logo
The most volatile major currencies in 2025

The most volatile major currencies in 2025

Miami Herald15 hours ago

The most volatile major currencies in 2025
2025 has proven to be an unusually volatile year for foreign exchange movements. The Trump administration and ongoing conflicts have led to frequent exchanges between world leaders and policymakers, while record-high tariffs are affecting global trade more significantly than we have seen since the 2000s.
Since 2020, the world has seen many disturbances compared to a much more geopolitically stable first part of the millennium. Between COVID-19, new conflicts around the globe, unprecedented central bank policies, and trade wars, there is a lot to digest for economists and individuals. However, for traders, with volatility comes opportunity.
OANDA dives into major currencies that have seen the most volatility since the beginning of 2025.
Major currency performance since 2025
Euro - the biggest major performer
The euro once again attracted significant attention from the markets. After the Trump administration decided to impose a policy of U.S. exceptionalism on the rest of the world, European politicians showed a strong response. Particularly after a heated exchange between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, European representatives issued strong statements.
French President Emmanuel Macron, EU President of the Commission Ursula von der Leyen, and other European leaders successively spoke up and showed cohesiveness to tackle a more distant American partner. This led to a significant reversal of a six-month downtrend in the euro versus other currencies.
Germany, Europe's largest economy, also announced a significant spending bill in March 2025, pledging $565 billion to an unforeseen infrastructure plan. Markets are seeing signs of Europe's strength with such policies, which underpin euro strength in the first part of this year.
EUR/USD: Technical analysis
The euro has been on an impulsive move up since the beginning of Q2 2025 and formed an ascending daily channel after its March-end consolidation.
The April 2, 2025 Liberation Day, when Trump announced his tariffs, led to weakness in the U.S. dollar and underpinned the euro in April to break through prior resistance at 1.0930, which then turned into support. Prices for the EUR/USD pair soared to levels unseen since November 2021. A tweezer top bearish candlestick pattern toward April 21 led the euro to correct back toward the low of the channel and eventually broke its support at the bottom line of the main ascending channel.
The medium term outlook still looks bullish as long as prices are maintained above the pivot zone-situated between 1.1070 and 1.1130-that served to slow down the April breakout move.
For bullish continuation, look for a break above the 1.14 psychological level and a re-entry into the ascending channel.
For a further bearish reversal, look for a close below the pivot zone around 1.1050.
Yen-finally showing signs of strength
The yen has had quite a volatile performance in the past few years. The Bank of Japan has been stuck in a dovish stance, particularly in the past 13 years, notably with its infamous Yield Curve Control policy. Installed in 2012, this policy aimed to maintain low interest rates on their yield curve, which is made to stimulate a sluggish economy that hasn't seen much improvement since their dominant 90s decade-particularly when it pertains to a quasi non-existent inflation, much needed for GDP growth.
This policy has led to a substantial depreciation of the yen relative to other currencies. Effectively, since the beginning of global hike cycles led by central banks, the USD/JPY has gone from 102.53 in January 2021 all the way to highs of 161.95 attained in July 2024. Since then, a more dovish stance by central banks supplemented by a weaker U.S. dollar bolstered the yen, which is now trading around the 145 handle.
Since the start of 2025, with frantic American policies, the yen has appreciated by 7.7%, though it remains volatile.
USD/JPY: Technical analysis
The yen has found buying momentum after tumultuous price action. USD/JPY has been in a downtrend since the beginning of 2025 with consistent lower highs. Prices eventually corrected in March, when the downside pressure materialized on the U.S. dollar against the JPY. These lows serve to form a daily descending channel.
April and Liberation Day also served as a support for the yen, as prices extended their moves lower to an extreme of 139.86 attained on April 21, 2025-levels unseen since September 2024. From these prices, the yen found sellers again (buying USD/JPY) with a swift reversal all the way to the pivot zone that served as a magnet for prices. The zone is established between 147.10 and 148.50.
A move below that would imply a bearish continuation, which can be confirmed if prices enter back into the descending channel below the major support at 146.50.
On the other end, to pursue the reversal move, bulls would be looking to break and close above 148.50, looking to extend toward the major resistance at 151.20.
US dollar-the elephant in the room
The greenback has had a powerful performance at the beginning of this decade. Between ever-so-strong U.S. companies powered by record highs in most major U.S. indices, the advent of artificial intelligence technology, and an economy that has sustained one of the fastest hiking cycles in its history, the U.S. has asserted its economic dominance.
