CPR theory test changes 'mean so much' to dad after daughter's death
Speaking previously to NHS Wales, Prof Noakes said he received a phone from his daughter's friend saying she had collapsed."By the time we got there, which is only five minutes away, the paramedics were there already working on Claire," he said.Prof Noakes told Radio Wales Drive he remembered asking if his daughter was breathing when he received the phone call.The person said she was breathing but "it was funny", the medical director at Cardiff City FC said.He said she was showing signs of agonal breathing, or sudden, irregular gasps of breath, which is closely associated with a cardiac arrest. "But you wouldn't expect someone who isn't aware of cardiac arrests to know that."Prof Noakes said he hoped young drivers having the knowledge and ability to identify a cardiac arrest will help people in similar situations."They can get on and dial 999. They will tell you how to start CPR and where the nearest defibrillator is," he added.Prof Noakes' daughter spent the next nine months unresponsive before she died."You can't stop this happening. But you can do your best to make sure other families don't have to go through this," he said.
Prof Noakes said he looked to other European countries for inspiration when he was appointed as the chair of Save a Life Cymru, which was established in 2019 by the Welsh government to make sure people know what to do if an out of hospital cardiac arrest happens.He said: "Some have the CPR in the driving test. Combining this with education has led to a significant rise in the survival rate."Prof Noakes described Wales' survival rate as "shocking" but said he hoped these changes will increase the percentage.He said it "meant so much" to know that questions are being added to the driving theory test early next year.But since they are aimed at new drivers, what advice does he have for people who have already passed their theory test?"Go online. There are a number of online tutorials you can look at," he said."If you want to physically learn how to do it there are a number of organisations offering training such as the St John's Ambulance service."We can all give it our best shot to help someone having a cardiac arrest."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
a few seconds ago
- BreakingNews.ie
More than third of women playing football and camogie experience urinary leakage
More than one third of women playing Gaelic football and camogie experience urinary leakage during training and match play, research has found. Urinary leakage – a form of incontinence – remains a hidden struggle for many female athletes, largely due to embarrassment and stigma, a report found. Advertisement Dublin City University's research, published in Science and Medicine in Football, explores how menstrual cycle-related symptoms, hormonal contraceptive use, and indicators of pelvic floor dysfunction affect players of ladies Gaelic football and camogie. Among players not using hormonal contraceptives, 97.7 per cent reported menstrual cycle–related symptoms, most commonly abdominal cramping (84 per cent) and fatigue (82.2 per cent). Around 85 per cent believe their menstrual cycle affects onfield performance, with 59 per cent indicating a negative impact. Dr David Nolan (DCU/PA) Approximately 37 per cent of athletes experienced urinary leakage during training or matches, suggesting potential pelvic floor concerns. A high proportion also experience urinary urgency (47.8 per cent) and genital pain (43.4 per cent). Advertisement Dr David Nolan, assistant professor of Sport and Exercise Sciences at the DCU School of Health and Human Performance, said urinary leakage is a current taboo in women's sports. He said: 'There's more and more data being gathered, more studies coming out showing that active young sports women are experiencing urinary leakage at a significant rate, very high prevalence in gymnastics, in strength sports. 'But now in field sports, you get more data that it's affecting up to one third of our players. 'From working in female sport myself, I knew there was a prevalence of it, but I didn't expect it to be that high. This is probably the issue of why it's not spoken about more, and why players probably don't speak about it as much as they themselves probably don't realise that it's as commonplace. Advertisement 'If they think that it's something that's not affecting their teammates as much as them, they're probably less likely to speak because they don't know how common it actually is.' He added: 'The common symptoms are the urinary leakage, then urinary urgency, so the strong desire to go to the bathroom. You can have prolapse within the vagina, and then you can have anal incontinence linked to it. 'The most common symptoms, though, would be the urine leakage and the urinary urgency. The sad and frustrating thing about them suffering in silence is with physiotherapy and just exercise interventions, we can significantly reduce those symptoms.' He said the effects can lead to women dropping out of their sport. Advertisement He added: 'We do have evidence to show that it's linked to drop out in sport and again, because there can be potential shame or stigma around it and a source of embarrassment. 