logo
JOHN MACLEOD: We are an island nation...nothing can erase the place fishermen hold in the UK's national consciousness

JOHN MACLEOD: We are an island nation...nothing can erase the place fishermen hold in the UK's national consciousness

Daily Mail​21-05-2025
In May 2000 I had a memorable break in Raasay, a lush and fascinating island sandwiched roughly between Portree and Applecross.
And found myself one afternoon, briefly at the tiller, helming a sailboat in the kindly sou' easter of a summer breeze, of a design that would have been immediately familiar to my four great-grandfathers, all of whom were fishermen.
How the Raasay Outdoor Centre came into possession of a traditional sgoth-Niseach – a broad-beamed, lug rigged clinker-built vessel with narrow oars, overlapping planks and in straight and evident descent from Norsemen's longboats – is, no doubt, a story in itself.
The very word abiding in Gaelic for the Vikings – na Lochlannaich, 'the loch-lurkers' – speaks to the terror these ruthless raiders once inspired.
But, as I pulled that tiller portside and to its tautest and the Oigh Niseach surged back towards Raasay on her starboard beam, I felt something of the muscle-memory of many near forebears, on the surge of the wind and the sea.
In a week when Britain's fishermen have just, and not for the first time, been comprehensively betrayed by His Majesty's Government, I have never forgotten that noiseless, washy boil of power, immediately under my hand, driven by but wind-filled sail, with no rattle of engine or taint of fumes.
The EU 'reset' on which Sir Keir Starmer signed off the other day, and on terms which will be very difficult for a future Government to overturn, grants EU access to our fishing-waters for the next twelve years and – apart from a veterinary, phytosanitary deal making our food exports a little easier – for not very much.
To add insult to injury, we will have to pay the European Union for the privilege – annual Danegeld to a racket the people of Britain voted to leave nine years ago and in larger numbers than they have ever voted for anything.
A decision most of the chatterati, and much of the deep State, has refused wilfully ever to respect.
'This is a total betrayal,' stormed one Cornish fisherman. 'We were promised our waters back, and now Starmer's rolled over and handed them straight to the French for over a decade.'
'It's like Brexit never happened. He's sold us out to Brussels just to please his Eurocrat mates.'
It's a 'horror show,' says Elspeth of the Scottish Fishermen's Federation, 'far worse than Boris Johnson's botched Brexit agreement.
'It is clear that Sir Keir Starmer made the whole deal on the backs of our fishermen and coastal communities, granting EU vessels 12 years of continuous access to UK waters at the last minute to secure other objectives.'
Fishing in Britain has deeply declined. Stornoway's inner harbour, chockers with smacks and trawlers when I was a little boy, is now largely a marina, glamorous yachts and launches putting one in mind of Bergerac.
The fleet harvesting our home waters is a whisper of what it was. In cold Whitehall numbers, fishing is now but 0.03% of the British economy – and barely 6,500 people now work on our fishing boats.
In fact, at least in the Western Isles, recruitment has been a problem for years. Few young men want a life of murderous hours, pre-dawn starts and arduous physical toil in what, statistically, is one of the most dangerous jobs out.
Few years pass without a Hebridean tragedy. Three friends of mine were fortunate to survive when – in separate Harris incidents, a hand or ankle momentarily entangled in a spooling rope – they went overboard with a fleet of creels.
One lost several fingers. We deluged 'Fachie' with assorted goodies in hospital and lamented his lost prospects as a concert-pianist.
In April 2016, the crew of the MFV Louisa awoke to find their craft foundering by the bows off the uninhabited island of Mingulay.
Everything that could have gone wrong for those lads went wrong. The electronic distress-beacon gave HM Coastguard an inaccurate position.
The life-raft would not inflate; the subcontractor handsomely paid for its annual service had failed to replace the CO2 cylinder.
Inadequate life-jackets had not kept men upright, face-up in the water. Only one, Lachlan Armstrong, 27 – who somehow swam to safety – survived. His three comrades drowned: one body, slipping from the winchman's grasp, was never recovered.
But bald economic statistics cannot erase the fond place of the trawlerman in our national self-consciousness.
This is an island nation. A maritime land, where nowhere is more than forty miles from the sea. We were raised singing sea-shanties at school, Captain Birdseye is something of a national treasure and even the Queen, on annual Balmoral sojourn, used to send out quietly for fish and chips.
Fishing, even on Lewis, is not what it was. The rich, haddocky waters of Broad Bay were trawled to extinction by ruthless east-coasters.
The broad boats I remember beached at Shawbost – cobles and skiffs, lovingly maintained by experts with the baited longline and shortline – vanished decades ago. The herring-boom collapsed in 1977 and no one even bothers, commercially at least, to poach salmon anymore.
What survives is a creel-boat, 'static gear' industry – most successfully in waters off South Lochs, Scalpay or in the Sound of Harris where the gainful pursuit of prawn, lobster and velvet-crab calls for keen local knowledge.
Which reminds me of when, back in 1996, Caledonian MacBrayne belatedly began a car ferry service across the Sound of Harris – all shoals, reefs, shifting sandbanks and quirky tides – and one local boatman, of unparalleled skill, was confidently assumed to be a shoo-in for command.
But CalMac had to choose another chargehand, for he turned out to be colour-blind.
To complicate things further, most of the fish landed in Britain goes overseas – the Spanish have a bottomless appetite for our crustaceans, and especially for our hake – and much of what we do eat is imported.
Much of it frozen and processed, for most of us these days shy from fish cookery and your local fishmonger – my daily walk to school, through Morningside, four decades ago used to take me past four – is now an endangered species.
But one still remember tales of a past fishing generation, not that long ago, who daily braved the perils of the deep.
Like one grizzled skipper, off the Butt of Lewis, sat at the transom and who spotted something, frowned, and at once ordered his men to row as fast as possible for the shore.
For an age they pulled and pulled on their oars. He demanded they go faster. One protested. He pulled a knife, glared at him, and rapped that the first man who stopped rowing would get it in the guts.
Just as the exhausted men felt they could not last another minute, they beached on the golden sands of Traigh Shanndaidh – and the boat disintegrated beneath them.
Her keel had cracked, half an hour earlier and a mile or two from shore: their master had spotted it immediately, and knew that only sustained forward motion would spare all their lives.
Typical of an old Hebridean school that taught life was precious, but the soul was priceless.
And in the dark wisdom of a Gaelic proverb one still hears. The waves have some mercy; but the rocks have no mercy at all.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rachel Reeves to take aim at environmental protections in bid to speed up infrastructure projects, say reports
Rachel Reeves to take aim at environmental protections in bid to speed up infrastructure projects, say reports

