadership. In April, Cory Booker delivered a record 25-hour speech on the Senate floor, denouncing Trump's attack on democracy and the rule of law. Murphy was his wing man for much of it, returning a favour after Booker supported Murphy during his nearly 15-hour filibuster for gun control legislation in 2016. Murphy reflects: 'You can't manufacture moments of leadership. They have to come organically but they're really important. What Cory did galvanised people. What Chris Van Hollen did in his trip to El Salvador galvanised people. 'It is important for us to be willing to take risks right now. People want to see us engaged in risk taking to save the democracy. I'm more than willing to support any of my colleagues who are doing that and we should all be looking for those opportunities.' After three terms in the House of Representatives, Murphy was elected to the Senate in 2012 to succeed the retiring Joe Lieberman. He has been a leading voice on gun legislation in the aftermath of the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, and was lead Democratic negotiator for a bipartisan gun control law that Biden signed in 2022. Asked if he would consider a White House bid in 2028, Murphy says: 'My voice is meaningful because I don't have any other agenda beyond just trying to save democracy. Anybody thinking about an election in 2028 or 2026 would be foolish. We are not right now on a glide path to have a free and fair election in 2028, so all of us better put all of our energy into trying to save the democracy.' Indeed, Trump has displayed authoritarian ambitions since taking office more than four months ago. He has used executive power to target Congress, law firms, media organisations, cultural institutions and leading universities. Some of the checks and balances have proved resilient. The president has run into significant pushback from the courts, with numerous judges – including some appointed by Trump himself – blocking his agenda. But Murphy sees no room for complacency. 'The problem is the courts can't keep up. I don't think we ever contemplated this level of lawlessness. So yes, the courts are playing a role but every time a court makes a ruling, Donald Trump just acts in a different illegal way. 'They told him he couldn't extort Harvard and he just found a different way to extort Harvard. The courts are largely doing the right thing but they are not a particularly effective prophylactic when there's this amount of lawlessness happening.' As Trump seeks to divide and rule, collective action is key, Murphy insists. 'The law firms can beat Trump but they have to stick together. They can't do what they did to Paul, Weiss, poaching attorneys when one of them gets targeted. Harvard can survive but only if the other universities stand with them. I've been very impressed by what Harvard has done but all the other universities have to stand firm.' Murphy says Trump's corruption comes in two parts: domestic and international. As a member of the Senate foreign relations committee, he has observed how Trump is operating in a way that no president has before in enriching himself and his family. His sweeping tariffs, for example, are a way to coerce foreign governments such as Vietnam's to cut deals that will benefit the Trump property empire. Qatar has gifted Trump a $400m luxury Boeing 747 jumbo jet for him to use as Air Force One then reportedly transfer to his presidential library in 2029 for his personal use after he leaves office. The Trump Organization recently signed a $5.5bn golf course and property deal with a firm established by Qatar's sovereign wealth fund. Murphy warns: 'We are a kleptocracy. This is outright thievery every single day. It's extraordinary how the president's net worth has what, tripled, quadrupled since he became president? We're not talking about first-term small-scale corruption, like buying a couple of rooms at the Trump hotel. We're talking about billions of dollars worth of deals.' National security is at risk, Murphy adds. 'My understanding is that in exchange for the $2bn investment from the UAE, he's willing to give them the advanced semiconductors. Those semiconductors could very likely fall into Chinese hands and that has catastrophic consequences for the US AI industry. 'Of course, the Saudis want nuclear technology and enrichment capabilities and that's what they're paying him for. These aren't small issues that are being exchanged for investments in Trump and his businesses.' In protest, Murphy will soon force a Senate vote on two joint resolutions of disapproval to block multibillion-dollar weapons sales to Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. He explains: 'I'm hopeful these resolutions will give us a chance to force Republicans to think hard about whether they want to be on the record normalising this kind of corruption. It's extraordinary what they have given him a pass on. We have very few moments to force them on the record so I didn't think we could pass up the opportunity.' Trump's focus on the Middle East and its financial opportunities has left Europe out in the cold. The sense of relative peace and security of the postwar transatlantic alliance is drawing to a close, as evidenced by Trump's moral equivocation over Russia's war in Ukraine. Murphy does not attempt to sugar-coat it. 'We are not a dependable partner right now and so I don't think there's any path for US leadership to magically reappear in the next three years. That matters most for Ukraine. 'I don't mean to be unnecessarily pessimistic, but I think Donald Trump has made the decision to not just abandon Ukraine but humiliate Ukraine. To the extent Ukraine survives over the next three and a half years, that is largely going to be because our European allies do something heroic and important.'
