logo
Cesc Fabregas' Como players involved in mass brawl with Real Betis stars as pre-season clash descends into chaos after ex-Premier League hero appears to PUNCH opponent

Cesc Fabregas' Como players involved in mass brawl with Real Betis stars as pre-season clash descends into chaos after ex-Premier League hero appears to PUNCH opponent

Daily Mail​13 hours ago
Real Betis and Como FC players were involved in a mass brawl at the end of the first half of their pre-season clash in Cadiz.
A number of stars were involved in the shocking altercation in which punches were thrown after Betis' Pablo Fornals and Como midfielder Maximo Perrone came to blows at the end of the first period.
The former West Ham star appeared to punch Perrone, with the Argentine then trying strike the 29-year-old.
Betis and Como players rushed over to intervene, before many of them also ended up in grappling matches of their own.
Amid a chaos, a moment of levity occurred when Betis striker Cucho Hernandez made contact with his team-mate Natan with a flying right hook after failing to land his blow on a Como star.
Despite landing the blow that sparked the unrest, Fornals remarkably avoided a red card, while Perrone and former Arsenal defender Hector Bellerin, whose increasingly animated protestations to the official landed him in hot water, were given their marching orders by the referee at the Estadio Municipal de La Linea de la Concepcion.
Como led the clash 2-0 when the fighting broke out at half-time but Betis fought back to level the match at 2-2 before Ivan Azon's stoppage-time winner ensured victory for Cesc Fabregas ' side.
Wednesday's clash could have lasting consequences for both sides as they near the start of their domestic seasons.
The actions of the likes of Bellerin, Fournals and Cucho could result in suspension for the start of the new campaign. All three players are bonafide starters for Manuel Pellegrini, whose side take on newly promoted Elche on the opening matchday of the season.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Michael ‘Venom' Page on the frustrations that led to surprise fight with Jared Cannonier at UFC 319
Michael ‘Venom' Page on the frustrations that led to surprise fight with Jared Cannonier at UFC 319

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Michael ‘Venom' Page on the frustrations that led to surprise fight with Jared Cannonier at UFC 319

Michael 'Venom' Page has explained his decision to stay at middleweight for his next UFC fight, despite previously expressing an intention to drop back to welterweight. A longtime welterweight fighter in Bellator, 'MVP' debuted in the UFC in the same division in March 2024, outpointing Kevin Holland. But after losing a decision to Ian Machado Garry last June, Page's next move was to head up to middleweight. There, the Briton proved his doubters wrong by outpointing the highly-touted Shara Magomedov in February. And although Page told The Independent before that bout, 'I'm fixated on getting business done [at welterweight],' his next fight will also take place at middleweight. The kickboxing specialist, 38, will face former title challenger Jared Cannonier at UFC 319 on 16 August. 'I want all the smoke, I want to go where the smoke is,' Page told The Independent on Wednesday (6 August). 'It feels like the guys in the welterweight division are not carrying any fire. It seems to be very political, it's a bit too technical about who fights who. 'There's even more people with even more claims of getting that title shot [than at middleweight], so a lot of people don't want to take those dangerous fights if they don't have to. And to add to the welterweight division, Islam is moving up as well now, which just holds up the division even more.' Page was referring to Islam Makhachev, who vacated the lightweight title in May with the intention of challenging for the welterweight belt. Makhachev is due to get his chance later this year, facing champion Jack Della Maddalena – potentially at UFC 322 in November. 'In the middleweight division, there are just a lot of hungry guys wanting to make it to the top,' Page continued. 'Everyone, it seems, is more excited to just fight and make big fights happen, continue to prove themselves. Even if they feel like they're next in line [for a title shot], they're still willing to take that extra fight to push them closer. "I was just tried of waiting, so I said: 'I've done it once [at middleweight], let me try it again.' Until things are cleared up down there, I'll just get some good fights at middleweight." Discussing how comfortable he felt at 185lb in his bout with Magomedov, Page added: 'I felt really good. It's weird, because most of your camp [even at welterweight], you're actually sparring at that weight [closer to 185lb]. So, although we cut down to whatever we cut down to, we never really stand around at [170lb]. So, it feels way more comfortable [at 185lb], because I've spent a lot more of my career – off-camera – at that weight.' Magomedov was the betting favourite against Page, entering that contest with an unbeaten record, but the latter's kickboxing capabilities trumped the Russian's. 'Even speaking to people afterwards, I knew he was the favourite,' Page said. 'I didn't go in there worried about that. I, and a lot of the British media, already knew it was a very good match-up for me. Anybody that's willing to stand in front of me is gonna have a problem.' Cannonier is also expected to stand in front of Page. The American, 41, is known for his heavy hands and previously fought at heavyweight and light-heavyweight. 'It'd be silly to overlook somebody of his calibre, who's fought absolutely everybody,' Page said. 'There's not really been one [fight] where he's been dominated. He's given all those names, every single one of those amazing fighters, a great fight. 'Heavyweight to light-heavyweight to middleweight, and I'm coming up to middleweight, so you know he's gonna be very strong. 'And he's a person that's going out on his shield. Even in his last fight: he got knocked down, it looked like it was going the other way, and he stuck in there, kept it going, then came back and won the fight himself.' Cannonier's last outing ended as a stoppage win over Gregory Rodrigues in February, with the 'Killa Gorilla' sealing the finish early in round four. With that, Cannonier snapped a two-fight losing streak. The American has fought a who's who of middleweights, from former champions Robert Whittaker, Sean Strickland, Anderson Silva and Israel Adesanya – who held the title when he beat Cannonier – to contenders Kelvin Gastelum, Marvin Vettori, Jack Hermansson and Nassourdine Imavov.

