logo
Fears over 'Ring of Fire' eruptions as Russian volcano roars into life for the first time in 500 years following huge 8.8-magnitude earthquake

Fears over 'Ring of Fire' eruptions as Russian volcano roars into life for the first time in 500 years following huge 8.8-magnitude earthquake

Daily Mail​17 hours ago
Scientists have warned that a string of volcanic eruptions along the volatile 'Ring of Fire' could have been caused by an enormous earthquake.
The Krasheninnikov Volcano in Kamchatka, Russia, roared into life in a 'historic' eruption on Sunday.
As it erupted for the first time in over 500 years, the volcano sent a plume of ash 3.7 miles (6 km) into the sky.
According to experts, this destructive blast was likely triggered by the huge 8.8-magnitude earthquake which struck last week.
Last Wednesday, Russia was hit by the sixth-largest earthquake ever recorded, sending people fleeing from tsunami warnings as far away as Chile and Hawaii.
Shortly after the tremor, another volcano in the Kamchatka region also erupted, sending streams of lava pouring down its slopes.
Dr Alexey Ozerov, Director of the Russian Institute of Volcanic and Seismic Sciences, said that there was a 'direct connection' between the powerful earthquake and these eruptions.
Dr Ozerov says: 'We associate the eruptions with the earthquake, which activated magmatic centres, and "pumped" additional energy into them.'
Last Wednesday, data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) showed an earthquake struck about 84 miles east-southeast of Kamchatka, Russia, at around 7:24 pm EST, marking the sixth strongest earthquake ever.
Just hours later, Klyuchevskaya Sopka, the largest volcano in the Kamchatka Peninsula, exploded with a stream of lava and ash.
On Sunday, the Krasheninnikov Volcano became the second volcano to suddenly erupt following the earthquake.
The Kamchatka Volcanic Eruption Response Team (KVERT) called the eruption 'historic' and reported that clouds of ash travelled 46 miles (75 km) from the blast.
The last time Krasheninnikov erupted was sometime between 1423 and 1503.
Roughly nine hours after the eruption, KVERT issued an aviation 'red alert' warning of significant levels of ash being sent into the atmosphere.
As of Monday evening local time, the eruption remained ongoing with KVERT warning that 'ash explosions up to 10 km (32,800 ft) a.s.l. could occur at any time'.
Following the eruption, the region was hit by another 7.0 magnitude earthquake, which triggered tsunami warnings all across the peninsula.
What would happen if the Ring of Fire erupted?
If the Ring of Fire erupted, the most immediate effects would be felt by areas close to volcanoes.
Eruptions up to a ranking of seven on the Volcanic Explosivity Index, as large as Krakatoa, would occur all along the chain of volcanoes.
Ash injected into the atmosphere could cause planes to crash and trigger global travel chaos.
The injection of dust and sulphur into the atmosphere would then lead to global cooling.
This could drop temperatures as much as 1°C (1.8°F), leading to widespread crop failure.
Scientists now say that all three of these events could have been caused by Sunday's earthquake.
Dr Jonathan Paul, a volcanologist from Royal Holloway University of London, told Daily Mail: 'The earthquake released a huge amount of stress in the crust, which could have made an eruption easier by opening up new lines of weakness through which magma could travel upwards.'
Dr Paul says that the delay between the initial earthquake and the eruption of Krasheninnikov is likely due to the fact that the fractures in the rock took time to develop.
In the days between the events, magma would have been forcing itself through new lines of weakness and building up enough pressure to erupt.
These events have sparked concerns that more volcanic activity may be on its way.
Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula has an exceptionally high density of active volcanoes because it is situated directly above the Ring of Fire - a 25,000-mile chain of volcanoes that stretches around the Pacific Ocean.
Made up of numerous faults between shifting tectonic plates, the Ring of Fire is home to over 425 volcanoes, making up 75 per cent of all active volcanic sites on Earth.
This includes some of the most destructive volcanoes ever to erupt, including Krakatoa, Mount Tambora, and Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai.
Could the Ring of Fire erupt?
Scientists say that an earthquake could never cause the entire Ring of Fire to erupt.
Earthquakes can only trigger eruptions in volcanoes that were going to erupt anyway.
The Ring of Fire is made up of too many plate borders with different geometries and rock types for this to ever occur.
Some scientists have suggested that a sufficiently large earthquake could trigger more volcanic activity along the Ring of Fire.
Michael Manga, a geoscientist at the University of California, Berkeley, previously told the Daily Mail: 'The volcanoes in volcanic arcs, including Chile, the US Cascades, Japan, Indonesia and Kamchatka, are prone to erupt after earthquakes.'
Were the Ring of Fire to erupt, the results could be extremely dangerous.
People in the vicinity of a volcano would be at risk from falling rocks, toxic gases, deadly mudslides, and boiling hot pyroclastic flows.
The bigger danger would come from the fact that, as volcanoes erupt, they inject huge quantities of sulphur and dust into the upper atmosphere.
This could block out the sun and cause global temperatures to plummet as much as 1°C (1.8°F) for several years.
Dr Paul says: 'Both the eruption and earthquake are bound together by plate tectonics.
'Earthquakes are always a likelihood around the Ring of Fire because of localised plate tectonic activity.
'Earthquakes are triggered because the movement of tectonic plates with respect to each other isn't a continuous process; it takes place in fits and starts, because of the build-up and release of friction and pressure.'
However, although scientists say that more eruptions and earthquakes are possible, a mass eruption event is extremely unlikely.
Dr Paul says: 'Earthquakes can only trigger volcanic eruptions when the volcano is "ready"; in other words, there is a sufficiently high build-up of pressure beneath the ground.
'An analogy might be a can of Coke that has been shaken up; the earthquake would be lifting the ring-pull that leads to an eruption.'
Since this 'ready' condition isn't very common in nature, earthquakes like those in Russia are unlikely to cause multiple eruptions.
WHAT IS EARTH'S RING OF FIRE?
The Ring of Fire is a horseshoe-shaped geological disaster zone and hotbed of tectonic and volcanic activity.
Roughly 90 per cent of the world's earthquakes occur in the belt, which is also home to more than 450 volcanoes.
The seismic region stretches along the Pacific Ocean coastlines, where the Pacific Plate grinds against other plates that form the Earth's crust.
It loops from New Zealand to Chile, passing through the coasts of Asia and the Americas on the way.
In total, the loop makes up a 25,000-mile-long (40,000km) zone prone to frequent earthquakes and eruptions.
The region is susceptible to disasters because it is home to a vast number of 'subduction zones', areas where tectonic plates overlap.
Earthquakes are triggered when these plates scrape or slide underneath one another. When that happens at sea it can spawn tsunamis.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US to build nuclear reactor on the moon
US to build nuclear reactor on the moon

