logo
Should Georgia Promise Scholarship Act be repealed, expanded? Democrats, Republicans clash

Should Georgia Promise Scholarship Act be repealed, expanded? Democrats, Republicans clash

Yahoo19-02-2025
The Brief
Rep. Floyd Griffin (D-Milledgeville) is sponsoring House Bill 436, which would repeal the Georgia Promise Scholarship Act.
More than 400 public schools statewide are eligible for the school voucher program, which provides a scholarship of $6,500 to pay for private school tuition or home school expenses.
Critics say it does more harm than good.
Senate Republicans have introduced legislation to expand the program.
ATLANTA - Some parents of Georgia school children who attend low performing public schools in Georgia will soon begin applying for school vouchers to help them pay for private school.
A Democratic state lawmaker wants to repeal the law. Senate Republicans want to expand the program.
What we know
The Georgia Promise Scholarship is a program that provides a school voucher worth $6,500 to the families of children who attend underperforming public schools in Georgia.
State officials released a list of more than 400 eligible schools, including more than 30 Atlanta Public Schools, more than 40 schools in DeKalb County, 22 in Clayton County, 16 in Gwinnett County, 9 in Fulton County and 8 in Cobb County.
RELATED: School list released for Georgia Promise Scholarship program
Big picture view
State Rep. Floyd Griffin (D-Milledgeville) is sponsoring House Bill 436.
HB 436 would repeal the Georgia Promise Scholarship Act, which was signed into law last year.
Critics say the program has been fraught with delays and unforeseen challenges, and disproportionately affects children in rural and urban school districts who can't afford private school, and lack transportation.
What they're saying
"Why should we be funding private schools? It's only going to help those individuals who can pay the additional funds to go to school," Rep. Griffin told reporters Tuesday.
The other side
Meanwhile, Lt. Gov. Burt Jones and Republicans in the Senate want to expand the program.
State Sen. Greg Dolezal (R-Cumming) has introduced Senate Bill 152, which would expand eligibility for the Georgia Promise Scholarship to biological and adoptive children of foster parents.
"We worked very hard to create opportunities for children and parents in this state," Jones told FOX 5. "If you are in a failing public school system you ought to be able to, to be given the opportunity to, take a voucher and find a place that's more suited for your child."
The Source
FOX 5 Atlanta Deidra Dukes spoke to Rep. Floyd Griffin (D-Milledgeville), Lt. Gov. Burt Jones and Sen. Greg Dolezal (R-Cumming) about the program, House Bill 436 and Senate Bill 152.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Democrat Locked in State Capitol for Refusing Mandatory Escort
Texas Democrat Locked in State Capitol for Refusing Mandatory Escort

Time​ Magazine

time23 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Texas Democrat Locked in State Capitol for Refusing Mandatory Escort