'Bang average' or a 'must keep'? - fans split on Dessers
'Bang average' or a 'must keep'? - fans split on Dessers

BBC News

time21 minutes ago

  • BBC News

'Bang average' or a 'must keep'? - fans split on Dessers

We asked for your views on whether or not Rangers should let Cyriel Dessers go this what some of you said:Scott: Dessers has the mentality to be a Rangers striker, even if he does miss some absolute sitters. He reminds me a little bit of Andy Cole at Manchester United (showing my age) – he works hard for the team and gets a lot of stick for it in the bargain, but he is so resilient. The other strikers are just here for the ride. When the going gets tough, time and again we've seen them go Dessers is bang average if you wish to be kind. Not a top quality striker and better needed if Rangers are to go forwards this Dessers should stay. His movement and awareness is second to none in the Rangers squad. Wish I could say the same about Mohamed Diomande. Keeps giving the ball away in the wrong places and is not a patch on Nicolas Raskin. Lastly why did Russell Martin sign Max Aarons? He is absolutely We have got to keep Dessers because he knows how to score goals and leads the line brilliantly, and we must keep Hamza Igamane as Dessers needs to stay, a number nine with that many goals has got to stay. Who are they going to bring in at this late stage who will score more? Enough said. Love him or hate him, he is good enough for Dessers certainly showed himself to be a good target player for linking play, neither Igamane or Danilo can do this. However, Rangers need to get back up and stop messing around. Otherwise we are again going to fall short.

Expanding Super League to 14 teams is unpopular. But it might just work
Expanding Super League to 14 teams is unpopular. But it might just work

The Guardian

time21 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Expanding Super League to 14 teams is unpopular. But it might just work

