
People with disabilities concerned proposed Liberal bill will increase federal taxes
HALIFAX – Advocacy groups are asking the federal Liberal government to adjust its proposed tax bill to ensure people with disabilities don't end up paying more to the Canada Revenue Agency.
Inclusion Canada says it favours Ottawa lowering the lowest marginal tax rate from 15 to 14 per cent, as proposed in the bill that passed first reading earlier this month.
However, the group says the unintended result of the change is that tax credits for people with disabilities will decrease in many cases.
That's because the credit — used to reduce taxes payable — is generated by a formula that is tied to the marginal tax rate, and by dropping that rate to 14 per cent, the credit shrinks.
Krista Carr, the CEO of Inclusion Canada, said in a telephone interview Monday 'we're really hoping this is something that will be remedied, but as of yet we've not had a response.'
The lobby group says without this change, many lower income people with disabilities who rely on the tax credit will be paying about $100 a year more to Ottawa.
The March of Dimes, an organization that also works on behalf of people with disabilities, says in a release that families with children with disabilities would lose an average of about $156 per child.
The federal Finance Department didn't immediately provide a comment on the groups' request for the change to the bill.
The Liberals have said reducing the marginal tax rate will save two-income families up to $840 a year in 2026. Ottawa has also noted that beginning in July eligible Canadians can receive up to $2,400 a year from the Canada Disability Benefit.
Carr said people with disabilities will lose money in the tax credits 'that are fundamentally important to them as it helps offset the expenses related to disabilities.'
She argues the simple fix is to amend the bill to keep the marginal tax credit rate at 15 per cent, 'just for the calculation of these particular tax credits.'
Carr also said tax credits on medical expenses will also be affected, and that could further add to the tax bill for people with disabilities.
Nicholas Taylor, a resident of Cooks Brook, N.S., said in an interview Tuesday that the extra $100 in taxes would be roughly equivalent to a month of medication costs.
The 39-year-old has polyneuropathy — a condition that where peripheral nerves in the body are damaged — which limits Taylor's mobility and requires the use of a wheelchair.
'For myself, that's a month's worth of medication. I'm diabetic and the blood strips that I have to purchase, they're also about $100 for a package,' Taylor said.
With tax payments annually of about $450 on $12,000 in income, Taylor estimates the extra $100 the changes may cost him represents a 25 per cent tax increase.
'We need people with disabilities to be consulted before policies like this are brought in,' Taylor added.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 19, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Carney's major projects bill sails through committee. What's next?
Running roughshod over the environment. Spawning the next Idle No More movement. Picking economic winners and losers. Prime Minister Mark Carney's Building Canada Act is anything if not a magnet for criticism. The Liberal government's controversial legislation that would let cabinet quickly grant federal approvals for big industrial projects like mines, ports and pipelines sailed through committee in the early hours of Thursday. A House of Commons panel sat from Wednesday afternoon to after midnight reviewing Bill C-5 in a hurried study, as the Liberal government seeks to pass it through the chamber by week's end. Indigenous and environmental groups, along with opposition MPs and senators, raised concerns that the bill is being rushed through parliament and will grant cabinet sweeping powers to override other laws to plow ahead with industrial projects favoured by the government of the day. Story continues below advertisement 'The process that led to Bill C-5 is a case study in how not to engage with Indigenous nations,' said Kebaowek First Nation Chief Lance Haymond, adding there was no 'meaningful engagement' or a 'recognition of the complexity of our rights, titles and interests.' 'The conditions for an Idle No More 2.0 uprising are being written into the law as we speak,' he told the House of Commons transport committee late Wednesday night. The legislation enjoys support from the business community and building trades, who testified to parliament that it can take longer to get projects approved than to get them built. Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc appeared at the hearings to defend the bill, warning Canada is weathering a 'storm of change' amid U.S. President Donald Trump's punishing trade war and that the country needs to quickly bolster the economy. 'Canadians have entrusted us to do things differently and better and move nation-building projects forward,' he said. 1:54 More pushback for Bill C-5 from Indigenous groups The bill is two pieces of legislation rolled into one, with the first part aimed at breaking down internal trade barriers – something Carney promised to achieve by Canada Day. Story continues below advertisement The second part grants the government the ability to designate major projects to be in the 'national interest,' then fast-track their approval. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Thanks to help from the Conservatives, who won a handful of amendments to the bill, the Liberal legislation appears on track to clear the Commons at a brisk pace. Even still, the Tories and the Bloc Québécois raised concerns that it consolidates too much power in the hands of the prime minister and his cabinet. In a series of testy exchanges with LeBlanc, Bloc Québécois MP Xavier Barsalou-Duval said there's no guarantee that the minister in charge of the new process will act in the best interests of the public by granting itself far-reaching powers. 'What we have at the end of the day is a series of decisions that will be made behind closed doors … and nothing guarantees that you won't transform yourself into the minister of cronyism,' he said in French. 'I do not agree that this bill opens the door to corruption,' LeBlanc said in French. As some MPs trotted out comparisons to the Emergencies Act, LeBlanc balked at the idea and added that it's not comparable to a 'White House presidential order,' either. Conservative MP Philip Lawrence pressed LeBlanc on whether there are sufficient ethics screens in place. Story continues below advertisement He noted that Carney previously chaired Brookfield, which has a hand in infrastructure and construction, reviving conflict of interest concerns about Carney's past ties to the firm that the party brought up constantly throughout the recent election. LeBlanc said elected officials would continue to be bound by current ethics rules. 1:46 Can the Liberal government's trade bill unify Canada's economy? Critics lined up on Wednesday to warn one after another that the bill could pose a threat to species at risk and allow Ottawa to sidestep its duty to consult with Indigenous Peoples. 'The last thing we want to do is hold up industry and projects with court cases, and this is exactly where it's headed,' Trevor Mercredi, grand chief of the Treaty 8 First Nations of Alberta, told the Commons committee. 'We say go back to the drawing board,' Charles Hatt, climate program director with Ecojustice, said at a press conference. Story continues below advertisement Anna Johnston, a lawyer with West Coast Environmental Law, said the bill throws the principle of informed decision-making 'out the window.' 'Allowing cabinet to decide whether projects proceed before reviewing them is like building a house and then calling an engineer to ask if it's safe,' she said. Liberal MP Marcus Powlowski said he understands the concerns raised by Indigenous and environmental groups but believes the government needs to act quickly. 'Are we going to continue to put this on hold, to tinker with it and make slight amendments? I think it's important we pass this legislation and there's always an opportunity afterwards to amend it,' he said. Heather Exner-Pirot of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute think tank warned the bill lets political Ottawa pick winners and losers and is 'rife with potential for abuse,' but she said she does not oppose it. She said at the hearings that the Canadian economy needs to be turned around at a critical moment, and this should be the start of broader reforms to spur investment. 'What good is a pipeline if the emissions cap means you can't fill it? What good is a railway if the Impact Assessment Act means you can't mine products to ship on it?' The House is scheduled to sit until Friday, and a Senate programming motion has the upper chamber wrapping up its examination of Bill C-5 by June 27. Story continues below advertisement — With files from Kyle Duggan, Alessia Passafiume, David Baxter and Sarah Ritchie


Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Watchdog recommends up to 100% foreign airline ownership amid low competition
Canada should allow 100 per cent foreign ownership of domestic-only airlines, the Competition Bureau says in a new report highlighting the country's 'highly concentrated' aviation industry. In a market study released Thursday, the watchdog suggested creating a new class of airline that operates only in Canada but could have owners from outside its borders, opening the gate to global expertise — and cash. The current foreign ownership cap sits 49 per cent. In addition, no more than 25 per cent of a carrier can be owned by any one foreign entity, a proportion the Competition Bureau proposed raising to nearly half. 'Allowing more foreign investment in Canadian airlines improves access to capital, drives growth and promotes competition,' the report said. Low competition in the airline industry remains a big hurdle to lower prices and better service across the country, and remote communities especially, the report found. 'Competition in Canada's airline sector has struggled to take off,' it said, noting consumers' dissatisfaction with fares, flight options and service quality. Air Canada and WestJet together account for between half and three-quarters of all domestic passengers at major airports, according to the study. Though competition improved between 2019 and 2023 with the arrival of Flair Airlines and the expansion of Porter Airlines, market concentration remains 'extremely high' and competition from new entrants fragile, the bureau said, with the field dominated by a few large airlines. 