From September 2024 to Trump's ascension to the White House, the dollar has shown a stellar increase of close to 10% against its major counterparts. Though, as mentioned earlier, the Trump administration has scared global markets, and fears of the United States backing off from the international scene have made the dollar give back its year-end run.
After the May 7, 2025 meeting, a more hawkish than expected Federal Reserve has stopped the bleeding from the U.S. dollar, which gave it some strength. The markets now await further news concerning tariffs and a potential continuation of the cutting cycle in upcoming FED meetings.
Dollar index: Technical analysis
Looking back at July 2024 serves a decent purpose for the dollar index. Effectively, the USD was in bearish momentum from July 2024 to October 2024, as markets started to price in the Trump victory in the U.S. elections, which led to a swift reversal.
The rally began with very few corrections and lasted until its inauguration speech in January 2025, with highs at 110.14. The end of the impulsive bullish move formed the head of an infamous head and shoulders pattern. The right shoulder was formed in March 2025, as markets feared that unprecedented tariffs would isolate the greenback-this price action sent bearish fears and led to a breakdown below a precedent pivot level at 103.250.
A further breakdown led to a swifter slump, which stopped at a measured move from the neckline, on Liberation Day at 101.27. There was a continuation of this move as the index found a bottom at 97.94 on April 21, 2025.
Since then, prices have reverted toward the last pivot at 101.750.
The trend is now unclear as prices are close to precedent confluence zones.
A further continuation of this bullish reversal in the DXY points at the next resistance of 103.25.
For a resumption of the downtrend, bears would look to break below the psychological level of 100.00 and the ascending trendline formed in the reversal.
Canadian dollar-the forgotten brother
The Loonie has had a rough year-over-year performance. From March 2022 to July 2023, the Bank of Canada engaged in a hiking cycle that was even faster than the one made by its historic trade partner and neighbor due to exceptionally strong inflation. In 2024, the more cyclical Canadian economy was affected by higher rates, lower energy prices, and political turmoil, sending the Canadian economy into a slump that has accelerated its cutting cycle-resulting in signs of a significantly weaker Canadian dollar. USD/CAD went from 1.31 in January 2024 to a spike of 1.47 in February 2025.
On a year-to-date perspective, though, the CAD has recovered from its weakness in February when fears of record U.S. tariffs were announced. Factually, U.S. and Canada trade tensions increased notably, with the U.S. president calling its northern neighbor "the 51st State" and menaces of +100% rises in energy tariffs were announced by Canadian counterparts.
Recently elected Prime Minister Mark Carney has engaged in discussions relating to tariffs, immigration, and other key subjects with the United States, which remains Canada's most strategic partner. This has reduced uncertainty and volatility in the pair. Furthermore, the new Canadian prime minister was once head of both the Bank of England and the Bank of Canada, which may have contributed to some strength in the CAD.
USD/CAD: Technical analysis
USD/CAD has been volatile in the past year, to say the least. Similar to the move seen in the DXY, the pair has seen a relentless rally with few corrections. The rally found its base after a double bottom in October 2024. Prices moved from 1.3445 to 1.4650, where they consolidated in a 2000 pip range between December 2024 and February 2025.
As explained earlier, fears of record-high tariffs led to a massive gap in the loonie on Feb. 3, 2025, where it found some relief. Prices moved toward 1.41650 and formed a more volatile range, as prices eventually broke support after Liberation Day.
Since the beginning of April, the Canadian dollar found buyers (sellers of USD/CAD), though prices consolidated toward the most recent pivot of 1.37800 and saw a 2000 pip reversal.
Canadian dollar aficionados would now be looking for a fall to the lows established by the pivot, with continuation on a breakout on the downside.
However, a break above the key 1.4000 medium-term psychological level may see the resurgence of USD/CAD bulls for the next resistance to come in at 1.4155.
2025 has been a rollercoaster year for financial markets. Trump and his infamous tariff policies concern economic players, as reviewing supply chains creates swift changes in monetary flows.
Q1 of 2025 was a test of strength for currencies that were mostly weaker against the U.S. dollar in previous years. The theme of U.S. economic activity being stronger than the rest of the world is one of the past. Markets are now looking forward to who might be the winners of these trade wars.
This article is for general information purposes only, not to be considered a recommendation or financial advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Opinions are the author's; not necessarily that of OANDA Corporation or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries, officers or directors.
This story was produced by OANDA and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
© Stacker Media, LLC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk threatens to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft after Trump feud. What does it mean for the US space industry?
Elon Musk threatens to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft after Trump feud. What does it mean for the US space industry?

