logo
How lazy Britons became a threat to the economy

How lazy Britons became a threat to the economy

Telegraph13-05-2025

Finding a job in Britain in the current market is not easy, but one sector still has plenty of work to go around: social care.
'There are 130,000 vacancies in the sector,' says Geoff Butcher, who runs several care homes in the Midlands. 'I honestly don't know how they are going to be filled.'
Labour thinks it has found a solution: push businesses such as care home operators to train up the growing ranks of workless Britons.
Announcing a crackdown on migration on Tuesday, Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, said the Government was ending 'what was effectively a free market experiment on immigration – encouraging employers to recruit from abroad, loosening controls in different areas but without any requirement to tackle skills and labour shortages here at home'.
Employers will now only be able to recruit overseas workers in limited circumstances and will need to provide a plan to train up more British workers if they do so. The system is meant to encourage businesses to turn to home-grown workers to fill skills gaps over the longer-term, with foreign staff used as a stopgap.
But observers like Butcher are sceptical.
'It's no good the Government saying, 'Well, we've got X million economically inactive people, and they've got to get back to work,'' he says. 'The health sector is not somewhere where you can have people who are forced to work and they really don't want to do it.'
Most UK job applicants never turn up for interviews, he says. The few who do end up failing probation or quit in the first three months.
'The majority of them just find it too hard work,' Butcher says.
Cooper and Sir Keir Starmer face an awkward truth: many British workers cannot or will not do jobs that foreigners desperate to earn money are happily queuing up to do. These include crucial roles such as helping elderly people, building houses or staffing hospitals.
Figures released on Tuesday by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show economic inactivity among UK-born people has risen since the pandemic, while it has fallen among those who were born overseas but now live here.
Some 21.8pc of UK nationals are economically inactive, up from 20.4pc before the pandemic. By contrast, the figure for those from abroad has fallen from 20.7pc to 18.5pc over the same period.
A closer look at the figures shows this has been driven by a plunge in the inactivity rate among those coming to the UK from outside of the EU. The rate has dropped from 29.2pc to 21.3pc, while the EU rate is largely unchanged at 14.7pc.
The rise in economic activity among British workers since Covid has sparked alarm for both ministers and policymakers.
While the classification of ineconomic activity can cover people studying and those who have retired early, the rise has been fuelled by a surge in the number of people claiming sickness benefits since Covid. There has been a wave of mostly younger people describing themselves as too depressed or anxious to work, while older workers blame back pain for keeping them out of work.
Four million 16 to 64-year-olds across England and Wales now claim disability or incapacity benefits, up from 2.8m in 2019.
Louise Murphy at the Resolution Foundation, a think tank, cautions that the ONS's data are notoriously unreliable. However, she says: 'When we think about economic inactivity, it's definitely not a problem around non-UK-born workers.'
She adds: 'Given that we have made it easier for people to come linked to employment, you would expect that to show up in the labour market data. Some of it also just reflects demographics: we've got more younger non-UK-born people compared to older UK-born adults.'
Benefits to blame
Could more training for economically inactive Britons help shift the dial? Those at the coalface are sceptical.
'I think the benefit system is a large part of the problem,' says Butcher. 'Quite a few of them come from families where their parents have lived on benefits, either in whole or in part, for the vast majority of their lives. So it is to an extent a culture. It's a way of life, kind of bumping along the bottom, and being able to do that knowing that the state ultimately will step in and provide a safety net.'
The wages on offer are simply not worth it for many of those already on benefits. Meanwhile, the sector struggles to pay more because funding from local authorities is not keeping up with costs, including the £25bn rise in employers' National Insurance contributions and recent inflation-busting minimum wage jumps.
'For what they're going to earn, they could lose their housing allowance,' says Nadra Ahmed, chairman of the National Care Association. 'They can lose other benefits, and it won't match up. Also people want to choose the hours that they work. We are a 24-hour service.'
When a care job is advertised to British workers 'it's just tumbleweed', she says.
'Very rarely do we get responses. I had somebody say they had 48 responses from a job centre advert. Ten people actually responded to their response. Two people came for an interview and left the job within two weeks.'
Risk to growth
In theory, this should be the best time to restrict access to foreign labour given the slowdown in the job market. Vacancies are at their lowest level since the start of 2017 outside of Covid, at 761,000.
Meanwhile, unemployment has edged up to 4.5pc, the highest since summer 2021 although still low by historical standards. On Reddit, UK job forums are full of posts from despairing young people struggling to find work. Desperate times could prompt many to rethink what they are willing to do.
However, there are still sectors struggling to plug gaps because British workers won't fill them. They include farming, construction, transport and hospitality, 'where roles tend to be lower-paid and harder to fill', says Jonathan Steenberg, an economist at credit insurer Coface.
'Around one in 10 UK businesses still cite labour shortages as a concern, and further curbs on immigration risk making this worse,' he adds.
Such shortages of willing workers threaten to undermine the Government's growth ambitions, he warns, pointing out that the construction industry Labour is depending on to build 1.5m new homes this parliament is already plagued by 'chronic shortages'.
'Although vacancies are now more than half a million below their pandemic peak, firms tell us recruitment remains a huge challenge,' says Jane Gratton, at the British Chambers of Commerce. 'They are still struggling to find people with the skills they need.'
Whether it is low wages, a broken benefit system or something else that is to blame, bosses fear they will have a hard time getting by without foreign workers. While there are millions of Britons sitting on the sidelines of the jobs market, many seem unwilling to do the work the country needs.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Major bar chain to shut ALL 250 venues across the UK for 24 hours next week in unusual business move
Major bar chain to shut ALL 250 venues across the UK for 24 hours next week in unusual business move

