Netanyahu survives attempt to dissolve parliament
Advertisement
Israel's opposition had hoped that the public anger over the exemptions would help topple the government. But just two of the 18 ultra-Orthodox members of the Knesset, Israel's parliament, supported the bill to dissolve.
Most Haredi MKs agreed to vote against the bill after Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Chairman Yuli Edelstein said he and the ultra-Orthodox parties had reached an understanding on the basis of a new draft law, which they will continue discussing over the coming week.
Military service is mandatory for most Jews in Israel, but the politically powerful ultra-Orthodox, who make up roughly 13% of Israeli society, have traditionally received exemptions if they are studying full-time in religious seminaries.
The ultra-Orthodox, also known as Haredim, or 'God-fearing' in Hebrew, say that integrating into the army threatens their traditional way of life. Each year, roughly 13,000 ultra-Orthodox men reach the conscription age of 18, but less than 10% enlist, according to parliament's State Control Committee, which held a hearing examining the issue.
Advertisement
Israel is engaged in the longest active war in the country's history, which has stretched its military to the breaking point. The Haredim's widespread refusal to serve, and threats to topple the government during wartime, have enraged many Israelis, especially those who have served multiple rounds of reserve duty.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US stock futures fall after Israel attacks Iran
(Reuters) -U.S. stock index futures dropped on Friday after Israel's military strike on Iran escalated tensions in the oil-rich Middle East and battered risk sentiment across global markets. Israel's widescale strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities were aimed at preventing Tehran from building an atomic weapon. Iran has promised a harsh response and retaliated by launching 100 drones. The escalation of tensions in the Middle East - a major oil-producing region - sent oil prices surging more than 6% and U.S. energy stocks rose in tandem, with Chevron and Exxon advancing nearly 3% in premarket trading. The strikes come just days ahead of a planned sixth round of nuclear talks between Iran and the United States. Tensions had been building as U.S. President Donald Trump's efforts to reach a nuclear deal with Iran appeared to be deadlocked. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the Israeli offensive a "unilateral action" and said Washington was not involved. At 04:32 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were down 505 points, or 1.17%, S&P 500 E-minis were down 70.5 points, or 1.17%, and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were down 309.25 points, or 1.41%. A 1.6% slump in Russell futures pointed to sharp declines for domestically focused stocks. Airline stocks dipped as the surge in crude prices raised concerns about higher fuel costs. Delta Air Lines was down 3.9%, United Airlines dropped 4.8%, Southwest Airlines lost 2.5% and American Airlines declined 3.9%. Defense stocks rose, with Lockheed Martin up 4.7%, RTX Corporation up 5.5%, Northrop Grumman up 4.2% and L3harris Technologies up 4.3%. The S&P 500 still remains just 1.8% below its record high reached earlier this year, following stellar monthly gains in May driven by upbeat corporate earnings and a softening in Trump's trade stance. The tech-heavy Nasdaq is about 2.8% off its record closing high reached in December last year. Investors are now focused on the Federal Reserve's meeting scheduled next week where policymakers are expected to keep interest rates unchanged. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China expresses deep concern about Israel's attacks on Iran, urges de-escalation
BEIJING (Reuters) -China was deeply concerned about the Israeli attacks on Iran and urged de-escalation for regional peace and stability, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson said on Friday. "China opposes any infringement upon Iran's sovereignty, security and territorial integrity, and opposes any escalation of tensions and expansion of conflicts. A sudden rise in regional tensions is not in the interests of any party," Spokesperson Lin Jian told a regular press briefing. Lin also said China was ready to play a constructive role in easing the situation. Israel launched large-scale strikes against Iran on Friday, saying it was the start of a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon. Iran promised a harsh response with Israel saying it was working to intercept about 100 drones launched towards its territory. Beijing and Tehran share friendly ties, supported by China's search for energy security through Iran's oil shipments and a wider strategy of increasing influence across the Middle East to rival the United States. Earlier on Friday, the Chinese embassies in Israel and Iran issued advisories to citizens warning of the "complex and severe" security situation in the two countries. The embassy in Tel Aviv also warned those in Israel to prepare for possible missile, rocket and drone attacks.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Why Iran won't block the Hormuz Strait oil artery even as war with Israel looms