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk threatens to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft after Trump feud. What does it mean for the US space industry?

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. An explosive, and very public, feud between President Donald Trump and SpaceX founder Elon Musk on Thursday (June 5) has raised doubts over the future of America's space industry. The war of words could place $22 billion of SpaceX's government contracts with multiple U.S. space programs at risk, according to one estimate, although the real figure — which remains classified — could be significantly higher. Following threats from the president on his social media platform Truth Social that the U.S. could cancel the government contracts and subsidies awarded to Musk's companies, the CEO of SpaceX retorted that his space company would "begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately." Hours later, Musk responded to a follower telling him to "cool off" by saying "Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon." The disagreement began on Tuesday (June 3) when Musk criticized the administration's proposed tax and spending bill on his social media platform X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," Musk wrote on X. Related: 'No radio astronomy from the ground would be possible anymore': Satellite mega-swarms are blinding us to the cosmos — and a critical 'inflection point' is approaching This then escalated into a full-blown social media feud on Thursday, with Musk claiming that Trump's name appears in unreleased files relating to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The White House condemned these allegations. "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted," representatives wrote on X. Trump then claimed Musk "just went CRAZY," posting: "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" SpaceX's Dragon capsule is a reusable spacecraft capable of carrying up to seven passengers and cargo to and from Earth orbit, according to SpaceX. NASA currently relies on the capsule to ferry astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS), so canceling these government contracts effectively eliminates America's ability to launch astronauts to space from American soil, Live Science's sister website, reported. NASA also heavily relies on SpaceX for other space programs, having selected the Starship Human Landing System (HLS), a lunar lander variant of the company's next-generation Starship spacecraft, to carry American astronauts to the moon for the first time in more than 50 years aboard the 2027 Artemis 3 mission. NASA is investing $4 billion into Starship's development, and canceling its contract could seriously handicap NASA and the future of U.S.-led space exploration. While other competitors exist, such as Amazon founder Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin and Boeing's Starliner spacecraft, they lag far behind SpaceX. RELATED STORIES —Facing steep funding cuts, scientists propose using black holes as particle colliders instead of building new ones on Earth —Trump's 2026 budget would slash NASA funding by 24% and its workforce by nearly one third —NASA plans to build a giant radio telescope on the 'dark side' of the moon. Here's why. The Starliner capsule is not yet certified to fly operational astronaut missions and was responsible for "stranding" two astronauts on the ISS for nine months last year. The astronauts returned to Earth on March 18 aboard a SpaceX Dragon capsule, and neither Boeing nor NASA have offered any significant updates into fixes that will make Starliner flightworthy. SpaceX's lead on its competitors is reflected in the size of its government subsidies. In April, the U.S. Space Force, the military branch of U.S. space exploration, awarded the company nearly $6 billion in launch contracts, while the United Launch Alliance received $5.4 billion and Blue Origin $2.4 billion. In response to the feud between Musk and Trump, NASA press secretary Bethany Stevens declined to comment on SpaceX, but she did tell Reuters that "we will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met." NASA's deputy administrator Lori Garver told Reuters that, as well as not being in national interests, canceling SpaceX's contacts would probably not be legal. However, she also added that "a rogue CEO threatening to decommission spacecraft, putting astronauts' lives at risk, is untenable."