The Independent

time5 hours ago

  • The Independent

Rachel Reeves to take aim at environmental protections in bid to speed up infrastructure projects, say reports

Rachel Reeves is preparing to strip back environmental protections in an attempt to accelerate infrastructure building and boost the economy, according to reports. The chancellor is considering major reforms that would make it more difficult for wildlife concerns to hold up developments, according to The Times. Treasury officials are said to be drafting another planning reform bill, the publication reported. The move reportedly involves tearing up parts of European environmental rules, which developers have argued slow down crucial projects. While Labour ministers have previously insisted their current planning overhaul would balance growth with nature, Ms Reeves is understood to believe that the government must go further. The Planning and Infrastructure Bill going through Parliament overrides existing habitat and nature protections, which, if passed, would allow developers to make general environmental improvements and pay into a nature restoration fund that improves habitats on other sites. But Ms Reeves is considering more contentious reforms that are likely to trigger further backlash from environmental groups, according to The Times. Among the changes under discussion are plans for a smaller, UK-only list of protected species, which would give less weight to wildlife considered rare across Europe but relatively common in Britain, The Times said. Ms Reeves is also reportedly considering abolishing the EU 'precautionary principle' that forces developers to prove projects will have no impact on protected natural sites. Instead, a new test would assess the risks and benefits of building. The chancellor is also exploring limits on legal challenges from environmental campaigners. Speaking to the House of Lords economic affairs committee last month, Ms Reeves said: 'The reason that HS2 is not coming to my city of Leeds anymore anytime soon, is because I'm afraid, as a country, we've cared more about the bats than we have about the commuter times for people in Leeds and West Yorkshire, and we've got to change that, 'Because I care more about a young family getting on the housing ladder than I do about protecting some snails, and I care more about my energy bills and my constituents than I do about the views of people from their windows.' High-profile examples of costly protections include the £100m Buckinghamshire 'bat tunnel' built to protect wildlife from HS2 trains and the so-called 'fish disco' at Hinkley Point C nuclear plant, which uses sound to deter fish from cooling system intakes. The existing Planning and Infrastructure Bill already proposes a 'nature restoration fund' under which developers could offset environmental damage by paying for conservation schemes elsewhere. But the bill has faced criticism from both environmental groups and developers, who fear it will fail to speed up construction. Paul Miner of the countryside charity CPRE told The Times that targeting habitats regulations would 'take us backwards rather than forwards on nature recovery'.