As tensions surge following Israeli strikes on Iran, fears have resurfaced that the Tehran could retaliate by targeting one of the world's most vital oil arteries — the Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Hormuz, which connects the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea, sees roughly 20 million barrels per day of oil and oil products pass through, accounting for nearly one-fifth of global oil shipments. Any move to block it would ripple through energy markets. However, market watchers believe a full-scale disruption of global oil flows by closing the waterway is unlikely, and might even be physically impossible. There really is "no net benefit" that comes with impeding the passage of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, especially given how Iranian oil infrastructure has not been directly targeted, said Ellen Wald, co-founder of Washington Ivy Advisors. She added that any such action would likely trigger further retaliation. She also warned that any major spike in oil prices caused by a closure could draw backlash from Iran's largest oil customer: China. "China does not want the flow of oil out of the Persian Gulf to be disrupted in any way, and China does not want the price of oil to rise. So they're going to bring the full weight of their economic power to bear on Iran," Wald explained. China is the number one importer of Iranian oil, reportedly accounting for over three-quarters of its oil exports. The world's second-largest economy is also Iran's largest trade partner. "Their friends will suffer more than their enemies … So it's very hard to see that happening," said Anas Alhajji, managing partner at Energy Outlook Advisors, adding that disrupting the channel could be more of a bane than a boon for Tehran, given how most of Iran's daily consumption goods come via that route. "It's not in their interest to cause problems because they will suffer first." Iran in 2018 threatened to shut the Strait of Hormuz when tensions spiked following the U.S. withdrawal from the nuclear deal and the reimposition of sanctions. Prior to that, another major threat reportedly came in 2011 and 2012, when Iranian officials, including then–Vice President Mohammad-Reza Rahimi, warned of a potential closure if the West slapped further sanctions on its oil exports over its nuclear program. The Strait of Hormuz, which is 35 to 60 miles (55 to 95 kilometers) wide, connects the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea. The idea of shutting the Hormuz waterway has been a recurring rhetorical tool but never been acted upon, with analysts saying that it's simply not possible. "Let's be real about the Strait of Hormuz. First of all, most of it is in Oman, not in Iran. Number two, it's wide enough that the Iranians cannot close it," said Alhajji. Similarly, Washington Ivy Advisors' Wald noted that although many ships pass through Iranian waters, vessels can still traverse alternative routes via the United Arab Emirates and Oman. "Any blockade of the Strait of Hormuz will be a 'last resort' option for Iran and likely contingent on a military engagement between U.S. and Iran," said Vivek Dhar, Commonwealth Bank of Australia's director of mining and energy commodities research. RBC Capital Markets' Helima Croft suggested that while there could be some disruption, a full-scale blockade was unlikely. "It is our understanding that it would be extremely difficult for Iran to close the strait for an extended period given the presence of the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain. Nevertheless, Iran could still launch attacks on tankers and mine the strait to disrupt maritime traffic," said Croft, head of global commodity strategy and MENA research at RBC. U.S. President Trump has warned of possible military action if negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program break down, but it is uncertain whether these threats are meant to raise the stakes of U.S.-Iran talks or simply to increase pressure at the negotiating table, said Dhar. Israel carried out a wave of airstrikes on Iran early Friday morning local time, claiming the attacks were aimed at facilities linked to Tehran's nuclear program. According to Iranian state media, the strikes killed Mohammad Hossein Bagheri, chief of the Iranian Armed Forces, along with Hossein Salami, the commander-in-chief of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. While a closure of the strait remains highly unlikely, the escalating conflict has prompted some to consider even the faint possibility. "[Closing the strait] is kind of an extreme scenario, although we are in an extreme situation," said Amena Bakr, head of Middle East and OPEC+ insights at Kpler. "So that's why I'm not putting that option completely off the table. We need to consider it." Crude futures jumped as much as 13% after Israel launched airstrikes against Iran early Friday. Global benchmark Brent futures were up 6.5% at $73.88 per barrel as of 4.30 p.m. Singapore time, while the U.S. West Texas Intermediate was trading 6.7% higher at $72.57 per barrel.
