Heritage association objects to toilet block near Oval Maidan
Mumbai: The Fort Heritage Conservation Association has written to the BMC objecting to construction of a new toilet block opposite Bombay High Court and adjacent to the Grade I heritage Oval Maidan.
In a letter dated May 16, the association criticized the proposed design as "a pastiche/ tasteless imitation," arguing that it disrespects the historical and architectural significance of the World Heritage precinct.
"We have earlier iterated that the toilet stands near the Grade I sites of the Oval Maidan (within 100m), the University of Mumbai, and the High Court; which are at the heart of the UNESCO World Heritage Site 'Victorian Gothic and Art Deco Ensembles of Mumbai'.
Additionally, this location is also a part of the Fort Heritage Precinct. As per the Heritage Control Regulations presented in Section 52 of the Development Control and Promotion Regulations (DCPR), any new construction at such an important site requires 'sensitive' development in terms of mass, scale, and setting and requires conservation of its heritage and cultural significance.
Any new addition should not alter the character of the precinct.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed!
IC Markets
Start Now
Undo
The new interventions could be contemporary but subtle or inspired by the original character, but should not be a pastiche/tasteless imitation of it," states the letter.
A public toilet that was earlier on the same location had been demolished.
The association stated that through documents obtained through a govt official in March 2025, they have observed that there are no updated designs nor has approval been sought from the Mumbai Heritage Conservation Committee (MHCC).
"The designs shared continue to expand the footprint and have a flat roof with a character that is insensitive to the heritage character of the World Heritage Site. Under the guise of providing a public amenity toilet, the structure also includes Rest Rooms, Store Areas, Waiting Area, Locker Rooms/ Luggage Rooms, Shower Rooms, Changing Areas, Office Room and Record Room," it said.
When contacted, civic officials clarified that the Mumbai Heritage Conservation Committee (MHCC) had granted approval on June 13, 2024, for the construction of a toilet block in front of the high court.
"During a review meeting on December 18, 2024, the Municipal Commissioner directed that the existing Solid Waste Management (SWM) labour chowky, adjacent to the proposed toilet block, also be integrated into this structure. A unified building was preferred," said a civic official.
Revised plans were accordingly submitted to the MHCC, featuring a ground-plus-one composite building that includes the toilet block and SWM chowky.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Garbage tax deferred amid property tax hike
MUMBAI: The civic administration has deferred its much-debated fee on solid waste management, or garbage tax, in view of the increase in property tax. The user fee was meant to cover the daily collection of solid waste from individual homes as well as commercial and industrial establishments. Proposed in April, the fee ranges from ₹100 to ₹7,500, depending on the size and nature of the establishment. It was to be levied under the revised Cleanliness and Sanitation Bye-Laws 2025. However, on Wednesday, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) announced an increase in property tax of nearly 16%. In view of this additional financial burden on citizens, chief minister Devendra Fadnavis and deputy chief minister and urban development minister Eknath Shinde stepped in to defer the proposed user fee on solid waste collection. It was to be added to the property tax bills. Meanwhile, the BMC has begun issuing revised property tax bills for financial year 2025-26, reflecting an average increase of 15.89%. The civic body clarified that the increase is not the result of any change in tax structure or rates by the BMC, but a statutory revision based on updated ready reckoner rates, which determine the capital value of properties. Under Section 154 (1C) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, the capital value of properties must be revised every five years. Although this mandate was implemented in 2015, the scheduled 2020 revision was postponed due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Legal amendments delayed the process, resulting in the current revision taking place after a ten-year interval. Each revised tax bill now includes a special notice stating, 'Capital valuation of the property is provisional, indicating that the final tax amount is subject to pending court rulings,' said a senior civic official. Any changes will be adjusted in future bills, either as a refund or additional charge. To protect low-income property owners, the BMC has reiterated that properties measuring less than 500sq ft will continue to be exempt from property tax. These