PNG, Bougainville holding talks at Burnham
Talks between Papua New Guinea and Bougainville to decide on issues surrounding an independence referendum are to be held at Burnham military camp near Christchurch this weekend.
The moderator in the talks is former New Zealand governor-general Sir Jerry Mateparae, who sought to have the discussion at Burnham where critical talks in 1997 helped end the Bougainville civil war.
The Burnham consultations will be conducted by Sir Jerry with the support of United Nations officials.
Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters said the government will provide the venue and environment necessary for substantive discussions on Bougainville's political future.
It is the third round of talks to try and resolve how the 2019 referendum results are tabled in the PNG parliament.
The Bougainville government is strongly in support of independence from PNG and expects to achieve that status by 2027.
Peters said reaching a mutually agreed outcome is important for Papua New Guinea, Bougainville, and the wider region, "is upholding the integrity of the Bougainville Peace Agreement, to which New Zealand is a witnessing signatory".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
A Shield Of Lies: Netanyahu's Battle Against The World
It was a sign of someone desperate that his message has failed to take wing and make its way to better lands. With the strategy of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Gaza Strip sundered and falling over, leaving only a thick butcher's bill (over 60,000 deaths for starters), extraordinary suffering and humanitarian catastrophe, he thought it wise to confront foreign press outlets on a late Sunday in the hope that the tide might turn away from his exemplary viciousness. There had been, he moaned like a wounded starlet, a 'global campaign of lies' about Israel's war in Gaza. In doing so, he merely inflated the arguments against him with boisterous credit and almost irrefutable plausibility. The conference, which gave 'an opportunity to puncture the lies and tell the truth,' involved the following points: Hamas still has thousands of fighters in Gaza; it vowed to repeat what it had done on October 7, 2023; it continued to expound the goal of wishing to destroy Israel even as it subjugated Gazans, stole their precious food, and shot those seeking to move to safe zones, the latter term being itself a monstrosity in the context of this conflict. Paternally, Netanyahu as the punishing father figure, thought he had deciphered the true desire of those in Gaza, which presumably would not have entailed the killing of Palestinians by the tens of thousands and starving the rest. Everything could be blamed on a militant organisation he had done so much to praise as a countering force against Fatah in the West Bank. As things stood now, Gazans seemed to be suffering from a highly developed sense of Stockholm's syndrome, 'begging us, and they're begging the world: 'Free us, Free us, and free Gaza from Hamas'.' With a solid body of mendacity to work with, Netanyahu proceeded to build an edifice of fantasy few others outside Israel could contend with: that the same Israeli forces who starve, kill and maim the civilian populace of the Strip have no wish to impose an occupation but 'free it from Hamas terrorists. The war can end tomorrow if Gaza, or rather if Hamas lays down its arms and releases all the remaining hostages.' Israeli policy was not one of starving the Palestinians into famine wrecks, skeletal ruin and physiological malfunction. That hideous criminal pursuit fell to Hamas, apparently responsible for the violent looting of aid trucks and the deliberate creation of 'a shortage of supply.' Fantastically, Netanyahu blamed the United Nations for refusing 'to distribute the thousands of trucks that we let into Gaza through the Kerem Shalom crossing,' a delightful complaint given his government's overt hatred for a body he always wished to be rid of from the occupied territories. The synapses in Netanyahu-Land seemed frailer than ever, if not altogether snapped. He then belted out the now familiar five-point vision of the Strip once Hamas is defeated. This elusive 'day after' includes the following objectives: the disarming of Hamas, the freeing of all hostages, the demilitarising of the Gaza Strip, granting Israel 'overriding security control', the creation of a non-Israeli administration that will not 'educate its children for terror, doesn't pay terrorists and doesn't launch terrorist attacks against Israel.' Unlike other proposals advanced by France, the UK and Canada, the Palestinian Authority is also excluded from the arrangements, since no Palestinian politician is worth the Israeli PM's time. Netanyahu's idea of a politically viable Palestinian is one manacled to the security regime of other powers. The stage for the next slaughter is set, namely, the dismantling of 'the two remaining Hamas strongholds in Gaza City and the Central Camps. Contrary to false claims, this is the best way to end the war, and the best way to end it speedily.' Netanyahu feigns a humanitarian streak in stating that the civilian population will be allowed to 'leave the combat areas to designated safe zones.' The process of ethnic cleansing, or simply cleansing of the population, is to simply continue. Oblivious to Netanyahu's fortified wall of prejudice is that much of the groundwork for precisely those outcomes he hopes to avoid have already been laid. Whether it be Hamas or any other militant organisation, the notion of pacifist subordinate figures content with their status in any territory where Israel has the last word on everything is absurdly unrealistic. Doing everything to make his case even less convincing, Netanyahu then told Israeli journalists after seeing the foreign scribblers off that he had never halted all humanitarian aid to Gaza. Even the patriotic Times of Israel found this a bit rich, noting that 'his government had enacted that policy earlier this year.' The paper went on to quote the announcement from the premier's office on March 2: 'Prime Minister Netanyahu has decided that, as of this morning, all entry of goods and supplies into the Gaza Strip will cease.' Netanyahu also refused to accept the proposition that Gaza's population was starving. Shortages in supply yes; starvation no. 'If we had wanted starvation, if that had been our policy, 2 million Gazans wouldn't be living today after 20 months.' The same could be said about the supreme crime of all: 'if we wanted to commit genocide, it would have taken exactly one afternoon.' A wise head might have told him that few who commit genocide or engineer circumstances of mass murder ever make the intention that obvious.