The Sun

time25 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Major bar chain to shut ALL 250 venues across the UK for 24 hours next week in unusual business move

A CHAIN of popular cafe bars will close for 24-hours next week. The closure will affect more than 250 branches countrywide on Monday June 9. 4 4 Loungers opened their first store in 2002 in Bristol and have since expanded across the country. They are known for their wide range of food, cocktails and coffees, as well as each lounge having its own unique decor - with some customers not realising it's even a chain. The closure is so that it's staff can enjoy a grand celebration, which they call LoungeFest. Beginning in 2013, the event celebrates the company's 9,000 staff. In an announcement on Facebook, the company wrote: "Attention Loungers! "All of our Lounges will be closed on Monday, 9th June, as we will be heading to our annual staff party - Loungefest! "We do this every year to celebrate everybody's hard work. "Regular Lounging will resume on Tuesday, 10th June." Photos of the event show an exciting mix of music, fairground rides, and a healthy dose of partying. Guy Youll, Loungers' Chief People Officer told Wales Online: "Back in 2013, Loungers was one of the first in the hospitality industry to host a party like this and I'm delighted we've kept close to our roots by continuing every year getting bigger and better. Most popular treats for Brits on holiday "Our teams work incredibly hard all year round so LoungeFest is our way of celebrating them and showing how much we appreciate the dedication and care they put in every day at all our sites to deliver great hospitality. It's going to be quite a party!" Facebook commenters were pleased to see the company showing appreciation for their staff. One wrote: "Well done for treating your staff I hope the staff and you have a brilliant time." While another commented: "Oh that's a lovely thing to do for all the hard working staff." This year's LoungeFest will take place at Ragley Hall in Warwickshire. Its theme is 'at the movies' as the event will be equipped with funfair attractions, DJ sessions, music stages featuring live bands and performances by Loungers' employees - as well as games, activities and complimentary food and drink. 4 4 Loungers was founded in 2002 by a group of three friends on North Street in Bristol. They also run the popular Cosy Club chain of restaurants, as well as the roadside eatery Brightside. As of March 2025, the company operates 291 sites in England and Wales across the three brands. Its 250th Lounge - Pionero Lounge - opened in Rochdale in January 2024. With plans to expand with 10 more restaurants, loyal customers have been begging the company to come to their town. The company won the employer of the year award at the Casual Dining Awards 2025.

Who owns the news? It must not be a group of foreign powers
Who owns the news? It must not be a group of foreign powers

Telegraph

time26 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Who owns the news? It must not be a group of foreign powers