properties have not been issued revised bills, nor will they be subject to the SWM fee, if and when it is imposed. The property tax increase has been criticised, mostly from former corporators and other political leaders, who said the increase was unfair to citizens. In a letter to municipal commissioner Bhushan Gagrani, former leader of the opposition Ravi Raja condemned the administration's inability to recover dues from large defaulters while burdening regular taxpayers. He said property tax has become the BMC's primary source of income after the abolition of octroi, formerly a major revenue stream. According to Raja, while the administration has shown some efficiency in tax collection, it still fails to recoup massive outstanding dues from major property owners. At present, 481 major defaulters collectively owe the BMC a staggering ₹14,320 crore in unpaid property tax. Prominent among them are Raghuvanshi Mills, Taj Lands End Ltd, Seven Hills Healthcare, MMRDA, Bombay Cricket Association and J Kumar Infra, according to the BMC. Gaothans hit with 40% property tax hike A 40% hike in property tax for gaothan properties, traditional or village settlements within the city, has triggered strong opposition. Civic activist advocate Godfrey Pimenta called it 'illegal', demanding its immediate withdrawal. In a letter to civic chief Bhushan Gagrani, Pimenta noted that his latest six-month bill amounted to ₹19,885, a 40% increase over the earlier rate. He argued that this violates the provisions of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, which caps such increases at 14.52%, as approved by the civic Standing Committee in 2015. Pimenta also cited state ordinances protecting small residential units (under 500sq ft) from tax increases beyond the 2015 level, and asserted that even as administrator, the municipal commissioner cannot exceed the limits set by law. He has demanded a rollback of the hike and adherence to the 14.52% cap, warning against what he called an 'overreach of the civic body'.
Indian Express
3 days ago
- Indian Express
BMC defers decision to impose SWM charges after property tax bills hike
A day after the property tax bills that were issued by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) showed a rise up to 20%, the civic administration on Thursday announced deferment of the proposed solid waste management (SWM) charges. The BMC's move came following huge uproar on social media where citizens criticised the move of increasing taxes abruptly. The BMC's decision of imposing the SWM user charges was also criticised by the opposing Shiv Sena (UBT) and Congress. The civic administration had proposed implementation of the SWM charges in its 2025-26 budget. The fees ranged between Rs 100 to Rs 7,500 depending on the entities on which it would be imposed. The civic body had earlier aimed towards generating Rs 687 crore in its revenue. 'Taking into account the additional financial burden on citizens due to the revised property tax bills, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis and Deputy Chief Minister and Urban Development Minister Eknath Shinde recommended a reconsideration of the proposed Solid Waste Management (SWM) charges. Accordingly, BMC has decided to defer the implementation of SWM charges,' the BMC said in a statement issued on Thursday. The proposed user fee would be implemented on both residential and commercial properties. The minimum fee of Rs 100 would be imposed on residential buildings that would be less than 50 square meters, while the maximum amount of Rs 7,500 crore was to be imposed on hotels, banquet halls and commercial properties having a floor size of 3,500 square meter or more. After announcing the draft of this new policy, the civic body had invited suggestions and objections from citizens, with civic officials saying that so far 376 suggestions and objections were issued by the authorities. Meanwhile, the increase in property tax rates took place following the hike in ready reckoner rates (RRR) imposed by the civic administration. The state government for the ongoing 2025-26 financial year has increased the RRR by an average 3.88% across the state. Meanwhile, Mumbai has recorded an increase in RRR by 3.39% – slightly below the state average. Property tax is a cess charged by the BMC which comprises multiple components. While the larger aspect of this cess is determined by the ready reckoner rate (RRR) or the minimum property value determined by the government for revenue collection, the remaining valuation is determined by factors like age and condition of the property and sewerage charges among others. As a result, an increase in RRR leads to automatic increase in property tax. Outstanding property tax due A day after the hike in property tax bills, the BMC's data shows that as many as 481 entities owe the civic body an outstanding tax worth Rs 14,320 crore inclusive of private as well as government properties. Of the