Trump and Putin speak after Pentagon stops Ukraine missile shipments
Trump announced the call on his Truth Social account and said the conversation would take place at 10:00 am ET.
The last time the two leaders spoke was on June 14, amid the Israeli-Iranian conflict that ended after Trump ordered U.S. bombers to attack a trio of Iranian nuclear sites and subsequently negotiated a ceasefire between the two nations. Ten days before that, they also spoke on the same topic, at which point Putin had offered to assist in the then-ongoing U.S. nuclear talks with Tehran.
The call between Trump and Putin comes just one day after Washington indirectly aided Putin's war effort against Ukraine by suspending some shipments of air defense missiles, artillery shells and other weapons as part of what Pentagon officials have described as a pause of arms shipments globally while the U.S. replenishes its own stockpiles.
The pause includes some shipments of Patriot missiles, precision-guided GMLRS, Hellfire missiles and Howitzer rounds, all of which are needed by Ukraine's defense forces.
Elbridge Colby, the U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for policy, said in a statement that the decision to halt some weapons comes as Pentagon officials have aimed to provide Trump 'with robust options to continue military aid to Ukraine, consistent with his goal of bringing this tragic war to an end.'
'At the same time, the department is rigorously examining and adapting its approach to achieving this objective while also preserving U.S. forces' readiness for administration defense priorities,' Colby added.
The pause has coincided with a massive Russian air assault on Ukraine that has required the expenditure of many of the Patriot interceptor missiles already allocated to Kyiv.
It also contradicts President Trump's promise to examine providing yet more Patriots to Ukraine at last month's NATO summit in The Hague.
At a press conference, the president said he wasn't ruling out a new defense assistance package for Kyiv.
He told reporters 'we'll see what happens' when asked whether the U.S. would contribute anything on top of the $8 billion pledged by NATO allies as part of the 32-member bloc's continued support for Ukraine's war effort.
Speaking on the heels of a closed-door sit-down with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, Mr. Trump said there has been 'a lot of spirit' in Ukraine's fight against the invasion Putin ordered in February 2022.
Trump also appeared to shift blame for the continuation and escalation of the war to Putin, marking a dramatic reversal from how he characterized the situation during a contentious Oval Office meeting with Zelensky earlier this year.
'Vladimir Putin really has to end that war,' the president said. 'People are dying at levels that people haven't seen before for a long time.'
He recounted to reporters how he'd rebuked Putin during a recent phone call after the Russian leader offered to mediate an end to hostilities between Israel and Iran, stressing he would rather he brought an end to the conflict in Ukraine.
Trump's relationship with Putin has appeared to sour in recent months as the Russian dictator has continued to pound civilian targets in Ukraine with drones and missiles, killing thousands and complicating efforts by Trump to cajole both sides to the negotiating table.
In April, he became so irate over Putin's attacks on civilians that he took to Truth Social to exhort the Russian leader to halt the attacks and get to the negotiating table, writing: 'Vladimir, STOP! 5,000 soldiers a week are dying. Let's get the Peace Deal DONE!'
Since then, he has floated the possibility of imposing harsh new sanctions on Moscow if Putin refuses to cooperate in the U.S.-led efforts to bring about a settlement in the three-year-old conflict.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
29 minutes ago
- Metro
What is Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' and what does it mean for Americans?
President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' has cleared multiple hurdles and passed in Congress and is on its way to his desk to be signed into law. The House passed Trump's signature domestic policy bill 218-214 on Thursday, with Representatives Brian Fitzpatrick and Thomas Massie being the only Republicans who joined Democrats in opposing it. Trump set a July 4 deadline for the bill to reach his desk and his Republican allies delivered, with House Speaker Mike Johnson in particular succeeding in flipping dozens of members who hand planned to vote against it. The president is set to sign his bill at 5pm on Friday while celebrating the Fourth of July at the White House. Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' is a massive spending and tax bill with his signature policies. It will extend his 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was set to expire at the end of 2025. It will make many tax cuts permanent and boost funding for defense, border security and producing energy. To offset those costs the bill makes cuts to programs like Medicaid health insurance for low-income and disabled Americans, and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) food aid. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the bill would add $3.4trillion to the federal deficit and leave nearly 12million Americans without health coverage over the next decade. But the Trump administration has contested that and claim that it would decrease the deficit by more than $5trillion. Immigrants including refugees, asylees and victims of sex trafficking and domestic violence may no longer qualify for federal benefits like Medicaid and food stamps. Additionally, immigrants would have to pay more for programs like work authorization and Temporary Protected Status. The bill puts aside $45billion to detain undocumented people taken into custody by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). It provides $46.5billion for border wall construction, making up the amount that Trump was not able to secure for the project during his first term. The passage of the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' represents Trump's first major legislative win in his second term, and he touted it as 'the biggest bill of its kind ever signed' in the US. Speaking to reporters at Joint Base Andrews late afternoon Thursday, Trump confirmed that he will be signing the bill surrounded by lawmakers including Johnson and that military aircraft will be flying over the White House as part of a July 4 celebration. 'It's going to be a great day,' he said. 'So we'll be signing with those beautiful planes flying right over our heads.' Elon Musk, who served as Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) chief, has been criticising the bill ever since his departure from the White House, and that caused a big feud to happen between the two billionaires. More Trending The Tesla CEO has denied Trump's claim that he is upset because the bill eliminates federal tax credits for purchasing electric vehicles, and said he is against it because it 'pork-filled' and will drive up the deficit. On Wednesday, Musk appeared to take a break from firing shots at Trump and gave him 'credit where credit is due' on his work to try to resolve conflicts and wars around the world. Hours after the bill cleared Congress, Musk remained silent on the bill on his X platform. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Convenience store worker dies after 'manager sat on and suffocated her' MORE: Hundreds of blueberry boxes recalled over 'severe' listeria warning in the US MORE: Fact check: Is the US using planes for deportations to throw people into the ocean?
