
What's at stake as Canada's industrial carbon pricing rules face political headwinds
Social Sharing
Cabot Canada has been making carbon black, a powdery chemical used mainly in reinforcing rubber, in Sarnia, Ont., for 72 years.
It takes a lot of energy — in the form of burning natural gas — and that's meant the company has had to pay for its carbon emissions, under Canada's industrial carbon pricing rules.
This week, they won a $5.6 million grant from the federal government to install new equipment that would slash their carbon footprint.
The money comes from a fund created from the proceeds of the industrial carbon pricing system, which put a price on the carbon emissions of major industries. (In Ontario, the program started as a federally-run operation, then switched in 2022 to Ontario's own provincially-run pricing system that works in a similar way.)
"We're very happy to see that they have these funding programs available," said Dean Pearson, president and facility general manager of Cabot Canada, which will use the money on new technology to reuse the heat energy produced in its manufacturing process. The recycled energy will be used to heat its buildings and facilities, lowering the plant's use of gas.
Along with Cabot, the federal government announced funding for a range of projects this week from $662,000 for retrofitting a dryer at McCain Foods in Carberry, Man., to $25 million for Redpath Sugar in Toronto to reduce energy use in its sugar refining plant.
It's a snapshot of what could be at risk if industrial carbon pricing was cancelled, something Pierre Poilievre's Conservatives have promised to do at the federal level on the campaign trail. The announcement last week drew concerns from climate policy experts who are worried how the uncertainty will impact companies across Canada.
Companies stand to make money from carbon pricing
The industrial carbon price has been a key part of the Liberal government's plan to tackle climate change, giving economic incentives to reduce emissions — by both carrot and stick.
Large-scale emitters have thresholds for how carbon-intensive their operations can be. Those that exceed it have to pay. Those that produce less carbon pollution than allowed can profit by having surplus credits to sell.
Currently, the federal government directly administers the pricing system in Manitoba, Prince Edward Island, Nunavut and Yukon. All other provinces run their own programs, but they need to comply with federal standards on the price put on companies and how the money is used.
An independent analysis last year found it the most effective part of the government's policies to lower emissions in Canada, and industrial voices were publicly supporting it — until recently.
The Conservatives say they would remove the federal requirement, leaving it to provinces to run their own pricing systems if they choose, and expand federal tax credits aimed at clean technology and manufacturing.
Mark Carney, the Liberal leader, has said he would maintain and improve the industrial carbon pricing system, but has not detailed any proposed changes to it.
Since Poilievre's announcement, Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe announced Thursday that he will pause his province's industrial carbon pricing system April 1.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, meanwhile, welcomed Poilievre's announcement to remove the federal government's role in carbon pricing. But many expect Alberta to maintain its own system, which has been in place since 2007.
"There's money on the table that has been invested that is at risk," said Dave Sawyer, principal economist at the Canadian Climate Institute.
"We're hearing from investors that they are really worried they're going to have to write off some significant assets or get a significantly lower return on their investment that they've made should these systems go away."
Sawyer was referring to the "carrot" part of the industrial carbon pricing system, where companies can generate carbon credits in return for cutting their emissions. Those credits can then be sold, at a profit, to other more polluting companies who are required to offset some of their emissions.
What all this uncertainty means for investment
The Canadian Climate Institute now estimates that 70 emissions-reducing projects across Canada, with a value of over $57 billion, are tied to the carbon price.
"You can see that those that have been moving early, using new tech, trying new tech, implementing new technologies, they've become winners in these carbon markets," said Michael Berends, CEO of ClearBlue Markets, a firm that advises companies on how to navigate carbon pricing systems in Canada.
Berends says that Ontario's pricing system is attractive for multinational companies to bring their investments to the province, because they know they can access the money they pay into the system in future years. Without that certainty, he says those companies would rather invest elsewhere.
"We've had a client say, we decide to invest in our Quebec plant rather than Ontario plant because the carbon pricing was more stable and more certain," Berends said, referring to Quebec's carbon credit market which has been in place since 2013 and is considered to have stable prices.
The federal government raised $313 million from pricing industries in Ontario from 2019 to 2021, before Ontario's own provincially-run system kicked in — the "stick" to get companies to lower their emissions.
Cabot and many other companies are now finding their way to the "carrot" part of that system, where they can get some of the money for green upgrades to their facilities.