Ohio food banks strain as Trump slashes federal aid programs
Ohio food banks strain as Trump slashes federal aid programs

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ohio food banks strain as Trump slashes federal aid programs

By P.J. Huffstutter COLUMBUS, Ohio (Reuters) -On a warm spring morning, volunteers at the Mid-Ohio Food Collective plucked cucumbers from a greenhouse where a state psychiatric hospital once stood and the land lay fallow. Now the state's largest food bank is working that ground again, part of an urgent effort to shore up supplies amid shrinking federal support, including deep funding cuts under President Donald Trump. They are planting more. Prepping soil for fruit trees, and installing hives for honey. In the greenhouse, crates of romaine and butterhead lettuce were packed for delivery, bound for a pantry across town. Back at headquarters in Grove City, staff chased leads from grocers, manufacturers, even truckers looking to unload abandoned freight. Every pallet helped. Every pound counted. In a state that handed Trump three straight wins, where Trump flags flap near food aid flyers pinned on bulletin boards, the cost of his austerity push is starting to show. "Food banks will still have food," said Mid-Ohio CEO Matt Habash. "But with these cuts, you'll start to see a heck of a lot less food, or pantries and agencies closing. You're going to have a lot of hungry, and a lot less healthy, America." For decades, food banks like Mid-Ohio have been the backbone of the nation's anti-hunger system, channelling government support and donations from corporations and private donors into meals and logistics to support pantries at churches, non-profits and other organizations. If a food bank is a warehouse, food pantries are the store. Outside one of those – the Eastside Community Ministry pantry in rural Muskingum County, Ohio – Mary Dotson walked slow, cane in hand. The minute she stepped through the doors, her whole body seemed to lift. They call her Mama Mary here, as she's got the kind of voice that settles you down and straightens you out in the same breath. The regulars grin as Dotson, 77, pats shoulders, swaps recipes. She had tried to do everything right: built a career, raised five children, planned for the quiet years with her husband. But after he died and the kids moved away, the life they'd built slipped out of reach. Now her monthly Social Security check is $1,428. She budgets $70 of that for groceries, and she gets $23 in food benefits as well. She started as a volunteer at Eastside. Simple math convinced her to become a customer. 'I figured if I'm going to take these things,' Dotson said, 'I'm going to work here, too.' CAMPAIGN FODDER The Mid-Ohio Food Collective was born out of church basements and borrowed trucks nearly a half-century ago, when factory closures left more families hungry. It's now the state's largest food bank, feeding more than 35,000 Ohio families a week. It supplies more than 600 food pantries, soup kitchens, children and senior feeding sites, after-school programs and other partner agencies. When Trump returned to office in January, Mid-Ohio was already slammed. Pantry visits across its 20 counties hit 1.8 million last year, nearly double pre-COVID levels, and are continuing to grow this year. The biggest surge came from working people whose paychecks no longer stretch far enough due to pandemic-era inflation under Joe Biden's presidency, staff said. Then came the Trump cuts. In March, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) cancelled the pandemic-era Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program, which funded about $500 million annually for food banks; and froze about $500 million in funding for The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), one of the agency's core nutrition programs that supplies food to states to pass on to food banks for free. Much of the food Mid-Ohio distributes is donated, but donations alone can't stock a pantry consistently. Its current $11.1 million purchasing budget, built from federal, state and private dollars, helps fill the gaps. The March cuts wiped out about 22% of Mid-Ohio's buying power for next fiscal year – funds and food that staff are trying to replace. In early December, Mid-Ohio ordered 24 truckloads filled with milk, meat and eggs for delivery this spring and summer. The food came through the TEFAP program, using about $1.5 million in government funding. The first delivery was scheduled to show up April 9. The only thing to arrive was a cancellation notice. USDA said in a statement Secretary Brooke Rollins is working to ensure federal nutrition spending is efficient, effective and aligned with the administration's budget priorities. More cuts could come. Last month, the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives passed Trump's tax and spending bill. It called for $300 billion in cuts to food benefits for low income people under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which fed nearly 1.4 million Ohioans in January, according to the latest state data. If the cuts survive the Senate and are passed into law, it annually would cost Ohio at least $475 million in state funding to maintain current SNAP benefits, plus at least $70 million for administrative program costs, said Cleveland-based The Center for Community Solutions, an independent, nonpartisan policy research group. That would consume nearly every state-controlled dollar in Ohio's Department of Job and Family Services budget, roughly 95% of the general revenue meant to help fund everything from jobless claims to foster care. Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine and other lawmakers in this GOP supermajority state capitol, facing a constitutional requirement to pass a balanced budget, told Reuters that extra money for food banks isn't there. The proposed fiscal 2025 Ohio budget would set food bank funding back to 2019 levels – or about 23% less than what it spent this year, in a state where nearly one in three people qualify for help. Federal safety-net programs have become campaign fodder, too. At a recent Ohio Republican Party fundraiser in Richland County, Ohio, voters in suits and Bikers for Trump gear alike listened to Vivek Ramaswamy, the tech millionaire turned presidential candidate now running for Ohio governor. He spoke out against "a culture of dependence on the entitlement state that has festered in our country for 60 years." SAVING A PENNY So what happens when the government pulls back and supplies thin? If you're Victoria Brown and her small team of four, it means working the phones, chasing leads, watching markets, and moving fast. At Mid-Ohio's offices in Grove City, the food bank's director of sourcing sipped her coffee and squinted at her screen, eyes tracking the price-per-pound of cucumbers down to the cent. Saving a penny might seem inconsequential, unless you're trying to buy 40,000 pounds. In a supply chain that has relied on steady government support, food donations have become even more important, even as they grow more haphazard in both timing and what's available. Outside Brown's office, one staffer was trying to track down a shipment of pineapples. The rest were on the road, talking crop conditions with farmers, negotiating delivery times with suppliers and checking with grocers to see what might be sitting in the back, waiting for a second life. Brown glanced at her inbox, where new offers stacked up: At 11:10 a.m., one pallet of frozen chicken. I'll find out why it's being donated, a staffer promised. At 11:13 a.m., four pallets of cereal, bulk packed in industrial totes. Brown jotted a note for the volunteer coordinator: Anyone available to scoop a thousand pounds of cereal into small bags? RACING THE CLOCK Some of that food may be headed for Mid-Ohio's Norton Market, a modern food pantry built to feel like a real store in Columbus. The man in charge here is Denver Burkhart. He moves with the kind of precision the military teaches and life reinforces. At 35, he looks every bit the soldier he still is – broad-shouldered and lean, squared off at the edges. Fifteen years in the Army, two tours in Afghanistan, one in Iraq, now he has a mission back home until he serves overseas again with the Ohio Army National Guard. He started the morning as he always does: at a laptop in the back cramped office, racing to secure whatever free or discounted goods Brown's team had found. He leaned over the keyboard, one eye on the clock, the other on the blinking screen. The inventory system had just refreshed. The race was on to fill his mental list. His fingers clicked fast, steady, practiced. He hovered over baby formula. More moms have been showing up lately. Forty cases into the cart. Maybe too many – but if he waited, they'd be gone. "I rely heavily on the free product," he said. "Without it, we'd be hurting really bad." "WATER DAYS" Across town, Shannon Follins checks on her ice supply. It's for what she calls the "water days." Follins, 37, is raising three kids, including 3-year-old twins. One is autistic; he hasn't found his words yet. Until recently, Follins worked third shift at Waffle House for $5.25 an hour, and now she's studying for a degree in social services. Family brings groceries when they can. But it's the pantry at Broad Street Presbyterian Church, stocked by Mid-Ohio, that lets her make meals that feel like more than survival. One recent night, her daughter Essence twirled barefoot across their kitchen floor, dancing to the sounds of boiling pasta and chicken simmering in the pan. When there was nothing else to eat, she filled her kids' bellies with tap water and a mother's promise that tomorrow might be better. "It gives me a sense of security," she said, nodding toward the plastic jugs stacked in her freezer. If the government cuts food aid? She's prepared for more water days.