Rachel Reeves to cut ‘bats and newts' in boost to developers
Rachel Reeves to cut ‘bats and newts' in boost to developers

Times

time6 hours ago

  • Times

Rachel Reeves to cut ‘bats and newts' in boost to developers

Rachel Reeves is preparing to strip back environmental protections in an effort to boost the economy by speeding up infrastructure projects. The chancellor is considering reforms that would make it far harder for concerns about nature to stop development, which she insists is crucial to restoring growth and improving living standards. The Treasury has begun preparing for another planning reform bill and is thinking about tearing up key parts of European environmental rules that developers say are making it harder to build key projects. Labour ministers have repeatedly insisted that their current planning overhaul will not come at the expense of nature, promising a 'win-win' system where developers will pay to offset environmental damage. But Reeves is understood to believe that the government must go significantly further, after expressing frustration that the interests of 'bats and newts' are being allowed to stymie critical infrastructure. She has tasked officials with looking at much more contentious reforms, which are likely to provoke a furious backlash from environmentalists and cause unease for some Labour MPs. A smaller, UK-only list of protected species is being planned, which would place less weight on wildlife — including types of newt — that is rare elsewhere in Europe but more common in Britain. Developers would also no longer have to prove that projects would have no impact on protected natural sites, under plans that would abolish the 'precautionary principle' enshrined in European rules. Instead, a new test would look at risks and benefits of potential projects. Further curbs to judicial review are also being considered by Reeves to stop key projects being delayed by legal challenges from environmentalists. No decisions have been made, but work is underway and Treasury sources acknowledged there was a growing belief that the government needed to go further, as Reeves says she wants to make boosting Britain's sluggish productivity the centrepiece of her autumn budget. She argued this week that building more infrastructure such as roads and railways were crucial to this aim. A Planning and Infrastructure Bill currently going through parliament attempts to encourage development through a 'nature restoration fund' through which developers will be allowed to press ahead with projects by setting up schemes elsewhere to offset their environmental impact. • The grid is struggling — and our green future hangs in the balance But the plan has been criticised by environmental groups while also attracting scepticism from some developers, who fear it will not work in practice and do little to speed up building. Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, who stood down as energy minister in May, is urging his former colleagues to go further to achieve Labour's promise of 150 major infrastructure projects. 'While I think the planning bill will work for housing, I don't think it is sufficiently focused on the major infrastructure projects, so it is encouraging that the Treasury is going to have another look at whether we've really got this right,' he said. 'The government has to face up to the tensions in the Habitat Regulations which are making it hard to build essential infrastructure and the reality is that at some point someone needs to make a hard decision and say 'on some things, you just have to press ahead'.' The rules, which incorporate the EU Habitats Directive into British law, ban killing of hundreds of species, including types of bats, news, voles, snails, spiders, insects and woodlice. Developers must prove there is no risk to protected sites and species before being allowed to go ahead with projects, under rules which critics say impose an 'impossibly high standard' on vital projects. Reeves is increasingly sympathetic to such criticism, after repeatedly hitting out at 'ridiculous' environmental protections. She said last month that she cared 'more about the young family getting on the housing ladder than I do about protecting some snails', after a speech in January in which she said developers should be able to 'focus on getting things built, and stop worrying about bats and newts'. Sir Keir Starmer has also expressed frustration with the ability of campaigners to delay projects through legal challenges, and is already introducing rules which limit judicial review to override the 'whims of nimbys'. Campaign groups and residents, who currently have three opportunities to apply for judicial review, which will be reduced to two, or one in cases deemed by a judge 'totally without merit'. Reeves is now considering allowing only one opportunity to bring any challenge. Some Labour MPs and peers want her to go further by using dedicated acts of parliament to prevent any legal challenge to specific named projects. The plans are at an early stage and are likely to cause tension with ministers in other departments who have pledged to protect the environment. Paul Miner, of the countryside charity CPRE, said targeting habitats regulations would 'take us backwards rather than forwards on nature recovery', adding: 'We urge the government to drop the worn-out 'builders versus blockers' narrative which wrongly frames climate and nature as being in conflict with economic growth.' Becky Pullinger, of the Wildlife Trusts, said maintaining environmental standards was 'essential if we are to achieve targets to protect and restore the natural world which is suffering huge declines, saying Reeves should abandon 'the myth that deregulation will lead to economic growth'. But Robbie Owen, head of infrastructure planning at Pinsent Masons, said: 'Ministers are finally realising that their rhetoric about reform doesn't match up up the reality of their bill. We have been saying to ministers and officials all year that the bill needs to go further and it seems that message has finally been heard.'

