Kerala government says not enacting black magic law, HC asks if it endorses practice
KOCHI: The state government told the Kerala High Court on Tuesday that it has decided not to enact a legislation banning evil practices, including sorcery and black magic, prompting the court to ask whether it endorsed such practices.
In an affidavit filed before the HC, the government said the state cabinet had considered the Kerala Prevention and Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices, Sorcery and Black Magic Bill in 2023, but a decision was made not to enact it. It was a policy decision and might not be interfered with by the court, the affidavit said, adding that a writ of mandamus will not lie against the legislature directing it to legislate on a particular subject.
Hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking enactment of a law against evil practices on Tuesday, a division bench comprising Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji observed orally, 'Is the state endorsing these evil practices? There may not be enactment, but that does not mean the government should do nothing. Assuming there is no legislation, how does the state proceed against such practices?'
The court said the government did not mention in the affidavit that it endorsed such practices and does not wish to eradicate them. 'We expect a more detailed affidavit,' the bench said, urging the state to clarify its position and efforts in curbing such harmful practices despite the absence of specific legislation.
The Kerala Yukthivadi Sangham, Thrissur, had sought a directive to the state government to take a decision on the recommendation of the Law Reforms Commission report, 2019, submitted by Justice K T Thomas on the Bill's enactment. The plea filed in the wake of the murder of two women as part of human sacrifice in Pathanamthitta's Elanthoor village in 2022, alleged that the government was reluctant to take steps to enact such laws despite the reporting of several such incidents.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Kerala High Court slams state for not enacting law to ban black magic, sorcery
The Kerala High Court expressed dissatisfaction with the state government's stance of not proceeding with the legislation to ban black magic, sorcery and other inhuman practices. The state told the High Court that it has decided not to pass such a law, and this decision was taken by the state cabinet— which means it is a policy its position, the government maintained that the court cannot issue a writ of mandamus compelling the enactment of such a law, as this falls within the domain of executive court's observation came during the hearing of a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Kerala Yukthi Vadhi Sangham, seeking the enactment of a specific law against black magic and sorcery — The Kerala Prevention of Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices, Sorcery and Black Magic Bill, 2019. This Bill was originally recommended by a commission headed by Justice K.T. government also told the court it had decided not to implement the recommendations of the commission led by former Supreme Court judge Justice KT Thomas in 2019. The proposed legislation sought to ban all practices that result in bodily division bench, comprising Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji, however, asked the government to propose alternative measures to curb the spread of black magic and sorcery if it holds a similar view on the affidavit does not mention that the State has endorsed such practices and does not wish to eradicate the same,' the court noted, while questioning the state on its course of action regarding the bench remarked that taking such a stance when illegal practices continue to be carried out amounts to an implicit endorsement of those activities. It reiterated that while the legislature has the authority to decide on whether to frame laws, the High Court cannot issue a directive mandating such a move. Nevertheless, the court directed the government to file a detailed affidavit within three Yukthi Vadhi Sangham is an organisation that leads campaigns against black magic and other similar practices. The organisation had sought the enactment of 'The Kerala Prevention of Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices, Sorcery and Black Magic Bill 2019'.The matter will be heard again on July 15.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Kerala
NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
'God Knows Who Is Still Languishing In Jails': Supreme Court Raps UP Police