Vincent Caron, vice-president of Ontario government relations and member advocacy at lobby group Canadian Manufacturers & Exporters, called Ontario's carbon pricing system "the gold standard," because companies can get up to 100 per cent of what they pay into the system.
"I think companies broadly are really confident that the program gives them enough certainty. The funds don't expire, they can pull several years together," he said.
And Cabot is not done using the grants on offer. Pearson says the company has been paying into Ontario's pricing system, and is applying to get that funding back for projects to improve their manufacturing processes and switch their vehicles from gas to electric.
"Being able to recycle those proceeds and bring them back into our business is a really good incentive for companies to make those improvements faster than they normally would," Pearson said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


National Observer
7 hours ago
- National Observer
PBO estimates tax rebate on new homes would save typical first-time buyer $27K
An eligible first-time homebuyer could save an average of $26,832 in sales tax on the price of a newly built home under Ottawa's latest housing proposal, the parliamentary budget officer said in a new report on Wednesday. But the PBO's estimate of the plan's total cost is substantially lower than the federal government's estimate, and ministers responsible for the file have not offered an explanation for the gap. In a new analysis released Wednesday, the federal fiscal watchdog predicts that 71,711 new builds would qualify for GST relief over the lifetime of the program. The proposal would see the federal portion of the sales tax eliminated on a new home worth up to $1 million if it's bought by a qualifying first-time homebuyer. The GST rebate would be phased down as the price of the home approaches $1.5 million. Homes bought from May 27 through to 2031 can qualify for the rebate, as long as construction starts before 2031 and finishes by 2036. With some exceptions, Canadians who have owned a home already are not eligible for the GST relief. Neither are investors. The PBO forecasts the program will cost $1.9 billion over six years, about $100 million lower than the estimate it presented during the spring federal election campaign. It attributes that gap to a later implementation date and a different definition used for first-time homebuyers. The federal government, meanwhile, estimated the "tax savings" for Canadians at $3.9 billion over five years when the legislation was tabled on May 27. The Liberals' spring election platform costed the GST rebate at around $1.6 billion over four years. A PBO spokesperson said in an email that any difference in figures is likely due to assumptions about the share of homes ultimately bought by first-time buyers, but deferred to Finance Canada for questions about the government's figures. Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne did not stop for questions about the cost discrepancy on his way out of the Liberal caucus meeting Wednesday. His office did not respond to a request for clarification. Housing Minister Gregor Robertson also did not comment about the PBO report when asked Wednesday. He told reporters he would answer questions "tomorrow." A Desjardins Economics analysis of the proposal released Monday offered one explanation for the discrepancy between the PBO's cost estimate and the government's figure: Ottawa might think its program will be more popular than the PBO does. A higher cost estimate suggests more first-time homebuyers purchasing qualifying new builds, in other words. The GST rebate, which is not yet law, was included in the Liberals' spring election platform as a way to help Canadians break into the housing market. A home priced at $1 million would receive the maximum rebate of $50,000. Homes priced below that amount would still get the full rebate — but since the sales tax is a taken off a lower overall cost, the size of the rebate would be reduced accordingly. The rebate also would be lower than $50,000 for homes sold above $1 million because the rebate gradually ramps down until it zeros out at a purchase price of $1.5 million. The Desjardins report by economist Kari Norman said that if the program proves popular with first-time buyers, it could spur additional housing construction to meet higher demand. The PBO said it does not include possible behavioural responses to the program in its analysis. Norman noted in her report that it's also possible increased demand from homebuyers will push up home prices in the near-term. She estimated that 85 per cent of new homes built in Canada over the program time frame will be eligible for the full GST break of up to $50,000. In cases where the GST portion of a new home sale is rolled into the mortgage principal, the typical owner could expect to save $240 per month on mortgage payments, she said. The savings are more direct when a developer charges the GST upfront. The measure is packaged in legislation that also includes the Liberals' promised income tax cut, which is set to take effect July 1.


