Family fears for elderly UK couple held by Taliban
'I don't know if they're still alive,' said their son, Jonathan Reynolds, who has not spoken to his parents since their last phone call on June 15.
'How would I know if they were no longer alive? Who's going to call me? The Taliban's never called me. Who's going to call? I don't know,' asked Reynolds, one of the couple's four children.
Peter Reynolds, 80, and his 76-year-old wife were arrested in February along with Chinese-American friend, Faye Hall, who was released in March, and an Afghan translator.
The couple were married in Kabul in 1970, and have spent almost two decades living in Afghanistan running educational programs after moving there. They also became official Afghan citizens.
Taliban officials have refused to detail why the couple was arrested in February as they were returning to their home in central Bamiyan province.
'They were told by the judge that they were not guilty of any crimes,' said their son.
'So many times we've been told two to three days and then you'll be released ... But it's six months on Saturday,' he added.
The couple were first held in a maximum security facility, 'then in underground cells, without daylight, before being transferred' to the intelligence services in Kabul, according to UN experts.
In late July, the independent UN human rights experts called for the Taliban to free the pair warning of the 'rapid deterioration' of their physical and mental health, stating that they 'risk irreparable harm or even death'.
UN experts shared a voice message from the couple with their son, but he has not been reassured.
'You have to remember their age,' Reynolds, 45, told AFP during a video call from his home in Chicago.
'Are they in danger? Yeah, they're an elderly couple who are unjustly held ... in captivity. They are not free,' he said.
'Their bodies are not used to being put through this, they're being trapped, they're sleeping on a little mattress on the floor,' he said.
'Weak and fragile'
The couple's children have set up a website called Free Peter and Barbie to campaign for their release, which counts down the number of days they have been held.
Since being detained, Peter Reynolds has suffered two eye infections and intermittent tremors in his head and left arm, according to the UN experts.
'My dad has had heart attacks ... he has a stent in his heart. He has had skin cancer,' Jonathan Reynolds said.
'So he needs an ECG (electrocardiogram), blood test, EEG (electroencephalogram), CT scans. He needs all of that,' he added.
His mother suffers from malnourishment and anemia after months of being 'fed once a day in prison,' her son added.
She is 'weak and fragile,' the experts said.
The Taliban government's top diplomat Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi said the couple had been receiving medical care.
'Their human rights are being respected,' he told a press conference in Kabul.
'They are being provided with medical care. They are in occasional contact with their families.'
'Their case isn't anything serious,' the Taliban interior ministry said in April, adding they hoped it would be 'resolved soon'.
The couple run an organization in Afghanistan called Rebuild, which provides educational programs for women and children.
'My parents have never thought about their security and safety,' Reynolds said, it was 'no way to treat an elderly couple who've given the last two decades of their life for the good of Afghanistan'.
When the Taliban returned to power in 2021, the couple remained in Afghanistan against the advice of the British embassy.
Their son recalled the embassy asking them: 'Why are you staying? You're on your own.'
His parents had replied: 'How could we leave these people in their darkest hour? We came here because we love these people, and that's what we'll give the rest of our lives to, even if it means we die.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
a day ago
- CBC
Pakistan resumes forced expulsions of 1.4 million Afghan refugees despite UN concerns
Authorities in Pakistan have resumed the forced deportations of Afghan refugees after the federal government declined to extend a key deadline for their stay, officials said Monday. The decision affects approximately 1.4 million Afghans holding Proof of Registration (PoR) cards, whose legal status expired at the end of June. Many had hoped for a one-year extension to settle personal affairs, such as selling property or concluding business, before returning to Afghanistan. In addition to PoR cardholders, around 800,000 Afghans hold Afghan Citizen Cards. Police say they also are living in the country illegally and being detained prior to deportations in the eastern Punjab, southwestern Balochistan and southern Sindh province. Monday's decision drew criticism from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the UN refugee agency. At least 1.2 million Afghans have been forced to return from Iran and Pakistan this year, according to a June UNHCR report. Repatriations on such a massive scale have the potential to destabilize the fragile situation in Afghanistan, where the Taliban government came into power in 2021. A July 31 government notification seen by The Associated Press confirms Pakistan's decision to repatriate all Afghan nationals holding expired PoR cards. It states Afghans without valid passports and Pakistani visas are in the country illegally and must return to their homeland under Pakistani immigration laws. Police across Pakistan are detaining Afghans to transport them to border crossings, according to two government and security officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. They said there are no mass arrests and police were told to go to house-to-house and make random checks to detain foreigners living in the country illegally. "Yes, the Afghan refugees living in Pakistan illegally are being sent back in a dignified way," said Shakeel Khan, commissioner for Afghan refugees in the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. WATCH | Researcher says Afghans in Pakistan scared to leave their homes: Human Rights Watch says Afghans in Pakistan arbitrarily detained, forced to pay bribes 5 months ago Fereshta Abbasi, an Afghanistan researcher with U.S.