J.B. Poindexter & Co., Inc. Acquires Ambulance Manufacturing Leader Demers Braun Crestline Medix
Commercial vehicle and specialty manufacturing leader expands into emergency vehicle market with addition of one of North America's leading brand portfolios with a global sales track record
HOUSTON, June 20, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--J.B. Poindexter & Co., Inc. (JBPCO), a privately held North American manufacturing leader serving the commercial vehicle and specialty manufacturing industries, today announced the acquisition of Demers Braun Crestline Medix (DBCM).
Headquartered in Beloeil, Quebec (Canada), DBCM is one of North America's largest ambulance manufacturers with a strong presence across the U.S. and Canadian markets. Known for advanced innovation and paramedic-driven design, DBCM has delivered more than 70,000 units to over 40 countries and employs more than 1,500 team members across its operations.
"Our acquisition of DBCM aligns with JBPCO's long-term vision—building a platform of industry-leading companies with a shared commitment to quality, innovation, and customer service," said John Poindexter, CEO and Chairman of JBPCO. "As JBPCO celebrates its 40th anniversary, and each of the DBCM brands celebrates decades of dedication in the emergency vehicle industry, we are proud to bring together more than 500 years of combined manufacturing excellence across our portfolio of companies. DBCM has built a solid foundation, and we look forward to investing in its future, supporting the team, enhancing the products, and unlocking new opportunities for growth."
Demers recently launched its 11th-generation ambulance platform and continues to set the bar in safety, design, and performance with paramedic-centric features like the FX Care Module. As part of JBPCO, the Company will continue to operate with brand autonomy while benefiting from expanded resources, shared capabilities, and a culture that values team member contributions.
"Joining JBPCO is a major milestone for our organization and our team," said Alain Brunelle, CEO of Demers Braun Crestline Medix. "We are united by a mission to improve lives, one relationship and one vehicle at a time—and this partnership ensures we can continue doing just that, with even greater scale and support."
JBPCO's total revenue will reach $3 billion with this acquisition, reinforcing its role as a cornerstone in the commercial and specialty vehicle manufacturing space—from last-mile delivery and work trucks to emergency response vehicles.
About J.B. Poindexter & Co., Inc.
J.B. Poindexter & Co., Inc. (JBPCO) is a privately held, diversified manufacturing company providing best-in-class commercial automotive and industrial solutions. JBPCO owns and operates a portfolio of leading business units including Morgan Truck Body, LLC; Morgan Olson, LLC; The Reading Truck Group, LLC; Truck Accessories Group, LLC d/b/a LEER Group; Masterack, LLC; EFP, LLC; Federal Eagle, LLC; and EAVX. JBPCO is headquartered in Houston, Texas and with the acquisition of DBCM, now employs more than 10,000 team members across North America. For more information, visit JBPoindexter.com or connect on LinkedIn.
About Demers Braun Crestline Medix
Demers Braun Crestline Medix is one of North America's largest ambulance manufacturers, with a legacy of over 175 years across its four leading brands. Headquartered in Beloeil, Quebec, and operating in both Canada and the United States, the company designs and manufactures ambulances that meet the evolving needs of emergency service providers. Its brands—Demers, Braun, Crestline, and Medix—have delivered over 70,000 units in more than 40 countries. To learn more, visit demers-ambulances.com, braunambulances.com, crestlineambulances.com, and medixambulance.com.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250620587137/en/
Contacts
Media Contact: Matt Eul, Director of MarketingJ.B. Poindexter & Co.641-629-0921meul@jbpco.com
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investor slams Victoria's Secret ‘super squad' leadership as inexperienced, ineffectual
This story was originally published on Retail Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Retail Dive newsletter. Victoria's Secret & Co.'s CEO Hillary Super is under fire just nine months into her tenure from an investor who would like to see the lingerie giant step back into the past. In a letter to the retailer's board chair this week, Barington Capital Group Chairman and CEO James Mitarotonda advocated for bringing back the lingerie giant's 'iconic Angels campaign' and shaking up its board, and against its adoption of a poison pill last month to stave off a hostile takeover. He criticized Super as having limited leadership experience, especially at a public company or in intimates, and has demonstrated 'a troubling lack of strategic focus.' Super arrived in September after serving as Savage x Fenty CEO for about a year. In April she brought on Adam Selman, previously chief design officer for Savage X Fenty, to be executive creative director. Victoria's Secret & Co. in an email to Retail Dive expressed confidence in its 'strategy under the new and experienced leadership team' and said that, while Barington hasn't sought to engage with the company, it was open to a discussion. Mitarotonda gave Barington Capital props for L Brand's stock performance of several years ago. The firm was advising the L Brands board until the once-mammoth apparel conglomerate formally spun off Victoria's Secret in 2021. Since then the lingerie company has lost over $2.4 billion in shareholder value, he wrote. As of Friday Barington owned more than 1% of Victoria's Secret & Co.'s outstanding common stock. 