'So players might, in extreme cases, drop out of sports, or be less motivated to train. It can occur mostly in high impact, high kind of stress sports and performance – so they might be hesitant to push themselves hard or to engage in intense activities for fear of of this embarrassment.' The new peer-reviewed study of ladies' Gaelic footballers and camogie players in Ireland has thrown new light on the issue. Some 455 female Gaelic games athletes across both club and inter-county level were surveyed. Advertisement The study asked players about their menstrual cycles, use of hormonal contraceptives, like the contraceptive pill, and any pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms. Firstly, the survey confirmed that menstrual-related symptoms are highly prevalent. Among players not using hormonal contraceptives, 97.7 per cent reported at least one menstrual-related symptom each month. The most common complaints were abdominal cramping (experienced by 84 per cent of players) and fatigue or low energy (82 per cent). Perhaps not surprisingly, a large proportion – about 59 per cent perceived a mostly negative impact on how they play, citing issues like pain, heavy bleeding, or sluggishness during certain cycle phases. The study also looked at hormonal contraceptives. Just over half of the Gaelic players (51.7 per cent) were on some form of hormonal contraception, with the pill by far the most popular choice (used by about 69 per cent). Some 62 per cent of the athletes using hormonal contraceptives reported side effects, including fatigue (37.2 per cent) and experiencing mood swings or low mood (35.0 per cent). About one in three contraceptive-users (31.6 per cent) even felt that their contraception was impacting their athletic performance. However, issues around the pelvic floor is an aspect of women's health that athletes and coaches rarely discuss, the research found. 'Pelvic floor dysfunction' is an umbrella term for problems like urinary incontinence (leakage), urgency (sudden intense need to go), or pelvic organ prolapse. The stereotype is that these issues only impact older women or those who have had children. In this research, the average age of players surveyed was just 23.6 years old, and most had likely never given birth as the average first-time mother in Ireland is 31.5. Despite this, a considerable number of these young athletes reported troubling pelvic floor symptoms. The authors behind the report recommend enhanced education and support for athletes, coaches, and support staff on menstrual health, contraceptives, and pelvic floor health – as well as individualised symptom management strategies, integrating physiological monitoring with athlete feedback.
Daily Mirror
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Doctors names red flags to spot before booking filler that's 'too cheap to be true'
As the government cracks down on regulations in the aesthetics industry, we speak to world-leading cosmetic doctor Dr Rosh on the red flags to look out for before booking with a cheap practitioner It's no secret cosmetic procedures can be expensive - so it's no wonder people can be tempted to book with cheaper practitioners, but it comes at a huge risk. With so many cases of botched filler and Botox out there, most commonly from unregulated injectors, I spoke to world-leading doctor and specialist in aesthetics Dr Rosh on red flags to look out for before you book yourself in with an injector who's paying less than average for their services. Manchester becoming filler capital of the UK, there is so much filler available - you can get it out the back of a van, in a backroom of a hairdressers or even someone's basement. As a result Health Secretary Wes Streeting is to introduce a raft of new laws to deal with dodgy cosmetic surgery in the UK. On a mission to campaign against the unregulated beauty industry, Dr Rosh, a Manchester-based leading specialist is calling on change from the government in a petition to tighten the rules - including those who offer cheap treatments. He told The Mirror: "I find myself diffusing so many situations where people have been botched with unregulated filler and Botox. One patient I had told me she couldn't leave the house because it had affected her confidence so badly and this is where it's going to wrong. For more stories like this subscribe to our weekly newsletter, The Weekly Gulp, for a curated roundup of trending stories, poignant interviews, and viral lifestyle picks from The Mirror's Audience U35 team delivered straight to your inbox. 'The problem with the UK is you have non-medics genuinely believing they are better than non-doctors. They say doctors should stick in the NHS, and non-medics think they are better. But they can't fix issues when they go wrong, they can't prescribe and they can't make things better if there are complications. Anyone can inject and they believe it's safe." So according to Dr Rosh, here are some of the bigget flags to look out for when booking in for cosmetic work... When filler is too cheap to be true The expert, who is loved by many big name celebrities said one of the biggest problems in the UK are the filler packages. He noted: "I find myself dissolving a lot of these packages. 5ML is just too much in one sitting, I limit myself to 3ml, and 5ml for an 18-year-old is too much, it needs to be done in a gradual way but people are doing it to just make money." Filler costs about £100/£120 for 1ml, so if someone is doing it for less than £200, which raises the alarm for Dr Rosh. "£60 filler is alarming, I don't know what they are injecting. People are making fake filler from home, and these fake products are becoming an epidemic," he added. "It's becoming such a saturated market and people are able to book in for a 5ML filler package for around £200/£300, everyone is in a race to be the cheapest. The fact people are selling it so cheap is so dangerous," and it raises the question of how are they doing it at less than the cost price of filler. Past medical history and allergies aren't checked before your appointment Dr Rosh also urged people to visit a prescribing professional, as