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday reprimanded Uttar Pradesh Police for failing to ensure that persons granted bail by a court of law, including itself, were not promptly released. The top court directed PC Meena, the Director-General (Personnel) of UP Police to conduct a statewide video conference with officers to ensure the court's orders on bail are not countered by 'vested interest' masquerading as 'nit-picking' of the instructions to release someone. The top court also directed the UP government to pay Rs 5 lakh as compensation to a man it had granted bail on May 27 but was not released till an irate court intervened Tuesday. Suspecting 'vested interests' in keeping the man jailed, the Supreme Court also ordered a judicial inquiry by the Principal District and Sessions Judge of Ghaziabad. Officers found to be at fault will be fined Rs 5 lakh, the court warned. Reports of the inquiry and confirming compliance are expected by Friday, the court said. Expressing serious concern over people being forcibly jailed in UP despite court orders for their release, the bench of Justice KV Vishwanathan and Justice NK Singh hauled up the state's police force for denying individuals their fundamental right to liberty. "Nit-picking of court orders to deny bail amounts to a serious dereliction of duty," the Supreme Court warned state officials. Mr Meena and other senior officers had been summoned as the Supreme Court heard a petition by a man called Aftab, who was denied release from Ghaizabad Jail despite securing bail. He told the top court he had been detained for 28 days, a delay the authorities claimed before the court was due to a 'clerical error' in sections of the bail and release orders. The court, though, batted away the claim, saying personal liberty could not be denied by 'useless technicalities and irrelevant errors', and asked the police to not repeat such mistakes. "God knows how many persons are languishing in UP jails like this... Sensitise your officers by Friday... via video conference... to ensure no person enlarged by a court should be in jail..." The bench also warned the police of further action if the 'vested interests' are revealed. Mr Meena assured the court he would conduct the VC immediately, and told the court there are as many as 90,000 people in jails across the state, as of June 24. Earlier, senior counsel Garima Prasad, appearing for the state government, told the court 'certain apprehensions' about a bail order, and the resulting delay, were not deliberate. In the Aftab case, he pointed out, the police sent the order back to a lower court, on the same day the Supreme Court ordered his release, for a clarification. The delay, therefore, was from the lower court, he declared. But Justice Vishwanathan was unimpressed. Warning that he would increase the compensation ordered to Rs 10 lakh, he asked, "Is 'sub section not mentioned' a valid ground to be taken by officers manning our prisons?" The bench pointed out the fact the authorities knew what the 'error' with the subsection was, but still failed to release Aftab for nearly a month.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
'Human rights are most sacrosanct component of human life': Bring back 63-year-old deported to Pakistan after Pahalgam attack, HC tells MHA
JAMMU: The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh high court directed the ministry of home affairs (MHA) to bring back a 63-year-old woman, Rakshanda Rashid, who was deported to Pakistan after the Pahalgam terrorist attack. Justice Rahul Bharti passed the order on June 6 on a writ petition filed by the woman through her daughter, Falak Zahoor, directing the central govt to bring her back within 10 days and file a compliance report on July 1. Although Rakshanda is a Pakistani national, the HC observed that human rights had to be preserved at all costs and ordered her return, after Falak informed the court that her mother was ill and had no one in Pakistan to look after her. The court took note of the fact that the petitioner had been living in India for nearly four decades. You Can Also Check: Jammu AQI | Weather in Jammu | Bank Holidays in Jammu | Public Holidays in Jammu 'Human rights are the most sacrosanct component of a human life and, therefore, there are occasions when a constitutional court is supposed to come up with SOS like indulgence, notwithstanding the merits and demerits of a case which can be adjudicated only upon in due course of time,' Justice Bharti said. The HC noted that the petitioner had a long term visa, but she was deported even without a detailed hearing or a formal order. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Laxmi Ji Idol For Wealth, Peace & Happiness Luxeartisanship Shop Now Undo Her case should have been considered on merit before taking such an extreme step, it stated. Rakshanda was forced out of the country on April 30, the same day her plea challenging the deportation was scheduled for hearing. Earlier on April 30, in a major relief to a police personnel, Ifthkar Ali (45), and his eight siblings, the high court halted their deportation to Pakistan. The authorities brought them back from Punjab to reunite them with their families in Poonch district. The police personnel and siblings had moved court claiming they were not Pakistani nationals and had been living in Salwah village for generations. Minal Khan, a Pakistani national married to a CRPF jawan, was also granted last-minute relief from deportation by the HC on April 30.