Could Musk-Trump feud stoke GOP divisions ahead of midterms? ANALYSIS
Could Musk-Trump feud stoke GOP divisions ahead of midterms? ANALYSIS

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Could Musk-Trump feud stoke GOP divisions ahead of midterms? ANALYSIS

Even by the standards of President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk's relationship -- an unprecedented alliance punctuated by a meme-inspired reshaping of the government, numerous rocket launches, assassination attempts, a quarter-billion-dollar political gamble and electric car photo-ops -- it's been an unusual week. For months, Musk had been the closest of Trump's advisers -- even living at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida and spending time with the president's family. More recently, Trump gave Musk a congratulatory Oval Office sendoff from his work leading cost-cutting efforts in his administration, giving him a golden key with a White House insignia. But the billionaire's muted criticisms of Trump's "big, beautiful bill" grew louder and more pointed, culminating in posts Thursday on his social media platform taking credit for Trump's November win and Republicans' takeover of the Senate. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk posted. "Such ingratitude." Some lawmakers and Republicans worry Musk's apparent acrimonious departure from Trump's orbit could create new uncertainties for the party -- and stoke GOP divisions that would not serve Republicans well heading into a critical legislative stretch before the midterm elections. The back-and-forth attacks, which continued into the weekend and took a sharply personal turn, reverberated across a capital they have both reshaped. Trump on Friday told several reporters over the phone that he was not thinking about Musk and told ABC News Chief Washington Correspondent Jonathan Karl that Musk had "lost his mind." In the near term, Trump and the GOP are trying to muscle their signature tax and domestic policy megabill through the House and Senate, with the slimmest of margins and no shortage of disagreements. MORE: Speaker Johnson tries to protect fate of megabill from Trump-Musk crossfire Any shift on the key issues could topple the high-wire act needed to please House and Senate Republicans. A nonstop torrent of criticism from Musk's social media megaphone could collapse negotiations, harden the position of the bill's critics and even undermine other pieces of Trump's first-term agenda. "You hate seeing division and chaos," Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., who represents a swing district, told ABC News about the Trump-Musk fracas. "It's not helpful." Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, the chairman of the House Budget Committee, called Musk a "credible voice" on "debt and spending" issues. "It's never helpful when he says those things. He's a believable person and he has a broad reach, but I think he's frustrated and people understand the context," Arrington said, predicting that both men will eventually resolve their dispute. Republican operatives watching the spat unfold this week told ABC News it is too early to say how the feud between Trump and Musk could affect the next election. The billionaire spent more than anyone else on the last election, pouring $270 million into groups boosting Trump and other Republicans up and down the ballot, according to Federal Election Commission filings. MORE: Trump-Musk feud leaves some DOGE staffers worried about their futures: Sources He already suggested he would cut back on his political donations next cycle, more than a year out from the midterm elections. In the final stretch of the 2024 race, he relocated to Pennsylvania, hosting town halls and bankrolling his own get-out-the-vote effort in the critical swing state. Since his foray into Washington, Musk has become a deeply polarizing and unpopular figure, while the president's approval rating has ticked up in some recent surveys. Groups affiliated with Musk spent $20 million this spring on the Wisconsin Supreme Court race, only for the liberal candidate to win -- signaling to some Republicans the limits of Musk's political pull. While his support may be missed by Republicans next cycle, Trump has continued to raise millions of dollars to support his future political plans, a remarkable sum for a term-limited president that underscores his central role in the party and undisputed kingmaker status. MORE: Trump tells ABC Musk 'lost his mind,' as CEO's dad says 'make sure this fizzles out' Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., who is mulling a gubernatorial bid in 2026, downplayed the tensions or political implications, suggesting that reporters "spend way more time worrying about these things than most average people." "I'm sure they will make peace," Lawler told ABC News on Friday. There were some signs of a détente. While Musk continued to hurl insults at Trump ally and critic Steve Bannon, his social media activity appeared to cool off on Friday, and the billionaire said one supporter was "not wrong" for saying Trump and Musk are "much stronger together than apart." Through nearly a decade in politics and three campaigns for the White House, Trump has demonstrated a remarkable ability to move past disputes or disagreements with many intraparty rivals and onetime critics, including some who now serve in his Cabinet. Now, some Republicans left Washington this week asking themselves if Musk is willing to do the same. Could Musk-Trump feud stoke GOP divisions ahead of midterms? ANALYSIS originally appeared on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store