'We can't bring back the Angels because we're not in that time, and that's what shot down Victoria's Secret in the first place." Jessica Ramírez Co-founder and Managing Director, The Consumer Collective The company was losing market share back then, too, however, and Barington's idea to revive the old Angels campaign would be shortsighted, according to Jessica Ramírez, co-founder and managing director of The Consumer Collective advisory firm. The brand's share losses continued through its most recent quarter. 'We can't bring back the Angels because we're not in that time, and that's what shot down Victoria's Secret in the first place,' she said. 'They didn't catch up with the times, they didn't want to innovate. To want to bring back the exact same model, the exact same messaging, from when it was successful — you have to understand that the '90s and the 2000s were a different time. That go-to-market strategy isn't going to work today.' The Angels did return last fall after a six-year hiatus, but that was a lower-key, more inclusive event, she said by phone. Mitarotonda also had linguistic criticisms, slamming 'internal rhetoric referring to senior leadership as a 'super squad'' as 'arrogant and unjustified given the company's declining performance.' He said it was surprising that executives 'expressed satisfaction' during the company's most recent earnings call, counting 14 mentions of being 'pleased' or 'proud.' Barington is unlikely to let up the pressure any time soon, according to Jason Schloetzer, a professor at Georgetown University's McDonough School of Business, who called the firm's letter 'a shot across the bow to an underperforming management team.' 'Underperforming management typically strikes a tone of seriousness and concern, so Barington may be pointing out that routinely mentioning how 'proud' management is with the company's current performance, which appears to be less than super, is well out of step with reality,' Schloetzer said by email. 'If there isn't some combination of a change to strategic direction, modest evidence of leadership change, and a tweak to board composition after this letter, I suspect Barington will make another move to shake up the company.' But it's too soon to judge Super, according to Ramírez. It will be a full year before the results of her team's efforts will be truly evident, she said. 'Victoria's Secret still has large market share, and it's a big brand, but the reality is, it has definitely lost a lot of the market and it is out of touch. They have a bunch of issues with quality, design, marketing — and while it's better, it's still not the best,' she said. In its email Wednesday, Victoria's Secret acknowledged the need for further improvement but said it's making inroads. 'As outlined on our March and June earnings calls, bras and beauty are at the center of the Victoria's Secret Path to Potential strategy, and these efforts are showing momentum in spite of the challenging market environment,' the company said. 'While we have more work to do, we are already delivering meaningful progress, including exceeding revenue and adjusted operating income guidance in the first quarter.' Recommended Reading Adidas says its Yeezy partnership is 'under review' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's Why I'm Buying Alphabet Stock Like There's No Tomorrow
Generative AI is challenging Alphabet's Google search business. The company's financial results have remained strong despite this rising competitor. 10 stocks we like better than Alphabet › Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) doesn't get the same respect as its big tech peers. These stocks all trade at a premium to the market, as measured by the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC), while Alphabet does not. There is a lot of pessimism that Alphabet's primary cash cow, the Google search engine, could be losing its dominance, threatening the company as we know it today. However, the numbers don't back this up. Google Search is still dominant and making a ton of money. Because of Alphabet's strong financial picture and cheap price, it's an excellent stock to load up on right now. Most of the concern about Alphabet losing market share involves users switching to alternatives, such as generative AI models. Regardless of which one they use, each time a generative AI model is asked a question, it is one time that Google isn't able to place ads in front of a user. This threatens a core part of the company's business because it gets 56% of its revenue from search. We've seen Google's market share slip a bit, dropping below 90% for the first time since 2015 earlier this year. Still, this doesn't mean the financial picture is trending in the wrong direction, as Google Search revenue rose 10% year over year in the first quarter. One thing helping Google maintain its position is the introduction of AI search overviews, which bridge the gap between a traditional Google search and using a generative AI model. Management has discussed how popular the feature is, and it is going to continue developing it. Although the forecast for Google's market share isn't particularly great, it's still doing an excellent job with its business. I think the market is underestimating the fact that most consumers aren't going to switch away from Google unless something much better is launched. This will protect Alphabet's mindshare and ensure that it continues producing solid results. The first quarter's results were truly fantastic and did not indicate a company that was struggling at all. In that quarter, overall revenue increased 12% year over year, and diluted earnings per share (EPS) increased 49% year over year. If all I presented were those growth rates and its valuation, you would think it's an incredibly undervalued stock. But because Alphabet's name is attached to the stock, it trades at a hefty discount to the market and its peers. With the stock trading at a mere 18.6 times forward earnings, it's far cheaper than the S&P 500, which trades at 22.9 times forward earnings. The