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

US to build nuclear reactor on the moon

The US is planning to build a nuclear reactor on the Moon as it seeks to push ahead in the space race. Sean Duffy, the new Nasa head, is preparing to announce plans to install a small reactor on the moon to allow astronauts to undertake lengthy missions on the lunar surface and pave the way for future Mars expeditions. A directive from the space agency, seen by The Telegraph argues that a reactor is necessary to stop rival superpowers effectively colonising the Moon and establishing US 'keep-out' zones. China and Russia previously announced a joint effort to put a reactor on the Moon by the mid-2030s, it notes. 'The first country to do so could potentially declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not there first,' the directive says, referring to existing plans to explore the Moon and prepare for missions to Mars. Nasa needs to 'move quickly' to 'support a future lunar economy' and 'strengthen our national security in space', it adds. Solar panels are ineffective because nights on the Moon last the equivalent of two weeks on Earth. A Nasa official said: 'If we are going to have a habitable system on the Moon then we have to bring power.' He said small reactors were already in use on submarines and aircraft carriers. 'They solve the problem,' he added. Mr Duffy, who is also the US transport secretary, has directed Nasa to seek industry proposals for a minimum 100 kilowatt reactor to launch by 2030. The agency had already been working on a 40-kilowatt reactor to use on the moon by the early part of the next decade. Mr Duffy was named interim head of Nasa after Donald Trump abruptly withdrew the nomination of Jared Isaacman, a tech billionaire and commercial astronaut. The move deepened a rift between Mr Trump and Elon Musk, the SpaceX billionaire and until that point one of the president's closest political allies. Mr Musk, who had pushed for Mr Isaacman to be named to the top job, wrote on social media in May: 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good hearted'.