those who aren't medically trained can't reverse issues or fix problems. "Poor injections are happening and when things go wrong, unregulated practitioners can't fix the issues and they can't manage complications effectively," he said. While the lower price may be tempting, it's also crucial to be checked over with any past medical history and allergies - and if that's not done in a consultation, alarm bells need to be rung. Your practitioner isn't insured In most countries including Dubai and Germany, procedures like these are always done by doctors who will be insured and able to fix any issues if they ever arose, but the expert argues it's becoming too easy for non-medics to inject without real training. He advises to always do your research and check if your injector is medically trained or not. "Every other country is doctor led, so why aren't we?' Anyone in this country can pick up a syringe and get insured and that's why we're seeing this bizarre and overfilled result and a lot of patient harm'. There's no aftercare contact or package According to research conducted by the Royal Society for Public Health, of the 1,617 complaints made to Save Face, the national register of non-surgical cosmetic treatment practitioners, over 4 in 5 complainants were ignored or 'blocked' by their practitioner when they sought help and over three quarters believed that their practitioner was uninsured or saw no evidence of adequate insurance. One of Dr Rosh's patients Bethany Roberts knew this all too well. When she was offered free filler in her nose, that led to a blocked blood vessel in her nose, she realised she wasn't given any number to call or aftercare advice to turn to when needing help. "I was informed of the risks, but in terms of the aftercare I didn't have anything or even a number to call, so at 5AM I had to go onto Instagram and was messaging everyone who worked at the clinic on their personal Instagram accounts telling them I knew I had a vascular occlusion and I need your help," she told The Mirror. Help us improve our content by completing the survey below. We'd love to hear from you!
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Lucy Letby ‘raised alarm over poor care of babies in her hospital'
Lucy Letby raised the alarm over the poor care of babies at the hospital in which she worked, new documents show. The former neo-natal nurse, 35, was convicted of the murder of seven children and the attempted murder of seven more at the Countess of Chester Hospital in a prosecution that has come under intense scrutiny. Letby has since appointed a new legal team who have submitted an application on her behalf to the Criminal Cases Review Commission, claiming that she is the victim of a miscarriage of justice. Mark McDonald, Letby's barrister, said that she was a 'hard working nurse who loved her job' and would never harm a child. He added: '[That] is why she would not let any fault pass. This was a neonatal unit in crisis and she consistently formally reported issues. 'She was a whistleblower – but instead of listening to her they went for her instead.' Mr McDonald said Letby was targeted for raising concerns, and an expert international panel recently concluded that no murders were committed and instead that the babies collapsed or died because of either poor care or natural causes. Lawyers for the families of Letby's victims previously rubbished the panel's findings as 'full of analytical holes' and 'a rehash' of the defence case heard at trial. The documents that reveal Letby's complaints were first reported by The Mail on Sunday. The records – known as Datix Admin and Management Forms – cover a number of medical emergencies in the unit in 2015 and 2016. The group that investigated Letby's complaints included Dr Stephen Brearey, who was one of two doctors who would later raise questions about whether she was 'purposely harming babies'. Lack of resources On June 30 2016, Letby used the system to report an incident a week earlier when a baby had suffered a 'sudden acute collapse requiring resuscitation', only for staff dealing with the emergency to find that the sodium bicarbonate infusion required to deal with the crisis was not available. Dr Brearey's investigating group recommended new measures to 'ensure adequate stock levels in future'. Letby filed a second report about another baby on the ward who had collapsed three hours after the first incident, saying that 'resources were not available on unit' to deal with the emergency. According to the Mail on Sunday, Dr Brearey later amended the incident form to state that the medical resources mentioned were not necessary to deal with the incident and in any case were not 'routinely kept on the unit' – but then conceded that because of 'a recent increase in usage' delivery would be arranged. Another report by Letby in June 2016 identified failures by doctors over the administration of intravenous medication. Dr Brearey's group concluded that nurses should check the equipment 'on an hourly basis' and that Dr Brearey would 'update new doctors at induction'. At Dr Brearey's request, Letby was removed from clinical duties the following month. Other reports by Letby included the 'unexpected death' of a baby in August 2015. However, it was concluded that 'neonatal care was appropriate... it is unlikely any changes in management would have prevented this sad outcome'. She also recorded the deterioration of an infant after ventilation records were not recorded for a 12-hour period and a 'chest drain complication' resulting from a lack of needles on the ward. Letby's case is now being considered by the Criminal Cases Review Commission, which is expected to report back before Christmas.