'Many Canadians report that international flights are often cheaper than flights within Canada,' it noted. The report recommended a basket of reforms that include shifting the financial burden of airport maintenance away from passengers, thus lowering ticket prices and allowing more consumers to book flights on budget carriers, as well as expanding market access for new entrants by allowing secondary airports to compete with major hubs. Currently, flight exclusivity clauses often mean only one airport in a local area can host international flights. 'New entrants to the market face aggressive competitive responses,' the study found. The report also called for an end to the transport minister's power to override mergers and acquisitions deemed anticompetitive under a federal review process. It also urged industry-wide publication of data on delays and cancellations to help consumers make informed choices, on par with the United States and United Kingdom. It further stressed the unique challenges faced by remote communities and recommended a working group to ramp up service to the North, where air transportation is an 'essential lifeline, even for residents who never fly' but whose food and medicine arrive by plane. 'New entrants face major barriers because existing carriers control critical assets at the major northern airports,' the report said. It asked the government to 'tailor regulations to the northern context' and weed out unnecessary costs. Over the past 20 months, four low-cost carriers have disappeared from the skies, as Lynx Air and Canada Jetlines shut down and WestJet folded subsidiary Swoop and the recently acquired Sunwing Airlines into its main-line service. While the country's biggest cities remain amply served, smaller ones have fewer options, which can also result in higher prices and, when things go awry, stranded passengers. The Calgary-Saskatoon route saw flights fall 39 per cent to 412 last month from 673 in May 2019, now that the airspace between Alberta and Saskatchewan's two biggest cities is served with non-stop flights by WestJet only — Air Canada pulled out over two years ago — according to aviation data firm Cirium. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. Flight volumes between Ottawa and Fredericton decreased 23 per cent in the same period to 89 trips after Air Canada exited the route, leaving Porter as its sole carrier. Routes served by just one airline tend to be more expensive, the report noted. 'Our research shows that when just one new competitor flies on a route between two cities, airfares go down by nine per cent on average,' the report said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 19, 2025. Companies in this story: (TSX: AC)


Calgary Herald
2 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Nelson: Elbows down, Canada, as Trump and Carney make nice over tariffs
Tuck those elbows in Canada. We're pals again with Donald Trump's America. Article content Yes, we can once more spend Januarys in Orlando or Phoenix without feeling guilty. We can even drink Budweiser beer. And next NHL season, there'll be no booing the Star Spangled Banner before games. Because, speaking of games, the Liberals have played an absolute gem. Article content Article content Before election night, new boss Mark Carney wrapped himself so tightly in the Maple Leaf it's a wonder he had the breath to thank voters for returning the Grits to power, a victory that looked next to impossible a few months earlier. Article content Article content Back then, Trump was busy insulting outgoing prime minister Justin Trudeau, calling him the governor of Canada and talking about making this country a 51st state. Article content Article content We were not amused, especially when our biggest trading partner also announced a series of tariffs. Article content Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre was cast as a mini-me Trump, given his earlier hard-edged attacks on the failing Trudeau. That — along with the collapse of the NDP vote thanks to the stunningly inept performance of its then-leader Jagmeet Singh — led the Liberals to a remarkable turnaround victory. Article content But that was then, this is now. The votes are counted and the pretence we're turning our backs on our somewhat rude southern neighbours can be ditched. It worked a treat. Article content And as we saw during the U.S. president's brief appearance at this week's Kananaskis G7 summit, there's been a Chinook-sized thaw in Carney's Captain Canada routine regarding Trump and the U.S. Article content Article content All that guff about Canada forging a different path was ditched. Instead, Carney promised to work hand in hand with Trump, after gushing it was such a great honour welcoming him to Alberta. Article content Article content 'This marks the 50th birthday of the G7, and the G7 is nothing without U.S. leadership,' said Carney, before praising Trump's personal leadership on issues such as geopolitics, the economy and technology. Remarkably, our prime minister didn't even blush. Article content Of course, those paying attention understood Canada was already bending its knee before the Kananaskis meeting. Article content First up was the Strong Borders Act, a proposed bill to crack down on drugs and weapons crossing the border, while toughening up immigration checks, areas Trump had repeatedly accused Canada of ignoring. Article content That was followed by Carney's announcement that we'd increase defence spending to hit the magic two per cent of GDP mark, not in five years but in nine months. This, too, follows U.S. condemnation of our previously paltry contribution.