Rep. Nicole Collier, a Democrat representing Fort Worth, claims that she's been unlawfully locked in the Texas House chambers, where she remained overnight Monday and may stay for days until the issue is resolved. Collier was one of dozens of Democrats who fled the state earlier this month to break quorum in an effort to block a vote on a contentious redistricting plan backed by President Donald Trump that would favor Republican candidates in the 2026 midterm elections. Some of the representatives returned on Monday for the start of a second special session but GOP Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows is requiring that they be escorted by state troopers when leaving the House chamber to prevent another walkout. Collier, however, said she would not agree to such monitoring. 'I refuse to sign away my dignity as a duly elected representative just so Republicans can control my movements and monitor me with police escorts,' Collier said in a statement to media outlets. 'My constituents sent me to Austin to protect their voices and rights,' she said. 'When I press that button to vote, I know these maps will harm my constituents—I won't just go along quietly with their intimidation or their discrimination.' Proposed Texas maps kicked off interstate redistricting fight Texas GOP leaders have criticized the Democrats that fled for having 'abandoned their duties.' Earlier this month, Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit to remove 13 representatives from office over their continued absence on Aug. 8, while Gov. Greg Abbott requested that the Texas Supreme Court vacate the seat of House Democratic leader Gene Wu. Litigation is ongoing, although it's not clear how the members' return will affect the suits. Even so, the passage of the redistricting plan is all but guaranteed. The Texas Senate redistricting committee approved the maps on Sunday, and the Republican-majority upper chamber could vote on the plan as soon as this Wednesday. 'We knew that this was something we were not going to be able to stop,' Rep. Ramon Romero, one of the Democrats who fled, told the Fort Worth Report. 'We could slow it down, though, and that's exactly what we did.' Texas Republicans were energized by the Democrats' return. 'Representatives come and go. Issues rise and fall. But this body has endured wars, economic depressions and quorum breaks dating back to the very first session,' Burrows said at Monday's session. 'We are done waiting. We have a quorum. Now is the time for action.' Trump posted on Truth Social, 'Please pass this Map, ASAP.' Trump had earlier threatened to involve Federal Bureau of Investigations officers in bringing back the representatives. The Democrats' return to the state comes after California launched its own redistricting plan that would counter the Texas Republicans' efforts. Several more states—Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, New York, and Ohio—have also entered redistricting battles. Redistricting typically happens once every 10 years, after the U.S. census, which was last conducted in 2020. But Trump and his allies began lobbying for Republican states to redraw their congressional lines sooner, in order to gain an advantage in next year's midterms. 'Now that the nation is involved in this fight, some Texas Democrats are coming back to fight these racist maps in the legislature and then in the courts,' Texas Democratic Party Chairman Kendall Scudder said in a statement Monday. 'Texans can see that the Republicans would rather serve Trump than serve the interests of Texans.' Wu told the Houston Chronicle that the Democrats will challenge the legality of the maps. Many Democrats, though, did not return on Monday. 'Even if California and New York redistrict and successfully get rid of Republicans, that doesn't help my district,' Rep. Jolanda Jones, who did not return to Texas, told the New York Times. 'We will lose one Black seat in Houston and one Black seat in Dallas. That's unacceptable.' Collier alleges 'illegal confinement' Collier told CBS that she could go to her office with a police escort and with Department of Public Safety officers stationed outside or she could remain inside the chamber. She told the Fort Worth Report that she does not know how long she will be there for. Collier has filed a habeas corpus petition to a Travis County court alleging her 'illegal confinement.' Another Democratic representative, Ann Johnson, signed the permission slip but remained with Collier for some time after objecting to being followed by an officer. Johnson eventually left the chamber. 'This is another exercise of authority and power over people of color, over people who resist,' said Collier, who is the former chair of the Texas Legislative Black Caucus. 'This exercise, this requirement that we be trailed by DPS officers who could be out there fighting crime is not only a waste of taxpayer dollars, but is also offensive to the dignity of each one of us who has been elected by our constituents to come here and fight.' Collier's attention-grabbing move has been applauded by Democrats across the state and country. 'As a former Texas State Rep, let me be clear: LOCKING Rep. Nicole Collier inside the chamber is beyond outrageous,' U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D, Texas) posted on X. 'Forcing elected officials to sign 'permission slips' and take police escorts to leave? That's not procedure. That's some old Jim Crow playbook.' Democratic state senator Roland Gutierrez, who visited Collier in the chamber, posted a video of a group of supporters gathered inside the Texas Capitol building that was chanting, 'Let her out.'

'Deport Depot' Merch from Florida Falls Flat as Home Depot (NYSE:HD) Fights Back
'Deport Depot' Merch from Florida Falls Flat as Home Depot (NYSE:HD) Fights Back

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

'Deport Depot' Merch from Florida Falls Flat as Home Depot (NYSE:HD) Fights Back

It is no secret that the parking lots at home improvement giant Home Depot (HD) have been the stage of controversy lately. The Republican Party of Florida tried to make hay while the sun shined, and produced a line of goods called 'The Deport Depot.' But Home Depot fought back, and investors did not take it well. Perhaps thinking Home Depot should focus less on politics and more on selling hammers, investors sent shares down fractionally in Monday afternoon's trading. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. The 'Deport Depot' line of merchandise looked a lot like Home Depot's own logo, with blocky orange stencil-style letters over a black background. Florida Republicans then raced to put the logo on everything from shirts to mugs and beyond. But outcry followed, and the Republicans pulled the parodical product line. Home Depot took what amounted to the high road, and declared, 'We don't allow any organization to use our branding or logo for their commercial purposes, and we did not approve this use.' Though the Florida GOP might have been able to stand on parody and fair use applications for copyright and trademark issues, it likely figured discretion was the better part of valor here, and pulled the merchandise line almost hours after it first showed up. Though it is safe to say that Home Depot would have fought this. It already faces concerns that it is getting payoffs from ICE, and it really does not need further comparisons. Watch Out for that Ladder Meanwhile, Home Depot has a bit of a ladder problem. More specifically, a line of ladders sold under the Werner brand name are being recalled, many of which can be found at Home Depot. The ladders pose a 'falling hazard,' reports note. That may sound odd in that every ladder poses a falling hazard in one way or another, but this one may be particularly dangerous. Apparently, reports note, the ladders' locking mechanism may jam, and thus not fully lock in place. Without that locking mechanism, the ladder may unexpectedly fold and send those on the ladder crashing down accordingly. Already, there are 14 reports of a range of injuries that resulted from the ladders' faulty lock mechanism. Is Home Depot a Good Long-Term Buy? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Strong Buy consensus rating on HD stock based on 19 Buys and six Holds assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. After a 10% rally in its share price over the past year, the average HD price target of $430.68 per share implies 8.65% upside potential. Disclosure

Trump vows to change how elections are run. The US Constitution doesn't give him that power

timean hour ago

Trump vows to change how elections are run. The US Constitution doesn't give him that power

