logo
As ICE Protests Ramp Up, Organizers and Thinkers Share Lessons from the 2020 Uprising for Black Lives

As ICE Protests Ramp Up, Organizers and Thinkers Share Lessons from the 2020 Uprising for Black Lives

Yahooa day ago

Helen H. Richardson/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images
This summer marks five years since the 2020 uprising for Black lives — an anniversary that feels even more resonant right now, as protesters in cities like Minneapolis, Minnesota, where George Floyd was murdered by police, stand up against Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and the Trump administration's deportation spree.
For days now, protesters in Los Angeles, California have fought back against the mass deportation efforts while Trump sent in the National Guard (just like he did in 2020) and 700 Marines. The fight, and the backlash, have spread to cities across America: footage of a protester with cops kneeling on their neck in Philly; arrests in New York City, Chicago, Dallas, and Atlanta; and thousands upon thousands taking to the streets. ICE is reportedly sending tactical agents to five Democratic-run cities.
As we noted in our running series launched last year, United States of Suppression, the mass protests of 2020 also marked the start of an era of increasing criminalization of protesters. Throughout 2024, as police swarmed college campuses and deployed tear gas against students demonstrating against the war in Gaza, I thought of 2020.
Yet amid the darkness of that pivotal summer, there were so many things I saw for the first time, made possible because so many people were unified by the structural abandonment of marginalized communities under COVID. People were outside in masks, setting up tents, painting buildings and hosting concerts and handing out supplies. There were tuition strikes to get cops off campuses. Protesters brought down statues of Confederate generals. What officials always told us was demanding too much — was 'impossible' — suddenly became demands they couldn't ignore. It was born of painful necessity, but the possibilities for solidarity that it created seems in part a byproduct of, as author and activist Arundhati Roy put it, the pandemic as portal.
How the Backlash to the George Floyd Protests Set the Stage for Another Trump Administration
*This op-ed argues that our collective actions are a part of an ongoing struggle and resistance, not a final resting place.*
Contributor Olayemi Olurin recently memorialized that time, and the ensuing backlash that brought us to our current moment, for Teen Vogue, writing, 'It's important to reflect, not just on our collective actions, but the state's violent response to them — the consequences and the backlash that always follow.'
For this piece, we wanted to remember the lessons of that time that seemed so unprecedented, to practice what Olurin called for: To remember our history, and that we've been here before — so we can learn from the past and keep building towards a different future. So we asked organizers, thinkers, activists, and writers: What lessons do you hold from the 2020 uprising? And how can we learn from it now to make it through the current crisis wrought by the Trump administration?
I often think of the title of the first novel by Sarah Thankam Mathews, a founding organizer behind the mutual aid group Bed-Stuy Strong, formed in 2020: All This Could Be Different. The suffering caused by police brutality, white supremacy, transphobia, and infinite losses – Breonna Taylor, Oluwatoyin Salau, Dominique 'Rem'mie' Fells, Tony McDade, and so many others — is a stain on this nation forever. How can we think of ways to make a different world together?
I've come away with a renewed sense of appreciation for long term strategic thinking, and for the kinds of organizations that can pursue long term strategies. Among the reasons that even large scale, attention-grabbing protests can fail to move the needle in the protestors' direction is that the powers that be can wait them out — not only for people to leave the streets, but for ongoing news cycles and the regular business of life to move attention away from where the protestors have briefly been able to concentrate it. There's really no substitute for being able to mount a long term political struggle and that means there's no substitute for the kind of organizations that can do this.
Alongside that long term thinking is not just the ability to continue to advocate or express political discontent over the long haul — philanthropies and non-profits can manage that just by not rocking the funding boat, after all. But opportunity comes when we pair that with the kinds of organizations that can speak to the powerful on terms they understand: organizations that can withhold labor, rent, utility payments, or any other kind of cooperation the powerful need to get their way. When these kinds of organizations make long term plans, they aren't only planning messaging campaigns — they're planning the full scale of political contest and conflict.