results become even more eye-opening compared to some of its peers in big tech. Revenue Growth Rate Diluted EPS Growth Rate Forward P/E Alphabet 12% 49% 18.6 Apple 5.1% 7.8% 27.6 Microsoft 13.3% 17.7% 35.8 Amazon 8.6% 62.2% 34.8 Data source: YCharts. Note: All growth rates were taken from each company's last reported quarters. Alphabet is posting results similar to these other three, yet it trades for a massive discount compared to them. This makes me conclude one of two things: The other big tech stocks are overvalued, or Alphabet is undervalued. Both can be true, but what matters is what investors do with their money. Alphabet is a great stock right now, as it combines growth and value well. This combination could provide explosive returns in the future, making it one of my best stocks to buy. Before you buy stock in Alphabet, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Alphabet wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Keithen Drury has positions in Alphabet. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Here's Why I'm Buying Alphabet Stock Like There's No Tomorrow was originally published by The Motley Fool
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Hiring A Content Writer? Maybe You Need A Content Strategist Instead
A content strategist carries out content strategy. Do you have a content strategy for your business? You know you need content. Blog posts. Emails. Lead magnets. Maybe even an entire content library. You want to attract customers, earn trust, and grow your business. So you do what seems logical: Hire a writer. And what do you hand them? A topic. Maybe a keyword. Maybe a vibe. Maybe a deadline. And then you wait for magic. But if what you get back feels off—scattered, superficial, or otherwise not the right fit—you might not have a writing problem. You might have a strategy gap. Writers write; content strategists decide what gets written Content strategists may writer, but they also decide what to write about, for whom, and where to ... More publish. Here's the simplest way to understand the difference between a content writer and a content strategist: It's the difference between saying, "Write me a blog post about humans-in-the-loop for humanoid development," and saying, "We want to build authority in the humanoid development space, especially among humanoid engineers. Let's map out a three-month content series that educates, attracts search traffic, and nurtures people toward our services." That second one? Strategy. From that strategy comes a writing brief. From that brief comes content that has a damn good chance of actually working. A content brief in my inbox: A real-world example Here's a real-life example of what a content strategist does, right from my inbox Just last week, I received an email that said, "We're looking for articles that answer common questions readers are already searching for. We'll provide a detailed brief, created by an SEO expert, designed to help you maximize long-term traffic." See, a brief does more than provide writing direction. It puts content strategy into motion. As soon as I read it, I realized someone had already spotted an opportunity, researched what the audience wants, and built a container for the content. The brief included: I'm a good writer, so all I have to do is follow the brief. But what I want you to see here is that someone had to make that brief. And that someone was a content strategist. If you don't have a strategist in your corner, you're likely relying on your writer to make strategic decisions, which can be good or bad, depending on the writer. Why content strategy matters to your business A content strategist helps your content have pinpoint focus. Here's the thing. You can hire the best content writer in the world, but if you don't give them strategic direction, you're making them guess. That humanoid article I mentioned? It's a real assignment that landed in my inbox without a brief. So I had to email my client back to ask: Without that clarity, content gets fuzzy. Outcomes get fuzzy. ROI gets fuzzy, or disappears. Ask yourself these questions to know if you need a content strategist If you're not sure whether you're hiring a writer or a strategist, ask yourself: If your answer to most of those is 'me, I guess,' you probably need a strategist. How to hire smarter (without doubling your budget) Content strategist or content writer? Here's help for you to decide. Fret not about your budget: You don't need to hire both a content writer and a content strategist right away. But you do need to be clear about what you're asking for. If you only need words on a page, say that. And give your writer a solid brief. If you need help deciding what to create, hire someone who can see the whole forest, how content maps to your brand and content goals, and how it changes the lives of prospects. Some content professionals do both. Others specialize. Know which one you're getting. (Side note: I do both, in case you're wondering. I love helping founders turn scattered content efforts into clear, connected strategies and pieces that work.) The truth is, most good content strategists started as writers. They learned to think beyond the words on the page. So when you hire a content strategist, chances are you're getting someone who can both plan the strategy and do the writing. But when you hire just a writer, you might only get half the equation. The bottom line? When you think 'content strategist,' think "thinker" Content strategists are thinkers. Great content doesn't start with writing. It starts with thinking. If your content efforts aren't working as you'd hoped, or if you've hired writers and still feel like you're not results, it might be time to stop looking for wordsmiths and to start looking for thinkers. With better strategy, you'll get better writing. And with better both, you'll get better results.