RNZ News
13 hours ago
- RNZ News
Oral Questions for Thursday 14 August 2025
Questions to Ministers Hon CARMEL SEPULONI to the Minister for Pacific Peoples: Does he stand by his statement, "We absolutely have endeavours to get Pasifika people into employment"; if so, why? TEANAU TUIONO to the Minister of Foreign Affairs: Does he agree with the Prime Minister that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has "lost the plot"; if so, why? CATHERINE WEDD to the Minister of Finance: What reports has she seen on COVID-19 and the economy? Hon KIERAN McANULTY to the Minister of Housing: How many social houses funded in the 2024 and 2025 Budgets have been built? SCOTT WILLIS to the Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology: How many jobs, if any, have been lost in the science sector since the formation of this Government? SAM UFFINDELL to the Minister of Health: What recent announcements has he made about health infrastructure? CAMILLA BELICH to the Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety: Will she formally consider the report to be published by the People's Select Committee on Pay Equity next January; if not, why not? Dr HAMISH CAMPBELL to the Minister for Mental Health: What recent announcements has he made in relation to a promotion campaign for better mental wellbeing for New Zealanders? ARENA WILLIAMS to the Acting Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (Grocery Sector): Does she agree with Nicola Willis, who said in 2023 that "National will take action to get food prices under control once more"; if so, why are food prices still going up under her watch? Dr DAVID WILSON to the Minister for Resources: What recent reports has he seen on the New Zealand resources sector? TIM VAN DE MOLEN to the Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing: What is the Government doing to support small businesses? LEMAUGA LYDIA SOSENE to the Minister of Internal Affairs: Does she stand by her statement that online casino-type gaming providers should not have to make community returns because that would create "a perverse incentive to increase gambling activity in order to increase revenue for these organisations"; if not, why not? Question to Member INGRID LEARY to the Chairperson of the Health Committee: Were any items of business relating to Health NZ removed from the Health Committee agenda this week after the agenda was originally distributed and before the meeting took place; if so, what were they? To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
RNZ News
17 hours ago
- RNZ News
New bill gives Tonga's King control over diplomacy
King Tupou VI Photo: 2019 Mark Tantrum New legislation passed by Tonga's parliament could give the King of Tonga significantly more say in the country's foreign affairs. His Majesty's Diplomatic Service Bill 2025 will replace Tonga's Ministry of Foreign Affairs with a new entity called His Majesty's Diplomatic Service. "The Bill aims to modernise and strengthen the framework for the conduct and implementation of diplomatic and consular relations, while also enhancing oversight of immigration in alignment with national interests," the Tonga's Legislative Assembly said in a statement. Matangi Tonga reported that the Bill was tabled by the Foreign Affairs Crown Prince Tupouto'a 'Ulukalala, and passed on 5 August. It establishes the structure, operations, and responsibilities of His Majesty's Diplomatic Service. The foreign affairs and defence portfolios were at the centre of a falling-out between King Tupou VI and former Prime Minister Hu'akavameiliku Siaosi Sovaleni last year. King Tupou and former Prime Minister Huʻakavameiliku were at odds over the foreign affairs and defence portfolios last year. Photo: RNZ Pacific The King's decision at the time was labelled as a move to take the kingdom back to the "dark ages". Crown Prince Tupouto'a was appointed Foreign Minister and Minister for His Majesty's Armed Forces in January. "The Eke government's newly passed bill - handing full control of Foreign Affairs back to the monarchy - threatens to unravel Tonga's fragile democratic progress," local media outlet Kaniva Tonga stated in a report. It said the move "directly undermines" reforms that sought to transfer executive power from the monarchy to parliament. "By restoring royal authority over a key ministry, the legislation risks reviving the very 'mistakes' the [King George V] once warned against: a retreat from accountable governance toward unchecked monarchy."
