Who is Rama Duwaji? Wife of NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani he met on Hinge
Zohran Mamdani might not be the only radical relocating to Gracie Mansion in the fall — his artist wife, whose multimedia career often includes pro-Palestinian works, will be by his side if the Democratic primary winner claims another victory in November.
Mamdani's wife — 27-year-old Rama Duwaji — shared the stage with her 33-year-old socialist husband after his stunning victory Tuesday night, one of the rare appearances she's made on the campaign trail.
She was largely unseen since Mamdani announced his candidacy in October, but was thrust into the spotlight in May after The Post reported on the couple's small but lavish Dubai engagement celebration.
Advertisement
Mamdani took a moment to honor his wife after his stunning victory over disgraced former Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
'I must thank my incredible wife,' he said to applause from the watching crowd. 'Rama, thank you,' he added, kissing her hand.
'Couldn't possibly be prouder,' Duwaji wrote on Instagram after the Queens assemblyman's historic win, which, if elected, would see him become the youngest Big Apple mayor since 1914.
Advertisement
4 Rama Duwaji, 27, joined her 33-year-old husband Zohran Mamdani onstage after his victory in the primaries Tuesday
AP
So, who is the possible future first lady of the Big Apple?
Brooklyn-based Syrian artist
The bio on Duwaji's Instagram, where she boasts nearly 85,000 followers, indicates she's originally from Damascus, Syria, though a campaign spokeswoman told the New York Times Wednesday that the artist is 'ethnically Syrian and was born in Texas.'
The Post has reached out to Mamdani's campaign for clarification.
Advertisement
Duwaji told YUNG that she spent most of the COVID-19 pandemic with her family in Dubai, The Post reported last month.
She has been working as an animator and illustrator in Brooklyn for several years, after earning a Master of Fine Arts in Illustration at $29,000-a-semester School of Visual Arts.
'Using drawn portraiture and movement, Rama examines the nuances of sisterhood and communal experiences,' according to her website.
4 'I must thank my incredible wife,' Mamdani said to applause. 'Rama, thank you,' he added, kissing her hand.
Getty Images
Advertisement
Her notable clients include the New Yorker, Washington Post, BBC and London's famed Tate Modern gallery, it added.
Duwaji's work — largely pen-and-ink-style digital illustrations — centers on pro-Palestine, Arab and female identity themes, showing burka-clad women crushed under rubble or keffiyeh-clad protesters being pinned down by police.
One extended animation — also posted by her husband's Instagram account — describes how New York charities send more than $60 million to 'fund Israeli war crimes.'
'By recognizing groups like these as charities, New York is subsidizing Israel's illegal settlement expansion and state violence against Palestinians,' the animation says.
Others refer to Palestinians facing an 'ethnic cleansing' or show support for Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University protester arrested by the Trump administration for his part in widespread anti-Israel protests at the Ivy League school.
Duwaji and Mamdani met on Hinge
Mamdani and Duwaji met several years ago on the dating app Hinge, but little is known about the city's potential first couple beyond a bevy of lovey-dovey photos posted on Instagram.
'Rama isn't just my wife, she's an incredible artist who deserves to be known on her own terms,' Mamdani wrote on the platform when he shared photos from their civil ceremony at the City Clerk's office, his first major public mention of his wife.
4 Duwaji is an illustrator and animator who has been living in Brooklyn. She met Mamdani on Hinge several years ago.
Laura Thompson/Shutterstock
Advertisement
4 Duwaji and Mamdani were married this past winter at the City Clerk's office.
Instagram/Rama Duwaji
The ceremony came months after the two secretly held an engagement and Nikkah — an Islamic religious ceremony in which a couple signs a marriage contract — in Dubai, according to Instagram posts by florist LMF Dubai.
The bash was held Dec. 22, 2024, on the rooftop of Vida Creek Harbour, which boasts breathtaking views of the Burj Khalifa, according to the post.
Advertisement
'Before their civil ceremony in New York City, Zohran and his wife celebrated their engagement in Dubai last year—where her family lives—with a small, joyful ceremony surrounded by their loved ones,' the Mamdani campaign said in a statement.
What's next for Mamdani's campaign
Mamdani earned 43.41% of the vote in the ranked-choice ballot to beat out Cuomo, 67, who nabbed 36.42%, and conceded to Mamdani soon after polls closed Tuesday.
That means Mamdani will take on incumbent Mayor Eric Adams — who is running as an independent — in November, along with Republican Curtis Sliwa.