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
How the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' will affect grad student loans
The House of Representatives is advancing the GOP's 'Big Beautiful Bill', which is set to significantly alter how graduate students finance their higher education. The bill proposes eliminating the federal Grad PLUS loan program starting July 2026, replacing it with increased but potentially insufficient limits on federal Stafford loans. Graduate students would face annual borrowing limits of $20,500 and a lifetime cap $100,000, while professional students could borrow up to $50,000 annually $200,000 lifetime maximum. Critics warn the changes could force students into private loans, deter them from pursuing advanced degrees, and exacerbate shortages in high-demand sectors like rural healthcare. While Republicans argue the limits will help control college costs, President Donald Trump is scheduled to sign the bill, which will also affect borrowers on the Biden-era SAVE plan from next summer.
Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Now Reeves hints taxes WILL go up: After she vowed there'd be no more hikes, public is warned of £40BILLION bill in Budget
Rachel Reeves fired a Budget tax warning yesterday as experts predicted she could have to plug a £40billion black hole this autumn. The Chancellor said there would be 'a cost' to this week's U-turn on welfare reform, which she said would be 'reflected in the Budget'. Ms Reeves declined to say how this and other recent U-turns would be funded. But she insisted she would not change her 'fiscal rules', leaving tax rises as the most likely option. Her comments are the clearest hint yet that taxpayers are set to be penalised for the Government's capitulation to Labour MPs opposed to any attempt to bring Britain's bloated benefits bill under control as Sir Keir Starmer tried to fight off a rebellion. They came amid growing warnings over the likely scale of the looming crisis in the public finances. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) think-tank said that Ms Reeves could have to find as much as £40billion this autumn – equal to the sum raised by her record tax-raising Budget last year, which was blamed for bringing economic growth to a halt and which she promised not to repeat. Ben Zaranko, an economist at the IFS, said it was 'not hard to imagine a world where they are of a ballpark similar scale to last autumn'. He added: 'If you have the perfect storm of economic forecasts being downgraded, additional spending commitments because these reforms haven't got through Parliament, and the world is in a gloomier place generally, you could comfortably be into double-figures billions even before you talk about any retail offers. 'A £20, £30, £40billion Budget is not what the Government would want but it's not impossible by any means.' Last year's Budget tax bomb included a £25billion raid on employers' National Insurance, which has been blamed for fuelling inflation and unemployment and slowing investment and growth. The following month, the Chancellor told the Confederation of British Industry that she would not need further tax rises as the Budget had 'drawn a line under the inheritance' she received from the last Conservative government. 'Public services now need to live within their means because I'm really clear, I'm not coming back with more borrowing or more taxes,' she said. But the pledge has been quietly ditched in the wake of sluggish economic growth blamed partly on the impact of the Budget. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) halved its growth forecast for this year in March. This week the economic watchdog hinted at a further likely downgrade after admitting that previous forecasts had proved too optimistic. Economists have warned that a 0.2 per cent downgrade in the OBR's forecasts would leave the Chancellor with an £18billion hole to fill. The problem has been made worse by recent costly U-turns on welfare. Sir Keir's climbdown on the winter fuel allowance will cost £1.5billion. This week's retreat over cuts to the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) could cost as much as £6billion. And Labour MPs are pushing for the abolition of the two-child benefit cap. Ms Reeves and Sir Keir yesterday refused to say how any of these measures would be paid for. Shadow Chancellor Sir Mel Stride said voters were paying the price of Labour's 'inability to govern'. He told the Mail: 'Labour's welfare shambles has left the country facing a ticking tax timebomb. 'Businesses and hardworking families should brace themselves for further painful tax hikes as Rachel Reeves scrambles to plug the gaping hole left by this weak prime minister's economic mismanagement. This week's chaos exposes Labour's inability to govern – pushing us towards higher taxes and a spiralling debt crisis. It doesn't have to be this way.' Labour MPs lined up in the Commons this week to demand the introduction of wealth taxes to pay for higher benefits. IFS director Paul Johnson told Times Radio the Chancellor would be 'caught between a rock and a hard place' if she needs to raise substantial sums this autumn. He added: 'Politically, she's going to be under pressure to impose a wealth tax or hit high earners or capital gains [tax] or something. And the markets will respond very badly to that, because they'll be worried about its impact on growth. 'The alternatives are to essentially break some manifesto commitments on increasing income tax or VAT. And I think her backbenchers and the electorate will react very badly.' The Prime Minister yesterday insisted that the Government would press on with welfare reform, despite his humbling at the hands of Labour backbenchers this week. He said it was 'important we reform the system' as 'welfare isn't working'. But in an embarrassing development, the parliamentary authorities forced Sir Keir to change the name of the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill after cuts to PIP were dropped from the legislation. Commons leader Lucy Powell said it would be shortened to the Universal Credit Bill as it will be 'narrower in scope'.