Global News
8 hours ago
- Global News
Liberals won't split internal trade, major projects bill despite Bloc call
The Liberal government is rejecting a call from the Bloc Québécois to split its marquee legislation in two and allow part of it to speed through the House of Commons this summer. The bill — known as Bill C-5, or the free trade and labour mobility in Canada act —was introduced last Friday. It has two parts. The first portion addresses internal trade barriers the Liberals have promised to tackle by July 1. The second part proposes to make sweeping changes to speed up approvals of major projects. The Bloc argued the internal trade portion of the legislation could be passed relatively quickly with broad support from the House of Commons, but called for a separate study of the changes to major project reviews. 'The bill as it is now would be sent to the transport committee, whereas if it were to be split it could be sent to two different committees, the second one being environment,' Bloc deputy leader Christie Normandin said at a press conference on Monday. Story continues below advertisement Government House leader Steven MacKinnon said Wednesday the Liberals won't split the legislation, even if that would ensure the government meets its self-imposed deadline to tackle interprovincial trade barriers. 'This is a bill that responds to economic conditions caused by the tariff war, among other things, and mobilizes premiers, mobilizes Canadians from coast to coast to coast behind projects of national significance,' MacKinnon said on his way into a Liberal caucus meeting. 1:46 Can the Liberal government's trade bill unify Canada's economy? The legislation would give the federal government sweeping new powers to push forward projects that have been deemed to be in the national interest. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy It sets out five criteria to determine if a project is the national interest, including its likelihood of success, whether it would strengthen the country's resiliency and advance the interests of Indigenous peoples, and whether it would contribute to economic growth in an environmentally responsible way. Story continues below advertisement The government intends to create a list of such projects and then fast-track the approval system with a goal of issuing approvals within two years, instead of the current five-year timeline. The bill would create a new federal office to take the lead on streamlining approvals and task the intergovernmental affairs minister with overseeing the final permitting decision. It's meant to send a signal to build investor confidence, the government said. The proposed legislation has been criticized already by groups like Greenpeace Canada, and some have warned that there are risks in trying to shortcut environmental interests. 4:58 Carney looking to pass legislation 'before summer' to remove trade barriers in Canada The minority Liberal government needs the support of at least four MPs from another party to pass the bill. It does not have a formal or informal agreement with any opposition party to pass legislation, as was the case with the NDP in the last Parliament. Story continues below advertisement Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has said his party will support legislation that gets new projects built — but he also said he wants the current bill amended to go even further. On Friday, Poilievre said he wanted to meet with his caucus before saying whether Conservative MPs will vote in favour of the legislation. After Wednesday's caucus meeting, his office said there was no update to provide. Prime Minister Mark Carney suggested last week he would consider extending the House sitting into July to get the legislation passed. The House of Commons is scheduled to take a summer break beginning June 21. MacKinnon said Wednesday that he has not tried to get consensus from the other parties to extend the sitting.


Ottawa Citizen
9 hours ago
- Ottawa Citizen
Dayforce confirmed as replacement for Phoenix as federal government pay system
The federal government is set to move forward with replacing the plagued Phoenix pay system with Dayforce. Article content Procurement Minister Joël Lightbound announced Wednesday that the government would start the 'final build and testing phase' of the new platform. Article content Article content 'The Government of Canada remains committed to modernizing its HR and pay systems in a responsible and transparent manner,' Lightbound said in a statement. 'By investing in the future of HR and pay, we are taking an important step forward in ensuring an efficient, secure, and sustainable solution for public service employees.' Article content Article content The announcement came as the federal government continued to work to ease the backlog of pay issues. As of April 23, there were 327,000 transactions in the system remaining to be processed. Of that number, 49 per cent were more than a year old. Article content Article content The total of 327,000 represented an improvement on previous months. In late February, the backlog stood at 366,000 transactions and in October 2024 it was 402,000. Article content The Liberal government launched Phoenix in 2016 after the previous Conservative government had initiated the platform. Problems soon arose as public servants struggled to get paid fully and on time. Article content An auditor general report from December 2024 found that 32 per cent of federal government employees reported errors in their basic or acting pay during the 2023–24 fiscal year. That was up from 30 per cent in 2022–23 and 28 per cent in 2021–22. However, it was also a steep decrease from the peak of Phoenix's problems in 2019–20, when 51 per cent of employees had to deal with pay errors. The cost of Phoenix's failure for the government has also ballooned. Since 2017, the federal government has spent at least $3.5 billion on the Phoenix pay system. It has also cost the federal government money in settlements and compensation for public servants. Last November, the government settled a class-action lawsuit brought by non-unionized and casual employees over the payment system fiasco. And in 2020 Canada's largest public-sector union, the Public Service Alliance of Canada, reached an agreement with the government giving 140,000 workers each $2,500 in compensation over the issues with Phoenix. Article content Article content