One to mention in particular is the resistance from the Service Employees International Union. SEIU California President David Huerta was just attacked and detained by ICE while participating as a community observer as ICE attacked immigrant workers, and plenty of other Angelenos were lined up against ICE on the streets. From the mass layoffs of federal workers, to the dismantling of the National Labor Relations Board, to the attacks on higher education and the regulation of food and water, I think it's fairly clear that the present administration poses a threat to the 99% that we can't combat with awareness. They won't stop unless and until we stop them, and we will need to support the kind of organizing that can do that. Supporting SEIU, federal workers, and other organized centers of popular power is a step in the right direction.
When we look at the state of the country and the world right now, it can seem pretty grim. Authoritarianism is rising and making it more dangerous and difficult to protest and resist. Yet when you understand that the 2020 unrest did not exist in a bubble, that it wasn't just an anomaly but instead a continuation of the fight for Black liberation and anti-capitalism in the face of police violence, we realize there can be hope that another mass movement can happen again.
The importance of looking back is to be honest about where there can be growth. For hope to be more than just foolish optimism we must learn the lessons from the waves that came before us: resistance will be followed with harsh repression; and opportunistic interests will try to co-opt the movement and energy. Specifically discussing the former, there were many prosecutions of protesters and rioters whose stories were mostly ignored, as well as anti-protest laws passed in state legislatures that remain understudied. And when it comes to co-optation, the usurping of energy by the Democratic Party, the non-profit industrial complex, corporations and the media turned out to be devastating. All of this was predictable for me, because I experienced and witnessed it happening in previous waves. This is why it's important for people to learn about the Green Scare, Occupy Wall Street, Standing Rock, and Ferguson and other anti-police protests that led up to 2020, as state tactics being used now were built upon by the repression of these movements.
Trump's presidency is in part a response to the year 2020, both the protest and the pandemic. There was a naivete that riots had resulted in a cultural revolution, but what we see now is the changes of that moment were fleeting. This is why movement gains must go beyond individual benefits under capitalism like diversity initiatives, which have come and gone since the protests. There needs to be an understanding when these spontaneous uprisings happen that the sense of power that people feel will not last forever.
Once the riots began to settle later in summer 2020 and people were still engaged, it would have been a great opportunity to build assemblies either based on locality and/or affinity. This would have created entry points for newcomers and opportunities to build power outside the current political system and away from the Democratic Party. This model would allow broader segments of our communities to be building actual political opposition against Trump and the oligarchy that enables him.
When I look back at 2020, some of the most urgent lessons for this moment are about protecting and defending one another. I think about how the Chicago Freedom School sheltered young protesters who had been brutalized and gassed by police, and protected those young people when cops showed up to raid the building. I think about the safety teams led by young Black activists in Chicago, distributing masks, treating wounds, and doing everything they could to keep people safe in the streets. I think about the connection between a mass uprising and a mass mobilization of mutual aid, and what that tells us about what it takes to sustain collective action.
There was a time in 2020 when people were deeply invested in one another's well-being. There was so much mutual concern, care work, a growing interest in the lessons of disability justice, and a storm of empathy that cracked something open in us, and in the world around us. The same impulses that led to an explosion of mutual aid propelled a lot of people into the streets. In many ways, we've drifted from that level of connection. But we'll need to find our way back to it. Empathy is essential in any fight against fascist, dehumanizing politics.