-based Human Rights Watch says Afghan migrants — documented or not — are fearful of leaving their homes in Pakistan, after reports of arbitrary arrests and extortion, as they face a government-set deadline of March 31 to leave the country. The latest operation is the most significant step yet under orders from federal government in Islamabad, he said. Rehmat Ullah, 35, an Afghan, said his family migrated to Pakistan's northwestern Peshawar city decades ago and now is preparing to return home. "I have five children and my concern is that they will miss their education," he said. "I was born here, my children were born here and now we are going back," he said. Millions have fled to Pakistan over the past four decades to escape war, political unrest and economic hardship. The renewed deportation drive follows a nationwide crackdown launched in 2023 targeting foreigners living illegally in Pakistan. The Interior Ministry, which oversees the campaign, did not immediately comment. Qaiser Khan Afridi, a spokesperson for the UN refugee agency, expressed deep concern over the government's recent actions. "Sending people back in this manner is tantamount to refoulement and a breach of a state's international obligations," Afridi said in a statement, urging Pakistan to adopt a "humane approach to ensure voluntary, gradual and dignified return of Afghans" and praised the country for hosting millions of Afghan refugees for more than 40 years. "We call on the government to halt the forcible return and ensure a gradual, voluntary and dignified repatriation process," Afridi said. "Such massive and hasty return could jeopardize the lives and freedom of Afghan refugees, while also risking instability not only in Afghanistan but across the region."
CTV News
2 days ago
- CTV News
Glass bottle thrown at mom and baby in Victoria, police say
The Victoria Police Department says it has released race-based use-of-force data for a six-year period after being ordered by the B.C. Human Rights Commissioner to share the statistics in November 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chad Hipolito
National Post
2 days ago
- National Post
Raymond J. de Souza: How the Helsinki Accords helped end communism
Article content Carter agreed with Brezhnev on that reading and attacked Helsinki as 'legitimizing Soviet domination.' Reagan considered the accords a moral abandonment of the enslaved nations of what he would characterize eight years later as the 'evil empire.' Article content Everyone got it wrong. As Kissinger himself would write later: 'Rarely has a diplomatic process so illuminated the limitations of human foresight.' Article content To get his de facto recognition of empire, Brezhnev conceded to the inclusion of 'basket three' in the Helsinki accords. Those provisions committed the signatories to permitting the peaceful changes of international borders, allowing states to leave or join alliances (NATO and Warsaw Pact) and, most remarkably, committed the Soviets to 'the universal significance of human rights and fundamental freedoms … in conformity with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.' Article content The Soviets had solemnly signed a promise to honour human rights. Brezhnev thought he had made an easily ignored concession to gain a hard-won recognition of Russian imperial ambitions. He was wrong. Article content 'Helsinki became, in short, a legal and moral trap,' in the judgement of leading Cold War historian John Lewis Gaddis. 'Without realizing the implications, Brezhnev thereby handed his critics a standard, based on universal principles of justice, rooted in international law, independent of Marxist-Leninist ideology, against which they could evaluate the behaviour of his and other communist regimes.' Article content By 1976, a 'Public Group to Promote Observance of the Helsinki Accords' was operating in Moscow with the endorsement of Andrei Sakharov, the leading scientist-dissident. 'Helsinki Groups' were established in other communist countries, and the regimes were unable to silence them, given that they existed to monitor what the Soviet regime had itself promised. Article content Contrary to Brezhnev's securing the legitimation of communist rule at home and in the near abroad, Gladdis concluded that, 'the Helsinki process became instead the basis of legitimizing opposition to Soviet rule.' Article content Five years after Helsinki, Pope John Paul II had visited Poland and shook the regime to its foundations; Lech Wałęsa was leading the strikes that would lead to Solidarność, the Polish trade union that heralded an end to communist rule; Václav Havel had formed Charter 77 to advocate for human rights in Czechoslovakia; Margaret Thatcher was in Downing Street and Reagan was on his way to the White House. Article content The Cold War had always been at heart a moral argument, but the realpolitik of the 1970s sought to minimize that. Helsinki was realpolitik in intention, but massively not in effect. It restored the language of morality, of good and evil, to the Cold War. And once that was done, the end happily came sooner than expected. Article content