Mamdani, a Queens assemblyman born in Uganda to a professor father and a renowned movie-making mother, would be the first Muslim to serve as New York City mayor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Trump officials to give first classified briefing to Congress on Iran strikes
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senators are set to meet with top national security officials Thursday as many question President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three Iranian nuclear sites — and whether those strikes were ultimately successful. The classified briefing, which was originally scheduled for Tuesday and was delayed, also comes as the Senate is expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval if Trump decides to strike Iran again . Democrats, and some Republicans, have said that the White House overstepped its authority when it failed to seek the advice of Congress and they want to know more about the intelligence that Trump relied on when he authorized the attacks. 'Senators deserve full transparency, and the administration has a legal obligation to inform Congress precisely about what is happening,' said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, who said Tuesday that it was 'outrageous' that the Senate and House briefings were postponed. A similar briefing for House members was pushed to Friday. CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth are expected to brief the senators on Thursday. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was scheduled to be at the Tuesday briefing, but will not be attending, according to a person familiar with the schedule. The briefing could be contentious as questions have swirled around Trump's decision to strike Iran and whether the attacks were successful. A preliminary U.S. intelligence report found this week that Iran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months, contradicting statements from Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities, according to two people familiar with the report. The people were not authorized to address the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. On Wednesday, Gabbard and Ratcliffe sent out statements backing Trump's claims that the facilities were 'completely and fully obliterated.' Gabbard posted on social media that 'new intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed.' She said that if the Iranians choose to rebuild the three facilities, it would 'likely take years to do.' Ratcliffe said in a statement from the CIA that Iran's nuclear program has been 'severely damaged' and cited new intelligence 'from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' Most Republicans have staunchly defended Trump and hailed the tentative ceasefire he brokered in the Israel-Iran war. House Speaker Mike Johnson even went as far as to question the constitutionality of the War Powers Act , which is intended to give Congress a say in military action. 'The bottom line is the commander in chief is the president, the military reports to the president, and the person empowered to act on the nation's behalf is the president,' Johnson told reporters. But some Republicans — including some of Trump's staunchest supporters — are uncomfortable with the strikes and the potential for U.S. involvement in an extended Middle East conflict. 'I think the speaker needs to review the Constitution,' said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. 'And I think there's a lot of evidence that our Founding Fathers did not want presidents to unilaterally go to war.' Paul would not say if he is voting for the resolution by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would require congressional approval for specific military action in Iran. The resolution is likely to fail as 60 votes would be needed to pass it and Republicans have a 53-47 majority. But Kaine says it's important to put the Senate on the record. 'You have a debate like this so that the entire American public, whose sons and daughters are in the military and whose lives will be at risk in war, get to see the debate and reach their own conclusion together with the elected officials about whether the mission is worth it or not,' Kaine said. While he did not seek approval, Trump sent congressional leaders a short letter Monday serving as his official notice of the strikes, two days after the bombs fell. The letter said that the strike was taken 'to advance vital United States national interests, and in collective self-defense of our ally, Israel, by eliminating Iran's nuclear program.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
James Carville calls Zohran Mamdani's NYC mayoral primary victory a ‘potentially damaging event' for Democratic Party
Veteran strategist James Carville warned on Wednesday how democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani winning the New York City mayoral primary may be a burden for the Democratic Party. Mamdani, a Ugandan-born New York State Assemblyman from Queens, caused a major upset by defeating former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the race to become the Democratic Party's nominee for New York City mayor. Republicans and some Democrats have blasted Mamdani, warning he is a grim sign of America's political future. Carville, one of the most famous strategists in American politics, has been speaking about the Democratic Party's need to ditch far-left politics since well before the 2024 election. He spoke about Mamdani's surprising victory on his podcast with co-host Al Hunt, warning it may be yet another hurdle for struggling Democrats. The strategist noted that Mamdani 'has not walked back' calls for 'global infitada' [sic]. Carville was referencing how Mamdani refused to disavow the phrase 'Globalize the intifada,' which pro-Israeli supporters argue is a call for violence, and Israel opponents tout as a mere call to struggle against oppression. 4 Carville warned that Mamdani's victory may be yet another hurdle for struggling Democrats. Youtube / Politicon 'Maybe he'll turn out to be a very skilled candidate that can skillfully navigate some of what I refer to as 'esoteric' positions,' Carville said, appearing to refer to Mamdani's policy of government-run grocery stores, which bewildered the seasoned strategist. 'There's a lot of baseball left here,' Carville said of the mayoral election. 'We've got a lot of baseball left to play.' Hunt argued that New York City is not a reliable indicator for America at-large, citing how many of its most iconic mayors did not represent a larger political shift outside of their city. 4 Republicans and some Democrats have blasted Mamdani, warning he is a grim sign of America's political future. 'However, I do believe that Republicans will jump on this,' he said. He then appeared to refer to Rep. Elise Stefanik's, R-N.Y., comment where she warned about Mamdani being a 'radical, Defund-the-Police, Communist, raging Antisemite.' Hunt denied that Mamdani is a communist, but argued, 'he does have some issues that the Republicans will love to talk about.' 'I can't imagine that any Democratic candidate anywhere in the country is going to be able to escape answering this question. I think the microphone's going to follow him around. I think that they're going to pound this home as hard as they possibly can,' Carville agreed. 4 Hunt argued that New York City is not a reliable political indicator for America at-large. Youtube / Politicon A big part of the answer, Carville replied, is encouraging people to 'look at our nominees in Virginia and New Jersey.' However, he said, 'Depending on who comes in a general election, there's a lot of Democrats that are going to have a hard go at this. I think it's a potentially damaging event.' Both of the hosts drew parallels between former President Joe Biden and Cuomo being rejected as symbols of the Democratic Party's past in favor of something entirely new. 4 Supporters celebrate as Zohran Mamdani leads in the Democratic Primary for New York Mayor at the 'Zohran For NYC Election Night Party' in New York City on June 24, 2025. Derek French/Shutterstock 'Sometimes the Democratic Party's attitude is 'take this and eat it, because you gotta eat it,' and people don't like that,' Carville said, arguing that mentality was enforced on Democrats with Biden and then with Cuomo. The rejection of this, he said, goes beyond ideology and is a generational shift, one could either be positive or negative for the Democrats' future. 'I think this guy creates probably more problems than opportunities for the Democrats,' Hunt later argued after criticizing his grocery store proposal as 'not realistic at all.' Carville warned that opposition to Mamdani is going to 'keep unearthing stuff' from his past. 'I mean he's gotta give an umbrella answer for all of this,' he said. 'You know, Harris had the same problem.'
CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump claims the press is demeaning the military. But questioning power is patriotic
Journalists ask questions, vet the answers and report the results to the public. That's pretty much the job description. But the Trump administration is claiming that it's unpatriotic to do so. Several days after the US conducted airstrikes in Iran, as the public awaits a clearer picture of the strikes' impact, President Trump is attacking CNN for reporting on an early US intel assessment that undercut his claims about Iran's nuclear enrichment sites being 'totally obliterated.' The New York Times is also being targeted by Trump because it matched CNN's reporting. 'They tried to demean the great work our B-2 pilots did,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Wednesday. CNN and The Times have not demeaned any pilots. But the administration is casting 'any questioning of the success of an incredibly difficult military operation as fake, as unappreciative, and as disrespectful to servicemembers,' CNN's Jake Tapper said on 'The Lead' Wednesday evening. Tapper cited past examples of government deception and said, 'history has taught us that the most pro-servicemember action we can take is to ask questions of our leaders, especially in times of war. That, for journalists, is the height of patriotism.' Indeed, history is replete with proof that it is imperative to ask for evidence of presidential assertions. It is necessary to question official accounts; to wonder if the public is being misled; and to do so regardless of which party is in power. When President Joe Biden ordered the withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan in 2021, CNN was at the forefront in documenting and scrutinizing the chaos that followed. One headline at the time stated, 'Biden's botched Afghan exit is a disaster at home and abroad long in the making.' When lives are on the line, government officials often have an incentive to hide or obscure the truth — and reporters have a duty to uncover it. 'The truth, which literally hurts, is that every administration lies about war, particularly (though not only) about its reasons for initiating deadly force,' Matt Welch wrote for Reason magazine in 2020. Welch warned that 'too many people turn off their brains once the battle bugle calls' when the opposite response is actually needed. Trump clearly thinks it is politically advantageous to claim that scrutiny of the Iran strike's outcome is insulting to the US military and to the country. At a NATO summit press conference on Wednesday, Trump asserted that the B-2 pilots were 'devastated' by Tuesday's reports about the early intel assessment. 'You should be proud of those pilots and you shouldn't be trying to demean them,' Trump said in response to a question from NBC's Kelly O'Donnell. 'There's a difference, sir, between asking about an assessment' and doubting the pilots, O'Donnell responded, although she was barely audible over the president's mic. 'No one is questioning the skill of the US military,' O'Donnell added. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth took the same tack as Trump at the press conference, charging the press with trying to 'spin' the airstrike outcome 'for their own political reasons to try to hurt President Trump or our country.' Later in the day, Trump announced that Hegseth would hold a Thursday morning news conference at the Pentagon 'to fight for the Dignity of our Great American Pilots.' Their dignity is not in question, however. 'No one is questioning whether this was a heroic and valiant effort on behalf of the United States,' Tapper said Wednesday evening. The key questions are 'about the degree of success of the operation, and the current state of Iran's nuclear weapons program, and what the intelligence — not the politicians — what the intelligence reveals.' 'Our obligation as journalists,' Tapper continued, 'is not to praise President Trump, or protect his feelings, or to disparage him,' it's 'to report facts.' The Times responded to Trump's all-caps assertion that it teamed up with CNN to 'demean one of the most successful military strikes in history' by pointing out the White House's inconsistency on the subject. 'Yesterday,' The Times said, 'President Trump called this 'fake news.' But he and his entire national security team subsequently confirmed that the Defense Intelligence Agency did in fact produce the preliminary assessment described in a report by The Times and others. So their statement was fake, not The Times's reporting.' CNN also issued a statement after Trump called for Natasha Bertrand, one of three correspondents who broke the initial story, to be fired. 'We stand 100% behind Natasha Bertrand's journalism and specifically her and her colleagues' reporting of the early intelligence assessment of the U.S. attack on Iran's nuclear facilities,' the network said. 'CNN's reporting made clear that this was an initial finding that could change with additional intelligence. We have extensively covered President Trump's own deep skepticism about it.' 'However,' CNN said, 'we do not believe it is reasonable to criticize CNN reporters for accurately reporting the existence of the assessment and accurately characterizing its findings, which are in the public interest.'