total outstanding dues, Rs 1,090 crore is owed by the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA), out of which Rs 13.39 crore is owed by the Azad Nagar Metro station, while Rs 943 crore is owed by J Kumar infraprojects private limited – a private construction firm which is currently undertaking several infrastructure projects in Mumbai. Rs 103 crore is owed by the Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Private Limited (MMRCL). The University of Mumbai owes Rs 84 crore in taxes while the Airport Authority of India (AAI) owes Rs 45 crore to the BMC. Civic officials maintained that several of these private parties have been using the BMC's plots for setting up casting yards for various infrastructure projects that have been taken up by the government authorities. 'We have sent letters and notices in each of these organisations and entities. In many cases, these matters are stuck in arbitration considering multiple stakeholders are involved. As a result the outstanding tax charges couldn't be recovered. In some cases we attach the properties and confiscate them till the dues are paid,' an official said.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Noida cracks down on condos with no WTPs, space a squeeze, say residents
Noida: With parking and play area already a squeeze, Noida Authority's decision to serve notices to group housing societies that generate over 100 kg of waste daily but have no on-site waste treatment plants (WTPs) has left apartment owners' associations miffed. Under the Solid Waste Management (SWM) Rules, 2016, waste treatment plants are a must for group housing societies built on plots spanning 5,000 sqm or more. Earlier this month, the Authority started issuing notices to societies that continued to dump waste in the open, asking them to draw up a waste management plan or face penalties, including recovery of disposal costs. In April, Noida CEO Lokesh M had also warned about deregistering apartment owners' associations (AOAs) of societies that violated environmental norms. AOA representatives and highrise society federations told TOI that the order was "autocratic" and failed to take into account that most group housing societies, including those in newer 7x to 10x sectors, were built or their building plans approved by Noida Authority before 2016 when designated space to hold and process a large quantity of waste within the compound wasn't the norm. A few others accused the Authority of trying to park the issue of waste treatment on group housing societies rather than addressing the frequent sanitation workers' strikes in the city. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo "Asking group housing societies to build infrastructure for WTPs overnight is problematic. Societies are already fighting for space for parking and even play areas for children within the complex. Where is the space for a waste treatment plant or process?" Rajiva Singh, president of Noida Federation of Apartment Owners Associations (NOFAA) that represents over 80 high-rise societies, said. Nikhil Singhal, president of Noida Highrise Federation (NHRF) for 100X sectors, also called out the decision as "hasty", one taken without consulting AOAs or the residents' federations. "Most NHRF societies lack space for setting up WTPs as these were not a part of the original building plan drawn up by developer and approved by the Authority," Singhal said. Ashutosh Rai, AOA secretary of Gaur Grandeur Apartments in Sector 119, which was issued a notice on Monday, said, "Noida Authority's notice stated that we need to start processing our waste within the society. This is a one-sided communication with no formal platform for an open discussion," he said. While Gaur Grandeur is yet to figure out a resolution, some societies which are facing FIRs for allegedly discharging untreated sewage into stormwater drains have decided to take legal recourse. RG Residency, which was among the seven societies against whom FIRs were registered in April, challenged the action and obtained a stay from Allahabad high court that restrained Noida Authority from taking coercive action against the Sector 120 society "till the next date of listing" in July. Besides RG Residency, FIRs were filed against Sikka Karmik (Sector 78), Lotus Boulevard (Sector 100), Purvanchal Royal Park (Sector 137), Aims Max Gardenia (Sector 75), Prateek Stylome (Sector 45), and Amrapali Silicon City (Sector 76) for allegedly operating without functional STPs. According to Rajiva Singh, NOFAA had proposed a cluster-based approach for solid waste management under which a few highrise societies in a sector could come together and establish a WTP. "Our proposal was approved by the previous CEO some three years back. Also, land was allotted to the Federation by the Noida Authority to make this cluster approach possible through a people-private-administration partnership. But nothing has moved since then," Singh claimed.