Who owns the news? Much of the Left has been obsessed with the issue for over a century. They have long railed against press barons and their supposed bias. So it is perhaps surprising that this Labour Government is taking such a lackadaisical approach to foreign states having substantial holdings in British newspapers. The last Conservative government back in December 2023 intervened to put on hold and scrutinise the proposed sale of The Telegraph to a company backed by Sheikh Mansour, the deputy prime minister of the United Arab Emirates. Columnists, including Charles Moore, The Telegraph's former editor, rightly argued that even if there was no actual interference in the newspaper's editorial line, there would be the perception that the paper would no longer be independent. This would fatally undermine the newspaper's standing by throwing away its reputation for fearless reporting, whatever the reality of the situation. The then government listened and last year, in the Digital, Media and Competitions Act, introduced a new regulatory regime to restrict foreign state ownership of newspapers and news magazines. But this Act only set out the broad principle, not the details of how it would be implemented. A total ban would come with its own problems. There would be little risk of editorial interference if, say, the sovereign wealth fund of Norway was a passive investor owning 3pc or 4pc in a UK-listed media company. During the consultations, it was proposed that a 5pc limit may be appropriate to allow for such holdings. Last month the new Government announced that the threshold would not be 5pc, but actually 15pc. I and many of my colleagues in the House of Lords have serious misgivings about this much higher limit, but it is one we can live with. However, there is another aspect of the draft regulations which is unacceptable. The 15pc threshold is not cumulative, it applies to each individual holding. This means that there would be nothing to stop multiple states each owning 15pc of a newspaper. It has been reported that after The Telegraph's proposed takeover by RedBird Capital, Sheikh Mansour intends to retain up to a 15pc stake in the newspaper. With the current proposals there would be nothing to stop, say, Saudi Arabia, Oman and Bahrain from each taking 15pc holdings. A cumulative 60pc of a British newspaper owned by foreign states is a very different proposition. The guarantees against foreign control would have evaporated. Has this potential scenario arisen as a result of an oversight by Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary? Alongside 50 of my fellow peers, I have written to Ms Nandy asking for clarification. Signatories include former chancellor Lord Lamont, former trade secretary Lord Lilley, long-time chairman of the 1922 committee Lord Brady, ex-director of public prosecutions Lord Macdonald and the current chairman of Ipso, the independent press regulator, Lord Faulks. Our fears could be easily assuaged by simply amending the proposed regulations to ensure that 15pc is a cap on total foreign ownership. If the move is deliberate, it raises serious questions about this Government's commitment to a free press. The statutory instrument implementing the Government's regulations has now been laid and will shortly come before both Houses of Parliament. If the proposals reach the Lords in their current form, I and many of my colleagues will not be able to support the measure. The Telegraph's ownership has been left in limbo for two years so far. It is time for the new regulatory framework to be put in place that will allow its smooth transfer to new owners. But this must be done in a way that entrenches the traditional freedoms of our press. The issues are much wider than the future of just one newspaper.

Woodbridge not suitable for active travel plan, say residents
Woodbridge not suitable for active travel plan, say residents

BBC News

time29 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Woodbridge not suitable for active travel plan, say residents

A £5m project aiming to encourage sustainable transport methods is not suitable for a market town, residents have claimed. Suffolk County Council was awarded funding from the government's Active Travel England scheme in 2022 to look at ways of making walking and cycling journeys easier in Woodbridge. Changes proposed include widening of some pavements and creating a one-way system for traffic toward Market HillA recent public consultation saw 433 responses as the council now looks to review the plans over the next year but some residents said the consultations were handled "poorly". Chris Mapey runs the Angel pub, just off Market Hill and said while on the face of it the project was a "cracking idea", he was believed it was for the wrong town."The problem we've got with any small market town is it's a fine balancing act - we want to try and preserve the town as much as we can but we also want to have decent levels of footfall," he said."If you make Woodbridge too closed off, we're right on the doorstep of Martlesham [Retail Park]... so you end up losing, conceivably, a lot of footfall."It's been very frustrating for business owners to know where to turn." Woodbridge resident Neil Armstrong Boast similarly felt the council's consultation was "poor"."They hid road closures by the use of buzzwords and people lost faith when at the public meeting held in the community hall, the councillors wouldn't state what their preference was," he residents have spoken in favour of road and pavement improvements but some feared the project would negatively affect those who rely on cars and buses. "Wider pavements are a lovely idea but at what cost to free and efficient movement around the town for the less mobile," fellow resident Alison Parish said."I envisage that this will create more traffic hold-ups, longer journeys - time wise and distance - and people will avoid going into the town to shop and socialise." Ruth Leach, Lib Dem county councillor for Woodbridge, said she initially believed the project would be difficult to implement but felt progress had been made."The project has changed shape from what was initially proposed but I am very confident that we are getting closer to something that is going to perfect for Woodbridge," she said."With a budget of £5m I am very keen to work tirelessly on it to make sure it is something that stays in Woodbridge and we can benefit from it."She stressed the project did not seek to remove cars from Woodbridge. A spokesperson for the county council said the project aimed to give people better choice in how they travel for local, shorter journeys and the level of response for the consultation process had been "higher than expected".They said people had been provided options to fill either an online or paper survey and there had been drop-in events during both weekdays and weekends to "maximise people's ability to attend", while local businesses and key stakeholders had been engaged with to "ensure that all voices" were heard. Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store