This moment is about holding onto our humanity, and to do that, we need to reach for and hold onto each other. We need to anchor ourselves to each other. That means remembering how to care, commit, and throw down together, even when we don't like each other. We need to recover the sense of solidarity that a lot of people felt in the early days of the pandemic. There was a lot of fear and panic in that moment, but also a lot of potential. We still have that potential, but we are going to have to bring it back to the surface.
I think the lessons are many. One lesson is that cultural work is irresistible — the art, music, dancing and bombastic energy of those uprisings still thrum through my system.
Another lesson is that when we let ourselves feel into our hurt and anger, we can harness those righteous emotions into powerful action, even when we have to adapt to conditions like a global pandemic.
Our task as movement workers is to support organic moments of popular unrest and uprising, recognizing we can shape these moments but we are not meant to control them. And we have to remember that we are not the beginning or the end of this fight, and we are not always the center of focus — a lot of people showed up in solidarity with us, and I see so many of us showing up in solidarity with other communities.
There are way more people than we expect who are frustrated and angry about the brutality and greed of the current systems, who will join in bold, even risky collective action when they see others in the streets. After 2020, the militancy of our movements increased — more people willing to take risks and break rules to stop business as usual. This is visible in the student uprising against genocide in Palestine, and the disruptions of weapons manufacturers, as well as in mobilizations against ecocide [or the destruction of the environment by dangerous human activity]. We need this kind of rule-breaking, bold militancy more than ever now.
2020 saw the mainstreaming of the idea of police abolition — suddenly the concept of defunding the police was being discussed across the country and many city councils made big promises about cutting police budgets that had been steadily rising for decades. However, we weren't able to hold them to it. The dedicated work that people did to keep the pressure on ended up showing us that our city governments really are owned by cops and Chambers of Commerce, and elected officials backpedal to keep their jobs, or they get replaced.
This is an important lesson — that their systems don't work for dismantling what they are designed to build, expand and preserve. This is important, too, because we saw that trying to direct and focus the upsurge into electoral and government-centered reform projects not only doesn't work, but it reifies the widespread liberal misunderstanding that resistance should focus on changing the hearts and minds of elected officials, which is, ultimately, a dead end.
Under this administration, this is particularly clear — that direct action and mutual aid are what is needed, not more efforts to convince elites to stop wars, policing, ecocide. It's not about convincing them, it's about stopping them.
[Trump's] desires and plans for the current moment are terrifying, but we defeated the Alt-Right and Trump in the streets once and we can do it again. From the Airport Shutdowns to OccupyICE to #MeToo, from the successful no-platforming campaigns, mass marches and education to punching [white supremacist] Richard Spencer (twice!) to vigilantly combating them wherever they appeared, we successfully stymied their ambitions and shattered their movement. Our many anti-fascist victories, which came at great cost, culminated in the historic defeat of Trump at the ballot box in 2020: Biden was the only presidential campaign since the '60s to outnumber the traditional most popular option among eligible voters — abstention.
The US working class has gone through over a decade of intense radicalization, organization, street movement and political awakening since 2010, and the state has offered us little more than table scraps. Contra those who see this as evidence that our movements have lost, that we've been unsuccessful, it seems just as likely that the failure to buy us off means that earlier period, dramatic though it was, was merely the prelude to a social and political revolution that utterly transforms this continent and the world.
It is up to us to change everything. But, against the doomers, I believe in this moment we may be uniquely poised to do so.
Originally Appeared on Teen Vogue
More great activism coverage from Teen Vogue:
'Young Activist' Label Can Be a Burden for Youth Organizers
Economic Disobedience: What Is It and How Does It Work?
The Jewish Teens Who Fought Back Against Hitler
The 13 Best Protest Songs Of All Time