Do you know anyone who thinks expanding Super League to 14 clubs next season is a good idea, beyond the people who voted for it and the Championship clubs with hopes of promotion? Me neither. When almost no one thinks something is the right thing to do, it almost certainly isn't. But why have nine successful businessmen made such a controversial decision? Let's analyse the widespread objections to the idea and play devil's advocate to see if there are valid reasons for making a change. Clubs and Super League management have had enough of shambolic Salford and want them out. If Toulouse were simply to replace them in a 12-team top flight next season, some clubs would play home games against French clubs (with their handful of away fans) and others would have to travel to France three times. That would not be popular either. Expanding the league to 14 teams means Toulouse can join, loop fixtures can be removed, and two more major markets are added. Toulouse and Bradford appear to be 12th and 13th on IMG gradings. They are averaging crowds of more than 3,000 and could double that in the top flight. Both cities have populations of more than 500,000 and the clubs would both bring major commercial backing. York and Oldham only draw 4,000 fans between them in the Championship but both have more than 200,000 local residents, plus wealthy backers and suitable stadiums, so have the potential to 'do a Leigh'. London Broncos, whose underfunded team are ranked 22nd and play to low three-figure crowds in Wimbledon, would be a gamble: but the one with the biggest winnings if it came off. Only the club owners seem to disagree with that, although at least two did vote for expansion to wait until 2027. 'Three-quarters of the league concluded we should grasp the nettle and voted for change as quickly as possible,' said the RFL Senior Executive Director and RL Commercial chair Nigel Wood, who personally thought 2027 was more sensible. 'Even under the current grading system we could have multiple clubs suddenly having to move leagues at short notice.' With the decision due in October, the two or three promoted clubs will have only three months to prepare, which should guarantee they finish below 11 established clubs, a win-win scenario for self-centred owners. Not necessarily. Much of the dismay was based on the assumption that two additional teams, selected by a supposedly independent panel, would be based on unspecified criteria. The assumption that Nigel Wood's Bradford Bulls and Gary Hetherington's London Broncos would happen to fit those criteria was understandable. Wood has now clarified the decision would be based on the grading system but the panel will 'stress-test' each applicant's financial strength. 'There has to be an enhanced scrutiny of the financial aspects of grading to find clubs with the sustainability to cope within the Super League, possibly with not a full distribution,' said Wood, reiterating the need to avoid a repeat of the Salford farce. If two expansion clubs have to cope with less than the full £1.3m central funding, that puts moneybags York – surprise Championship leaders – firmly in the picture. Hetherington and Wood divide league fans into two camps: one that considers them cynical opportunists and the other that views them as clever entrepreneurs. They are probably both. Hetherington has an excellent track record with Leeds and, if he could repeat that in London, it would benefit the whole sport. And the majority of Super League clubs wanted Wood back in some capacity, maybe just not as king of the castle again. Replacing one northern town with another – Bradford for Salford – will have minimal national impact, but increasing Super League's footprint seems wise. Toulouse and Bradford both have serious potential and buoyant clubs there could increase Super League's attractiveness to external investors. Having started in seven markets, Super League has shrunk to just four: the addition of Toulouse and either London or York would take that back up to six. Oldham would make much of their Greater Manchester location, York their famous one. Sky has always implied it wants Super League to be whatever size Super League wants to be, but it is not clear what will happen to the seventh weekly fixture or who would pay the £500,000 a season for those games to be televised. It could be streamed or not broadcast: most viewers will hardly be fuming if they can't watch Huddersfield v Leigh live from The Shay. If Toulouse are in the top flight, they and Catalans could play home games every other Friday night. That would allow Sky to show a game at 6pm UK time and another at 8.15pm, forgoing the Thursday night slot that is increasingly supplanted by darts on Sky and up against European football on TNT. That arrangement may lure in beIN or L'Équipe to broadcast the seventh game. Voilà! The Warrington CEO Karl Fitzpatrick says loop fixtures – where you play five teams three times and the other six only twice – are the 'main issue in the game'. Nonsense. Granted, loop fixtures are neither fair nor lucrative, with reduced crowds for repeated fixtures. Wigan played at Hull FC twice in the opening nine weeks this season and St Helens played Salford three times before they faced Leigh. But they are also a red herring. If clubs felt that strongly they would have dumped them years ago, but they were unwilling to sacrifice two home games for a simple 22-game home and away schedule (plus Magic, or maybe not). Outsiders don't care that Warrington play Leigh three times, although the committed fan might rather see them play Bradford instead. But home games against Oldham, Toulouse or York are not going to generate vastly more matchday revenue or corporate interest than repeated home games. Most season ticket holders would not object to having two fewer home games as few go to every game anyway. As Wigan CEO Kris Radlinksi said, the big issue is increasing the size of the sport, not fiddling around with the schedule. True, if Magic is the 27th game. But rather than abandoning Magic, spice it up and make it work to solve a problem. Five clubs share their pitch with football clubs so have to vacate in summer for re-seeding, thus skewing the fixture list. Next year half of Super League clubs may be groundsharing with football clubs. So make Magic a home game for those who can't use their grounds, which would produce an equitable 26-game calendar and chop a week off the season. Don't schedule any derbies at Magic but give the 'home' clubs a greater share of the gate. Simple. Maybe, but teams have been out of their depth in previous Super League seasons, whether they have featured 10, 12 or 14 clubs. Expansion may see a glut of Palookaville Panthers, home of the mediocre and the incompetent, battling it out at the bottom. At least they might be well matched, although a relegation spot would make that much more interesting. Promoted clubs can now recruit 10 overseas players so it's by no means certain who will struggle. Three years ago Leigh came up and flew; this season Hull have gone from second bottom to playoff contenders in a few months. There is hope for (nearly) everyone. Follow No Helmets Required on Facebook

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store