Jordan's Muslim Brotherhood and its role
Here are some basic facts about the Brotherhood and the political party that is widely seen as its parliamentary wing:
THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN JORDAN
The Brotherhood was founded in Egypt in the 1920s as an Islamic political movement to counter the spread of secular and nationalist ideas. It swiftly spread through Muslim countries, becoming a major player but often operating in secret.
Although it works illegally as a clandestine organisation in many countries, it had been officially licensed in Jordan since independence in 1946 as a charitable and social organisation when the monarchy regarded the group as a potential ally.
It has widespread grassroots support in major urban areas and scores of offices around the country.
The Brotherhood does not operate under its own name as a political party but the Islamic Action Front (IAF) is widely regarded as its - unacknowledged - political wing.
The IAF, whose head Wael Saqqa said on Wednesday the party has "no organisational ties" with the Brotherhood, has been one of the biggest forces in parliament since Jordan legalised political parties in 1992.
Saqqa's party offices were raided on Wednesday and documents seized.
WHAT DO THE AUTHORITIES THINK?
Despite its long presence in Jordan, the Brotherhood fell under official suspicion after the 2011 Arab Spring, when Islamists vied for sway with established powers across the Middle East.
Jordan for years resisted pressure from Gulf Arab countries and Egypt, which have long been suspicious of the Brotherhood, to ban the organisation.
But in keeping with a regional crackdown on political Islam and public freedoms, Jordan tightened restrictions on the group over the past two years, forbidding its public rallies and arresting vocal dissidents.
Jordanian authorities had also encouraged a splinter group to legally challenge the main movement's license to operate but until Wednesday, they had shied away from an outright ban.
Security officials say the suspects arrested last week were directly linked to the Lebanese wing of Palestinian Islamist militant group Hamas.
Jordan's political establishment now views the Brotherhood as having tried to form a clandestine militia and posing a direct challenge to the state, crossing a red line.
The Brotherhood said the group arrested over a plot that was unveiled last week had links to it but acted in its own capacity. The arrested group had sought to smuggle weapons to Palestinians but did not plan attacks inside Jordan, according to the Brotherhood.
THE ISLAMIC ACTION FRONT
The IAF took more seats than any other party in last year's parliamentary elections, giving it 31 of the 138 seats for the first time, but it remained in opposition to the pro-Western government.
Although the IAF says Jordan's political system treats it unfairly, it has competed in most elections. It says this is necessary to prevent it falling into the political wilderness and to ensure a vocal opposition.
The party commands strong support in the cities, especially in Palestinian areas, but has also become more popular in tribal areas in recent years.
In a country where anti-Israel sentiment runs high, the IAF has led some of the largest protests in the region in support of Hamas during the war in Gaza, and its opponents say this has helped boost its popularity.
WHAT'S NEXT?
The government says the courts will deliver the final verdict at the end of the trial on those implicated in the plot.
Meanwhile it has said that any organisation promoting the Brotherhood's ideology will also be banned, raising questions about the future of the IAF.
The Amman government may push both the IAF and individual members of parliament to disavow the Brotherhood, though it is not yet clear how that would work or what it could mean for the seats the IAF now holds. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
US report says India acts minimally, Pakistan rarely acts against rights abuses
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi shake hands as they attend a joint press conference at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 13, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo WASHINGTON - The U.S. government noted abuses in India and Pakistan in a shortened human rights report released on Tuesday that said India "took minimal credible steps" to combat the abuses while Pakistan "rarely took credible steps." The Trump administration scaled back the annual U.S. government report on human rights worldwide, dramatically softening criticism of some allies and countries that have been President Donald Trump's partners. The State Department human rights documentation for India and Pakistan was also much shorter and scaled back this year. India has been an important U.S. partner in recent years in Washington's effort to counter China's rise, although relations have been tense over Trump's imposition of a 50% tariff on goods from India. Pakistan is a non-NATO U.S. ally. About India, the report said: "The government took minimal credible steps or action to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses." On Pakistan, it added: "The government rarely took credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses." Indian and Pakistani embassies in Washington had no immediate comment on the report released on Tuesday, which documented instances in 2024. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Luxury items seized in $3b money laundering case handed over to Deloitte for liquidation Singapore MyRepublic customers air concerns over broadband speed after sale to StarHub Singapore Power switchboard failure led to disruption in NEL, Sengkang-Punggol LRT services: SBS Transit Singapore NEL and Sengkang-Punggol LRT resume service after hours-long power fault Business Ninja Van cuts 12% of Singapore workforce after 2 rounds of layoffs in 2024 Singapore Hyflux investigator 'took advantage' of Olivia Lum's inability to recall events: Davinder Singh Singapore Man who stabbed son-in-law to death in Boon Tat Street in 2017 dies of heart attack, says daughter Singapore Man who stalked woman blasted by judge on appeal for asking scandalous questions in court Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch fault Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government for its treatment of minorities. They point to rising hate speeches, a religion-based citizenship law the U.N. calls "fundamentally discriminatory," anti-conversion legislation that challenges freedom of belief, the 2019 removal of Muslim-majority Kashmir's special status, and the demolition of properties owned by Muslims. Modi denies discrimination and says his policies, such as food subsidy programs and electrification drives, benefit everyone. In Pakistan, Amnesty International says government authorities fail to protect minorities, including Christians, and use "excessive and unnecessary force" against civil society voices and protesters. In particular, rights groups, the U.N., and Western governments raised concerns over the 2024 Pakistani elections. A U.N. working group said last year that former Prime Minister Imran Khan's detention violated international law. Khan remains in jail. Islamabad says its elections were fair and dismisses allegations of rigging and foul play. Washington and New Delhi have not reached a trade deal, while the United States has reached an agreement in recent weeks with Pakistan. Trump angered India by taking credit for an India-Pakistan ceasefire in May after hostilities between the neighbors following an April attack in India-administered Kashmir. India says New Delhi and Islamabad should resolve their ties directly without outside involvement. REUTERS
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Ex-NMP Calvin Cheng resolves differences with ex-SDP chairman after latter retracts comments
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Former NMP Calvin Cheng (right) and former SDP chairman Mohamed Jufrie Mahmood said they have resolved their differences amicably. SINGAPORE – Former Nominated MP Calvin Cheng and former Singapore Democratic Party chairman Mohamed Jufrie Mahmood have resolved their differences amicably. In separate Facebook posts on Aug 12, the two men said they met to talk after Mr Cheng sued Mr Jufrie for defamation and were able to agree to disagree. In March, Mr Cheng made remarks about activists who had turned up and caused a scene at a Meet-the-People Session in Chong Pang. Mr Cheng had proposed sending them to Gaza as long as they did not return. Mr Jufrie then claimed that Mr Cheng had a track record of anti-Muslim sentiment and supported genocide, among other comments. In April, Mr Cheng then came out to say he was deeply remorseful for his initial comments and that he should have been more sensitive. He added that some other statements were wrongly attributed to him and that he had to take legal action as the untrue statements were damaging to him. One of the people he took action against was Mr Jufrie. On Aug 12, Mr Jufrie posted that both he and Mr Cheng have strong opinions about the situation in Gaza. He said they agreed to meet and were able to have a pleasant discussion, after which he accepted that Mr Cheng is neither a racist nor an Islamophobe. 'While I thought Mr Cheng was insensitive, which he accepts, I now recognise that I was too harsh in some of my other comments,' said Mr Jufrie. 'In (the) light of our meeting and further information made available to me, we both agreed to resolve our differences amicably and the court case.' He said he retracted his previous statements that criticised Mr Cheng's character and that implied he had committed criminal offences. Mr Cheng posted a photo of the two men standing side by side and noted Mr Jufrie's retractions. He said: 'Gaza is a divisive and emotive issue. But as Singaporeans, we can agree to disagree. 'We agreed we both want the best for Singapore.'
AsiaOne
2 days ago
- AsiaOne
Malaysia, Bangladesh among regional partners sending peace mission to Myanmar, Asia News
DHAKA — Malaysia, Bangladesh and some regional partners will send a joint delegation to Myanmar to push for peace and humanitarian aid for Rohingya refugees, the Southeast Asian nation's Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said on Tuesday (Aug 12). Bangladesh shelters more than one million Rohingya refugees in camps in its southeastern district of Cox's Bazar, the world's largest refugee settlement. Anwar's comments came at the start of a three-day visit by Bangladesh's interim head, Nobel peace laureate Muhammad Yunus, to Malaysia. "To secure peace in Myanmar is of course a great priority, along with immediate humanitarian assistance for the suffering first, the refugees and also the victims of earthquakes," Anwar told a joint press briefing with Yunus. Malaysia's foreign minister will coordinate the Myanmar mission, set for the coming weeks, along with counterparts from Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand, added Anwar, who is chair of the Asean regional grouping this year. "We are concerned with the burden placed on Bangladesh on having to cater for enormous numbers of Rohingya refugees." Escalating conflict and targeted violence against the Rohingya, a mostly Muslim minority in mainly Buddhist Myanmar's western Rakhine state, have forced about 150,000 to flee to Bangladesh in the past 18 months, the United Nations said. Malaysia and Bangladesh signed five pacts during Yunus's visit, covering defence co-operation and collaboration in supply and infrastructure of liquefied natural gas (LNG), petroleum products, and related facilities. [[nid:716009]]