Trump's new NASA boss wants to build a nuclear reactor on the MOON
Trump's new NASA boss wants to build a nuclear reactor on the MOON

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump's new NASA boss wants to build a nuclear reactor on the MOON

New NASA Administrator Sean Duffy's first project will be an attempt to take American energy dominance to the moon. Duffy, who is also Secretary of Transportation and took the job as NASA Administrator after the White House shut out Elon Musk's preferred candidate, will announce plans to build a nuclear reactor on the moon this week. The Daily Mail has reached out to NASA and the White House for comment. In 2022, NASA announced plans to put a nuclear reactor on the moon by 2030 as part of a vision to turn the lunar body into an orbiting power station but Duffy wants an expedited, more definite timeline. The goal is for United States to outpace China in 'winning the second space race,' a source told Politico. Earlier this year, it was revealed China may team up with Russia in an attempt to build their own lunar nuclear reactor. Sure enough, Duffy's directive claims that China or Russia or any American enemy could 'declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States' if they got to the moon first. Duffy's directive commands NASA to get someone to lead the effort in the next 60 days and solicit companies that can help launch ahead of China. A former Fox News and reality TV star, Duffy is also pushing an effort to replace the International Space Station. Duffy, a former Congressman from Wisconsin, oversees the $25 billion space agency. In 2022, the US space agency chose three design concept proposals for a fission power system that could be ready to launch by the end of the decade. It is unclear if Duffy is going from the same plans. The plan is for the 40-kilowatt class fission power system to last at least 10 years in the lunar environment, with the hope that it could one day support a permanent human presence on the moon, as well as support manned missions to Mars and beyond. If NASA is to build a base on the lunar surface, one of the major problems to solve will be how such a proposed settlement would be powered. Solar panels are great for powering rovers, but a human base would need a continuous and reliable source of power. NASA experts are looking into nuclear fission as the answer because the technology has been used extensively on Earth. Relatively small and lightweight compared to other power systems, fission systems are reliable and could enable continuous power regardless of location, available sunlight, and other natural environmental conditions, the US space agency said. If the demonstration of such a system on the moon was successful, it would pave the way for the fueling of longer duration journeys through space. It is hoped that the development of these fission surface power technologies will also help NASA advance nuclear propulsion systems that rely on reactors to generate power. These could then be used for deep space exploration missions. The goal will also be to beat China and Russia to the same mission. The East Asian country aims to become a major space power and land astronauts on the moon by 2030, and its planned Chang'e-8 mission for 2028 would lay the groundwork for constructing a permanent, manned lunar base. In a presentation in Shanghai, the 2028 mission's Chief Engineer Pei Zhaoyu showed that the lunar base's energy supply could also depend on large-scale solar arrays, and pipelines and cables for heating and electricity built on the moon's surface. Russia's space agency Roscosmos said last year it planned to build a nuclear reactor on the moon's surface with the China National Space Administration (CNSA) by 2035 to power the International Lunar Research Station (ILRS). The inclusion of the nuclear power unit in a Chinese space official's presentation at a conference for officials from the 17 countries and international organisations that make up the ILRS suggests Beijing supports the idea, although it has never formally announced it. 'An important question for the ILRS is power supply, and in this Russia has a natural advantage, when it comes to nuclear power plants, especially sending them into space, it leads the world, it is ahead of the United States,' Wu Weiren, chief designer of China's lunar exploration program, told Reuters on the sidelines of the conference. After little progress on talks over a space-based reactor in the past, 'I hope this time both countries can send a nuclear reactor to the moon,' Wu said.

July quake appears to have damaged Russian nuclear sub base, NY Times reports
July quake appears to have damaged Russian nuclear sub base, NY Times reports

Reuters

time4 hours ago

  • Reuters

July quake appears to have damaged Russian nuclear sub base, NY Times reports

Aug 4 (Reuters) - A nuclear submarine base in Russia's remote Far East region was damaged last week following one of the most powerful earthquakes to hit the area in decades, the New York Times reported on Monday, citing satellite images. Photos captured by Planet Labs, a commercial satellite imaging firm, show damage to a floating pier at the Rybachiy submarine base on the Kamchatka Peninsula, the newspaper reported. One section of the pier appears to have broken away from its anchor point. Aside from the damaged pier, the satellite imagery does not show any other major destruction. Reuters could not independently verify the report. There was no immediate response from Russia's defence ministry outside business hours to a Reuters request for comment. A very powerful magnitude 8.8 earthquake off Russia's Far Eastern Kamchatka coast on Wednesday triggered tsunami warnings as far away as French Polynesia and Chile, and was followed by an eruption of the most active volcano on the peninsula. The Rybachiy nuclear submarine base, a strategic hub for Russia's Pacific Fleet, serves as a facility for the maintenance, deployment, and operations of the country's nuclear-powered submarines in the Pacific region.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store