President Donald Trump on Monday vowed more changes to the way elections are conducted in the U.S., but based on the Constitution there is little to nothing he can do on his own. Relying on false information and conspiracy theories that he's regularly used to explain away his 2020 election loss, Trump pledged on his social media site that he would do away with both mail voting — which remains popular and is used by about one-third of all voters — and voting machines — some form of which are used in almost all of the country's thousands of election jurisdictions. These are the same systems that enabled Trump to win the 2024 election and Republicans to gain control of Congress. Trump's post marks an escalation even in his normally overheated election rhetoric. He issued a wide-ranging executive order earlier this year that, among other changes, would have required documented proof-of-citizenship before registering to vote. His Monday post promised another election executive order to 'help bring HONESTY to the 2026 Midterm elections.' The same post also pushed falsehoods about voting. He claimed the U.S. is the only country to use mail voting, when it's actually used by dozens, including Germany, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Similar complaints to Trump's, when aired on conservative and conservative-leaning networks such as Newsmax and Fox News, have led to multimillion dollar defamation settlements, including one announced Monday, because they are full of false information and the outlets have not been able to present any evidence to support them. Trump's post came after the president told Fox News that Russian President Vladimir Putin, in their Friday meeting in Alaska, echoed his grievances about mail voting and the 2020 election. Trump continued his attack on mail voting and voting machines in the Oval Office on Monday, during a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The announcement signals yet another way that Trump intends to stack the cards in his favor in the 2026 midterm elections, after he already has directed his attorney general to investigate a Democratic fundraising platform and urged states to redraw their congressional districts to help the GOP maintain its majority in the House of Representatives. Here's a breakdown of Trump's latest election post and why Congress is the one entity that can implement national election rules. Trump for years has promoted false information about voting, and Monday was no exception. He claimed there is 'MASSIVE FRAUD' due to mail voting, when in fact voting fraud in the U.S. is rare. As an example, an Associated Press review after the 2020 election found fewer than 475 cases of potential fraud in the six battleground states where he disputed his loss, far too few to tip that election to Trump. Washington and Oregon, which conduct elections entirely by mail, have sued to challenge Trump's earlier executive order — which sought to require that all ballots must be received by Election Day and not just postmarked by then. The states argue that the president has no such authority, and they are seeking a declaration from a federal judge in Seattle that their postmark deadlines do not conflict with federal law setting the date of U.S. elections. Trump also alleged that voting machines are more expensive than 'Watermark Paper." That's a little-used system that has gained favor and investments among some voting conspiracy theorists who believe it would help prevent fraudulent ballots from being introduced into the vote count. Watermarks would not provide a way to count ballots, so they would not on their own replace vote tabulating machines. While some jurisdictions still have voters use electronic ballot-marking devices to cast their votes, the vast majority of voters in the U.S. already vote on paper ballots, creating an auditable record of votes that provides an extra safeguard for election security. In his post, Trump also claimed that states 'are merely an 'agent' for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes' and must do what the federal government 'as represented by the President of the United States' tells them to do. Election lawyers said that's a misrepresentation of the U.S. Constitution. It also flies in the face of what had been a core Republican Party value of prioritizing states' rights. Unlike in most countries, elections in the U.S. are run by the states. But it gets more complicated — each state then allows smaller jurisdictions, such as counties, cities or townships, to run their own elections. Election officials estimate there are as many as 10,000 different election jurisdictions across the country. A frequent complaint of Trump and other election conspiracy theorists is that the U.S. doesn't run its election like France, which hand counts presidential ballots and usually has a national result on election night. But that's because France is only running that single election, and every jurisdiction has the same ballot with no other races. A ballot in the U.S. might contain dozens of races, from president on down to city council and including state and local ballot measures. The Constitution makes the states the entities that determine the 'time, place and manner' of elections, but does allow Congress to 'make' or 'alter' rules for federal elections. Congress can change the way states run congressional and presidential elections but has no say in the way a state runs its own elections. The president is not mentioned at all in the Constitution's list of entities with powers over elections. 'The president has very limited to zero authority over things related to the conduct of elections,' said Rick Hasen, an election law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles. Parts of Trump's earlier executive order on elections were swiftly blocked by the courts, on the grounds that Congress, and not the president, sets federal election rules. It's unclear what Trump plans to do now, but the only path to change federal election rules is through Congress. Although Republicans control Congress, it's unclear that even his party would want to eliminate voting machines nationwide, possibly delaying vote tallies in their own races by weeks or months. Even if they did, legislation would likely be unable to pass because Democrats could filibuster it in the U.S. Senate. Mail voting had bipartisan support before Trump turned against it during the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 election, but it's still widely used in Republican-leaning states, including several he won last November — Arizona, Florida and Utah. It's also how members of the military stationed overseas cast their ballots, and fully eliminating it would disenfranchise those GOP-leaning voters. The main significance of Trump's Monday statement is that it signals his continuing obsession with trying to change how elections are run. 'These kinds of claims could provide a kind of excuse for him to try to meddle,' Hasen said. 'Very concerned about that.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store