Trans ruling set to be big issue for SNP at next election
Trans ruling set to be big issue for SNP at next election

Times

time6 hours ago

  • Times

Trans ruling set to be big issue for SNP at next election

John Swinney's 'fear of activists' within the SNP has prevented him from implementing the Supreme Court ruling which asserts sex is defined by biology, a feminist campaign group has said. For Women Scotland (FWS) won the backing of the UK's highest court in April for its case that the legal definition of sex in the Equality Act is based on sex at birth, not by which gender people may want to be identified by. However, the SNP government has faced criticism for not implementing the ruling to enforce single-sex spaces for biological men and women in public sector services such as schools and prisons. Susan Smith, a director of FWS, which is taking the Scottish government to court for the second time over the issue, told LBC News that 'fear of activists' in the SNP was preventing ministers from implementing the ruling. She argued that its policies, including delaying implementing the ruling and making gender self-ID easier, were likely to backfire on the party in Scottish parliament elections next year. Sections within the SNP base still strongly support the policies pursued by Nicola Sturgeon, despite these now being viewed as costing the party wider public support. Swinney was 'risking making this an election issue', Smith said. John Swinney risks a lawsuit damaging him shortly before the Holyrood election next year JANE BARLOW/PA 'If we do end up going to court that will be close to the 2026 election and I cannot understand why John Swinney would want to preside over another humiliating legal defeat,' she said. Swinney had agreed to meet FWS to discuss the issue but later pulled out, saying he 'had a lot on his plate', Smith claimed. 'I think he'll be wishing had met with us,' she added. 'I don't know if the Scottish government thinks we'll get bored and go away but we won't.' The new legal action wants a court ruling on the legality of Scottish government's policies in prisons and schools. Under official guidance, men and boys who claim to have switched gender to female can enter single-sex women's spaces. The guidance also allows for biological males to compete against girls in school sports if they say they identify as female. • Hadley Freeman: Scotland is sullied by the cult of gender ideology Police Scotland became one of the first public services to exclude trans men and women from spaces such as toilets and changing rooms in offices and police stations designated for biological men and women last month. But the Scottish government is yet to update its advice to the wider public sector, including the civil service, schools and prisons, totalling hundreds of thousands of employees, saying it is waiting for official guidance from the UK-wide Equalities and Human Rights Commission. FWS said it had been left with 'little choice' but to take the Scottish government to court again after nationalist politicians refused to abandon gender self-ID policies, which the group says are now clearly in breach of the law. Formal proceedings began on Friday with the lodging of court papers. The Scottish government has 21 days to respond. The Scottish government said it would not comment on a live legal action.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store