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MAGA Freaks Out as Man Arrested for Allegedly Handing Out ‘Bionic' Face Shields to Protesters
MAGA Freaks Out as Man Arrested for Allegedly Handing Out ‘Bionic' Face Shields to Protesters

Gizmodo

time30 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

MAGA Freaks Out as Man Arrested for Allegedly Handing Out ‘Bionic' Face Shields to Protesters

Chaos has been happening in isolated areas of Los Angeles, where federal forces and the LAPD are clashing with angry protesters and rioters. The Trump administration claims it is maintaining public order against lawlessness. California's governor, Gavin Newsom, meanwhile, says that the White House is engaged in an authoritarian power grab. As the drama in the city continues, a recent arrest would seem to be yet another opportunity for both sides to bicker with one another about who is right. A man named Alejandro Theodoro Orellana was arrested by the FBI on Thursday morning and is now expected to face a charge of conspiracy to commit civil disorders. U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, who was appointed by Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi in April, announced Orellana's arrest on social media, writing, 'Alejandro Theodoro Orellana was arrested this morning by @FBILosAngeles on an allegation of Conspiracy to Commit Civil Disorders (18 USC 371) for distributing face shields to suspected rioters on Tuesday.' He added: 'We are moving quickly to identify and arrest those involved in organizing and/or supporting civil disorder in Los Angeles.' In case you missed that, it would appear that Orellana has been arrested because he helped distribute gas masks to protesters. Pictures of the supposed masks that have circulated on social media seem to show that they are a 'bionic' face shield designed to protect against tear gas. Orellana's arrest is now being used by authorities to bolster a claim made by President Trump, which is that the protests in LA are being funded and organized by outside groups. 'These are radical left lunatics that you're dealing with. They're tough. They're smart. They're probably paid many of them. As you know, they're professionals,' Trump said during a press conference on Wednesday. Relatedly, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt highlighted Orellana's arrest on social media on Thursday. 'Once again, President Trump was right,' Leavitt wrote on X. 'The President rightfully raised the important question of who is organizing and funding these dangerous riots in Los Angeles. This morning, the FBI arrested Alejandro Theodoro Orellana for conspiracy to commit civil disorders after handing out face shields to anti-ICE rioters.' This whole thing is bizarre for many reasons, but perhaps the most bizarre is that, despite the fact that cars have been set on fire and federal buildings have been attacked, one of the only people whose arrest has been actively platformed by the Trump administration is a guy whose sole alleged crime (as far as we know) is helping to hand out protective face coverings so that people's eyes don't get burned by tear gas. Also, handing out gas masks is not a crime, so what are officials even really talking about? It's not totally clear. It's easy to feel like they just arrested this guy for nothing. Many other things about the incident remain unclear. The Daily Mail reports that Orellana was not the person who actually handed out the masks, and was only driving the vehicle that delivered them. Another, so far unidentified woman, is said to have actually handed out the masks. When reached for comment by Gizmodo, a public information officer for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California did little to clarify the situation. They said, 'Mr. Orellana was arrested today. We expect his initial appearance will be scheduled for tomorrow at 1:30 p.m. PDT in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles.' The officer added that the office anticipates that Orellana will be charged with conspiracy to commit civil disorders and aiding and abetting civil disorders. There have been over 350 arrests in recent days, and the LA district attorney is expected to begin bringing cases soon, so Orellana is unlikely to be the last protester to grace the headlines. Still, right-wingers have been having a field day with his arrest and have used the incident to spin a larger conspiratorial narrative. The usual cast of MAGA voices have jumped into the fray to imply that Orellana is associated with some sort of vast conspiracy to 'fund' and coordinate the protests in LA. 'This militant and his network are part of the conspiracy to raise cash to buy riot gear,' MAGA influencer Any Ngo posted on Thursday. 'Who is funding and supplying the insurgents in Los Angeles and in other cities? The FBI has arrested the insurgency leader observed handing out $60 'bionic shield' face masks to rioters,' another frequent conspiracy poster with over 600,000 followers wrote. The Daily Signal, a conservative news site that was originally created by the Heritage Foundation, recently ran a news article entitled: 'Who Organized the LA Anti-ICE Protests That Escalated Into Riots?' It's incredibly unclear who is doing what in LA, so—hypothetically—it's not totally out of the realm of possibility that someone is giving supplies to some of the activists. But, last I checked, that's not a crime—nor is not wanting to get hit in the face with tear gas.

Ask Jordan: Who authorized the El Salvador prison contract?
Ask Jordan: Who authorized the El Salvador prison contract?

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ask Jordan: Who authorized the El Salvador prison contract?

'Who authorized the $6 million contract with taxpayer money [to imprison immigrants in El Salvador]?' — Gina Hi Gina, Your question provides a platform to spotlight a new lawsuit — the first of its kind, per the plaintiffs who brought it. The suit aims to invalidate the agreement between the Trump administration and El Salvador to remove people from the U.S. and hold them incommunicado and potentially indefinitely in a Salvadoran prison known for human rights abuses. To answer your specific question, the complaint that launched the suit said the State Department made the agreement. As for the possible legal basis to strike down the deal, the complaint cites a federal law called the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires federal agency actions to be both reasonable and reasonably explained. The lawsuit argues the agreement fails to meet those requirements because it is 'arbitrary and capricious' and 'was entered into without any legal basis.' While it called the facts 'extraordinary,' the suit says the application of the law to the deal is an 'ordinary' one requiring striking it down. The plaintiffs are a coalition of groups: Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Immigrant Defenders Law Center, Immigration Equality and the California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice, all of whom are represented by Democracy Forward. (RFK Human Rights, which is named for former senator and attorney general Robert F. Kennedy Sr., not the current health and human services secretary, is also representing itself.) It's still early in the new case, which was assigned to U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, Washington, D.C.'s chief federal trial judge, who is also presiding over separate litigation stemming from the administration's illegal Salvadoran renditions. The government hasn't yet responded in court to this latest suit; we don't know how it's going to play out or when it will be resolved. But the case provides another possible legal tool against one of the centerpieces of Trump's second-term agenda. Whatever the result of this latest litigation, it may uncover more information about the agreement along the way. Have any questions or comments for me? Please submit them on this form for a chance to be featured in the Deadline: Legal Blog and newsletter. This article was originally published on

As legal fight over Guard deployment plays out, Noem vows to continue Trump's immigration crackdown

time31 minutes ago

As legal fight over Guard deployment plays out, Noem vows to continue Trump's immigration crackdown

LOS ANGELES -- Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged to carry on with the Trump administration's immigration crackdown despite waves of unrest across the U.S. Hours after her comment Thursday, a judge directed the president to return control to California over National Guard troops he deployed after protests erupted over the immigration crackdown, but an appeals court quickly put the brakes on that and temporarily blocked the order that was to go into effect on Friday. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals scheduled a hearing on the matter for Tuesday. The federal judge's temporary restraining order said the Guard deployment was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded President Donald Trump's statutory authority. The order applied only to the National Guard troops and not Marines who were also deployed to the LA protests. The judge said he would not rule on the Marines because they were not out on the streets yet. Gov. Gavin Newsom who had asked the judge for an emergency stop to troops helping carry out immigration raids, had praised the order before it was blocked saying 'today was really about a test of democracy, and today we passed the test" and had said he would be redeploying Guard soldiers to 'what they were doing before Donald Trump commandeered them.' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said the president acted within his powers and that the federal judge's order 'puts our brave federal officials in danger. The district court has no authority to usurp the President's authority as Commander in Chief." The developments unfolded as protests continued in cities nationwide and the country braced for major demonstrations against Trump over the weekend. Noem said the immigration raids that fueled the protests would move forward and agents have thousands of targets. 'This is only going to continue until we have peace on the streets of Los Angeles,' she said during a news conference that was interrupted by shouting from U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, a California Democrat who was forcibly removed from the event. Newsom has warned that the military intervention is part of a broader effort by Trump to overturn norms at the heart of the nation's democracy. He also said sending Guard troops on the raids has further inflamed tensions in LA. So far the protests have been centered mostly in downtown near City Hall and a federal detention center where some immigrants are being held. Much of the sprawling city has been spared from the protests. On the third night of an 8 p.m. curfew, Los Angeles police arrested several demonstrators who refused orders to leave a street downtown. Earlier in the night, officers with the Department of Homeland Security deployed flash bangs to disperse a crowd that had gathered near the jail, sending protesters sprinting away. Those incidents were outliers. As with the past two nights, the hourslong demonstrations remained peaceful and upbeat, drawing a few hundred attendees who marched through downtown chanting, dancing and poking fun at the Trump administration's characterization of the city as a 'war zone.' Elsewhere, demonstrations have picked up across the U.S., emerging in more than a dozen major cities. Some have led to clashes with police and hundreds have been arrested. The immigration agents conducting the raids in LA are 'putting together a model and a blueprint' for other communities, Noem said. She pledged that federal authorities 'are not going away' even though, she said, officers have been hit with rocks and bricks and assaulted. She said people with criminal records who are in the country illegally and violent protesters will 'face consequences.' 'Just because you think you're here as a citizen, or because you're a member of a certain group or you're not a citizen, it doesn't mean that you're going to be protected and not face consequences from the laws that this country stands for," she said. Noem criticized the Padilla's interruption, calling it "inappropriate.' A statement from her agency said the two met after the news conference for about 15 minutes, but it also chided him for 'disrespectful political theater.' Padilla said later that he was demanding answers about the 'increasingly extreme immigration enforcement actions' and only wanted to ask Noem a question. He said he was handcuffed but not arrested. 'If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question, I can only imagine what they are doing to farmworkers, to cooks, to day laborers throughout the Los Angeles community,' he said. The administration has said it is willing to send troops to other cities to assist with immigration enforcement and controlling disturbances — in line with what Trump promised during last year's campaign. Some 2,000 Guard soldiers were in the nation's second-largest city and were soon to be joined by 2,000 more, along with about 700 Marines, said Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, who is in charge of the operation. About 500 of the Guard troops deployed to the Los Angeles protests have been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations, Sherman said Wednesday. The Guard has the authority to temporarily detain people who attack officers, but any arrests must be made by law enforcement. With more demonstrations expected over the weekend, and the possibility that Trump could send troops to other states for immigration enforcement, governors are weighing what to do. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, has put 5,000 National Guard members on standby in cities where demonstrations are planned. In other Republican-controlled states, governors have not said when or how they may deploy troops. A group of Democratic governors earlier signed a statement this week calling Trump's deployments 'an alarming abuse of power.' There have been about 470 arrests since Saturday, the vast majority of which were for failing to leave the area at the request of law enforcement, according to the police department. There have been a handful of more serious charges, including for assault against officers and for possession of a Molotov cocktail and a gun. Nine officers have been hurt, mostly with minor injuries. ___ Rodriguez reported from San Francisco and Seewer from Toledo, Ohio. Associated Press writers Julie Watson in San Diego, Jesse Bedayn in Denver, and Jim Vertuno in Austin, Texas, and Hallie Golden in Seattle contributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store